Appendix_A_-_Overview_of_EPLC_PowerPoint.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- FDA Nonclinical Information Management System (NIMS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FDA-SOL-13-1116203
About this file
Appendix A
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Overview of the Enterprise Performance Life Cycle (EPLC)
Enterprise Performance Life Cycle (EPLC)
What is EPLC?
The FDA Enterprise Performance Life Cycle (EPLC) is a framework to enhance Information Technology (IT) governance through rigorous application of sound investment and project management principles and industry’s best practices.
Why EPLC?
The EPLC provides the context for the IT governance and describes interdependencies between its project management, investment management, and capital planning components. The EPLC framework establishes an environment in which FDA IT investments and projects consistently achieve successful outcomes that align with department of Health and Human Services (HHS)/FDA goals and objectives.
EPLC Goals and Objectives Goal 1: Effective Project Management Methodology
Provide a coherent and effective project management methodology to guide IT project management at FDA
Consistently deliver IT capabilities that provide maximum support to FDA business needs within approved cost and schedule constraints
Goal 1: Supporting Objectives
Expand the role of Business Owners throughout the IT project life cycle to ensure that IT projects remain targeted on highest priority business needs and meet necessary schedule and cost constraints
Standardize IT project management within FDA based on best practices
Provide guidance to Project Managers regarding activities and deliverables required for project planning and execution throughout all stages of project management
Provide project templates and tools to help jump-start project activities
Improve project performance by applying repeatable processes and industry-leading best practices for project and earned value management
EPLC Goals and Objectives Goal 2: Better Integrated IT Investment Planning
Better integrated IT investment planning and execution with IT Governance
More effective multi-disciplinary reviews of IT investments by critical partners
Goal 2: Supporting Objectives
Facilitate alignment of IT projects with the FDA Strategic Plan
Provide a more effective process for integrating multi-disciplinary Critical Partner reviews into the IT Governance process
Establish clear, reasonable expectations and practical standards/guidelines
Ensure compliance with FDA Enterprise Architecture (EA) and prescribed design standards
Key Definitions
1 3 4
IT Project
A temporary planned endeavor funded by an approved information technology investment;
thus achieving a specific goal and creating a unique product, service, or result
IT Portfolio
The combination of all IT assets, resources, and investments owned or planned by an organization in order to achieve its strategic goals, objectives and mission
IT Investment
An organizational investment employing or producing IT or IT-related assets
A project has a defined start and end point with specific objectives that, when attained signify completion
The essential distinction between an IT project and other projects is that an IT project involves the delivery of an information technology product, service, or system
Each investment has or will incur costs for the investment, has expected or realized benefits arising from the invest-ment, has a schedule of project activities and deadlines, and has or will incur risks associated with engaging in the investment
IT Program
A group of related IT projects managed in a coordinated way to obtain benefits and control not available from managing them individually
A program may include elements of related work outside the scope of its discrete projects
A project may not be part of a program, but a program will always have projects
Project Stakeholders
IT Project Manager
Business Project Manager
Integrated Project Team (IPT)
Critical Partner Resource Managers
Critical Partners
Business Owner / Exec Sponsor CO and COTR Development Team Test and Evaluation Team Operations Data Administrator Information Systems Security Officer
(ISSO)
Program Analysts Configuration Control Board Network Analysts Technical and Vendor Support Training and Help Desk In-House Development and Operations Teams Contractors End Users Infrastructure Support Staff
Role of Business Owner / Executive Sponsor
Executive in charge of the organization owning the project
Primary customer and advocate for an IT project
Responsible for identifying the business needs and performance measures to be satisfied by an IT project
Provides funding for the IT project
Establishes and approves changes to cost, schedule, and performance goals
Validates that the IT project initially meets business requirements and continues to meet business requirements
Role of IT Project Manager (IT PM)
Responsible for project performance in relation to approved cost, schedule and performance baselines.
Maintains information project status, control, performance, risk, corrective action and outlook.
Accountable to the Business Owner for meeting business requirements and to IT governance for meeting IT project management requirements.
Accountable for the development of EPLC artifact where IT is indicated as the author.
Works with Business PMs to develop and manage to the Project Process Agreement, Project Management Plan, Project Schedule, Implementation Plan, and Contingency and Disaster Recovery Plan.
Develops an Integrated Project Team bringing in the appropriate IT resources at the appropriate times.
Leads EPLC Stage Gate Reviews and other project reviews defined in the project schedule.
Responsible for the management and mitigation of risks and issues.
Accountable for the execution and documentation of testing as defined in the Master Test Plan
Role of Business Project Manager (BPM)
Accountable for the development of the Boundary Document defining the scope of the project.
Collaborate with the IT PMs to the develop the Project Charter.
Accountable for the development, baselining, and prioritization of the business requirements (documented in the Business Requirements Document).
Work with IT PMs to develop and manage to the Project Process Agreement, Project Management Plan, Project Schedule, Implementation Plan, and Contingency and Disaster Recovery Plan.
BPMs, along the Business Owner / Executive Sponsor, manages scope changes that affect cost, schedule, and quality.
Represent Business at EPLC Stage Gate Reviews and other project reviews defined in the project schedule.
Accountable for the development of the Business processes involved in the project.
Responsible for the management of business related risks and issues.
Provides input to the Master Test Plan for the User Acceptance Test planning.
Collaborates with IT PM on developing a Training Plan, Training Materials and User Manual
Sets expectations and participates in the development and implementation of the User Acceptance Test.
On an annual basis, perform an Annual Operation Analysis to decide on new functional enhancements and/or modifications to the business product or the need to dispose of or replace the business product altogether.
Role of Integrated Project Team (IPT)
Chaired by the Project Manager
Subject Matter Experts and Business Owner representatives to assist the Project Manager with planning and execution of the project
ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE (EA)
BUDGET AND FINANCE
ACQUISITION
BUSINESS OWNER (PERFORMANCE)
CPIC
SECURITY
INFRASTRUCTURE
RECORDS MANAGEMENT
CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
DATA STANDARDS INTEGRATION TEAM (DSIT)
SECTION 508 TESTING AND INTEGRATION
Role of Critical Partners
Review the progress of the IT projects associated with IT Investments during EPLC Stage Gate Reviews to ensure compliance with HHS and FDA policies, applicable laws and guidance, and FDA and HHS-adopted government and industry best practices in their respective functional areas
Provide recommendations to the IT governance bodies, Business Owners, and IT Investment Managers on issues identified in those functional areas
EPLC Phase Objectives
Project proposal is worth pursuing?
Initiation
Project has been clearly defined and has the supporting organizational structure to proceed with full planning
Concept
Project has finalized project planning and defined initial baselines and requirements to permit outside validation
Planning
Project requirements have been defined sufficiently to be translated into the Business Product
Requirements Analysis
Design process will create a Business Product that meets the requirements within a specified project budget and schedule
Design
EPLC Phase Objectives (continued)
The code and/or other deliverables needed to build the Business Product have been completed within cost, schedule, and scope guidelines
Development
Test processes have been executed according to plan and tests verify that the implementation of the Business Product will be successful
Test
Verify the operational readiness of the Business Product for release into the production environment
Implementation
Verify that the Business Product is managed and supported in a robust production environment and to determine whether the Business Product is still cost-effective to operate or if it should be retired
Operations and Maintenance
Accomplish an orderly shutdown of the Business Product operation
Disposition
Preliminary
• Initial draft; updated to Final/Baseline in later EPLC phase(s)
Final
• Complete in the opinion of the Project Manager
Baseline
• Final for current phase; changes may be required in subsequent phases
Note
• Some deliverables (particularly baselines and project plans) undergo change control in which the IT Governance organization must approve initial documents and any subsequent changes
• Each year the Project Manager may provide updated deliverables associated with the project's Operations and Maintenance phase
EPLC Types of Deliverables
Security controls must be established and integrated into EPLC activities, phases, and reviews
EPLC references several Security artifacts
Project Security Categorization
Privacy Impact Assessment
System of Record Notice (SORN)
E-Authentication
System Security Plan
Security Control Assessment
Security Risk Assessment
Security Assessment Report (SAR)
Plan of Action and Milestones
Security Authorization Executive Summary (SAES)
Security Deliverables
Initiation Concept Planning Design Development Test Implementation Operations & Maintenance
Requirements Analysis Disposition
Initiation Stage Gate
Concept Stage Gate
Planning Stage Gate
Requirements Stage Gate
Design Stage Gate
Development Stage Gate
Test Stage Gate
Implementation Stage Gate
O&M Stage Gate
Disposition Stage Gate
Iterative Development (Optional)
EPLC Stages
STAGE GATE
REVIEWS
PROJECT
REVIEWS
Initiation Readiness
Review
Concept Readiness
Review
Planning Readiness
Review
Requirements Readiness
Review
Design Readiness
Review
Development Readiness
Review
Test Readiness
Review
Implementation Readiness
Review
Note: Readiness Reviews are intended to be internal reviews to ensure readiness for the next Stage Gate.
All projects require adequate documentation and deliverables to ensure that they are progressing appropriately to provide management with enough information for informed decision making
Lower risk projects do not need as much documentation to maintain appropriate oversight and control
Tailoring allows you to customize or waive application of particular elements of the EPLC framework like:
• Entire life cycle phases
• Specific activities
• Deliverables
• Project reviews
Not all projects should be tailored. Consider the risk and impact should the project fail to deliver.
Sometimes, one size does not fit all…
What is Tailoring?
Cost:
• For small projects, framework elements (i.e. deliverables) that increase overall project cost significantly may be candidates for tailoring as appropriate.
Risk:
• Framework elements that mitigate low-level risks are candidates for tailoring
Project Type:
• Software Development
• Maintenance or Migration (e.g. Internet Explorer upgrade)
Release Types:
• Software Development Projects (DOS and DBPS)
• Initial Release
• Major Release
• Minor or Operations and Maintenance (O&M) release
• Defect or Emergency release
• Software Installations, Maintenance or Migration Projects (DOT and DOI)
• Best practices under development
Tailoring Considerations
Tailoring Using the Project Process Agreement (PPA)
Created as a collaboration between the IT PM and Business PM
Drafted as early as the Initiation Phase, finalized for a release during the Planning Phase
Documents the reasons why specific phases, activities, deliverables or reviews are adjusted
Approved at the Planning Stage Gate Review
Any subsequent changes must be approved by the IT PM, the Business PM, and the Executive Sponsor.
Retrieve a PPA template from the PMO e-room
Create a Project Process Agreement (PPA)
Fill out this two columns for the release.
Add justification (column G not shown) if needed
- Obtain Signatures
- Load final document into e-room or Clarity
- Send copy to PMO (eplc@fda.hhs.gov)
Fill out these columns for the release.
Add justification if needed.
Create a Project Process Agreement (continued)
Retrieve MS Project schedule template from the e-room
Template for DME or Major Release
Tailor the schedule to your project
1. If you have an existing schedule, copy schedule template (starting at line 2) into existing schedule.
2. Replace x.xx with the 2.0 (release number)
3. Compare with PPA. Remove any artifacts and stage gates that have been waived.
4. Tailor template to project. Add project-specific subtasks under the appropriate Task headings.
5. Add timelines (dates).
IT PM determines which Critical Partner Areas apply to Stage Gate
Lists which Stage Gates each Critical Partner Area participates in and the Critical Partner Resource Managers to contact
IT PM Requests Critical Partners from Critical Partner Resource Managers
Critical Partner Resource Managers
GSD is preparing for the EPLC Requirements Analysis Stage Gate Review.
The EPLC Framework lists the following groups as Critical Partners for the Requirements Analysis Stage Gate Review:
Please assign a primary Critical Partner for your respective area or opt out of the review by providing a short justification. As a Critical Partner, he/she will be expected to do the following:
(1) Confirm Participation He/she will receive a spreadsheet on which they will do the following:
• Confirm that he/she is the primary Critical Partner. Additionally, provide the name of his/her backup who will serve as the Critical Partner in his/her absence.
• Indicate which of the EPLC Artifacts, applicable to your area, that he/she is committing to review.
• Return the spreadsheet to the IT Project Manager
(2) Perform the Review He/she will receive the artifacts for review at least <enter number> business days prior to the Initiation Stage Gate Review. During the review period, he/she will be expected to:
• Review artifacts / documentation relevant to your respective area for completeness, accuracy, adequacy.
• Evaluate the Mandatory Exit Criteria for the Stage Gate.
• Document any known issues and risks relevant to your respective area.
• Answer optional suggested questions.
• Provide a recommendation for Stage Gate Review outcome.
• Return the spreadsheet with his/her recorded results by the designated due date.
(3) Attend the Stage Gate Review
• Listen to IT Project Manager present a review of the State Gate Review Results Report including a discussion of known issues and risks.
