Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 74 KB Posted
- Attached to
- EAFB Custodial Services Solicitation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA9301-11-R-0006
About this file
Exhibit 1 - past performance questionairre - to be completed by offeror.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0005.pdf | ||
| Bid Schedule Amendment 0005.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Revised Bid Schedule Amendment 0004.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| FA9301-11-R-0006 Amendment 0004 PDF.pdf | ||
| FA9301-11-R-0006 Price Proposals(1).xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Amendment 0003 PDF.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Final QAs.doc | DOC document | |
| Custodial Industry Day QAs Updated Date.docx | DOCX document | |
| custodial amendment.pdf | ||
| Custodial Industry Day.ppt | PPT presentation | |
| Custodial Industry Day QAs.doc | DOC document | |
| Industry Day Sign-in Sheets.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - CBA.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - DD 254.pdf | ||
| Industry Day.pdf | ||
| custodial solicitation released.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - MESP.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 1 - PWS.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Sensitive Information (See FAR 2.101 & 3.104)
Attachment 4 – Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Base Custodial Services contract at Edwards AFB, CA.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at ________________________________.
Please submit completed questionnaire to the Government Contract Specialist identified on the attached questionnaire.
Contractor Signature
1 Attachment:
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Project Title and Brief Description of Work*: ______________________________________________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ________________ Dollar Amount:$__________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror*: _____________________
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
Title: ______________________
Address: _____________________
Telephone Number: _________________ _____________________________
Fax Number:
Email Address: _____________________
C. Voluntary Protection Program (VPP)
Pursuant to Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) requirements, include your Total Case Incident Rate (TCIR) and Days Away, Restricted or Transferred (DART) rate for the three most recently reported years of each contract submitted for consideration.
On page 6 in the remarks portion, explain in detail any submitted rates that exceed industry averages as defined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (http://www.bls.gov/iif/) according to the applicable contract NAICS code (e.g. for contracts with NAICS codes beginning with 541, rates exceeding 1.1 for TCIR and 0.5 for DART, based on the most recent reported year of data, 2008).
D. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO (E-mail is Preferred Method):
Steve Ostrander
Ashley Schaeffing
AFFTC/PKOB
AFFTC/PKOB
steve.ostrander@edwards.af.mil ashley.schaeffing@edwards.af.mil
E. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:
Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation or N/A if performance in this area is not applicable to the effort addressed.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________
CONTRACT #: _______________
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| Contractor Performance or Situation |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| N/A |
How well did the contractor implement an orderly transition from the incumbent contractor?
How well did the contractor comply with contractual terms and conditions including the preparation of any required documents?
How well did the contractor measure customer satisfaction?
How well did the contractor attract and retain qualified and fully trained personnel at all levels within their organization to ensure contract compliance?
How well does the contractor’s organization provide the necessary manning to meet requirements?
How would you rate the contractor’s critical key management and technical staff in terms of expertise, knowledge and qualifications?
Rate contractor’s ability to respond to workload fluctuations, e.g. budgetary fluctuations that resulted in increased or decreased activities.
How effective was the contractor in identifying and solving technical issues in a timely manner to customer satisfaction?
How well did the contractor use performance measurements and reporting systems to track performance?
How effective and efficient were the contractor’s quality assurance processes?
How willing was the contractor to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns?
How would you rate the overall customer satisfaction rating?
Rate the contractor’s overall management of subcontracts.
How would you rate the contractor’s overall quality of management of Government Furnished Property?
How would you rate the overall performance of the contractor under this contract?
| Was the contractor ever issued a default, cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| If a Government Contract, is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attachment 4
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .