SectionM.pdf

PDF 204 KB Posted

Attached to
PANEL, STRUCTURAL, AI Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8212-18-R-0027
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Hill Air Force Base

About this file

Section M

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to PANEL, STRUCTURAL, AI, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA821218R0027_______0003.pdf PDF
2406521_PKGRQMT_REPORT.pdf PDF
Statment_of_Work.pdf PDF
Engineering_Instructions.pdf PDF
2425062_TRNSPDATA_REPORT.pdf PDF
SPI.pdf PDF
Engineering_Data.pdf PDF
SectionLMike.pdf PDF
CDRLS.pdf PDF
SQSC0027.pdf PDF
2406521_PKGRQMT_REPORT.pdf PDF
FA821218R0027_______0002.pdf PDF
SectionM.pdf PDF
SPI.pdf PDF
Engineering_Instructions.pdf PDF
SectionLMike.pdf PDF
2425062_TRNSPDATA_REPORT.pdf PDF
Statment_of_Work.pdf PDF
CDRLS.pdf PDF
FA821218R0027_______0001_CDRLS.pdf PDF
FA821218R0027_______0001_SectionLMike.pdf PDF
FA821218R0027_______0001_SectionM.pdf PDF
FA821218R0027_______0001_EDL0027.pdf PDF
FA821218R0027_______0001_2407884_ATTACH.pdf PDF
FA821218R0027_______0001_SQSC0027.pdf PDF
FA821218R0027_______0001_2406521_PKGRQMT_REPORT.pdf PDF
FA821218R0027_______0001_EI0027.pdf PDF
FA821218R0027_______0001.RTF RTF text file
FA821218R0027_______0001_2425062_TRNSPDATA_REPORT.pdf PDF
FA821218R0027_______0001_SPI.pdf PDF
EI0027.pdf PDF
SPI.pdf PDF
2406521_PKGRQMT_REPORT.pdf PDF
CDRLS.pdf PDF
SectionLMike.pdf PDF
FA821218R0027.pdf PDF
SectionM.pdf PDF
SOW1.pdf PDF
2425062_TRNSPDATA_REPORT.pdf PDF
SQSC0027.pdf PDF
EDL0027.pdf PDF
Show all 41

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SECTION M

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

A. INTRODUCTION:

1. This acquisition will utilize Lowest Priced procedures restricted to technically qualified “Approved Source” offeror(s) This acquisition shall use price as the only evaluated factor

2. The government intends to award the requirement(s) represented in this solicitation to one awardee. However, the Government reserves the right to award no contract at all.

B. EVALUATION FACTORS AND PROCEEDURES:

1. The government shall evaluate proposals based on the evaluation factor below:

Factor 1- Price

The Offeror’s price will be evaluated based upon the Total Evaluated Price (TEP). The

Offeror’s Price Proposal will be evaluated for the criteria of Price Reasonableness and

Balance.

Price Reasonableness: The proposed prices will be evaluated for Price

Reasonableness. For a price to be reasonable, it will represent a price to the

Government that a prudent person would pay when consideration is given to prices in the market. Normally, price reasonableness is established through adequate price competition, but may also be determined through cost and price analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404. For additional information see

FAR 31.201-3.

Balance: The Government may also determine a proposal unacceptable should the proposed prices be unbalanced. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more items/Contract Line

Item Numbers (CLINs) is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques as those defined by FAR 15.404-1.

Total Evaluated Price (TEP): A TEP will be calculated to be used for evaluation of offers to determine the lowest priced proposal. The TEP calculation will be a summation of all Contract Line Item Pricing.

2. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions: Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and required delivery schedules.

A qualification requirements package is attached to this solicitation for those contractors who are not an “Approved Source” on the Qualified Bidders List. Per FAR 9.202(e), the government reserves the right not to delay contract award in order to provide a potential offeror with an opportunity to demonstrate its ability to meet the standards specified for qualification.

3. The process for the evaluation of proposals is as follows:

a. This award will be made to the offeror that submitted the proposal with the lowest

Total Evaluated Price and is a qualified source.

b. Performance record and history will be assessed as one of the multiple standards required for a successful offeror to be determined responsible as described in FAR

9.104. Contractors shall meet the required delivery dates, as well as the terms and conditions in this solicitation, to be determined responsible.

File details come from the government source that posted it.