• Validate and approve his/her recommendation
• Business
• Enterprise Architecture
• DSIT
• Testing
• Records Management
• 508
EA
Business
Records Mgmt Testing
DSITIT PM
Critical Partner Resource Managers Provide Names of Critical Partners
Critical Partner Resource Managers
IT PM
EA
Business
Records Mgmt Testing
DSIT
Danny Database will be the critical partner for DSIT
Willit Fit will be the critical partner for EA
Isit Traced will be the critical partner for Testing
Imona Mission will be the critical partner for Business
Rita Retention will be the critical partner for Records Mgmt
Doesit Comply will be the critical partner for Section 508
IT PM Prepares Stage Gate Checklists
Retrieve Checklist Template
- Customize List of Artifacts based on PPA.
- If Stage Gate is more than one stage combined, list Artifacts from each Stage
IT PM Communicates the Beginning of the Stage Gate Review Period
Critical Partners
INSERT A SHORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION HERE
The review period of the Clarity Implementation Stage Gate is from Monday, BEGIN DATE thru END DATE
Below are the links to the documentation for review. Please review and score only the documents that are applicable to your area, as you have indicated on the Implementation Stage Gate Spreadsheet (attached). Your responsibilities during the review using the review spreadsheet are:
• Review artifacts / documentation relevant to your respective area for completeness, accuracy, adequacy.
• Evaluate the Mandatory Exit Criteria for the Stage Gate.
• Document any known issues and risks relevant to your respective area.
• Answer optional suggested questions.
• Provide a recommendation for Stage Gate Review outcome.
• Return the spreadsheet with your recorded results to me by COB END DATE.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
IT PM
A
Critical Partners Perform Review
During the review period, Critical Partners are expected to:
A. Review artifacts / documentation relevant to their respective areas for completeness, accuracy, adequacy
B. Evaluate the Mandatory Exit Criteria for the Stage Gate
B
E
Critical Partners Perform Review (continued)
During the review period, Critical Partners are expected to:
C. Document any known issues and risks relevant to their respective areas
D. Answer optional suggested questions
E. Provide a recommendation for Stage Gate Review outcome
C
D
Overall Project Recommendation
Go - move to the next EPLC Stage
Go with Conditions - move to the next EPLC Stage, conditional on corrective action within two weeks
No Go – corrective action and repeat of Stage Gate required
Important: Impact must be considered
“Go/No Go” Guidelines
Average Artifact Score
< 6: No Go
6-8: Go with Conditions
> 8: Go
Mandatory Exit Criteria
> 2: No Go
1: Go with Conditions
0: Go
High Impact/High Probability Risks
> 2: No Go
1: Go with Conditions
0: Go
Critical Partners Return Checklist to IT PM
Danny Database will be the critical partner for DSIT
Danny Database will be the critical partner for DSIT
Danny Database will be the critical partner for DSIT
Danny Database will be the critical partner for DSIT
Danny Database will be the critical partner for DSIT
Danny Database will be the critical partner for DSIT
Critical Partners
IT PM Prepares Stage Gate Materials
Retrieve Results Report Template
Prepare Stage Gate
Report
Prepare Stage Gate Presentation
ENTERPRISE PERFORMANCE LIFECYCLE
GSD
RELEASE 2.0
PLANNING AND REQUIREMENTS
STAGE GATE REVIEW REPORT
IT PM Facilitates the Stage Gate Review
GSD Release 2.0 Planning and Requirements
Stage Gate Review
(1) IT PM presents a review of the State Gate Review Results Report including a discussion of known issues, risks, and lessons learned
(2) Critical Partners validate and approve their outcome recommendations
Stage Gate Outcomes
GO (to the next EPLC Stage)
NO GO
Conditional Go (two weeks to correct issues)
IT PM Communicates Stage Gate Results
IT PM
IT PM finalizes draft Stage Gate Report and sends final report to:
Project Team Critical Partners Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office
A Final Message about EPLC
EPLC
• Is required for all HHS and FDA IT investments, programs and projects
• Authority for the implementation of the EPLC is delegated to the FDA CIO
• Applies to IT projects of all sizes and complexities
• Processes and procedures for IT Projects can be tailored
OIM PMO is engaged in providing guidance and support to the FDA IT project managers:
• Contact eplc@fda.hhs.gov with any questions or suggestions regarding documents
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 1 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 2 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 5 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 6 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 7 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 8 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 9 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 11 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 12 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 13 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 14 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 15 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 16 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 17 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 18 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 19 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 20 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 21 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 25 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 26 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 27 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 28 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 29 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 30 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 31 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 32 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 34 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 35 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 36 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 37 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 38 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 39 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 40 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 41 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 42 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 43 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 44 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 45 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 46 |
| EPLC_TrainingPresentation_3hour_FDA_v1.2 47 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .