FA8553-20-R-0009-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

JSY

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

FA8553-20-R-0009-0001

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

7 AUG 2020

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

FD2060-20-32575

5. PROJECT NO (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE

FMS TACTICAL AIRLIFT (C-130), AFLCMC/WLKCB

235 BYRON ST STE 19A

BLDG 300 CML PHN 478 926 7204

ROBINS AFB GA 31098-1670

BUYER: Carson J. Best/WLNKB carson.best@us.af.mil Phone: (478) 222- 1919

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6) CODEFA8553

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE

X

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

FA855320R0009

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

31-JUL-2020

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods. ( a ) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; ( b ) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or ( c ) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return 1 copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

FMS REQUIREMENT

ROUTINE

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

BY ________________________________________________________

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY ____________________________________________________

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

FACILITY CODE

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PRESCRIBED BY GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

X

X X

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

FA8553-20-R-0009-0001

Continuation of block 14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

The purpose of this amendment is to:

A. Incorporate the following clauses:

FAR 52.219-16

DFARS 252.225-7052

DFARS 252.226-7001

DFARS 252.232-7017

DFARS 252.244-7000

DFARS 252.247-7028

B. Section J, Incorporate three additional Wage Grade Determinations and combine all Determinations into a single attachment. Each Determination was added based on three CONUS locations the RSAF utilizes (these are listed within Section 1.3 of the PWS).

C. Section L, Incorporate the legend offerors are to include at the bottom of each proposal page that contains proprietary information. The legend is as follows:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION -- SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

D. Section M, Revise the language within Volume III (A) as follows:

FROM:

Volume III, Price Factor: The Offeror’s submission for the demonstration project will be evaluated for reasonableness in accordance with paragraph (A). A Total Evaluated Price (TEP) will be calculated in accordance with paragraph (B) below.

(A) Reasonableness: The existence of adequate price competition is expected to support a determination of price reasonableness. Price analysis techniques may be used to further validate price reasonableness. If adequate price competition is not realized or if price reasonableness cannot be determined using price analysis of Government obtained information, additional information in accordance with FAR 15.4 may be required to support the proposed price.

TO:

Volume III, Price Factor: The Offeror’s proposed price submission will be evaluated for reasonableness in accordance with paragraph (A). A Total Evaluated Price (TEP) will be calculated in accordance with paragraph (B) below.

(A) Reasonableness: The existence of adequate price competition is expected to support a determination of price reasonableness. Price comparison analysis techniques will be used to validate price reasonableness. If adequate price competition is not

Amendment/Modification FA8553-20-R-0009-0001 realized or if price reasonableness cannot be determined using price analysis of Government obtained information, additional information in accordance with FAR 15.4 may be required to support the proposed price.

E. All CLINs are restated for tracking purposes only.

F. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

SECTION B

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS

On-Call Center

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

12 MO

R706 On-Call Center IAW PWS Para 4.14

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Standard Inspection Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Written Notice of Award _ Req No / Pri

Required Period of Performance

12 MO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

12 MO

Repair/Maintenance

Item No.

Time & Material Estimated Quantity

U/I Estimated Amount Ceiling Price

1 LO To be Determined

J015 IAW PWS para: 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.2, 4.6.3, 4.6.4, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9 and attached pricing matrix

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Repair/Maintenance

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Certificate of Conformance Foreign Military Sales :FMS Case:

Exempt From Foreign Disclosure Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Written Notice of Award _ Req No / Pri

Required Period of Performance

1 LO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

1 LO

Travel

Item No.

Cost Reimbursement - No Fee Quantity U/I Unit Price Total Estimated Cost

1 LO

TRAV

TRAVEL AS APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY CONTRACTING OFFICER

TRAVEL IN SUPPORT OF CLIN 0002. TRAVEL REIMBURSED IAW FAR 31.2

IAW PWS para 4.4 and 4.4.1

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Standard Inspection Foreign Military Sales :FMS Case:

Data

Item No.

Not Separately Priced Quantity U/I Unit Price

1 LO NSP

DATA

DATA

CDRLs A001, A002, A003, A004, A005, A006, A007, A008, A009, A010, A011, A012, A013, A014, A015, A016

Data

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: IAW DD FORM 1423 Exhibit: A Quality Assurance: IAW DD FORM 1423 Foreign Military Sales :FMS Case:

OPTION I: The Government may exercise Option I in accordance with FAR 52.217-9, within 12 months after award.

On-Call Center

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

12 MO

R706 On-Call Center IAW PWS Para 4.14

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Standard Inspection Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Written Notice of Award _ Req No / Pri

Required Period of Performance

12 MO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

12 MO

Repair/Maintenance

Item No.

Time & Material Estimated Quantity

U/I Estimated Amount Ceiling Price

1 LO To be Determined

J015

Repair/Maintenance

IAW PWS para: 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.2, 4.6.3, 4.6.4, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9 and attached pricing matrix

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Certificate of Conformance Exempt From Foreign Disclosure Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Written Notice of Award _ Req No / Pri

Required Period of Performance

1 LO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

1 LO

Travel

Item No.

Cost Reimbursement - No Fee Quantity U/I Unit Price Total Estimated Cost 1 LO To be Negotiated

TRAV

TRAVEL AS APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY CONTRACTING OFFICER

TRAVEL IN SUPPORT OF CLIN 1002. TRAVEL REIMBURSED IAW FAR 31.2

IAW PWS para 4.4 and 4.4.1

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Standard Inspection Foreign Military Sales :FMS Case:

Data

Item No.

Not Separately Priced Quantity U/I Unit Price

1 LO NSP

Data

CDRLs A001, A002, A003, A004, A005, A006, A007, A008, A009, A010, A011, A012, A013, A014, A015, A016

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: IAW DD FORM 1423 Exhibit: A Quality Assurance: IAW DD FORM 1423 Foreign Military Sales :FMS Case:

OPTION II: The Government may exercise Option II in accordance with FAR 52.217-9 within 24 months after award.

On-Call Center

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

12 MO

R706 On-Call Center IAW PWS Para 4.14

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Standard Inspection Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Written Notice of Award _ Req No / Pri

Required Period of Performance

12 MO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

12 MO

Repair/Maintenance

Item No.

Time & Material Estimated Quantity

U/I Estimated Amount Ceiling Price

1 LO To be Determined

Repair/Maintenance

J015 IAW PWS para: 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.2, 4.6.3, 4.6.4, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9 and attached pricing matrix

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Certificate of Conformance Exempt From Foreign Disclosure Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Written Notice of Award _ Req No / Pri

Required Period of Performance

1 LO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

1 LO

Travel

Item No.

Cost Reimbursement - No Fee Quantity U/I Unit Price Total Estimated Cost

1 LO

TRAV

TRAVEL AS APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY CONTRACTING OFFICER

TRAVEL IN SUPPORT OF CLIN 2002. TRAVEL REIMBURSED IAW FAR 31.2

IAW PWS para 4.4 and 4.4.1

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Standard Inspection Foreign Military Sales :FMS Case:

Data

Item No.

Not Separately Priced Quantity U/I Unit Price

1 LO NSP

Data

DATA

CDRLs A001, A002, A003, A004, A005, A006, A007, A008, A009, A010, A011, A012, A013, A014, A015, A016

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: IAW DD FORM 1423 Exhibit: A Quality Assurance: IAW DD FORM 1423 Foreign Military Sales :FMS Case:

PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES

SECTION I

CONTRACT CLAUSES

52.219-16 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (JAN 1999)

(IAW FAR 19.708(b)(2))

252.225-7052 RESTRICTION ON THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN MAGNETS AND TUNGSTEN

(DEC 2019)

(IAW DFARS 225.7018-5)

252.226-7001 UTILIZATION OF INDIAN ORGANIZATIONS, INDIAN-OWNED ECONOMIC

ENTERPRISES, AND NATIVE HAWAIIAN SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS (APR 2019)

(IAW DFARS 226.104)

252.232-7017 ACCELERATING PAYMENTS TO SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTORS -

PROHIBITION ON FEES AND CONSIDERATION (APR 2020)

(IAW DFARS 232.009-2)

252.244-7000 SUBCONTRACTS FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS AND COMMERCIAL COMPONENTS

(DOD CONTRACTS) (JUN 2013)

(IAW DFARS 244.403)

252.247-7028 APPLICATION FOR U.S. GOVERNMENT SHIPPING

DOCUMENTATION/INSTRUCTIONS (JUN 2012)

(IAW DFARS 247.207)

PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS, AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

SECTION J

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Form Number Description/File Name Date Number of Pages Wage Determinations 07AUG2020 48

PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION L

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS OR RESPONDENTS

Proposal Format

General: The following instructions cover the preparation and submittal of the offeror’s proposal for this solicitation. Offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Offerors are cautioned that any noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the RFP may cause their proposal to be determined not eligible for award. If a joint venture arrangement exists for this acquisition, the offeror shall provide a copy of the joint venture agreement that is signed and dated by all joint venture members as part of the proposal submission. Offerors shall submit only one proposal for the Royal Saudi Air Force (RSAF) C-130 On-Call Maintenance Support contract as the Government will review only one proposal per offeror/joint venture. Proposals must be received by Carson Best and Leon Castellano no later than the date and time specified in Block 13 on the face page of the RFP.

Communications: Exchanges of source selection information between the Government and offerors will be controlled by the Contracting Officer. Exchanges of source selection information, after submission of the initial proposal packages, between the Government and offerors, will be controlled by the Contracting Officer. Offerors shall submit their initial proposal through the DoD SAFE site (https://safe.apps.mil/). In order to utilize DoD SAFE, the offeror must send an email to the Contract Specialist Carson Best (carson.best@us.af.mil) and Contracting Officer Leon Castellano (leon.castellano@us.af.mil) and request a drop-off link. This link will allow the offeror to upload each volume of the proposal and all necessary documents for the Government to evaluate. All submittals shall be encrypted when dropped off in DoD SAFE by clicking the “Encrypt every file” checkbox and providing a passcode. The offeror shall request a drop-off link no later than five calendar days before the solicitation due date specified in Black 13 of the face page. All other regular communication may take place through normal email provided no sensitive source selection information and/or attachments are involved.

Volume Organization

General: Proposals shall be submitted to the Government in three (3) separate volumes as set forth below:

Volume Page Limits Description I N/A Completed RFP II 25 Written Technical Proposal III N/A Price Proposal

In addition to the page limitations set forth above, proposals shall comply with the following format:

Each volume shall be marked with the RFP number, the offeror’s name and address, and the number of the Volume, i.e. I, II, III, etc. Proposals shall be in the English language and all monies shall be proposed in United States dollars.

Print shall be no smaller than a font size of 12 and margins shall be no smaller than 1 inch and each page within a volume shall be numbered consecutively. Elaborate formats, bindings, or color presentations are not desired or required.

The page limitation for Volume II, Written Technical Proposal, is 25 pages. The page limitation includes any charts, graphs, drawings, diagrams, supporting illustrations, spreadsheets, etc., but excludes any cover page, table of contents or list of acronyms (if utilized). Offerors are cautioned that any pages that exceed the page limitations shall not be read but shall be removed and either retained in the contract file without being considered in the evaluation, or, sent back to the offeror.

Page limitations may be placed on Evaluation Notices (ENs), if issued. The specified limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offerors or on the EN form itself.

Each page containing proprietary information should be so marked.

Each page should contain the following legend at the bottom of each sheet:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION -- SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Volume I, Completed RFP

General: Volume I will consist of the completed and signed RFP, including any amendments issued, with a cover letter delineating any exceptions taken to the RFP terms and conditions with accompanying rationale. However, offerors are cautioned that any noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the RFP may cause their proposal to be determined not eligible for award. Offerors shall ensure that all clauses and provisions that require “fill-in” information are appropriately completed, including the proposed prices associated with the contract line items in the Schedule of the RFP.

