Industry_Questions3.doc
DOC document 44 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Paveway Program, 595 TTU B/E Test Set Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8213-19-R-3021
About this file
This document contains an industry questions and answers file and a related federal contract opportunity notice. The contract opportunity is for the Paveway Program TTU-595 B/E Test Set. The government plans to award a three year IDIQ production contract with a total estimated value not exceeding $9.7 million. Delivery of the first article is due within 455 calendar days of contract award. The contract will procure a first article test unit, production assets for both the USAF and foreign military sales, and technical data. Past producers of this test set include the Kansas City Plant government owned contractor operated facility and X-Technology. Responses are due by September 30, 2019 through the Federal Business Opportunities website.
Industry Questions 3
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA821319R3021_______0001.RTF | RTF text file | |
| Industry_Questions_and_Answers__4.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amended_Industry_Questions3.doc | DOC document | |
| Industry_Questions[2].doc | DOC document | |
| EDLvs4.pdf | ||
| SOWPackaging.pdf | ||
| TTU-595_CRDL_Package_Final.pdf | ||
| GFPFA821319R3021_1.pdf | ||
| FA821319R3021.pdf | ||
| Industry_Questions1.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Industry Questions and Answers
RFP# FA8213-19-F-3021
Question- 1: Is Stephens-Hinson & Associate (SHA) allowed to bid on this contract?
Answer- 1: It’s a full and open competition.
Question- 2: If the answer to #1 is yes, is the Gov’t aware that SHA plans to submit a bid as a response to this solicitation?
Answer- 2: The Government cannot disclose bidders at this stage of the acquisition.
Question- 3: Is SHA required to sell licenses for their SLSSA?
Answer- 3: No
Question- 4: If a bidder is already a designer and producer of SLSSA products and is familiar with that technology, do they still need to obtain a license agreement from SHA to build the SLSSA for the TTU-595?
Answer- 4: Yes, Please refer to Sections L&M sub-factor 3 Question- 5: Are there any parts of the SLSSA that will not be provided as part of the TDP for the TTU-595?
Answer- 5: No
Question- 6: Can the Gov’t provide a list of companies that produced the TTU-595 in the past?
Answer- 6: Kansas City Plant (GO-CO facility) & X-Technology.
Question- 7: The Gov’t has indicated that the TTU-595 has obsolescence issue (e.g. Motherboard):
a. Can the Gov’t provide a list of all assemblies and subassemblies that have obsolescence issues and a detailed list regarding extent of the obsolescence?
b. In the event that the above obsolescence list cannot be provided, how does the Gov’t expect that the unknown engineering efforts associated with DMSMS will be performed under an FFP contract?
Answer- 7:
a. No. The Government is only aware about the DAC cards but there may be other obsolete parts and pieces.
b. It is expected that all bidders will review the TDP and evaluate potential obsolescence and bid accordingly.
Question- 8: Can the Gov’t provide POC information for Stephens Hinson & Associates?
Answer- 8: The Government does not have a POC, however, feel free to utilize the Patent Website (listed below) that references the Patent Number listed in Sections L&M.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7652753.PN.&OS=PN/7652753&RS=PN/7652753
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .