13-30337_QASP.pdf

PR: FD2060-13-30337 QASP REVISION: 0 1

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

For

Technical Order 1F-15A-36, Nondestuctive Inspection, Update

8 April 2013

I. Performance Management

A. Objectives To provide high-quality, necessary, non-destructive inspection procedures to field and depot F-15 maintainers. The QASP will provide oversight capability to make certain that the contractor is delivering products and/or services that conform to contract requirements. It will also identify the methods used for evaluation and surveillance of the contractor.

B. Results

This acquisition will benefit the United States Air Force (USAF) by providing a complete revision of Technical Order 1F-15A-36. This revision will contain up-to-date criteria and inspection procedures for all F-15 areas of interest. These inspections will assist with maintaining the safety and integrity of the F-15 fleet.

C. General Multi-Functional Team (MFT) Responsibilities

1. Fostering partnerships with industry to ensure cooperation and exchange of information occur.

2. Conducting market research to identify commercial products and services which already exist, product developments, technological advancements, suppliers’ capabilities, new vendors, and commercial best practices. Providing findings to the person responsible for preparing the market research report.

3. Identifying Government requirements.

4. Ensuring the acquisition is linked to the USAF mission.

5. Ensuring the acquisition utilizes Performance-Based Service(s) Acquisition (PBSA) methods. Developing, implementing and executing an acquisition strategy including metrics to evaluate Contractor performance and incentives to encourage the highest level of Contractor performance.

PR: FD2060-13-30337 QASP REVISION: 0 2

6. Planning, programming, and budgeting adequate funds to ensure the acquisition is within approved funding.

7. Developing, implementing and executing a source selection that provides a thorough assessment of the proposal(s) of the offeror(s) and the best value for the Government.

8. Ensuring an Initial Contract Performance Review (30-Day Review) is conducted in accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 63-101, Acquisition and Sustainment Life Cycle Management, paragraph 4.9. Proactively reporting significant variances in quality of services, cost and/or schedule to Government management throughout the contract/order Period of Performance (PoP).

9. Developing, implementing, and executing Contractor performance measurement and management in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).

10. Developing, implementing and managing milestones to ensure the Contractor is on schedule for meeting Government requirements within the contract/order PoP.

11. Conducting surveillance of Contractor performance to ensure Government requirements including quality of services, cost and/or schedule are met. Providing results of surveillance to the Contracting Officer’s Representative(s) [COR(s)] for input into the Performance Assessment Report (PAR) and the person updating the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

12. Identifying opportunities to improve Contractor performance throughout the life of the contract/order including benchmarking against industry. Promoting initiatives to improve Contractor performance, assessing the risks associated with initiatives, using the QASP to implement initiatives, and monitoring the success of implementation.

13. Ensuring customer needs are met.

D. Specific Multi-Functional Team (MFT) Members Roles and Responsibilities

1. Program Manager (PM)

a. Responsible for overall program.

b. Serves as MFT lead.

c. Works with the MFT to identify Government requirements and prepare Purchase Request (PR) package.

d. Prepares market research report.

e. Prepares and submits Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs).

2. Engineer

a. Works with MFT in conducting market research.

b. Prepares market research report.

c. Prepares Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) Form 807, Recommended

PR: FD2060-13-30337 QASP REVISION: 0 3

Quality Assurance Provisions and Special Inspection Requirements

d. Works with MFT in developing other technical documents for PR package.

3. Data Management Officer (DMO)

a. Participates in acquisition strategy planning in accordance with local Operating

Instruction (OI) 63-003, Data Management/Contract Data Requirements List Process, paragraph 2.3.2.

b. Assists in preparation of Data Item Descriptions (DIDs) in accordance with OI 63-003, paragraph 2.3.3. Validates DIDs in accordance with OI 63-003, paragraph 2.3.7.

c. Assists in preparation of Department of Defense (DD) Form 1423s, Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs). Reviews and validates CDRLs in accordance with OI 63-003, paragraph 2.3.6. Ensures CDRL references match Performance-based Work Statement (PWS) paragraphs in accordance with OI 63-003, paragraph

2.3.4. Acts as Approving Official (AO) for CDRLs in accordance with OI 63- 003, paragraphs 2.3.11 and 3.3.3. Assists in preparation of revisions to CDRLs after contract/order award in accordance with OI 63-003, paragraph 2.3.12.

d. Reviews draft PR package and CDRL Data Call Worksheet and forwards to applicable external organizations in accordance with OI 63-003, paragraphs 2.3.9 and 3.1.2.1.

e. Schedules Data Requirements Review Board (DRRB) in accordance with OI 63-

003, paragraphs 2.3.10 and 3.1.2.2. Invites representatives from applicable external organizations to the DRRB in accordance with OI 63-003, paragraph

3.2.2. l. Co-chairs DRRB in accordance with OI 63-003, paragraphs 2.3.10 and 3.2.1.

4. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

a. Works with MFT in conducting surveillance on Contractor performance and evaluating Contractor performance.

b. Reports unethical conduct and instances of fraud, waste and/or abuse to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) in accordance with Under Secretary of Defense memorandum, DoD Standard for Certification of Contracting Officer's Representatives (COR) for Service Acquisitions, dated Mar 29 2010.

c. Documents Contractor performance via PARs, Corrective Action Reports (CARs), etc.

d. Issues PARs, at a minimum, bi-monthly, and negative PARs or CARs as required.

e. Provides reports (e.g., PARs, CARs, etc.) on Contractor performance to the PCO in accordance with Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS) Mandatory Procedure (MP) 5301.602-2(d), Designation, Assignment, and Responsibilities of a Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) [revised November 7, 2012], paragraph 2.9.

PR: FD2060-13-30337 QASP REVISION: 0 4

f. Establishes and maintains a COR surveillance folder in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d), paragraph 2.5 and Under Secretary of Defense memorandum, DoD Standard for Certification of Contracting Officer's Representatives (COR) for Service Acquisition.

g. Monitors Contractor payment and verifies it is commensurate with Contractor performance in accordance with Under Secretary of Defense memorandum, DoD Standard for Certification of Contracting Officer's Representatives (COR) for Service Acquisition

5. Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC)

a. Supports the MFT in the development of the contract/order quality assurance requirements specifically ensuring the requirements are clearly stated and enforceable in accordance with AFFARS MP5346.103, Contracting Office Responsibilities / The Quality Assurance Program [revised November 7, 2012], paragraph 1.c.(2).

b. Provides training to CORs and COR management (e.g., Functional Commander/Functional Director (FC/FD), COR supervisor, etc.) in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d), paragraph 4.1.

6. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

a. Only individual authorized to enter into contracts for supplies and services by obligating the Government.

b. Advises the MFT on PWS and QASP development including incentives and remedies tied to performance objectives and performance thresholds.

c. Develops and awards a contract/order based on MFT requirements and acquisition strategy.

d. Determines if COR(s) are required to conduct/document surveillance of Contractor performance in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d). Submits

Request for Contracting Officer’s Representative Support to requiring activity.

Upon receipt of the Nomination of Contracting Officer’s Representative from the COR Supervisor, submits Designation of Contracting Officer’s Representative to the COR(s) and Contractor for signature thereby ensuring the Contractor is notified of the COR(s) assigned to the contract/order and their areas of responsibility and limitation of authority. Upon transfer/termination of the COR(s), issues a Revocation of Designation of Contracting Officer’s Representative.

e. Ensures contract-specific training is provided to the COR(s) in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d), paragraph 1.4.

f. Reviews COR reports, e.g., PARs, on Contractor performance in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602-2(d), paragraph 1.6.

g. Responsible for administration of the contract/order except as delegated to the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO).

h. Monitors Contractor performance to ensure compliance with contractual requirements.

i. Takes action, if necessary, to enforce contractual requirements.

PR: FD2060-13-30337 QASP REVISION: 0 5

j. Approves travel requests for Contractor personnel.

7. Contractor

a. Participates as a member of the MFT upon approval of Justification & Approval (J&A) if sole source and upon contract/order award if competitive acquisition.

b. Responsible for ensuring personnel, information, system, facility, and international security requirements are met in accordance with DoD 5200.2-R, Personnel Security Program; DoD 5200.22-M, National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM); DoD Directive (DoDD) 5205.02E, DoD Operations Security (OPSEC) Program; DoD Manual 5205.02-M, DoD Operations Security (OPSEC) Program Manual; AFI 31-101, Integrated Defense;

and Robins Air Force Base Instruction (RAFBI) 31-101, Installation Security.

c. Complies with contractual requirements including the PWS and CDRLs.

d. Performs services required by the contract/order including the PWS and CDRLs.

e. Provides the Government with contractual deliverables and other requested data by which metrics will be developed and Contractor performance will be evaluated.

f. Provides an annual count of Contractor personnel performing services for the DoD in accordance with the SAF/AQ Memorandum, Implementation of FY11 NDAA Section 8108 [of Public Law 112-10 of the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011], Contractor Inventory, if the acquisition is equal to or greater than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT) [currently $150,000.00], if the acquisition is using U.S. Government appropriated funds, and if the DoD is the requiring activity. Reports all Contractor labor hours, including subcontractor labor hours, required for performance of the services provided under the contract at the Contract Manpower Reporting Application (CMRA) website:

http://www.ecmra.mil.

g. Signs and returns a PAR within five business days.

h. Signs and returns a negative PAR with corrective action identified within 10 business days.

i. Signs and returns a CAR with corrective action plan by the suspense date.

8. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) Supervisor

a. Upon receipt of Request for Contracting Officer’s Representative Support from the PCO, submits Nomination of Contracting Officer’s Representative to the PCO.

b. Reviews Contractor performance documentation prepared by the COR(s) on a regular basis. At a minimum, the COR Supervisor will review the AFSC/PZCA COR Surveillance Folder Checklists completed by the COR(s).

c. Considers COR duties in appraisal(s) in accordance with AFFARS MP5301.602- 2(d), which references the Deputy Secretary of Defense memorandum, Monitoring Contract Performance in Contracts for Services, dated 22 Aug 08; the Under Secretary of Defense memorandum, Designation of Contracting Officer’s Representatives on Contracts for Services in Support of Department of Defense Requirements, dated 6 Dec 06; and the signed Nomination of Contracting Officer’s Representative memorandum, paragraph 10.

PR: FD2060-13-30337 QASP REVISION: 0 6

9. Functional Commander/Functional Director (FC/FD)

a. The Functional Commander or civilian equivalent will determine if services are mission-essential and will continue in the event of a crisis in accordance with Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.237-7023, Continuation of Essential Contractor Services and AFI 10-403, Deployment Planning and Execution, paragraph 1.9.1.33.2.

b. The [Functional] Commander will ensure mission-essential services are addressed in the PWS in accordance with AFI 10-403, paragraph 1.9.1.33.2.

Note: The Functional Commander or civilian equivalent has determined these services are not mission-essential and will not continue in the event of a crisis.

Reference PWS paragraph 4.3.2, Continuation of Mission-essential Services During a Crisis and QASP signature page.

10. Services Designated Official (SDO)

a. In accordance with Public Law 107–107 - Dec. 28, 2001, National Defense

Authorization Act [NDAA] for Fiscal Year 2002, Section 2330, (a) Procurement of services: management structure, (2)(A) and (B), the designated official is responsible for the management of the procurement of services for military department, defense agencies and other defense components.

b. In accordance with Public Law 107–107, Section 2330, (b) Contracting Responsibilities of Designated Officials, (1), the designated official is responsible for ensuring services are procured by means of contracts/orders that are in the best interests of the DoD and are entered into or issued and managed in compliance with applicable statutes, regulations, directives, and other requirements and approving, in advance, any procurement of services through the use of a contract/order that is not performance-based or a contract entered into, or an order issued, by an official of the United States (U.S.) outside the DoD.

c. Responsible for ensuring an Initial Contract Performance Review (30-Day Review) is conducted in accordance with AFI 63-101, paragraph 4.9.

d. Responsible for ensuring an Annual Execution Review is conducted in accordance with AFI 63-101, paragraph 4.10.

E. Management Strategy

1. The MFT will meet, at a minimum, bi-monthly to review Contractor performance.

2. The COR(s) will issue PARs, documenting both satisfactory and unsatisfactory Contractor performance, at a minimum, bi-monthly. The COR(s) will prepare and forward the PAR to the PCO for submission to the Contractor. The PCO will submit the PAR to the Contractor. The Contractor shall sign and return the PAR to the PCO within five business days. Unsatisfactory Contractor performance will result in the COR(s) issuing a negative PAR.

PR: FD2060-13-30337 QASP REVISION: 0 7

3. If repetitive negative PARs or a single negative PAR identifying critical Contractor non-compliance are issued without satisfactory resolution, the COR(s) will issue a CAR. However, the MFT reserves the right to issue a CAR at anytime based on the severity of the Contractor non-compliance. If the CAR process fails to resolve the unsatisfactory Contractor performance, the PCO has the right to invoke FAR 52.246-1.

4. Incentives

a. If Contractor performance meets or exceeds contractual requirements, positive incentives may include, but are not limited to, decreased surveillance, favorable CPARs, and recognition. Recognition for outstanding Contractor performance may include a Letter of Appreciation which will become part of Contractor performance documentation and be used in the evaluation of Contractor performance for the CPAR.

b. If Contractor performance does not meet contractual requirements, negative incentives may include, but are not limited to, increased surveillance, unfavorable CPARs, and Government remedies identified in FAR 52.246-1.

F. Metrics:

The Contractor shall provide the Government with quality NDI procedures as assigned. Each procedure will contain no more than three (3) minor or zero (0) major discrepancies in the delivered source data following verification. Minor discrepancies are defined as typo errors, grammatical errors, poor quality artwork, or any other discrepancy that would not impact aircraft safety. Major discrepancies are defined as missing sections, missing or incorrect artwork, or incorrect procedures, or any other major discrepancy which would impact aircraft safety.

G. Initial Contract Performance Review (30-Day Review): In accordance with AFI 63-101, paragraphs 4.4.2.1 and 4.9, the SDO is responsible for managing and overseeing acquisition of services and the MFT is responsible for conducting an Initial Contract Performance Review. In accordance with AFI 63-101, paragraph 4.9, the review is a determination by the MFT that the Contractor has successfully started performance, has completed transition, is fully operational, and is within the estimated cost, schedule, and performance parameters of the contract. In accordance with AFI 63-101, paragraph 4.9.1, the review will take place within 30 [calendar] days after the Contractor assumes full performance responsibilities.

H. COR Supervisor Review: The COR Supervisor will review Contractor performance documentation prepared by the COR(s) on a regular basis for the purposes of monitoring Contractor performance and considering COR duties in appraisal(s) in accordance with AFFARS MP 5301.602-2(d) which references the Deputy Secretary of Defense memorandum, Monitoring Contract Performance in Contracts for Services, dated 22 Aug 08;

the Under Secretary of Defense memorandum, Designation of Contracting Officer’s Representatives on Contracts for Services in Support of Department of Defense Requirements, dated 6 Dec 06; and the signed Nomination of Contracting Officer’s Representative memorandum, paragraph 10. At a minimum, the COR(s) will complete and

PR: FD2060-13-30337 QASP REVISION: 0 8

sign the COR Surveillance Folder Checklist developed by AFSC/PZCA and the COR Supervisor will review and sign the checklist. The checklist can be found at the Quality Assurance website under QA Templates:

https://org.eis.afmc.af.mil/sites/FOWRALC/PK/qa/default.aspx.

I. Annual Execution Review: The SDO is responsible for ensuring an Annual Execution Review is conducted in accordance with AFI 63-101, paragraph 4.10.

J. Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)

1. The total estimated value of the contract equals or exceeds one million dollars ($1,000,000.00); therefore, CPARS reporting is required.

2. In accordance with FAR Part 42, Contract Administration and Audit Services, the MFT will evaluate Contractor performance. The Program Manager will, at a minimum, review the PARs and other information contained in the COR surveillance folder to prepare and substantiate the CPAR. CPARS will be updated, at a minimum annually, documenting Contractor performance for the contract/order in accordance with the current Department of Defense Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Policy Guide. More frequent updates may be made, as required, to document a significant improvement or decline in the level of Contractor performance.

3. The Contractor shall have input into the CPAR prior to it being finalized. For each reporting period, the Engineer will provide the Contractor a draft CPAR with no ratings, only justifications, to review for seven calendar days.

4. After seven calendar days, unless additional time is needed to address the Contractor’s response, the CPAR process will continue. The CPAR will be coordinated through management up to the Division level. Once approved, the CPAR will be sent to the Contractor via CPARS for the official 30 calendar day review. The Contractor shall have the option to concur or non-concur, with comments, via CPARS.

5. The following areas will be rated on the CPAR as applicable: quality of product/service, schedule, management of key personnel, business relations, and cost control.

K. Place of Performance: These services shall be performed at the Contractor’s facility and Robins AFB GA.

L. Environmental Management System (EMS)

1. Executive Order (E.O.) 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management, and E.O. 13514, Federal Leadership in Environment, Energy, and Economic Performance, establish the requirements for an Environmental Management System (EMS) and obligate federal agencies to implement sustainable practices.

PR: FD2060-13-30337 QASP REVISION: 0 9

2. In accordance with the Secretary of the Air Force (SAF) Policy Letter, Conformance with Air Force Environmental Management System (EMS) Requirements for Contracts Performed on Air Force Installations, dated 11 Dec 06 and the Air Force Materiel Command/Vice Commander (AFMC)/CV Policy Letter, Conformance with Air Force Environmental Management System (EMS) Requirements for Contracts Performed on Air Force Installations, dated 1 Aug 07, Contractor personnel who perform work on any USAF installation shall comply with the EMS requirements established by the installation.

3. Contractor personnel who perform work on Robins Air Force Base (AFB) shall complete

Robins AFB EMS General Awareness Training prior to beginning work.

4. The prime Contractor shall ensure subcontractors comply with the EMS requirement.

M. Green Procurement Program (GPP)

1. Under Secretary of Defense Memorandum, Establishment of the DoD Green

Procurement Program, dated August 27, 2004, establishes the requirement for a GPP. In accordance with FAR 23.101, Sustainable Acquisition Policy / Definition, the GPP requirement applies to all acquisitions, including services, using appropriated Government funds. The GPP is a mandatory federal acquisition program that focuses on the purchase and use of environmentally-preferable products and services. In accordance with FAR 23.404, Agency affirmative procurement programs, the GPP requires 100% of purchases of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-designated products, included in the Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines (CPG) list, contain recovered materials unless the item cannot be acquired competitively within a reasonable timeframe, meet appropriate performance standards, or be acquired at a reasonable price.

2. The prime Contractor shall ensure subcontractors comply with the GPP requirement.

N. Safety and Health

1. Mishap Notification/Investigation: In accordance with AFI 91-204, Safety Investigations and Reports, paragraph 2.12, the Contractor shall promptly report mishaps involving damage or injury to the USAF and cooperate with USAF safety investigations.

2. MFT Surveillance: The MFT will monitor Contractor compliance with the Safety and Health Plan/Program. The COR(s) will review applicable Contractor reports (e.g., monthly status reports, etc.) and any mishap notifications. The COR(s) will address safety and health issues in the bi-monthly PAR.

O. Trafficking in Persons

PR: FD2060-13-30337 QASP REVISION: 0 10

1. The Contractor shall comply with FAR 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons.

Additional information about Trafficking in Persons can be found at the website for the Department of State’s Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons at:

http://www.state.gov/j/tip .

2. In accordance with the Department of Defense COR Handbook, the COR(s) must inform the PCO if the Contractor/subcontractor and/or Contractor/subcontractor personnel fail to comply with the requirements of FAR 52.222.50. The PCO must convey the information to DoD Combat Trafficking in Persons (CTIP) Law Enforcement and Support / Office of Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD) Personnel and Readiness (P&R) Defense Human Resources Activity (DHRA).

II. Assessment Management

A. Services Summary

Performance Objective

PWS Reference Performance Threshold Method of Surveillance

Accuracy – Tech data

4.11.2.1.2

No more than three (3) minor or zero (0) major discrepancies in the delivered source data following verification.

Minor discrepancies are defined as typo errors, grammatical errors, poor quality artwork, or any other discrepancy that would not impact aircraft safety. Major discrepancies are defined as missing sections, missing or incorrect artwork, or incorrect procedures, or any other major discrepancy which would impact aircraft safety.

Surveillance will be conducted, at a minimum, bi-monthly (every two months) by the COR(s) in the PAR.

Accuracy- Status Reports

4.11.1.3 No more than one (1) re-

submittal on a single report and no more than three (3) re-submittals total for the duration of the contract

Surveillance will be conducted, at a minimum, bi-monthly (every two months) by the COR(s) in the PAR.

B. COR Surveillance Folder Contents

PR: FD2060-13-30337 QASP REVISION: 0 11

Tab 1: Contractual Documents contract/order, applicable contract/order modifications PWS, PWS revisions QASP, QASP revisions applicable CDRLs memorandum directing folder reviewer to the QASP signature page for documentation of FC/FD decision on mission-essentiality of services

Tab 2: Appointment and Training

Contract-Specific COR Training Checklist(s) COR(s) Appointment

Termination of Designation of Contracting Officer’s Representative Designation of Contracting Officer’s Representative Nomination of Contracting Officer’s Representative Request for Contracting Officer’s Representative Support

COR Level C Training Certificate(s) COR Supervisor and FC/FD training certificates

Tab 3: Contractor Performance Documentation (Metrics) monthly status reports other Contractor reports

Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) Receiving Reports

Tab 4: Surveillance and Inspection PARs CARs Initial Contract Performance Review (30-Day Review) COR Surveillance Folder Checklists

Tab 5: meeting minutes correspondence

Tab 6: Contract Plans (basic or order, as applicable) contract/order Appendix B (Government-Furnished Property) contract/order Appendix C (Industrial Safety Requirements) Contractor Safety and Health Plan

C. Plan for Corrective Action

1. Unsatisfactory Contractor performance will result in the COR(s) issuing a negative PAR. The COR(s) will prepare and forward the negative PAR to the PCO for submission to the Contractor. The PCO will submit the negative PAR to the Contractor for corrective action. In Section II of the negative PAR, the Contractor shall explain the

PR: FD2060-13-30337 QASP REVISION: 0 12

discrepancy and identify the corrective action they shall take to resolve the discrepancy.

The Contractor shall sign and return the negative PAR to the PCO within 10 business days.

2. If repetitive negative PARs or a single negative PAR identifying critical Contractor non-compliance are issued without satisfactory resolution, the COR(s) will initiate the CAR process. However, the MFT reserves the right to issue a CAR at anytime based on the severity of the Contractor non-compliance. The COR(s) will prepare a CAR and forward it to the QAPC. The QAPC will assign a control number and return the CAR to the COR(s). The COR(s) will forward the CAR to the PCO for submission to the Contractor. The PCO will submit the CAR to the Contractor for corrective action. The Contractor shall sign and return the CAR, with corrective action plan, to the PCO for acceptance by the MFT by the suspense date. The corrective action will be tracked and documented until the discrepancy is resolved. The COR(s) will notify the QAPC that the CAR has been closed. The CAR will become part of the PCO contract file. If the CAR process fails to resolve the discrepancy, the PCO has the right to invoke FAR 52.246-1.

D. Acceptance of Services

1. In accordance with DFARS 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports, the Contractor shall submit/process payment requests (invoices, Receiving Reports or combos) and Receipt/Acceptance documents via

WAWF.

2. CDRL deliverables may be submitted using WAWF or be submitted directly to Government personnel in accordance with the CDRL. The CDRL will determine submittal requirements; however, separately priced data must be accepted in WAWF in order for the Contractor to receive payment, and both separately priced and non-separately priced data must be accepted in WAWF in order for the contract line item to be closed out.

3. Services will be accepted by the ASIP Engineer.

PR: FD2060-13-30337 QASP REVISION: 0 13

III. Signatures

By signing below, you are appointed to the MFT for this acquisition and accept the above responsibilities.

Primary COR Date

Alternate COR

COR Supervisor

The QAPC signature above signifies guidance was provided to the MFT in the development of contract quality assurance requirements in accordance with AFFARS MP 5346.103, paragraph 1.c.(2).

PCO

Contractor

By signing below, you are identifying these services as not mission-essential in accordance with DFARS 252.237-7023 and AFI 10-403, paragraph 1.9.1.33.2. (Reference PWS paragraph 4.3.)

FC/FD Date