CMT16PCM0012_encl10a_evalplan_rating_lpta.docx

DOCX document 26 KB Posted

Attached to
Vault beam design, assembly, and installation at DISA PAC Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HC1028-16-T-0237
Issued by
Defense Information Systems Agency

About this file

RFQ Evaluation Plan

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Vault beam design, assembly, and installation at DISA PAC, newest first.
File Type Posted
RFQ_CMT16PCM0012.docx DOCX document
CLIN_worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HC1028-16-T-0096-0002.pdf PDF
CMT16PCM0012_PWS_Revised_20160411.doc DOC document
HC1028-16-T-0237-0001.pdf PDF
HC1028-16-T-0237.pdf PDF
Updated_CMT16PCM0012_PWS.doc DOC document
CMT16PCM0012_-_QASP.docx DOCX document
CMT16PCM0012_EPL.xls XLS spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EVALUATION PLAN GUIDE FOR LPTA

Non-Cost/Price Factors

A. Technical/Management Approach:

Contractor will design, fabricate and install beam assembly to augment existing under floor beam to increase floor load capacity to support 45,000 pounds.

Contractor will provide floor reinforcement AutoCAD As-Built drawings, Framing Plan, Elevation and Sections Drawing, Structural Notes and Floor Plan, Pounds per sq. ft. rating upon completion of work.

(a) Subfactor 1: Design, fabricate and install beam assembly IAW the requirements set forth in Section 6.1 of the PWS.

(b) Subfactor 2: Provide floor reinforcement AutoCAD As-Built drawings, Framing Plan, Elevation and Sections Drawing, Structural Notes and Floor Plan, Pounds per sq. ft. rating IAW the requirements set forth in Section 6.2 of the PWS.

Table 1. Technical/Management Ratings

Rating
Description
Acceptable
Proposal/quotation clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
Unacceptable
Proposal/quotation does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

B. Past Performance:

Do you want to consider past performance: Yes_____ No__X___

Cost/Price Factor

Since this requirement is based on LPTA, award will be made to the contractor that presents the lowest priced technically acceptable approach. The contractor’s price proposal will be evaluated to determine if it is reasonable and complete. Normally, price reasonableness is established through price analysis. The Government will determine completeness of the offeror's proposal by verifying that all solicitation requirements have been priced, figures are correctly calculated, and costs are presented in a clear and useful format. The Government reserves the right to conduct a realism analysis of the proposed price.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .