18_RFP_Attachment_7_Questions_Answers_23_May.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 14 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HC1019-19-R-0003
- Issued by
-
Defense Information Systems Agency
About this file
18 RFP Attachment 7 Questions Answers 23 May
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 18_RFP_Attachment_3_Pricing_Worksheet_23_May.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| HC1019-19-R-0003_Amendment_0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 18_RFP_Attachment_2_DD254.pdf | ||
| 18_RFP_Attachment_1_QASP.doc | DOC document | |
| HC1019-19-R-0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| 18_RFP_Attachment_3_Pricing_Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 18_RFP_Attachment_4_Past_Performance_References.doc | DOC document | |
| 18_RFP_Attachment_6_Questions_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 18_RFP_Attachment_5_BVTO_Eval_TAble_w_Full_PP_Rating.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUESTIONS
| Question No. | Document | Page No. | Paragraph No. | Section No. | Question/Comment | Answer |
| 1 | RFP | 86 | 12.1 | 12.1 | Is it necessary for the Prime to have FCL at time of submission if the sub-contractor has Final TS FCL? | It is the Prime’s responsibility to meet contractual obligations written within the specified PWS. |
| 2 | RFP | 86 | 12.1 | 12.1 | Must the bidder have either interim or final Secret Facility Clearance at the time of submission or at the time of award? | Bidder must have interim or final Secret Facility Clearance at time of award. |
| 3 | RFP, Instructions | 103 | 3 | (iv) | States that there is no page limit for Executive Summary, but on page 104, Table 1 Proposal Organization, it indicates that Executive Summary is limited to 5 pages. Can you please indicate if Executive Summary has or does not have a page limitation. | The Executive Summary has a page limit of 5 pages. The RFP has been revised. |
| 4 | RFP, Instructions | 105 | 2 | Volume II Technical Management requires "all other aspects of the PWS" to be addressed. Does this include "Optional" tasks as described in the PWS | Yes, the other aspects includes the Optional tasks. The Offeror shall address the Optional tasks in the PWS. | |
| 5 | RFP, Instructions | 104 | 5 | (vii) (B) | Paragraph states that table text must be no smaller than 11 point. However, graphics text point size is not mentioned. Can you agree to allow graphics text to be smaller than 11 point. Also, will you consider a smaller point size for table text? | All text shall be no smaller than an 11 point. |
| 6 | RFP, Instructions | 103 and 108 | 3 | (iv) and © | Paragraphs mention "generic resumes." Can you please explain what is meant by a "generic" resume? | Generic resume means a resume with no required format, but that includes pertinent information such as knowledge, skills, abilities and experience. Names of intended staff is NOT required. |
| 7 | RFP, Instructions | 105 | 3 | (C) | Paragraph states that Volume III Price shall be submitted in Excel format. However, the information required for the volume listed on page 106 indicates other narrative type information that does not easily go into a spreadsheet, such as estimating methodology, table of contents, etc. Does the government propose that all narrative material also be placed in the spreadsheet format? | The price proposal spreadsheet shall be submitted in Excel Format. Additional information for Volume III- Price is to be submitted as a Microsoft (MS) Word 2007 document. The RFP has been revised. |
| 8 | RFP, Instructions | 106 | 3 | (D) | Volume IV states that Past Performance should be "in accordance with Attachment 4". Does Attachment 4 go in two places -- Volume IV and Volume V (example - see page 106 Section (E) 5. | Past Performance shall be submitted in Volume IV. Reference within Volume V has been removed. The RFP has been revised. |
| 9 | Basis for Contract Award | 107 | 4 | (b) | The basis for contract award, subfactor 2: Technical cites Task 8, Subtask 1 and Task 8 Subtask 3. However, the subtask descriptions that are cited are actually Task 9, Subtasks 1 & 3. Please clarify for Subfactor 2, which Tasks and Subtasks the Government would like offerors to respond to? | Subfactor 2 has been revised to reflect the correct corresponding PWS task 9. The RFP has been revised. |
| 10 | Basis for Contract Award and PWS | 107, 76-77 | 4 and 1 | (b), 6.8 and 6.9 | Supplemental question - Both task 8 & task 9 are optional tasks - was it the Government’s intent for the response for Subfactor 2 be for an optional task? | PWS Tasks 8, 9, and 10 are no longer optional for the base year. Tasks 8,9, and 10 remain OPTIONAL for option year 1-4. The RFP has been revised. |
| 11 | RFP, Instructions | 106 | 2 | (E) | Vol V – Contract Documentation – requires completed pricing information in the CLIN spreadsheet. Does this refer to the Attachment 3 – pricing worksheet or to the SF1449 continuation sheet which is for the CLIN pricing? If it is attachment 3, does the Government want us to submit that worksheet in both volume III & V? | Completed pricing information shall be submitted within the CLIN spreadsheet. The RFP has been revised. |
| 12 | RFP Submission of Offers | 103 & 107 | 3 | (12)(D)(iv) | Page 107 states that "Section 508 Accessibility Standards do not apply to this requirement." Please clarify if the Offeror is, or is not required to submit a 508 compliance document with their proposal. If so where should it go in our response? | Section 508 Accessibility Standards do not apply; Offerors are not required to submit a 508 compliance document with their proposal. |
| 13 | RFP Technical Management | 107 | 3 | (b)(12)(vii)(B) | This appears to contradict the evaluation factors. Is it the intent of the Offeror to address ALL PWS aspects in addition to the identified evaluated subfactors (1 &2) Tasks? | Offerors are required to address all aspects of the PWS. However, the Evaluation Factors and Subfactors will be used in the evaluation of offers. |
| 14 | RFP Subfactor 3 Management | 108 | 3 | c Subfactor 3 Management | Is it the intent for the Offeror to submit resumes for each position or each labor category? If there are 4 quantities for a particular labor category, should we submit 4 resumes or just 1 resume per labor category regardless of quantities? | Contractor's proposal shall include a staffing plan that identifies each position, supplemented with generic resumes for review. Offerors shall submit resumes for each position. For the example provided within the question, the offeror shall submit 4 resumes. |
| 15 | RFP Subfactor 3 Management/ PWS | 108 & 78 | 3 | c Subfactor 3 Management/ PWS 6.11 | Should we submit resumes for the optional positions identified in PWS 6.11 page 78? | Yes. |
| 16 | RFP Technical Management | 104 | 3 | (b)(12)(vii)(B) | Is PDF an acceptable format for submission? | No, the technical portion of the proposal is to be submitted as a Microsoft (MS) Word 2007 document. |
| 17 | PWS 6.1.1, 6.1.2, 6.71. | 68 & 75 | 6.11, 6.12, 6.71 | 6.11, 6.12, 6.71 | Are there additional details about the critical cyber requirements associated with each of the referenced statements? | Critical Cyber requirements are constantly evolving and help to ensure Commander PACAF’s visions are meet. Specifics will not be published as a combined picture falls within a sensitive construct. All sections clearly outline the overarching requirements and provide a clear level of expectations that are to meet. |
| 18 | PWS | General | General | General | Where is off-site replication currently being hosted? Does this capability currently include a cloud-based solution? Do you anticipate the scope of the replication requirement to change during the new period of performance? | A. Location of off-site replication will not be published. |
B. Replication does not currently include cloud-based solution (if by definition this question refers to Commercial Cloud) but it is on PACAF's glide-path.
C. The mission drives IT and the replication requirement is sensitive and will not be outlined in the PWS or this forum. The scope of replication is likely to evolve over time. What degree of change, what type of change, and when, these are all questions that are mission-driven and technology-dependent.
19 NA NA NA NA is an incumbent contract or contractor associated to the requirement. If any, please provide the contractor's name and contract number. The incumbent contractor name can be found on the FBO description and the contract number can be found in the PWS header.
File details come from the government source that posted it.