GRANT ADMINISTRATION Scoring Sheet.pdf
PDF 200 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PE-66995-NONST-2026-000000003
- Issued by
- Terrell County, Georgia
About this file
This is a Grant Administration Ratings Criterion scoring sheet for evaluating consultant proposals in response to a Request for Proposals (RFP). The evaluation instrument assesses prospective grant administrators across six key performance categories. The scoring criteria address the consultant's knowledge of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) guidelines and regulations, with points awarded based on years of experience ranging from zero to six or more years of combined experience with CDBG and other federal programs. The sheet evaluates organizational capacity to complete the scope of work, ranging from concerns about capability to exceptional capacity. Additionally, the evaluation considers past performance through reference checks, with scoring based on the completeness of reference information and the strength of recommendations provided.
The remaining evaluation criteria focus on the consultant's experience administering similar project types, current workload capacity, and proposed fees. Consultants are rated on whether they have completed comparable projects, ranging from no prior experience to successfully completing six or more projects of the same type. Current workload assessment determines if administrators can effectively manage their existing commitments alongside new responsibilities. The fee component evaluates whether the proposed pricing represents good value for services, considering both cost competitiveness and service quality. The scoring sheet includes spaces for contact information, firm name and address, consultant name, and date of review, with all criteria using a zero-to-two-point scale to facilitate standardized evaluation of competing proposals.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Grant Administration RFQ Notice.docx | DOCX document | |
| Statement of Qualifications _ Admin.pdf | ||
| Section 3 Solicitation Package.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
GRANT ADMINISTRATION
RATINGS CRITERION
RFP Rating Score Sheet
Consultant’s knowledge of CDBG guidelines and regulations. Years of experience
0 No Experience.
1 One to five years of combined experience with CDBG and other federal programs.
2 Six or more years of combined experience with CDBG and other federal programs.
Capacity to complete scope of work.
0 Concerns administrator does not have organizational capacity to complete scope of work
1 Administrator has average organizational capacity to complete scope of work
2 Administrator has exceptional organizational capacity to complete scope of work
Consultant’s past performance. Check references.
0 Reference information is incomplete.
1 Three or less References are listed, with average recommendations
2 More than three references are listed, with strong recommendations
Consultant’s experience in administration of this type of project.
0 Administrator has not completed a project of this type.
1 Administrator has completed one to five projects of this type.
2 Administrator has successfully completed six or more projects of this type.
Consultant’s current workload.
0 Administrator has more work than they can handle.
1 Administrator has some difficulty managing their current work load.
2 Administrator has demonstrated they can handle their projected work load.
Consultant’s fee $______________________.
0 Fees are high, services do not appear to be a good value for the dollar.
1 Fee is normal, services do not appear to be a good value for the dollar.
2 Fee is normal, services appear to be a good value for the dollar.
Contact: ____________________________________ Name of Firm: _______________________________ Firm Address: ________________________________
Name: __________________________________________
Date of Review: ___________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .