Attach_1_Present-Past_Performance_-_FACTS_Sheet.pdf
PDF 39 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Aircraft Components and Accessories Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8524-13-R-30168
About this file
Attachment 1
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Packaging_Requirement_03.pdf | ||
| Attach_5_Consent_Form.pdf | ||
| Packaging_Requirement_01.pdf | ||
| Proposal_Adequacy_Checklist.pdf | ||
| Attach_3_Transmittal_Letter_for_Government_Sources_to_Accompany_Present-Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Pricing_Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| CAV_II_SOW.pdf | ||
| Packaging_Requirement_02.pdf | ||
| Packaging_Requirement_00.pdf | ||
| Attach_4_Client_Authorization_Letter.pdf | ||
| Attach_2_PAST-PRESENT_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf | ||
| Appendix_C_FD2060-13-30168.pdf | ||
| PWS_Final_13_Feb_13_changes_IA.pdf | ||
| Form1423_1330168_00_6.pdf | ||
| FA852413R30168.pdf | ||
| Form1423_1330168_00_4.pdf | ||
| Form1423_1330168_00_5.pdf | ||
| Form1423_1330168_00_1.pdf | ||
| Form1423_1330168_00_2.pdf | ||
| Form1423_1330168_00.pdf | ||
| Form2875_1330168_00.pdf | ||
| Form1423_1330168_00_3.pdf |
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
RFP # FA8524-13-R-30168
ATTACHMENT # 1
FACTS Sheet
Present/Past Performance “FACTS Sheet”
(TO BE COMPLETED BY
OFFEROR, JOINT VENTURE
PARTNER, AND IF APPLICABLE,
CRITICAL SUBCONTRACTOR)
Complete a separate FACTS Sheet for each relevant contract. See Clause L- 900 of this RFP for detailed instructions and limits on number and recency of contracts. Offeror is requested to provide frank, concise comments regarding present/past performance on the program identified in B. below.
A. OFFEROR: (1) Name (Company/Division), (2) Address: (3) CAGE Code
B. PROGRAM TITLE and CONTRACT NUMBER:
C. ROLE of the OFFEROR in EFFORT: Prime Contractor / Subcontractor
Note that the information provided in the FACTS Sheet shall reflect the role that the offeror performed in the effort, i.e. an offeror who performed as a subcontractor shall identify the contract type, dollar value, description, etc. of its subcontract with the prime contractor.
D. NAME OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY OR CUSTOMER:
E. CONTRACT TYPE(S) – (Check all that apply)
1. Firm Fixed Price
2. Time & Materials
3. Cost
4. Other (Explain)
F. CONTRACT $ VALUE: (If you performed work as a subcontractor, identify your contract $ value and the PRIME’s contract $ value, if known. Describe any changes in dollar value that may have occurred from time of contract award to the conclusion of the effort or the present, whichever is applicable.)
1. Original Contract Dollar value
2. Current Dollar Value:
3. If Award Fee Contract, what percentages of the fee have been awarded in each of last 3 years?
G. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: (includes start and end dates, i.e. Jan 2004-Dec 2007)
1. Original Schedule
2. Current Schedule (if changed)
3. Estimated percentage of completion:
4. How many times changed and primary causes of changes:
H. QUANTITIES of ITEMS INVOLVED in the EFFORT:
1. Quantities ordered
2. Quantities delivered
I. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EFFORT:
1. Provide a brief narrative description of the effort. Be sure to highlight portions of the narrative considered most relevant to the current acquisition and be sure to include the following:
a. Address how and to what extent the proposed effort relates to the program identified in
B. above.
b. Provide (in table form) Part Number, National Stock Number, Noun, and, if applicable, Aircraft application for items involved in program identified in B. above.
c. Include details to support the offeror’s record for on-time delivery, technical quantity and cost control for this effort identified in paragraph B. above.
2. To supplement the data provided in response to this paragraph, complete the following regarding relevancy of the effort identified in paragraph B to the proposed effort. This is limited to two pages beyond the page limitation of the FACTS sheet information.
This table will assist the PCO in evaluating the relevancy of the effort identified in paragraph B to the proposed effort. Offerors shall only complete column three. Offerors answers are applicable only to the effort identified in paragraph B. above. Please be as specific as possible with the fill-in information provided.
RELEVANCY TABLE
(Complete with each effort submitted for evaluation.)
Category
Fill-in for the Proposed Effort (GOVT has completed this column) DO NOT CHANGE
Fill-in for the Effort Identified in para. B above (Offeror completes)
Nature of Overhaul of Military Large Cargo Aircraft Components
Business Involved
Overhaul of Commercial Large Cargo Aircraft Components
Overhaul of Military or Commercial Aircraft Components
Other (Describe)
Type(s) of System(s)/ Technology
Hydraulic Actuators/Cylinders
Electro-mechanical actuators
Cable Tension Regulators
Hydraulic Valves
Gearboxes
Servo Assemblies
Wire Rope Hoists
Winches
Engine Oil Coolers
Pressure Regulators
Fill Receptacles
Other (List)
3. If you are small business, or, if you are a large business and a Small Business Subcontracting Plan per FAR 52.219-9 were NOT required by this effort, indicate your compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, by completing the following. That is, when subcontracting possibilities existed on this effort, did you award subcontracts to small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance? If FAR 52.219-8 was NOT included in this effort, whenever subcontracting possibilities existed in the performance of this effort, address whether or not it was your policy to utilize small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled Veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance.
Utilization of Small Business Concerns
Small Business Large Business
No subcontracting possibilities
In compliance Not in compliance (address why)
4. If you are a large business, identify whether a subcontracting plan in accordance with FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, was required by this effort. If one was required, complete the following regarding subcontracting goals and status-to-date. If goals were not met, please explain. This is applicable to large businesses only.
Required:
Not Required:
J. PRIMARY POINTS OF CONTACT: (The offeror is responsible for exerting its best efforts to ensure that current information is provided for all individuals.)
Name and Office Symbol Phone Number FAX Number
1. Procuring Contracting Officer/Contract Negotiator or equivalent
DSN & Comm DSN & Comm
2. Administrative Contracting Officer/Contract Administrator or equivalent
DSN & Comm DSN & Comm
3. Program/Project Manager, or equivalent DSN & Comm DSN & Comm
K. If the offeror or joint venture partner (if applicable) is a newly formed entity who either has no prior contracts or does not possess relevant corporate past performance, but does have key personnel with relevant past performance, but does have key personnel with relevant past performance while employed by another company, specify by name, such key individual(s) who will participate in the proposed effort under this acquisition who also participated in the program identified in B. above, and indicate their contract role. Describe how participation of these key personnel contributed to the success of the previous effort and how this indicates probability of success on the proposed effort.
L. Use this space to address any aspect about this program considered unique. Describe quality awards or certifications that indicate the offeror possesses a high-quality process for developing and producing the product/service required.
M. Summarize contract issues relative to the number and severity of quality deficiencies recorded/contract discrepancy reports issued, cure notices, show cause letters, termination for default or cause, disputes, claims, latent defects; and, corrective actions taken for the contract listed in paragraph B. above.
N. Additionally, for those efforts where you are cognizant of unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports previously assessed by customers or clients, but feel that significant progress has been made but not yet credited or formally documented, provide the program name, contract number, customer location and a narrative explaining "fixes" made to date, or any other information regarding the unfavorable/marginal assessment. This narrative portion is limited to one (1) additional page beyond the FACTS sheet required page limitation. It is not presumed that performance has been perfect. Rather, the proposal should contain evidence of the offeror's ability to isolate the root causes of problems and should describe programs or actions taken to resolve those causes. Demonstrated corrective actions (not just planned or promised), and the overall work record will be considered. Problems not addressed, but found by the Government during the evaluation of the information in this volume, will be assumed to still exist. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/ circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.
O. Was this contract effort (as identified in paragraph B. above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous WR-ALC procurement. Yes No . If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.
PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror's opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .