Gensler_State_of_AZ_OnCall.pdf

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Attachments/Response Forms

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division 1400 W Washington St., Ste. B200

Phoenix, AZ 85007

Available online at: appstate.az.gov Page 3 of 17

ATTACHMENT 1: OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE FORM

OFFER

TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA:

The Undersigned hereby offers and agrees to furnish the material, service and/or construction in compliance with all terms, conditions, specifications and amendments in the Solicitation and any written exceptions in the offer. Signature also certifies Small Business status if checked below (No. 4).

Company Name Signature of person authorized to sign

Address Printed name and title

City, State, ZIP Contact email address

Unique Entity ID (SAM #) ROC #(s)

Federal Tax Identifier (EIN or SSN) State Tax Identifier

By signature in the Offer section above, the Offeror certifies:

1. The submission of the Offer did not involve collusion or other anticompetitive practices.

2. The Offeror shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment in violation of Federal

Executive Order 11246, State Executive Order 2009-9 or A.R.S. §§ 41−1461 through 1465.

3. The Offeror has not given, offered to give nor intends to give at any time hereafter, any economic opportunity, future employment, gift, loan, gratuity, special discount, trip, favor or service to a public servant in connection with the submitted offer. Failure to provide a valid signature affirming the stipulations required by this clause shall result in rejection of the offer. Signing the offer with a false statement shall void the offer, any resulting contract and may be subject to legal remedies provided by law.

4. The Offeror certifies that the above referenced organization ___ IS/ ___ IS NOT a small business with less than 100 employees or has gross revenues of $4 million or less in prior FY.

ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER (To be filled out by Procurement Manager)

The Offer is hereby accepted.

The Contractor is now bound to sell the materials or services listed by the attached contract and based upon the solicitation, including all terms, conditions, specifications, amendments, etc., and the Contractor’s Offer as accepted by the State.

This Contract shall henceforth be referred to as Contract No._________________________________.

The effective date of the Contract is ____________________________________________________.

The Contractor is cautioned not to commence any billable work or to provide any material or service under this contract until Contractor receives purchase order, contact release document or written notice to proceed.

State of Arizona Awarded this _____day of__________________2024

Procurement Officer:___________________________________________

Contact Phone Number (Office) Contact Phone Number (Mobile)

Gensler

2575 East Camelback Road Suite 175

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

602.523.4911 martha_abbott@gensler.com

Martha dePlazaola Abbott, Principal-in-Charge

94-1663305

602.284.8872

M3SLD341VEG3

CTR076532

April 15, 2025

15 April

Gensler | State of Arizona 2

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division 1400 W Washington St., Ste. B200

Phoenix, AZ 85007

Available online at: appstate.az.gov Page 4 of 17

Attachment 2-A: Offeror Information Questionnaire

Failure to fully address all information requested may cause the statement of qualifications to be determined non-responsive.

1. Describe the firm’s and the proposed lead team member’s previous design and construction administration experience for projects similar in size and scope to this project.

2. Create a three-column chart. In the first column, list the past project title, budget, and year completed (listing only past projects with similar scope and budget within the past seven years) the firm has been the lead design professional. In the second column of the chart, list the names of any proposed key personnel and subcontractor(s) (if any) “team member” identified for this project that performed services for the project in column one and the team member’s role for the listed project. In column three provide best practices and lessons learned for each project.

Past Projects

(Within last seven years similar in size and scope.)

Proposed Key Personnel

(Performing role on past project)

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

(ex) Project x, $4M, 20XX John Doe, Architect XXXXXXXXXX

(ex) Project y, $2.6M, 20XX John Doe, Architect

Jane Doe, Mechanical Engineer

Jo Doe, Electrical Engineer

YYYYYYYYYY

3. In Attachment 3-B. Provide key personnel by the name, title, and directly responsible person who will be engaged in the work. An individual may be identified for more than one project discipline, or multiple individuals named to one single discipline. Describe each Individual’s specific qualifications and experience directly related to each type of Services proposed. Focus on the proposed individual’s specific duties and responsibilities and how project experience is relevant to each type of proposed Services.

GENSLER PHOENIX

The Gensler Phoenix office brings a distinctive and highly effective combination of expertise, making it an ideal partner for the Arizona Department of Administration. With extensive experience in designing and managing municipal facilities, our portfolio includes a wide range of projects such as city halls, operations centers, public works buildings, council chambers, ADA upgrades, and tenant improvements.

Our proven track record of successfully completing numerous on-call projects speaks to our ability to manage complex assignments with a high level of diligence and commitment. This experience ensures that we can consistently deliver projects that meet the highest standards of quality, efficiency, and client satisfaction.

ON-CALL EXPERTISE

Over the past several years, our team has worked on a diverse projects for various governmental entities, including the State of Arizona, the Town of Gilbert, the City of Mesa, the City of Phoenix, the City of Maricopa, the City of Surprise, the City of Avondale, Maricopa County, the City of Casa Grande, the City of Goodyear, and the City of Peoria.

These collaborations have given us invaluable experience in addressing the unique needs and challenges of each municipality, as well as a comprehensive understanding of the various expectations and requirements for public sector projects.

We are particularly adept at navigating the intricacies of on-call contracts, where flexibility, responsiveness, and a keen understanding of the public agency’s priorities are paramount.

Our approach ensures that each project is executed efficiently, on time, and within budget, while also meeting the high standards expected for public projects.

20+

AZ MUNICIPALITIES +

GOVERNMENT CLIENTS

60+

LOCAL

PROFESSIONALS

SELECT SERVICE EXAMPLES

PLANNING LEED CERTIFICATION

HISTORIC PRESERVATION MUSEUMS & CULTURAL

RENOVATIONS

CONSTRUCTION ADMIN

AVIATION

EXTERIOR FACADE

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Failure to fully address all information requested may cause the statement of qualifications to be determined non-

1. Describe the firm’s and the proposed lead team member’s previous design and construction administration

2. Create a three-column chart. In the first column, list the past project title, budget, and year completed (listing only past projects with similar scope and budget within the past seven years) the firm has been the lead design professional. In the second column of the chart, list the names of any proposed key personnel and subcontractor(s) (if any) “team member” identified for this project that performed services for the project in column one and the team member’s role for the listed project. In column three provide best practices and lessons learned for each project.

Past Projects

(Within last seven years similar in size and scope.)

Proposed Key Personnel

(Performing role on past project)

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

(ex) Project x, $4M, 20XX John Doe, Architect XXXXXXXXXX

(ex) Project y, $2.6M, 20XX John Doe, Architect

Jane Doe, Mechanical

3. In Attachment 3-B. Provide key personnel by the name, title, and directly responsible person who will be engaged in the work. An individual may be identified for more than one project discipline, or multiple individuals named to one single discipline. Describe each Individual’s specific qualifications and experience directly related to each type of Services proposed. Focus on the proposed individual’s specific duties and responsibilities and how project experience is relevant to each type of proposed Services.

Gensler | State of Arizona 3

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Failure to fully address all information requested may cause the statement of qualifications to be determined non-

1. Describe the firm’s and the proposed lead team member’s previous design and construction administration

2. Create a three-column chart. In the first column, list the past project title, budget, and year completed (listing only past projects with similar scope and budget within the past seven years) the firm has been the lead design professional. In the second column of the chart, list the names of any proposed key personnel and subcontractor(s) (if any) “team member” identified for this project that performed services for the project in column one and the team member’s role for the listed project. In column three provide best practices and lessons learned for each project.

Past Projects

(Within last seven years similar in size and scope.)

Proposed Key Personnel

(Performing role on past project)

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

(ex) Project x, $4M, 20XX John Doe, Architect XXXXXXXXXX

(ex) Project y, $2.6M, 20XX John Doe, Architect

Jane Doe, Mechanical

3. In Attachment 3-B. Provide key personnel by the name, title, and directly responsible person who will be engaged in the work. An individual may be identified for more than one project discipline, or multiple individuals named to one single discipline. Describe each Individual’s specific qualifications and experience directly related to each type of Services proposed. Focus on the proposed individual’s specific duties and responsibilities and how project experience is relevant to each type of proposed Services.

Past Projects Proposed Key Personnel Best Practices and Lessons Learned

State of Arizona, ADOA 1400 W. Washington Renovation

$8.5M Completed 2020

ADOA worked with Gensler to transform their mid-century administration building into a fully functional and flexible workplace of the future. The design team created modern solutions to increase the efficiency and performance of the building while maintaining the integrity of the structure.

Gensler leveraged their in-house workplace research to explore how best to incorporate a blend of work zones that offered employees choice in how they work.

Martha Abbott, Principal in Charge

Jay Silverberg, Design Principal

Patrick Magness, Technical Director

Susan Cherian, Interior Designer

State of Arizona, ADOA Department of Revenue Renovation

$655,000 Completed 2018

Gensler worked with the ADOA to complete two, fast-tracked interior renovations for the Department of Revenue.

The projects, which were completed concurrently, included temporary relocation of the existing lobby functions (the Departments had to remain operational while renovations were being constructed), separate demolition packages and complete interior redesign of the lobbies to make them more public-facing and capitalizing on existing daylighting opportunities.

Martha Abbott, Principal in Charge

Jay Silverberg, Design Principal

Patrick Magness, Technical Director

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Failure to fully address all information requested may cause the statement of qualifications to be determined non-

1. Describe the firm’s and the proposed lead team member’s previous design and construction administration

2. Create a three-column chart. In the first column, list the past project title, budget, and year completed (listing only past projects with similar scope and budget within the past seven years) the firm has been the lead design professional. In the second column of the chart, list the names of any proposed key personnel and subcontractor(s) (if any) “team member” identified for this project that performed services for the project in column one and the team member’s role for the listed project. In column three provide best practices and lessons learned for each project.

Past Projects

(Within last seven years similar in size and scope.)

Proposed Key Personnel

(Performing role on past project)

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

(ex) Project x, $4M, 20XX John Doe, Architect XXXXXXXXXX

(ex) Project y, $2.6M, 20XX John Doe, Architect

Jane Doe, Mechanical

3. In Attachment 3-B. Provide key personnel by the name, title, and directly responsible person who will be engaged in the work. An individual may be identified for more than one project discipline, or multiple individuals named to one single discipline. Describe each Individual’s specific qualifications and experience directly related to each type of Services proposed. Focus on the proposed individual’s specific duties and responsibilities and how project experience is relevant to each type of proposed Services. Dawn Hart, Design Manager

Gensler | State of Arizona 4

Past Projects Proposed Key Personnel Best Practices and Lessons Learned

City of Phoenix, On-Call Services Various Scope

Various Budgets Completed 2018 - 2020

Jay Silverberg, Design Principal

Patrick Magness, Technical Director

Gensler has been part of the City of Phoenix On-Call Service Contract since 2007, including the 2018-2020 contract renewal. The team has completed several projects at the Phoenix Convention Center, including renovations to lobbies, meeting rooms, exhibit halls, and more. They also designed a gateway monument for the Melrose District, spanning over six lanes of traffic. Key lessons learned include the importance of adaptive design to meet evolving city needs while preserving community identity.

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Failure to fully address all information requested may cause the statement of qualifications to be determined non-

1. Describe the firm’s and the proposed lead team member’s previous design and construction administration

2. Create a three-column chart. In the first column, list the past project title, budget, and year completed (listing only past projects with similar scope and budget within the past seven years) the firm has been the lead design professional. In the second column of the chart, list the names of any proposed key personnel and subcontractor(s) (if any) “team member” identified for this project that performed services for the project in column one and the team member’s role for the listed project. In column three provide best practices and lessons learned for each project.

Past Projects

(Within last seven years similar in size and scope.)

Proposed Key Personnel

(Performing role on past project)

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

(ex) Project x, $4M, 20XX John Doe, Architect XXXXXXXXXX

(ex) Project y, $2.6M, 20XX John Doe, Architect

Jane Doe, Mechanical

3. In Attachment 3-B. Provide key personnel by the name, title, and directly responsible person who will be engaged in the work. An individual may be identified for more than one project discipline, or multiple individuals named to one single discipline. Describe each Individual’s specific qualifications and experience directly related to each type of Services proposed. Focus on the proposed individual’s specific duties and responsibilities and how project experience is relevant to each type of proposed Services.

City of Phoenix, Sky Harbor Command Center

$12.5M Completed 2018

Jay Silverberg, Design Principal

Patrick Magness, Technical Director

This mission-critical facility presented the challenge of achieving anonymity and security as a central driver. From the exterior, the design solution appears inconspicuous as well as providing an interior environment that counteracts the high-stress nature of its program.

The design team incorporated strategic design elements to offer employees a great work experience- one that stressed the importance of security while providing an opportunity to collaborate and interact in select work zones.

Town of Gilbert Municipal Center Renovation

$17.85M Completed 2023

Martha Abbott, Principal in Charge

Jay Silverberg, Design Principal

Patrick Magness, Technical Director

The Town of Gilbert's Municipal Center aimed to improve space utilization, employee comfort, and efficiency. Three guiding principles emerged: support community, inspire employees, and promote transparency.

The conceptual approach focused on future-proofing with infrastructure and multi-use planning strategies. A key lesson learned was the importance of flexible design to accommodate future needs and growth.

Robert Himmelberger, Project Architect

Dawn Hart, Gensler | State of Arizona 5

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Office Renovations

Confidential Budget Completed 2019

Jay Silverberg, Design Principal

Completed in 2019, the new campus includes complete interior design services on two buildings, significant exterior upgrades to tie the disparate buildings into one cohesive vision, and several employee amenity spaces. The corporate campus efficiently supports over 2,000 employees.

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Failure to fully address all information requested may cause the statement of qualifications to be determined non-

1. Describe the firm’s and the proposed lead team member’s previous design and construction administration

2. Create a three-column chart. In the first column, list the past project title, budget, and year completed (listing only past projects with similar scope and budget within the past seven years) the firm has been the lead design professional. In the second column of the chart, list the names of any proposed key personnel and subcontractor(s) (if any) “team member” identified for this project that performed services for the project in column one and the team member’s role for the listed project. In column three provide best practices and lessons learned for each project.

Past Projects

(Within last seven years similar in size and scope.)

Proposed Key Personnel

(Performing role on past project)

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

(ex) Project x, $4M, 20XX John Doe, Architect XXXXXXXXXX

(ex) Project y, $2.6M, 20XX John Doe, Architect

Jane Doe, Mechanical

3. In Attachment 3-B. Provide key personnel by the name, title, and directly responsible person who will be engaged in the work. An individual may be identified for more than one project discipline, or multiple individuals named to one single discipline. Describe each Individual’s specific qualifications and experience directly related to each type of Services proposed. Focus on the proposed individual’s specific duties and responsibilities and how project experience is relevant to each type of proposed Services.

City of Mesa Hohokam Stadium Concept Study

$225,000 Completed 2024

SITE ISOMETRIC - DESIGN OVERVIEW

PROPOSED

OFFICE, STORAGE,

& WEIGHT ROOM

PROPOSED

KIDS SPEED PITCH

PROPOSED

FAMILY ZONE

CANOPY

PROPOSED

ADULT ZONE

CANOPY PROPOSED

PARTY DECK

PROPOSED

PARTY DECK

PROPOSED

“PORCH”

PROPOSED

OPEN MARKET

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR

RELOCATION

PROPOSED

ELEVATOR

RELOCATION

PROPOSED

PLAYER WARM

UP AREA

Gensler led Programming, Facility Assessment, Benchmarking, and Concept Design for Hohokam Stadium and Lew Wolff Training Center in Mesa, Arizona.

The team developed an improvement plan to enhance the stadium’s competitiveness within the Cactus League, prioritizing upgrades for fan experience, player facilities, and revenue generation.

City of Maricopa City Hall & Police Facility

$12.5M Completed 2013

Baseball Complex Design Update 11/20/2023

Jay Silverberg, Design Principal

Patrick Magness, Technical Director

The City Hall and Police Facility design followed a high-performance workplace model fostering collaboration.

Gensler engaged stakeholders through town meetings, visioning sessions, and structured discussions, compiling insights into a strategic programming document that shaped the final design.

This process reinforced the value of early engagement and structured feedback in driving informed design decisions.

PROPOSED

FAMILY ZONE

CANOPY PROPOSED

INFLATABLE KID

ZONE

(PLACEHOLDER)

PROPOSED

ADULT ZONE

CANOPY

PROPOSED

PARTY DECK

PROPOSED

COMMAND

CENTER PROPOSED

VOMITORYPROPOSED

PARTY DECK

PROPOSED

“PORCH”

SITE ISOMETRIC - DESIGN OVERVIEW

VISITOR’S

VISITOR’S

LOCKERS

VISITOR’S

TRAINING

ROOM

HYDRO-

THERAPY

ROOM

ADULT

ZONE

NOVELTY

STAND

TICKET

WINDOWS

CONCESSION

CONCESSION

STORAGE

MRR

STORAGE

STORAGESTORAGE

JC

Martha Abbott, Principal in Charge

Jay Silverberg, Design Principal

Patrick Magness, Technical Director

Patrick Magness, Technical Director

Dawn Hart, Gensler | State of Arizona 6

MCCCD, GateWay Community College Phoenix Forge

$5.2M Completed 2023

Gateway’s new Makerspace facility is a community hub designed to support city-wide entrepreneurship. The design team engaged with diverse stakeholders to gather feedback on their needs and goals. Multiple design iterations required transparent communication and weekly meetings to ensure clear direction. Shared BIM models were used to enhance collaboration with subconsultants. A key lesson learned was the importance of ongoing communication and adaptability in managing complex projects.

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Failure to fully address all information requested may cause the statement of qualifications to be determined non-

1. Describe the firm’s and the proposed lead team member’s previous design and construction administration

2. Create a three-column chart. In the first column, list the past project title, budget, and year completed (listing only past projects with similar scope and budget within the past seven years) the firm has been the lead design professional. In the second column of the chart, list the names of any proposed key personnel and subcontractor(s) (if any) “team member” identified for this project that performed services for the project in column one and the team member’s role for the listed project. In column three provide best practices and lessons learned for each project.

Past Projects

(Within last seven years similar in size and scope.)

Proposed Key Personnel

(Performing role on past project)

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

(ex) Project x, $4M, 20XX John Doe, Architect XXXXXXXXXX

(ex) Project y, $2.6M, 20XX John Doe, Architect

Jane Doe, Mechanical

3. In Attachment 3-B. Provide key personnel by the name, title, and directly responsible person who will be engaged in the work. An individual may be identified for more than one project discipline, or multiple individuals named to one single discipline. Describe each Individual’s specific qualifications and experience directly related to each type of Services proposed. Focus on the proposed individual’s specific duties and responsibilities and how project experience is relevant to each type of proposed Services.

City of Mesa Studios at Mesa City Center

$7.2M Completed 2022

The Mesa Studios project required upgrading an aging mid-century building while preserving its historic designation.

Early collaboration with mechanical and structural engineers ensured a strategic plan and clear budget, guiding the transformation into a 26,000 SF flexible, collaborative hub.

This process underscored the importance of early technical coordination in adaptive reuse projects.

Martha Abbott, Principal in Charge

Jay Silverberg, Design Principal

City of Phoenix Innovation 27

$20M Feasibility Study Completed 2023 Estimated Completion 2026

Martha Abbott, Principal in Charge

Jay Silverberg, Design Principal

Patrick Magness, Technical Director

The Innovation 27 Workforce Training and Education Collaborative repurposes a 128,000 SF former big-box store into a state-of-the-art workforce and education hub for the City of Phoenix.

Set to open in fall 2024, the facility will serve all ages with classrooms, gardens, and community spaces, fostering innovation, re-skilling, and upskilling through partnerships with government education providers and a workforce training center.

Martha Abbott, Principal in Charge

Jay Silverberg, Design Principal

Gensler | State of Arizona 7

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Available online at: appstate.az.gov Page 5 of 17

ATTACHMENT 2-B: EXPERIENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE

Failure to fully address all information requested may cause the bid to be determined non-responsive.

Firm Name Year Established

Principal Address (Street, City, State)

Years’ Experience performing services similar in size and scope as required by this solicitation.

Years the organization has conducted business in the State of Arizona.

CONTRACT REPRESENTATIVES TO CONTACT

Name Title Telephone Number E-Mail Address

THREE (3) PROJECTS COMPLETED BY FIRM SIMILAR IN SIZE AND SCOPE / REFERENCES

1 Client Company/Address Contact Begin Date End Date

Phone Number Email Address

Services Provided Similar to Those Described in Solicitation

2 Client Company/Address Contact Begin Date End Date

3 Client Company/Address Contact Begin Date End Date

M. Arthur Gensler, Jr. & Associates, Inc. (Gensler) 1965

2575 East Camelback Road Suite 175 Phoenix, Arizona 85016

Martha dePlazaola Abbott Co-Managing Director martha_abbott@gensler.com602.523.4900

State of Arizona, ADOA 1400, W. Washington Phoenix, AZ 85007

Ruben Duran

602.364.4851 ruben.duran@azdoa.gov

10/2019 05/2020

Gensler provided the following services: Architectural design, interior design, FF&E, renovation, tenant improvements, programming, ADA compliance, space analysis, workplace strategy, construction administration

Rory Carder Co-Managing Director rory_carder@gensler.com602.523.4900

City of Mesa 59 E 1st Mesa, AZ, 85201

Bryce Albretsen

480.644.4974 bryce.albretsen@mesaaz.gov

11/2019 08/2022

The Mesa Studios project transformed a mid-century building into a 26,000 SF collaborative hub.

City of Phoenix 200 West Washington Street 5th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85003

Jamie Garrido

602.256.4375 jaime.garrido@phoenix.gov

10/2019 05/2020

Gensler has collaborated with the City of Phoenix on numerous projects, including on-call work, the Sky Harbor Command Center, Adams Street Activation, and the Melrose District Monument.

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Failure to fully address all information requested may cause the statement of qualifications to be determined non-

1. Describe the firm’s and the proposed lead team member’s previous design and construction administration

2. Create a three-column chart. In the first column, list the past project title, budget, and year completed (listing only past projects with similar scope and budget within the past seven years) the firm has been the lead design professional. In the second column of the chart, list the names of any proposed key personnel and subcontractor(s) (if any) “team member” identified for this project that performed services for the project in column one and the team member’s role for the listed project. In column three provide best practices and lessons learned for each project.

Past Projects

(Within last seven years similar in size and scope.)

Proposed Key Personnel

(Performing role on past project)

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

(ex) Project x, $4M, 20XX John Doe, Architect XXXXXXXXXX

(ex) Project y, $2.6M, 20XX John Doe, Architect

Jane Doe, Mechanical

3. In Attachment 3-B. Provide key personnel by the name, title, and directly responsible person who will be engaged in the work. An individual may be identified for more than one project discipline, or multiple individuals named to one single discipline. Describe each Individual’s specific qualifications and experience directly related to each type of Services proposed. Focus on the proposed individual’s specific duties and

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Failure to fully address all information requested may cause the statement of qualifications to be determined non-

1. Describe the firm’s and the proposed lead team member’s previous design and construction administration

2. Create a three-column chart. In the first column, list the past project title, budget, and year completed (listing only past projects with similar scope and budget within the past seven years) the firm has been the lead design professional. In the second column of the chart, list the names of any proposed key personnel and subcontractor(s) (if any) “team member” identified for this project that performed services for the project in column one and the team member’s role for the listed project. In column three provide best practices and lessons learned for each project.

Past Projects

(Within last seven years similar in size and scope.)

Proposed Key Personnel

(Performing role on past project)

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

(ex) Project x, $4M, 20XX John Doe, Architect XXXXXXXXXX

(ex) Project y, $2.6M, 20XX John Doe, Architect

Jane Doe, Mechanical

3. In Attachment 3-B. Provide key personnel by the name, title, and directly responsible person who will be engaged in the work. An individual may be identified for more than one project discipline, or multiple individuals named to one single discipline. Describe each Individual’s specific qualifications and experience directly related to each type of Services proposed. Focus on the proposed individual’s specific duties and

Gensler | State of Arizona 8

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Available online at: appstate.az.gov Page 6 of 17

ATTACHMENT 3-A: METHOD PROPOSAL

(Method of Approach)

Response must demonstrate your comprehension of the objectives and services of this solicitation. Do not merely duplicate the description of work described in this Request for Qualifications (RFQu). Firms shall provide responses directly below the numbered questions in this attachment.

1. Substantiate how your team can most effectively undertake the requirements and responsibilities associated with the on-call mechanical plumbing engineering services for the state of Arizona and your proposed team’s understanding of this scope of services by:

a) Providing an organizational chart clearly identifying the lines of authority.

b) Describing your current workload and availability of designated team staff (including Sub-Consultants). Indicate the relationship of the work in this RFQu to the firm’s other current projects.

The following chart may be utilized to show current workload of proposed team members. Additional lines may be added as needed.

Project Team Member Current Workload Commitment Total Availability Name and Title:

1. Substantiate how your team can most effectively undertake the requirements and responsibilities associated with the on-call architectural/landscape architectural for the state of Arizona and your proposed team’s understanding of this scope of services by:

a) Providing an organizational chart clearly identifying the lines of authority

Gensler has a long-standing presence in Phoenix and has built a reputation for design excellence. We recognize every decision that we make with our clients must contribute to their overall goals and that’s why we approach each project strategically with the objective of solving the right problem. This strategic approach gives us the structure to align the best team to deliver a project that captures the vision of our clients, maintains schedule, delivers on budget, and organizes the project process.

We have experience working on numerous architectural on-call projects and are capable of delivering successful projects ranging in scale. For each on-call project we assemble a dedicated team. Our proposed Design Manager will work closely with the project stakeholders and lead communication efforts throughout each project phase. Gensler understands that on-call projects often require immediate attention and are to be delivered under tight schedules. Our team has the experience and the breadth of resources in-house to address these needs, as well as comprehensive experience with small tenant improvements, feasibility services, site design and planning, construction drawings, technical specifications, LEED evaluation, and interior upgrades to base building / exterior renovations.

Our team is poised to help the State of Arizona deliver your projects at any scale. We are collaborative and inclusive and can leverage our expertise to support your needs in the best way possible. We would like to be your partner and bring the following unique qualifications:

• We are an integrated + local team with strong ties and relationships to the State of Arizona

• We bring a foundation of working under on-call consulting contracts and have developed the on-call expertise necessary to deliver projects on time and on budget

• We are consensus builders through our visioning and Design Strategy Process; these projects have multiple stakeholders and passionate advocates —our process will create a clear roadmap to success

• We offer expertise in every project typology that might be relevant, with 33 practice areas that will influence and impact the project types in a multidisciplinary way

Martha dePlazaola Abbott, Principal in Charge

Jay Silverberg, Design Principal

Dawn Hart, Design Manager

Susan Cherian, Interior Designer

Robert Himmelberger, Project Architect

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Failure to fully address all information requested may cause the statement of qualifications to be determined non-

1. Describe the firm’s and the proposed lead team member’s previous design and construction administration

2. Create a three-column chart. In the first column, list the past project title, budget, and year completed (listing only past projects with similar scope and budget within the past seven years) the firm has been the lead design professional. In the second column of the chart, list the names of any proposed key personnel and subcontractor(s) (if any) “team member” identified for this project that performed services for the project in column one and the team member’s role for the listed project. In column three provide best practices and lessons learned for each project.

Past Projects

(Within last seven years similar in size and scope.)

Proposed Key Personnel

(Performing role on past project)

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

(ex) Project x, $4M, 20XX John Doe, Architect XXXXXXXXXX

(ex) Project y, $2.6M, 20XX John Doe, Architect

Jane Doe, Mechanical

3. In Attachment 3-B. Provide key personnel by the name, title, and directly responsible person who will be engaged in the work. An individual may be identified for more than one project discipline, or multiple individuals named to one single discipline. Describe each Individual’s specific qualifications and experience directly related to each type of Services proposed. Focus on the proposed individual’s specific duties and

Gensler | State of Arizona 9

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Available online at: appstate.az.gov Page 6 of 17

ATTACHMENT 3-A: METHOD PROPOSAL

(Method of Approach)

Response must demonstrate your comprehension of the objectives and services of this solicitation. Do not merely duplicate the description of work described in this Request for Qualifications (RFQu). Firms shall provide responses directly below the numbered questions in this attachment.

1. Substantiate how your team can most effectively undertake the requirements and responsibilities associated with the on-call mechanical plumbing engineering services for the state of Arizona and your proposed team’s understanding of this scope of services by:

a) Providing an organizational chart clearly identifying the lines of authority.

b) Describing your current workload and availability of designated team staff (including Sub-Consultants). Indicate the relationship of the work in this RFQu to the firm’s other current projects.

The following chart may be utilized to show current workload of proposed team members. Additional lines may be added as needed.

Martha dePlazaola Abbott | Principal-in-Charge

The Grand Hotel Renovation, Grand Canyon Village, AZ Phoenix Sky Harbor, Tonto Phase 1, Phoenix, AZ

10% 25%

Jay Silverberg | Design Principal

Phoenix Sky Harbor, Tonto Phase 1, Phoenix, AZ Confidential Semiconductor Facility, Phoenix, AZ Phoenix Art Museum Master Plan, Phoenix, AZ Herberger Theatre Phase 1, Phoenix, AZ

15% 70%

Dawn Hart | Design Manager

Phoenix Sky Harbor, Tonto Phase 1, Phoenix, AZ Herberger Theatre Phase 1, Phoenix, AZ City of Phoenix, Aviation On-Call, Phoenix, AZ GTI Manufacturing Tenant Improvement, AZ

10% 90%

Patrick Magness | Technical Director

Phoenix Sky Harbor, Tonto Phase 1, Phoenix, AZ Herberger Theatre Phase 1, Phoenix, AZ City of Phoenix, Aviation On-Call, Phoenix, AZ GTI Manufacturing Tenant Improvement, AZ

10% 75%

Robert Himmelberger | Project Architect

Astra Tower, Phoenix, AZ La Posada at Pusch Ridge, Oro Valley, AZ 25% 75%

Susan Cherian | Interior Designer

ASM American HQ, Scottsdale, AZ Confidential Semiconductor Facility, Phoenix, AZ 20% 65%

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Failure to fully address all information requested may cause the statement of qualifications to be determined non-

1. Describe the firm’s and the proposed lead team member’s previous design and construction administration

2. Create a three-column chart. In the first column, list the past project title, budget, and year completed (listing only past projects with similar scope and budget within the past seven years) the firm has been the lead design professional. In the second column of the chart, list the names of any proposed key personnel and subcontractor(s) (if any) “team member” identified for this project that performed services for the project in column one and the team member’s role for the listed project. In column three provide best practices and lessons learned for each project.

Past Projects

(Within last seven years similar in size and scope.)

Proposed Key Personnel

(Performing role on past project)

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

(ex) Project x, $4M, 20XX John Doe, Architect XXXXXXXXXX

(ex) Project y, $2.6M, 20XX John Doe, Architect

Jane Doe, Mechanical

3. In Attachment 3-B. Provide key personnel by the name, title, and directly responsible person who will be engaged in the work. An individual may be identified for more than one project discipline, or multiple individuals named to one single discipline. Describe each Individual’s specific qualifications and experience directly related to each type of Services proposed. Focus on the proposed individual’s specific duties and

Gensler | State of Arizona 10

A HOLISTIC APPROACH

Our team will initiate a kick-off meeting for each project with all project stakeholders. Through this interactive and collaborative kick-off meeting, we are able to provide a more detailed project schedule which includes major milestones and deliverables.

Understanding project scope and client expectations early in the process will help determine which deliverables make the most sense for each project.

We believe in designing more than great and functional spaces, we design a process to ensure transparency of expectations between all team members and tailor the deliverables to the needs of each project.

Budget control is of the utmost importance and will be tracked throughout the duration of the design and construction.

MANAGING MULTIPLE TASK ASSIGNMENTS

Our team has proven success managing multiple projects while under on-call contracts. We believe constant communication between team members and design managers is key to providing responsive services to our clients while delivering multiple projects within a similar timeline. As a local studio with 60+ professionals, we have the capacity and bandwidth to properly serve our clients.

A core team will be assigned to each contracted project with skill-sets that match the needs of the project’s scope. In our fast-paced architectural and engineering industry, our team members are equipped with the digital tools required to help organize their tasks, communicate with all team members, coordinate schedules, and staffing to serve our clients.

Through our proactive project approach method, we will ensure continuous communication threads between our design teams, design managers, and clients to ensure deadlines are prioritized appropriately.

2. Describe how your firm determines project deliverables. Also, describe your proposed team’s general approach to managing the assigned on-call projects of various sizes and complexity.

3. Are you familiar with Job Order Contracting projects? How can your firm support a project manager with defining quantities and units of measure?

Yes, our team brings extensive experience in managing Job Order projects of varying types and sizes. We understand the complexities that come with different project scopes and are adept at navigating challenges to ensure successful outcomes.

Our team’s expertise allows us to tailor our approach to meet the specific needs of each project while maintaining efficiency and quality. The key aspect of our process is our collaborative approach, which establishes a clear and strategic roadmap from the outset of the project. This roadmap serves as the foundation for the project, providing a structured framework that aligns stakeholders and guides decision-making. Our method not only enhances coordination but also allows for flexibility in adapting to varying project needs.

Dawn Hart, Design Manager, will oversee the budget and schedule, ensuring milestones are met efficiently. She will maintain in-depth communication with ADOA, providing weekly updates to keep stakeholders informed and engaged. With extensive experience working on numerous job order contracts, she understands the nuances of managing multiple project scopes under tight timelines. Her leadership and strategic oversight will help mitigate risks, address challenges proactively, and drive the project toward a successful completion.

Municipal + Governmental Clients

35+

CIVIC/MUNICIPAL PROJECTS

IN THE LAST 7 YEARS

5M+

SF OF MUNICIPAL WORK

IN AZ OVER THE PAST 5 YEARS

OUR LOCAL MUNICIPAL EXPERIENCE:

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Failure to fully address all information requested may cause the statement of qualifications to be determined non-

1. Describe the firm’s and the proposed lead team member’s previous design and construction administration

2. Create a three-column chart. In the first column, list the past project title, budget, and year completed (listing only past projects with similar scope and budget within the past seven years) the firm has been the lead design professional. In the second column of the chart, list the names of any proposed key personnel and subcontractor(s) (if any) “team member” identified for this project that performed services for the project in column one and the team member’s role for the listed project. In column three provide best practices and lessons learned for each project.

Past Projects

(Within last seven years similar in size and scope.)

Proposed Key Personnel

(Performing role on past project)

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

(ex) Project x, $4M, 20XX John Doe, Architect XXXXXXXXXX

(ex) Project y, $2.6M, 20XX John Doe, Architect

Jane Doe, Mechanical

3. In Attachment 3-B. Provide key personnel by the name, title, and directly responsible person who will be engaged in the work. An individual may be identified for more than one project discipline, or multiple individuals named to one single discipline. Describe each Individual’s specific qualifications and experience directly related to each type of Services proposed. Focus on the proposed individual’s specific duties and

Gensler | State of Arizona 11

We understand that standard turn-around times may vary depending upon factors such as type of request, number of requests required by the contractor, and other external undefined market factors. Our team will leverage their understanding of the City requirements, excellent project management experience, and reputation to do our best to fast-track the turn-around times.

Below is a list of turn-around times that can be anticipated.

• Design Requests/Changes: Case by Case Basis: Our teams approach will be to expedite all design changes in an efficient and detailed manner.

5. List standard turn-around time for design requests/changes, RFI’s, submittals, and differing situations that may impact time constraints.

6. Detail your firm’s quality control process related to specific plans, specifications and construction documents.

Our quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) process describes methods for developing, preparing, coordinating, checking, verifying, reviewing, approving, issuing, revising, and filing design construction, procurement and other project documents.

Through our comprehensive QA/QC process we improve the quality of our documentation. We have a reputation for producing excellent contract documents, and our projects have had one of the lowest Change Order rates in the industry.

Quality Assurance and Control is owned by the project team and is integral to every project phase. Primary responsibility for planning, executing, coordinating and reviewing project work resides with the team, with ultimate responsibility shared by our Design Manager and direct oversight from the Project Architect.

Our team will be responsible for ensuring that the work is properly coordinated, and that appropriate review procedures have been followed.

In addition, we are responsible for verifying the following:

degree of accuracy, detail and definition, quantity of information transmitted, and safety

accessibility for operation and maintenance

• Completeness including accurate cross-referencing to other drawings, details, or specifications

specifications, cost estimates and reports will be checked, initialed, and dated by the Project Architect, prior to submittal. Records will be kept confirming that verification has been performed and to validate that the documents comply with project requirements.

Solicitation No. BPM006827 Description:

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL AND

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

Arizona Department of Administration

General Services Division

Failure to fully address all information requested may cause the statement of qualifications to be determined non-

1. Describe the firm’s and the proposed lead team member’s previous design and construction administration

2. Create a three-column chart. In the first column, list the past project title, budget, and year completed (listing only past projects with similar scope and budget within the past seven years) the firm has been the lead design professional. In the second column of the chart, list the names of any proposed key personnel and subcontractor(s) (if any) “team member” identified for this project that performed services for the project in column one and the team member’s role for the listed project. In column three provide best practices and lessons learned for each project.

Past Projects

(Within last seven years similar in size and scope.)

Proposed Key Personnel

(Performing role on past project)

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

(ex) Project x, $4M, 20XX John Doe, Architect XXXXXXXXXX

(ex) Project y, $2.6M, 20XX John Doe, Architect

Jane Doe, Mechanical

3. In Attachment 3-B. Provide key personnel by the name, title, and directly responsible person who will be engaged in the work. An individual may be identified for more than one project discipline, or multiple individuals named to one single discipline. Describe each Individual’s specific qualifications and experience directly related to each type of Services proposed. Focus on the proposed individual’s specific duties and responsibilities and how project experience is relevant to each type of proposed Services.

The Design Manager will oversee project milestones, lead team meetings, and distribute meeting notes. We prioritize frequent communication to ensure successful delivery, with weekly meetings and touch-points for stakeholders to review progress, expectations, and milestones.