Attachment_3-HSEP_PWS_2016-_FINAL_2.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

ICBM SYSTEMS DIRECTORATE (AFNWC)

HILL AFB, UTAH 84056-5609

Performance Work Statement (PWS)

Hardness Surveillance EMP Program (HSEP)

Prepared by:

2d Lt R. Copeland Stubbs III

AFNWC/NIE

27 October 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 1 SCOPE AND PURPOSE PAGE 1

1.1 Scope and Purpose

1.2 General Background

SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES PAGE 1

2.1 Planning

2.2 Hardness Testing

2.3 Hardness Reporting

2.4 Compliance Documents

SECTION 3 SERVICES DESCRIPTION SUMMARY PAGE 5

SECTION 4 GENERAL INFORMATION PAGE 6

4.1 Government Program Management

4.2 Site Selection

4.3 Validation Testing

4.4 Turnover Conferences

4.5 Site Acceptance

4.6 Site Deposture/Reposture

4.7 Field Team Support

4.8 Transportation

4.9 Material and Services

4.10 Problem Notification and Resolution

4.11 Packaging

4.12 Criticality of Mission

4.13 Contractor Manpower Reporting

4.14 Drug Testing Policy

SECTION 5 SECURITY PAGE 10

5.1 Security Program Plan

5.2 Security Clearances

5.3 USAF Nuclear Weapons Personnel Reliability Program (PRP)

5.4 Two-Person Concept

5.5 Physical and Information Security Requirements

5.6 Classified Information

SECTION 6 QUALITY PAGE 12

6.1 Inspection Program

SECTION 7 SAFETY PAGE 12

7.1 System Safety

7.2 Safety Compliance Assessment Report

7.3 Safety Engineering Analysis

7.4 Nuclear Safety Support

7.5 Nuclear Safety Analysis

7.6 Nuclear Safety Certification

7.7 Nuclear Surety Training

SECTION 8 SUPPLY SUPPORT SERVICES PAGE 14

8.1 Government Owned Facilities

8.2 Contractor Furnished Facilities

8.3 Government Furnished Property

8.4 Contractor Furnished Equipment

8.5 Government Furnished Material

8.6 Contractor Support Data

8.7 Spares Acquisition

SECTION 9 TRANSITION PLAN PAGE 15

APPENDIX A ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS LIST PAGE 16

APPENDIX B GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY PAGE 18

APPENDIX C SAFETY, FIRE PROTECTION AND HEALTH SPECIFICATION PAGE 15

SECTION I: DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

1 SCOPE AND PURPOSE

1.1 Scope

The scope of the tasking in this Performance Work Statement (PWS) is the Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Hardness Evaluation of United States Air Force (USAF) Minuteman (MM) III Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) Systems. This Hardness Surveillance EMP Program (HSEP) consists of hardness evaluation of Launch Facilities (LFs) and Missile Alert Facilities (MAFs) to determine the system hardness status and project future system hardness.

Hardness evaluation of LFs and MAFs at each specified configuration will be completed on an annual basis. For planning purposes, testing shall be conducted in the following sequence.

Basic F.E. Warren AFB, WY Option 1 Minot AFB, ND Option 2 Malmstrom AFB, MT Option 3 F.E. Warren AFB, WY Option 4 Minot AFB, ND

1.2 Purpose

The purpose of this PWS is to contract for engineering services and technical support necessary to provide hardness status and projection for the ICBM Weapon System. The HSEP will determine wing and system level hardness status and hardness degradation projections for the ICBM weapon systems. The goal of this service is to establish baseline hardness test data for (applicable) system changes/modification, to provide sufficient data and analysis to support hardness degradation projections and provide adequate lead time for either replacement or refurbishment, as applicable, of any weapon system element prior to failure or loss of safety margin.

2 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

The contractor shall develop and execute HSEP testing and reporting IAW applicable techincal guidance outlined in PWS Paragraph 2.4. The contractor shall determine EMP hardness and project with acceptable lead time (approximately five years) future hardness utilizing statistically quantifiable determination and projection methods. The goal of the hardness projection is to provide adequate lead time (approximately five years) for either replacement or refurbishment, as applicable, of any weapon system element prior to failure or loss of safety margin. The determination and projection methods shall produce results at the site level (LF and MAF), wing level (Wings I, III, V), and configuration level. The contractor shall plan, conduct and report hardness testing of nine (9) facilities as outlined below.

2.1 Planning

2.1.1 Program Management Plan (PMP).

The Contractor shall plan and coordinate the program tasks defined in this PWS. The contractor shall plan to test nine (9) facilities each calendar year. Facilities shall include seven (7) Launch Facilities (LFs) and two (2) Missile Alert Facilities (MAFs). Engineering liason and technical documentation shall be established and maintained by the contractor throughout the program. The contractor shall advise AFNWC/NIEI of management problems and shall generate and update the PMP upon Government approval of changes.

The contractor shall direct, coordinate, evaluate, and control the program tasks defined in this PWS and as described and defined in the approved PMP (CDRL No. A005; DI-MGMT-81797).

2.1.1.1 Schedules

The contractor shall generate and comply with the approved Integrated Program Management Report (IMPR) (CDRL No. A001; DI-MGMT-81861/T).

2.1.1.2 Status Updates. The contractor shall support HSEP status updates and site test Quick Look Briefings at the request of AFNWC Program Management (CDRL No. A009; DI-MGMT-80368A).

2.1.1.3 Meetings. The contractor shall participate in meetings in support of HSEP efforts at the request of AFNWC Program Management, to include meetings at USSTRATCOM and AFGSC.

2.1.2 Test Plans /Procedures

The contractor shall consider the integration and installation of all test equipment, and shall fully define how hardness testing is to be conducted. The contractor shall also include the entire site setup and checkout effort and define site-specific requirements in any plans for on-site testing at operational ICBM facilities. The contractor shall update as necessary, test plans and procedures (CDRL No. A011; DI-NDTI-80566A) (CDRL No. A012; DI-NDTI-80603A) (CDRL No. A013; DI-NDTI-80809)

2.1.3 Inspections Plans /Procedures

The contractor shall consider the integration and installation of all inspection equipment, and shall fully define the conduct of hardness inspections. The contractor shall also include the entire site setup and checkout effort and define site unique requirements in any plans for on-site inspections at operational ICBM facilities. The contractor shall update as necessary, the inspection plans and procedures. (CDRL No. A011; DI-NDTI-80566A) (CDRL No. A012;

DI-NDTI-80603A) (CDRL No. A013; DI-NDTI-80809)

2.1.4 Wing Implementation Management Plan (IMP).

The contractor shall generate an Implementation Management Plan (IMP) governing test and field operations. The contractor shall coordinate this plan with the Program Manager. The contractor shall coordinate this plan with the appropriate AFGSC agencies through the Single Manager (Section 2.2.3.7) if field activities are proposed. This plan shall establish a method to accomplish the effort required by this program and shall address such topics as test site custodial responsibilities, site access (section 2.2.3.6), base support requirements and functional responsibilities . The IMP shall also cover:

a. integration and timing of all HSEP activities;

b. transportation and setup of equipment;

c. the contractor's planned completion of the site setup and testing and/or inspections;

d. the development of all contract compliance and contractor inspection records and how the contractor will ensure compliance with all procedures; and

e. verification that all tests and/or inspections and checkouts have been completed.

f. plans to identify any condition that could lead to damage to hardware during testing as well as proposed method to avoid damage while still assessing hardness of site

If field activities are proposed, the contractor shall generate a Sequencing Plan as part of the IMP, describing the order of testing at each Wing considering the constraints listed below

a. The HSEP testing shall be conducted as a Category 2 effort as defined in AFI 21-202, Volume 1, AFGSC Supplement (2 Feb 2011).

b. The HSEP inspections shall be conducted as a Category 1 or 2 effort as defined in AFI

21-202, Volume 1, AFGSC Supplement (2 Feb 2011).

c. The contractor shall revise engineering and planning, as required by the Procuring

Contracting Officer (PCO) approved contingency work.

2.1.5 Deviations and Waivers

The contractor shall generate requests for deviations and waivers from approved program management or field activity plans when warranted by problems or discrepancies occurring during the activities required by this program. The contractor shall coordinate these activities with the Program Manager and proceed as directed by the PCO. During field activities, the contractor shall also notify the Single Manager verbally of changes to field activity plans (CDRL No. A015, DI-CMAN-80640C).

2.2 Hardness Testing

2.2.1 The contractor shall perform EMP Hardness testing on nine (9) facilites to evaluate compliance with S- 133-128D, and all other applicable technical guidance to include but not limited to items in PWS Paragraph 2.4. Facilities shall include seven (7) Launch Facilities (LFs) and two (2) Missile Alert Facilities (MAFs). Testing shall include High Altitude EMP (HEMP) simulation as well as Source Region EMP (SREMP) simulation to evaluate hardness. HEMP and SREMP testing shall be performed with system operating and in a manner as similar to operational function as reasonably achievable.

2.2.2 The contractor shall perform electromagnetic shielding effectiveness testing on one (1) LF and one (1) MAF per year. Contractor shall evaluate compliance with S-133-128D Paragraph 30.4.2.2 (Figures A-24 & A-25).

2.2.3 Field Activities

To accomplish field test/inspection activities, the contractor shall coordinate with Government agencies and shall provide the following elements where appropriate.

IAW DFARS 211.106 – FAR 37.104, contractor personnel shall identify themselves as contractors, either by prominent display of badge/identification, declaration upon answering phone, or other self-identification as appropriate.

The contractor shall comply with the following provisions for assuming and maintaining control of ICBM basing sites.

2.2.3.1 Site Configuration Inspection

The contractor, in conjunction with Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC), shall perform pre-acceptance setup tasks IAW the test procedures (Section 2.1.2) or inspection procedures (Section 2.1.3) and verify existing equipment configurations against engineering and technical data prior to acceptance of each MAF or LF from the Government. Should discrepancies exist between this data and the actual configuration, the contractor shall notify the Program Manager and proceed as directed IAW Section 4.10 (CDRL No. A011; DI- NDTI-80566A) (CDRL No. A012; DI-NDTI-80603A) (CDRL No. A013; DI-NDTI-80809)

2.2.3.2 Weapon System Operational Checkout

The contractor shall perform a weapon system checkout (Class III Demonstration) to verify operation of the site/equipment IAW the test plans/procedures prior to HSEP testing. Should discrepancies be encountered, the contractor shall notify the Program Manager IAW Section

4.10 and proceed as directed IAW Section 4.10. (CDRL No. A011; DI-NDTI-80566A) (CDRL No. A012; DI-NDTI-80603A) (CDRL No. A013; DI-NDTI-80809)

2.2.3.3 Preparation for Return of Sites to the Government

The contractor shall perform a final weapon system checkout IAW the test plans/procedures to show conformance with the system requirements following HSEP testing. Should discrepancies exist between this data and the actual configuration, the contractor shall notify the Program Manager IAW Section 4.10 and proceed as directed IAW Section 4.10 (CDRL No. A011; DI-NDTI-80566A) (CDRL No. A012; DI-NDTI-80603A) (CDRL No. A013; DI-

NDTI-80809)

The contractor shall, at the completion of the site work, return the facility to the condition existing upon entry IAW the DD Form 1149 and perform an inventory inspection in conjunction with AFGSC personnel.

2.2.3.4 Photographic Library

The contractor shall photograph all problems/anomalies and deficiencies discovered on site and maintain a reproducible library of these photographs.

2.2.3.5 Site Security

The contractor shall be responsible for the installation and removal of the Joint Services Interior Intrusion Detection System (JSIIDS) or Maintenance and Security Alarm Monitor (MASAM), at both the test and monitoring facility, IAW the MASAM Installation and User's Manual (60683-K076-UT).

In the event of a JSIIDS/MASAM security alarm indicating a potential security violation at the test facility, security personnel at the monitoring facility will dispatch a response team to the test facility. Upon verification by the response team that the test facility has not been penetrated, the contractor shall be notified and shall respond by dispatching a two-person, PRP certified (IAW Section 5.3) team that shall provide security at the test facility until either MASAM security is reset (by the two-person team), or until the next contractor duty period.

Costs associated with responses to JSIIDS/MASAM security alarms will be covered on the over and above line item. Because of the need to respond to JSIIDS/MASAM alarms during contractor non-duty periods, pre-authorization to charge to the over and above line item is not practical for this task. The contractor shall notify the Single Manager, AFNWC HSEP Manager, and Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) of any costs associated with this task on the next contractor duty period.

2.2.3.6 Site Access

The contractor shall conform to all approved procedures for site access. This shall include ingress and egress procedures as described in the Site Access Instructions for the Hardness Surveillance EMP Program (60683-K478-UT) and procedures associated with using the JSIIDS/MASAM as described in the MASAM Operating Instructions (60683-K375-UT).

2.2.3.7 Single Manager Support

The Government has established at or near each Strategic Missile Wing (SMW) a Single Manager to interface with the contractor. The contractor shall establish a similar point of contact to interface with the Government and shall maintain status and schedule data for all Wing activity affected by this program.

2.3 Hardness Reporting

2.3.1 EMP Hardness Determination

The contractor shall perform the necessary tests, analyses, and/or inspections to determine the hardness of the ICBM system Operational Ground Equipment (OGE) and Real Property Installed Equipment (RPIE) relative to the Weapon System Specifications listed in Section 2.4. The determination shall be at the site level, at the wing level, and by site configuration and shall include a final report at the wing level and by site configuration. The contractor shall quantify the wing level statistical confidence of a hardness determination, normally based on a minimum number of seven (7) LF and two (2) MAF test sites.

2.3.2 EMP Hardness Projection

The contractor shall perform the necessary tests, analyses, and/or inspections to project the hardness of the ICBM system OGE and RPIE relative to the Weapon System Specifications listed in Section 2.4. The projection shall be at the site level, at the wing level, and by site configuration and shall include a final report at the wing level and by site configuration. The contractor shall quantify the wing level statistical confidence of the hardness projection, normally based on a minimum number of seven (7) LF and two

(2) MAF test sites.

2.3.3 Identification of Anamolies and Deficiencies

Weapon system anomalies are those items that would adversely impact or impede the contractor’s program or schedule. Weapon system deficiencies are deviations from the weapon system specifications which do not adversely impact or impede the contractors program or schedule. Upon identification in the HSEP of any significant (i.e., having the near-term potential for adversely affecting weapon system performance, reliability, hardness, or service life) anomalies, deficiencies, or changes in performance, the contractor shall identify potential system impacts and performance degradations (e.g., “Loss of command function”, “Loss of status reporting”, etc.) which could occur as a result of the identified anomaly or deficiency. The contractor shall identify possible cause(s) based on the work accomplished in identifying the anomalies or deficiencies and recommend a potential solution. The contractor shall promptly notify the Program Manager and Single Manager IAW Section 4.10 and proceed as directed IAW Section 4.10 (CDRL No. A010; DI-MGMT-81232).

The contractor shall screen the anomalies, deficiencies, or changes in performance into the following categories:

a. No hardness impact;

b. Minor hardness impact;

c. Major hardness impact.

2.3.4 Wing Commander Briefings

The contractor shall prepare and present an In-Briefing and an Out-Briefing to the Wing Deputy Chief of Maintenance, and the Wing Commander and Staff prior to and following completion of all activities at the Wing. The contractor shall include test/inspection sites, test/inspection schedules, and an overview of the base support requirements in the In-Briefing. The contractor shall provide test results in the Wing Out-Briefings (CDRL No. A002; DI-ADMN-81249A) (CDRL No. A003; DI-MGMT-81605) (CDRL No. A004; DI-ADMN-81505).

2.4 Compliance Documents

The following documents of the exact issue listed state requirements with which the contractor shall comply. Documents called out for compliance within the following cited documents are incorporated by reference even if not listed here. Specific editions/revisions of documents will be listed here. Individual paragraph references will only identify basic documents.

Weapon System Specifications

DOCUMENT

NO. DATE TITLE

S-133-128D 14 Jan 15 Weapon System Specification for Minuteman III

(WS 133 A-M)

(Wings I, III, and V)

Appendices I and III of the Weapon System Specifications are classified SECRET and access to these documents is controlled. Security clearance at the SECRET level will be required to review these documents. Copies of these documents will be provided to the contractor upon request.

Military and DOD Standards

MIL-STD-882E 19 Jun 93 System Safety Program Requirements DoDI 1010.09 22 Jun 12 DoD Civilian Employee Drug-Free Workplace Program DoDR 5210.42 29 May 15 Nuclear Weapons Personnel Reliability Program (PRP) AFMAN 13-501 29 May 15 Nuclear Weapons Personnel Reliability Program (PRP)

Other Publications

DOD 5210.41

AFMAN 38-

108_AFSCSUP

21 Feb 14 Nuclear Weapon Security Manual

DOD 5220.22-M 17 Apr 14 National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) AFI21-202 17 Sep 14 Missile Maintenance Management AFI91-203 19 Aug 14 Air Force Consolidated Occupational Safety Instruction AFI91-204 14 Apr 15 Safety Investigations and Reports AFI91-103 20 Oct 11 Air Force Nuclear Safety Design Certification Program

AFMAN91-118

AFMAN91-119

AFI91-10 30 Jun 15 Air Force Nuclear Weapon Surety Program

Copies of Publications Copies of Military and Federal Specifications and Standards may be obtained from the Commanding Officer, Naval Publications and Forms Center, 5801 Tabor Ave., Philadelphia, PA, 19120. A request can be initiated by telephone, (215) 697-3321.

2.4.1 Contract Deliverables

CDRL # TTILE DID # Paragraph Reference/s

A001 Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR) DI-MGMT-81861/T 2.1.1.1 A002 Conference Agenda (Meeting Agenda) DI-ADMN-81249A 2.3.4, 4.4 A003 Briefing Material DI-MGMT-81605 2.3.4, 4.4 A004 Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes DI-ADMN-81505 2.3.4, 4.4 A005 Program Management Plan DI-MGMT-81797 2.1.1 A006 Operations Security (OPSEC) Plan DI-MGMT-80934C 5.1 A007 Implementation Plan DI-MGMT-81737 4.7, 5.3.n A008 Transition Plan DI-MGMT-1945 9.3 A009 Status Report DI-MGMT-80368A 2.1.1.2 A010 System Problem Report (SPR) DI-MGMT-81232 2.3.3

A011 Test Plan DI-NDTI-80566A 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.2.3.1, 2.2.3.2, 2.2.3.3

A012 Test Procedures DI-NDTI-80603A 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.2.3.1, 2.2.3.2, 2.2.3.3

A013 Test/Inspection Report DI-NDTI-80809 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.2.3.1, 2.2.3.2, 2.2.3.3

A014 Deficiency Report (DR) DI-ALSS-81535 4.10 A015 Request for Deviations (RFD) DI-CMAN-80640C 2.1.5 A016 Funds and Labor Hour Expenditure Report DI-FNCL-81537 4.13 A017 Preservation & Packing Data DI-PACK-80120C/T 4.11 A018 System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) DI-SAFT-81626 7.1 A019 Nuclear Certification Impact Statement (NCIS) DI-NUOR-81888A 7.4 A020 Certification Requirements Plan (CRP) DI-NUOR-81409A 7.6 A021 Nuclear Safety Analysis Report (NSAR) DI-NUOR-81405A/T 7.5 A022 Accident/Incident Report DI-SAFT-81563 Appendix C A023 Training Materials (Nuclear Surety Training Materials) DI-ILSS-80872 7.7 A024 Status of Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Report DI-MGMT-80269 8.3, 8.7

The Contractor shall submit an electronic copy to the inspection/acceptance point of contact and to all other offices that provide functional input to the inspector/acceptor; these offices are identified in the CDRL DD Form 1423-1, block 14.

3 SERVICES SUMMARY

Performance Parameter PWS paragraph

Performance Threshold

1. Quick Look Briefings 2.1.1.2 Quick Looks for 9 of 9 facility tests; delivered NLT two weeks of site return unless postponed by AFNWC/NIEI.

2. Comply with Testing Schedule 2.1.1 Testing on 9 of 9 facilities completed; On-schedule accept and return of sites for 8 of 9 facilities.

3. Timely CDRL Reporting 2.4.1 and DD Form

95% of all reports are generated on time

4. Comply with PRP Program 5.3 100% compliance with AFMAN 13-501and established MOAs relating to PRP

4 GENERAL INFORMATION

4.1 Government Program Managment

4.1.1 Program Management

Within the AFNWC the ICBM Systems Directorate (AFNWC/NI) has overall program management responsibility for ICBM Weapon Systems. Program management of the HSEP has been delegated to the HSEP Manager of the ICBM System Integration & Test Branch, AFNWC/NIEI.

4.1.2 Project Engineering

The HSEP Project Engineer, AFNWC/NIEI, will provide the technical project management and is responsible for coordinating technical and engineering functions of the HSEP.

4.1.3 Contract Management

Responsibility for contracting activities rests solely within the ICBM Contracting Division (AFNWC/PZB). No conversation, recommendation, or direction, whether given directly or implied by AFNWC personnel, that will affect the scope, schedule, or price of the program covered by this PWS, shall be acted upon by the contractor unless specifically directed in writing by the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO). Efforts under the over and above line item must be reviewed and authorized by the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO). Prior to submitting a request for over and above effort, the contractor shall obtain concurrence from the AFNWC HSEP Manager.

4.1.4 Single Manager

The Government has established a Single Manager at or near each Strategic Missile Wing (SMW). The Single Manager's function is described in AFI 91-103.

4.2 Site Selection

AFNWC/NIEI will provide a list of proposed access sites for each wing to the contractor. The contractor shall review this list and either accept the designated sites or suggest alternative sites along with the rationale as to why the alternative sites were chosen. AFNWC/NIEI will review the contractor’s inputs and suggestions and designate which sites shall be accessed.

The contractor shall plan to perform testing at only one ICBM site at a time. On occasion, at the discretion of the host Wing, the contractor may be asked to perform operations at two sites simultaneously.

Site Unavailability

Due to changes in Wing activities the host Wing may prefer that the scheduled facility not be tested.

In such situations the Wing shall propose a comparable facility to test in its stead, which change shall be approved by AFNWC/NIEI and coordinated with the contractor.

Some sites may not be testable IAW the testing procedures proposed by the contractor. If deemed necessary, the contractor may conduct site surveys as part of this effort. All site surveys shall be conducted on a non-interference basis to the visited site. All requests for site surveys shall be submitted with full justification of need to AFNWC/NIEI through the PCO at least 45 calendar days in advance of visit. The Government reserves the right to deny any site survey request that is not deemed fully justified.

4.3 Validation Testing

AFNWC/NI may direct the contractor to perform validation (hardness assurance) EMP testing for new systems/equipment in lieu of normal HSEP testing. Such testing is not covered under the over and above line item; however, reasonable and unforeseen expenses associated with the validation testing that would not have been necessary under normal testing conditions may be covered by the over and above line item.

4.4 Turnover Conferences

The contractor shall support a site turnover conference for each facility. AFNWC/Single Manger will prepare and submit a DD Form 1149 to the appropriate agencies to affect site acceptance from AFGSC to AFNWC/Single Manager. AFNWC/Single Manager will then notify the contractor that the site is available to conduct contractor tasks. AFNWC/Single Manager will delegate overall control and responsibility of the site to the contractor. Upon completion of contractor activities at a site and following a successful site reposture, AFGSC will accept the site from AFNWC/Single Manager via the DD Form 1149 (CDRL No. A002; DI-ADMN-81249A) (CDRL No. A003; DI- MGMT-81605) (CDRL No. A004; DI-ADMN-81505).

4.5 Site Acceptance

Following site configuration inspection (section 2.2.3.1) and the Turnover Conference, the contractor shall accept the site from AFNWC/Single Manager.

4.6 Site Deposture/Reposture

If field activities require site deposture/reposture, the contractor shall update as necessary, the site deposture and reposture procedures (CDRL No. A012).

4.7 Field Team Support

The contractor shall provide support to his field teams except for those goods and services provided through the Implementation Management Plan (CDRL No. A007; DI-MGMT-81737).

4.8 Transportation

The contractor shall supply all required vehicles and transportation/handling equipment which are not listed in Appendix B of the contract to accomplish the tasks of this PWS. The contractor shall be responsible for transportation and delivery of all hardware, including GFP. The Government will support transportation and delivery of hardware when in the best interest of the Government.

4.9 Material and Services

The contractor shall provide all necessary materials and services to perform the EMP hardness activities necessary to complete the requirements identified in this PWS. Government Furnished Property (GFP) and drawings will be provided to the contractor IAW the GFP clause of the contract.

In support of the field effort, the contractor shall provide, as necessary, the following:

a. Management and Program Control

b. Security

c. Configuration Control and Management

d. Warehousing and Transportation

e. Engineering Liaison

f. Industrial Safety

Unless awarded a follow-on contract, the contractor shall transfer title of all Special Tooling and Special Test Equipment purchased or manufactured for this contract to the Government upon completion of this contract. The contractor shall request disposition instructions for the Special Tooling and Special Test Equipment from the PCO.

4.10 Problem Notification and Resolution

Problem Notification Report The contractor shall promptly notify the Program Manager and Single Manager verbally of any weapon system anomalies or deficiencies (as defined in section 2.3.3) encountered during setup, checkout, and testing and proceed as directed by the ACO. The contractor shall prepare a Problem/Anomaly Report identifying the weapon system anomaly encountered and suggest potential corrective action. The contractor shall prepare a Deficiency Report describing all deficiencies encountered (CDRL No. A014; DI-ALSS-81535)

Costs associated with these tasks are not included in the over and above line item.

Problem Resolution Problem resolution will be handled on a case by case basis. The contractor shall coordinate with the Government on the review and analysis of problem areas and proposed changes, determination of impact on facilities, equipment, and security, and correlation of such impact with other changes. Some problems will be resolved by the Government while others may be assigned to the contractor for resolution. Such direction will be given by the ACO. Resolution of the problem(s) shall be made by the contractor as directed by AFNWC/NIEI through the ACO. The contractor shall submit a work request to the Program Manager for each problem resolution. Each work request must be approved by the Program Manager and the ACO prior to performance of any work. Cumulative problem resolution costs in excess of $1,000.00 per site will be authorized on the over and above line item. The ACO will assure that sufficient funds are obligated prior to authorization of any work.

The resolution of some problems or anomalies may require additional on-site activities. The direction to conduct such activities will be given by the ACO. Cumulative activities to resolve problems or anomalies shall not impact the overall program schedule. The contractor shall submit a work request to the Program Manager for each activity related to problem or anomaly resolution. Each work request must be approved by the Program Manager and the ACO prior to the performance of any work. The cumulative problem or anomaly resolution will be authorized on the over and above line item. The ACO will assure that sufficient funds are obligated prior to authorization of any work.

4.11 Packaging

Preservation for Packaging Unless otherwise specified in this contract, the preservation and packaging for storage and shipment of HSEP elements (including GFP) shall be in accordance with good commercial practices.

Packing Unless otherwise specified in this contract, the packing of HSEP elements (including GFP) shall be in accordance with good commercial practices to ensure acceptance by common carriers.

Marking Unless otherwise specified in this contract, the marking of unit packages, intermediate packages, and shipping containers shall be in accordance with good commercial practices for shipment by common carriers. (CDRL No. A017; DI-PACK-80120C/T)

4.12 Criticality of Mission

In order for ICBMs to be a credible tool of nuclear deterrence, it must be determined that they are survivable. HSEP testing is one of the only metrics curently in use to measure survivability. As long as strategic nuclear deterrence is a concern for national strategy, the HSEP will be mission-essential.

4.13 Contractor Manpower Reporting

The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract for the Air Force via a secure data collection site. The contractor is required to completely fill in all required data fields at http://www.ecmra.mil.

Reporting inputs will be for the labor executed during the period of performance for each Government fiscal year (FY), which runs 1 October through 30 September. While inputs may be reported any time during the FY, all data shall be reported no later than 31 October* of each calendar year. Contractors may direct questions to the CMRA help desk.

Contractors are required to input data by 31 October of each year. However, due to the delayed implementation, input of FY17 data is required by 31 Mar 18. Information from the secure web site is considered to be proprietary in nature when the contract number and contractor identity are associated with the direct labor hours and direct labor dollars. At no time will any data be released to the public with the contractor name and contract number associated with the data. Data for Air Force service requirements must be input at the Air Force CMRA link. However, user manuals for government personnel and contractors are available at the Army CMRA link at http://www.ecmra.mil. (CDRL No. A016; DI-FNCL- 81537)

4.14 Drug Testing Policy

Per DoDR 5210.42/AFMAN 13-501 Paragraph C2.8.4, ensure that employees to be assigned to a PRP position are subjected to a PSI, medical record evaluation, substance abuse testing, personal interview, proficiency certification, and continuing evaluation according to the certifying official, under the reliability standards of the PRP. Contractor personnel assigned to designated NC2 PRP positions shall be subject to random CSP testing. (Added)(AF) Contractor personnel shall ensure all dental/medical and pharmacy information is made available to the CMA.

Per DoDR 5210.42/AFMAN 13-501 Paragraph C4.4.4 and C4.4.4.1, Because of the danger to public health and safety or to U.S. national security that might result from the failure of an individual performing PRP duties to perform reliably, mandatory substance abuse testing of all military, civilian, and contractor personnel assigned to PRP duties shall be conducted according to DoD Directives 1010.1 and 1010.9.