Volume II, Written Technical Proposal

General: The written technical proposal shall be clear, concise, and include all the information required by this provision in sufficient detail for effective evaluation.

The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of their capabilities, work processes, facilities, and experience as the Government will base its evaluation only on the information presented in the offeror’s technical proposal.

Format and Specific Content: The following information shall be provided in the written technical proposal and will be evaluated to assess technical acceptability in accordance with Section M, Evaluation Basis for Award. The written technical proposal shall describe the offeror’s proposed approach to performing the requirements set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) within a provided demonstration project. The offeror’s written technical proposal shall provide the essential components to accomplish the demonstration project as well as convey that the offeror fully understands the requirement. The proposal shall include all required elements of work to complete the project in accordance with the PWS requirements.

Demonstration Project:

General: The offeror’s written technical proposal shall provide the essential components to accomplish the demonstration project as well as convey the offeror fully understands the requirement. The proposal shall include all required elements of work to complete the project as shown below.

Project Description:

Incident Location: Dover Del. Dover AFB Issue 1: #3 engine generator light out, no load, good voltage and frequency Issue 2: #4 engine propeller oil leak Issue 3: #4 engine oil cooler flap stuck at 40%

Troubleshooting Ran engines found #2 and #4 propellers leaking excessively #3 generator out #4 flap oil cooler door was stuck

Repairs Remove and replace #3 and #4 props Remove and replace oil cooler flap actuator on #4 Remove and replace #3 generator control panel

Required Elements: The elements listed below must be addressed in full for the demonstration project technical proposal.

Provide a detailed work plan of the demonstration project which details how each stage will be accomplished including materials, equipment, number of personnel involved for each element and subcontractors that will be utilized. The work plan must sequentially address project completion from one step to the next; copying and pasting major elements of the PWS “IS NOT” acceptable. The contractor must exhibit and apply their expertise of project planning.

Volume III, Cost/Price:

General Instructions:

The offeror shall submit cost and pricing information in Volume III. The offeror shall complete the RFP Attachment 4, “CLIN 0002 Price Spreadsheet” in addition to Schedule B in the RFP. If discrepancies between RFP Attachment 4 and Schedule B arise, the prices in Attachment 4 will take precedence. Note: Attachment 4 includes labor categories that have been utilized for similar requirements in the past. Offerors are not required to utilize all labor categories within the attachment. However, once the contract has been awarded, the labor categories proposed by the offeror will be the only billable categories when submitting invoices.

Proposed unit/CLIN prices shall be rounded to the nearest whole dollar. If any proposed unit/CLIN price does not meet the required rounding, the Government will round that unit/CLIN price to the nearest whole dollar. The Government adjusted unit/CLIN price will become the offeror’s proposed amount.

Data beyond that is required by this instruction shall not be submitted. All data relating to the proposed price, including all required supporting documentation, must be included in the section of the proposal designated as the Price volume. Under no circumstances shall this data and documentation be included elsewhere in the proposal

Compliance with these requirements is mandatory and failure to comply may result in rejection of the proposal.

In accordance with FAR 15.403-1(b) and 15.403-3(a), data other than certified cost or pricing data may be required to support a determination of price reasonableness. Data shall be provided in accordance with FAR 15.403-5. If, after receipt of proposals, the CO determines that there is insufficient data available to determine price reasonableness and none of the exceptions in FAR 15.403-1 apply, the offeror shall be required to submit additional cost or pricing data.

In accordance with DFARS 215.371-3, cost and pricing data may be required in the event only one offer is received. If no exception in FAR 15.403-1(b) applies, the cost and pricing data shall be certified.

PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION M

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS OR RESPONDENTS

14. Basis for Contract Award.

13. Source Selection Methodology: This acquisition will utilize the Lowest Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedure in accordance with FAR 15.101-2 and 15.3 as supplemented by the DoD Source Selection Procedures referenced in DFARS 215.300 to make an integrated assessment for a best value award decision. A decision on the technical acceptability of each offeror’s proposal will be made. Among those offerors who are determined to be technically acceptable, award will be made to the offeror having the lowest total evaluated price. Offerors are reminded that the Government will only evaluate one proposal from each offeror. Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal is technically acceptable, conforms to all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, technical requirements, and also provides the best value to the Government based on the results of the evaluation paragraph II below.

15. Proposal Evaluation: The evaluation process will be accomplished as follows (organized by volume.)

General

Discussion: The Government intends to award without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined necessary. Any discussions will be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.306.

Evaluation Process: Below is the list of steps the Government will take to evaluate each proposal.

Initial Proposal Submittal (Step 1): The Government will evaluate the Technical Proposal for technical acceptability. If the proposal receive an “Unacceptable” rating that offeror will no longer be considered for award.

Step 2: The Government will calculate each remaining offeror’s Total Evaluated Price (TEP) and conduct an analysis of the reasonableness of the proposed price IAW with paragraph D. Volume III Price Factor (A) and

(B) below. If any of the proposals are evaluated as unreasonable, the proposal will no longer be considered for award.

Award Decision: The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. If the Government conducts Discussions, and an “Unacceptable” rating is not resolved, the offeror will be ineligible for award.

Volume I, Completed RFP

The Government is expecting a completed and signed RFP, including any amendments issued, with a cover letter delineating any exceptions taken to the RFP terms and conditions with accompanying rationale. Offerors shall ensure that all clauses and provisions that require “fill-in” information are appropriately completed, including the proposed prices associated with the contract line items in the Schedule of the RFP.

Volume II, Technical Factor

General: Each Offeror’s written technical proposal shall be evaluated to determine if the offeror provides a sound, compliant approach to the Demonstration Project that meets the requirements of the RSAF C-130 On-Call Maintenance Support PWS and demonstrates a thorough knowledge and understanding of those requirements.

Completeness of the Demonstration Project

This is met when the offeror’s written technical proposal adequately identifies the essential components to accomplish the Demonstration Project in accordance with the PWS. The proposal shall include all required elements of work to complete the Demonstration Project in accordance with the PWS.

Demonstration Project

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings:

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Volume III, Price Factor: The Offeror’s proposed price submission will be evaluated for reasonableness in accordance with paragraph (A). A Total Evaluated Price (TEP) will be calculated in accordance with paragraph (B) below.

(A) Reasonableness: The existence of adequate price competition is expected to support a determination of price reasonableness. Price comparison analysis techniques will be used to validate price reasonableness. If adequate price competition is not realized or if price reasonableness cannot be determined using price analysis of Government obtained information, additional information in accordance with FAR 15.4 may be required to support the proposed price.

(B) TEP:

For Firm Fixed Price (FFP) CLINs: Offerors will propose a Unit price and a Total price for each FFP CLIN. Failure to bid all tasks will result in the offer being determined not eligible for award. The Government will multiply the quantity by the unit price to calculate the amount of the total FFP CLIN dollar amount. All FFP CLINs will be added together to calculate the FFP total dollar amount (Option CLINs Included).

For Time and Materials (T&M) CLINs: Offerors will propose rates within Attachment 4,”CLIN 0002 pricing spreadsheet”. The T&M rates will be multiplied by a Government evaluation quantity of labor hours and material costs. The Time portion shall be proposed as loaded labor rates for the applicable performance year IAW FAR 52.232-7. The Material portion shall be proposed as material handling factor rates for the applicable performance year IAW FAR 52.232-7. The Time portion and Material portion will be added together to calculate the total T&M evaluated CLIN price. All T&M CLINs will be added together to calculate the T&M total price (Option CLINs Included).

Total T&M price will then be summed with the FFP total price to calculate the Total Evaluated Price for each offeror.

Note 1: T&M TEP shall NOT be entered in volume I the RFP.

Note 2: Cost Reimbursable travel & per diem line should be proposed, but will NOT be included in TEP.

Note 3: Data CLINs shall not be proposed.