Amendment 1_Questions and Answers.pdf
PDF 142 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Direct Action Instructor Support Amendment Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- H92257-22-Q-0006
- Issued by
- United States Special Operations Command
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DD254 MRTC DIRECT ACTION DRAFT 20220113.pdf | ||
| Amendment 1_Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| Amendent 1_RFQ H92257-22-Q-0006.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1_ Statement of Work_vF.pdf | ||
| H92257-21-Q-0006 Final.pdf | ||
| DD254 MRTC DIRECT ACTION DRAFT 20211208.pdf | ||
| Pricing Template Final.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers
Direct Action Instructor Support
Solicitation H9225722Q0006
Doc Section Pg Question Answer
SOW 4.1 6 Does the Government require the offeror to submit a letter of intent or commitment along with the resume for each 3 Key Personnel?
Signed letters of intent/commitment are not required to satisfying the requirement. However, it is not prohibited and will not be applied toward any page count limitation if provided.
RFQ Provision
52.212-1
12-13 Ref: Factor II Past Performance
Can proposed subcontractors’ past performance be submitted as relevant and recent contracts to meet the Past
Performance Volume requirements?
Offeror may utilize proposed subcontractor’s relevant past performance if proposed subcontractor and offeror previously performed together under the same contract in a manner comparable to a Prime/Sub arrangement or even a Joint venture partnership. Additionally, an offeror may utilize past performance of another firm if offeror and partnered firms are in an active Joint Venture.
Reminder: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.
Pricing
Template and RFQ
FBLR
Daily
Rate and
Provision
52-212-1
13-49 Ref: Factor III Price
The Pricing Template spreadsheet, FBLR Daily Rates Tab provides for rates proposed by the Prime and
Subcontractors and indicates that
“Subcontractors must submit the same level of details.” In addition, the RFQ requires a Total Compensation Plan
(TCP) from both the Prime and any
Subcontractors. As this subcontractor level of detail may include proprietary and confidential information, will the
Government modify the solicitation instructions to permit Subcontractors to directly submit their TCP and pricing data to the Government via sealed package?
The RFQ will be amended to include language which permits the subcontractor to submit pricing information directly to the Government point of contact provided in the
Instructions to Offerors.
Pricing FBLR –
Daily
FBLR
Tab
Ref: Factor III Price Any changes to the formulas made by the offeror shall be clearly annotated and
Doc Section Pg Question Answer
Rates
Tab
Can the offerors modify any formulas or calculations in accordance with accounting system practices?
sufficiently explained in the submission of quotes.
RFQ Clause
52.212-5
36-38 Item 1-8 Pertain to Service Contract
Act, FLSA, Wage Determination, etc.
They do not have a check mark next to them. Is this Contract Subject to
Service Contract Labor
Standards/Wage Determination? If yes, which wage determination applies to this contract?
Service Contract Act and subsequent labor category procedures do not apply to this requirement. All labor categories under this contract are subject to the professional services exemption.
RFQ Pricing Please provide the GS equivalent level for the Labor Categories in the
RFP.
Equivalency is not required for this requirement.
RFQ Pricing Please identify all positions that fall under the Service Contract Act and provide the appropriate Wage
Determinations for Eastern NC.
Service Contract Act and subsequent labor category procedures do not apply to this requirement. All labor categories under this contract are subject to the professional services exemption.
RFQ Provision
52.212-1
12-13 Ref: Factor I Technical
Sub Factor 1: Personnel
Qualifications state "The experience, education, and qualifications of personnel proposed to work on the contract will be evaluated to determine their ability to perform their proposed duties". Question - is this requirement just for the three (3) key positions or does this requirement also include the Episodic Instructors?
Personnel Qualifications shall be evaluated as stated in the provided FAR provision for all personnel under this requirement (Full time and Episodic).
However, resumes are only required for key personnel as stated in the SOW.
SOW Para (e) 5
Ref: Ensure compliance with
Lautenberg Act: The provisions of the
Lautenberg Amendment to the Gun
Control Act of 1968 make it illegal for anyone convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence to ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms or ammunition. This stipulation disqualifies any affected individual from performing instructional duties in accordance with this SOW. All Contractor employees must provide a statement, which acknowledges that they understand the provisions and consequences of the Lautenberg
Amendment, and that they have not been convicted of any covered
Print out shall be provided prior to Day 1 of performance period.
offense. Additionally, in order to ensure that MARSOC complies with
18 U.S.C. § 922(s) (4), the contractor will attach a copy of a print-out from the National Crime Information
Center (NCIC) supporting the
Contractor’s statement.
Can the print-out from the National
Crime Information Center (NCIC) be provided on day 1?
RFQ Provision
52.212-1
Fill-In Clauses: Provide all fill-ins or certifications required by the solicitation, for inclusion in any resulting contract.
Q: Will the government accept a copy of the bidders Sam.gov Reps and
Certs, or a statement of compliance, in lieu of the submission of the RFQ
Reps and certs fill in pages 16-31?
No alternative to this requirement will be accepted.
RFQ Provision
52.212-1
Two (2) copies of Volume II are required. The Contractor shall provide a complete copy of Volume II and a ‘REDACTED’ copy of Volume
II that removes all Company names, references, and logos.
Q: As it relates to the ‘REDACTED’ copy of Volume II, should the names of each candidates resume and any references to the same also be redacted?
Yes. Redaction applies to company names, references, logos, as well as proposed personnel under this requirement.
RFQ Provision
52.212-1
Are cover pages, Table’s of content, compliance matrix exempt from page count?
Table of content, cover pages, and compliance matrix are exempt from page counts.
RFQ Provision
52.212-2
13 …This includes but, is not limited to syllabus, vendor facility information…
Q: What is the governments requirement for ‘vendor facility’?
Q: Is this in reference to the vendors
Facility Clearance (FCL)?
Please reference the provided DD254 in regards to the vendor facility information/clearance.
DD254 1.b 1 In block 1.b of the DD254 it states that SECRET Safeguarding is required however, in block 11 only block a, j, l, and m are checked. Can the government verify that SECRET safeguarding is not needed?
Secret Safeguarding is needed as stated in the DD254 and is detailed in box 13 of the DD254.
DD254 1.b 1 If a company does not have safeguarding at the time of submission, will the Government allow time post-award and issuance of
DD254 for a change condition to be processed to a safeguarding FCL?
Per para 7 of the SOW, Security requirements will be in accordance with form DD254 and shall be provided at time of award. Contractor team individual(s) supporting this task will be cleared at the Secret level at the start of the task.
Can the vendor use two different fringe rates – one for FTEs and other for episodic personnel? The reason is that episodic fringe rate is much lower than the FTE fringe rate.
Offerors may utilize two different fringe rates if necessary.
However, offeror is responsible for ensuring submitted pricing reflects an accurate amount.
The formula in the cell G6 of the
“FBLR – Daily Rates” calculates direct rate by using the hours required by the Government for that labor category. This results in a confusing calculation. The traditional method is to divide the annual salary with 2080 hours to correctly derive the hourly rates, otherwise the vendor will have to prorate each annual salary to the required Government hours. Please clarify.
The traditional method which calculates
40 hours a week multiplied by the number of weeks in a year is an inaccurate approach because it does not consider federal holidays, paid leave, sick leave, etc. The government utilizes
1880 hours as a standard and deviates from that standard when there is evidence to support that change. In the case of this requirement, the annual salary for an FTE is divided by 2000 hours vise 1880 hours, as specified in the
SOW.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .