Amendment 0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATiON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED

(SEE

ITEM

11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Amendment 0002 Page 2 of 4

1. The Evaluation Criteria provided in the Request for Proposal (RFP) package is changed as follows:

A. Remove and disregard the Restoration Skills Qualifications Form (pages 1-9) of the “Project Manual”

B. Adhere to the technical proposal submission requirements as detailed (below and on pages 6-8) in the RFP Section C201.

Factor # 1 Past Performance Past Performance is being used as an evaluation factor against which offerors’ relative ranking will be compared. The SSEB may also consider any information obtained from past performance evaluations currently on file as part of their overall evaluation of this factor.

The following past performance information must be submitted:

Each offeror must provide a list of projects completed within the past five years that demonstrates the firm’s experience working on a Historic Window Restoration project with a construction valued at greater than or equal to $500,000.00. At least one of the projects submitted must include construction work in an occupied office facility.

It is recommended that each offeror submit ALL experience within the past five years listed in order of relevance. GSA will review a minimum of three projects. The projects reviewed will be at the discretion of the SSEB.

Offerors providing projects that exceed the stated requirements in terms of size and complexity may receive a higher rating and offerors providing projects below the stated requirements in terms of size and complexity may receive a lower rating.

For each project identified, offerors will be required to provide the following information for each project:

- Up to date contact information of the property owner, including name, telephone number, email address and mailing address

- Name and location of the project

- Description of the Work

- Date of award and date of final completion

- Construction cost at award

- Construction cost at completion

- Any special features of the project

*GSA reserves the right to contact references. The following questions may be asked to use as evaluation of performance:

- Would you work with this firm again on another similar project?

- Provide a description of the scope of work of the referenced project.

- Was the construction completed in an occupied facility?

- Was the contractor successful in limiting disruptions to occupants?

- Was the project completely in a timely manner?

- Was the contractor cooperative with the owner in helping to limit change order costs for the project?

Amendment 0002 Page 3 of 4

- Was the project completed with the desired level of quality?

- Would you consider the overall project successful in terms of quality, schedule and budget?

Please explain.

Minimum Standard The minimum standard is met when the following conditions are satisfied:

a) The past performance on comparable contracts was satisfactory or better. In order to be considered satisfactory, the offeror must have completed the work in accordance with all contract requirements.

b) The contractor has experience working on one historic window restoration project with a construction valued at greater than or equal to $500,000.00 in an occupied office facility.

Factor #2 Key Personnel For this procurement, Key Personnel is defined as the individual serving the role of the Project Manager and the individual serving the role of the Superintendent. This factor considers the education, training, qualifications, past performance and experience relative to the tasks they will be performing. Contractors will be requested to include any professional qualifications, specialized experience in this type of work, and the technical competence of the staff on similar projects. Each proposed team member will be evaluated based on GSA’s evaluation concerning the qualifications and experience to the proposed staff with similar roles and project experience as proposed on this project.

Resumes and qualifications of the individual serving the role of the Project Manager shall be submitted demonstrating experience of 3 projects exceeding $500,000 within the past 10 years, 1 of which was working on a historic window restoration project. The resume must clearly identify the name of the individual serving in the role of Project Manager.

Resumes and qualifications of the individual serving the role of Superintendent shall be submitted demonstrating experience of 3 projects within the past 10 years exceeding $500,000, 1 of which was working on a historic restoration project. The resume must clearly identify the name of the individual serving in the role of Superintendent.

For each proposed individual, the offeror shall provide two professional references, including the following information:

- Viable point of contact, email address and phone number

- Name, date and location of project experience referenced

- Description of the work

- Construction Value

- Title the individual held under the project

* GSA reserves the right to contact references. The following questions may be asked to use as evaluation of performance:

- What project did you work on with the person in question?

- What title and role did the person in question have on the project?

- How would you rate their performance?

- Were their any issues with their performance? If so, were performance issues addressed?

- Would you work with the person again?

Amendment 0002 Page 4 of 4

Minimum Standard The minimum standard is met when the Key Personnel resumes and qualifications for each discipline reflect at least one project within the past 10 years exceeding $500,000 on a historic window restoration project.

Factor #3 Small Disadvantaged Business Participation The extent of participation of Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) concerns in the performance of construction contracts expected to exceed $1,000,000 is a FAR requirement for all solicitation issued on an unrestricted basis. As this project meets the FAR requirement, this factor measures the extent to which the offeror will utilize small disadvantaged business concerns in the performance of the contract. The proposal will be evaluated on the extent to which SDB firms are specifically identified and the extent of planned participation of SDB concerns in terms of the value of the total acquisition. SDB concerns, and the work they are to perform, shall be specifically identified in the offer.

Minimum Standard The minimum standard for the project is met when the Small Disadvantaged Business Participation factor is identified according to the criteria set forth, including the SDB firms and the extent of work to be performed.

THE STRAWBRIDGE BLDG -3PQCK

20 NORTH 8TH ST

PHILADELPHIA PA 19107-3191

1. The Evaluation Criteria provided in the Request for Proposal (RFP) package is changed to reflect pages 2-4 of this amendment.

2. Remove Section 01 2900 Payment Procedures from the RFP Package.

3. All other terms and conditions of the original solicitation, as modified, apply.