(Added)(AF) Drug abuse testing for military and civilian personnel assigned to specially designated Nuclear Command and Control PRP positions identified in Table AP1.T1. (subsequent to 25 May 93) shall be administered before the individuals assume those duties. The AF Civilian Drug Testing Plan specifies that all Air Force civilian PRP positions are “Testing Designated Positions,” and as such, PRP employees are subject to random testing. These positions must be formally identified and designated on each position description and vacancy announcement. Drug testing for contractor personnel will be in accordance with the contract and will be equivalent to the AF Civilian Drug Testing Plan.

Per DoDI 1010.09 Enclosure 4 Paragraph 3, any DoD Component, agency, or organization implementing a certified DFWP must assign a drug program coordinator to carry out the drug-free workplace program, to serve as the principal contact with the laboratory, and to ensure compliance with Reference (e) and the requirements of this Instruction in collection activities.

Contractor personnel will use off base facilities to complete the drug testing requirements. On base facilities are not authorized for contractor use.

5 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

5.1 Security Program Plan

http://www.ecmra.mil/ http://www.ecmra.mil/

The contractor shall update as necessary the Security Program Plan (SPP) for conducting the HSEP (CDRL No. A006; DI-MGMT-80934C).

5.2 Security Clearances

The contractor shall ensure that all personnel who participate in the HSEP hold sufficient levels of security clearances to accomplish the requirements of this PWS. Minimum clearance required for all field activity personnel is SECRET.

5.3 USAF Nuclear Weapons Personnel Reliability Program

The contractor shall conduct a Nuclear Weapons Personnel Reliability Program (PRP) based on requirements in DoD 5210.42R_AFMAN 13-501, Incorporating IC1, 10 Sep 08, Nuclear Weapons Personnel Reliability Program (AFMAN 13-501). IAW AFMAN 13-501, the contractor is directed to provide a contract Competent Medical Authority (CMA) to perform all health-related PRP recommendations and evaluations to the Certifying Official on contract employees IAW established MOA/MOU as applicable, the contractor may be allowed to utilize the Military Treatment Facility as CMA.

If the contractor chooses to subcontract activities requiring PRP certification, it is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure that the subcontractor meets, implements, and adheres to all requirements and provisions of the PRP. Failure of the contractor or its subcontractor to fully comply with the PRP requirements and provisions may result in contract termination.

The contractor shall conduct the PRP in a manner compatible with AFMAN 13-501, as applicable. The contractor shall provide personnel who shall be qualified for critical access to implement the requirements of the USAF Two-Person Concept. The contractor shall ensure that personnel required for Two-Person Concept teams are PRP certified IAW the requirements of AFMAN 13-501. The contractor shall notify the Single Manager, the Program Manager, the AFNWC/NIEI and/or Host Wing PRP monitor, and the AFNWC/NI and/or Host Wing Certification Official of any potential compromise and then proceed as directed by the ACO.

The contractor shall ensure that all personnel performing duties that are of a critical or controlled (PRP certified) position as defined under AFMAN 13-501meet the reliability standards of PRP. Not all employees are required to have PRP certification. However, the contractor shall certify enough personnel to insure that the HSEP meets the requirements of the PRP and threat changes in the status of personnel PRP certification do not impact the HSEP schedule. In addition, the contractor shall:

a. Instruct managerial, supervisory, medical, and other personnel as that the assignment is subject to the standards and procedures of the PRP.

b. Make sure personnel assigned, or to be assigned, to a PRP position are medically examined and evaluated as required, and receive an OS-10 physical profile from a DOD medical authority.

c. Make sure personnel assigned, or to be assigned, to PRP positions meet the security investigative requirements of AFMAN 13-501.

d. Requests for investigations must reach the Defense Investigative Service (DIS) in enough time to allow the investigation to be conducted for the PRP position required. Interim certification is authorized for contractor personnel; however, only one interim-certified person can be used to form a TPC team.

e. Provide for day-to-day observation by contractor supervisory personnel of personnel assigned to PRP positions.

f. Provide to the certifying official results of a medical evaluation of any personnel assigned, or to be assigned, to a PRP position, and an immediate report of any other data or information concerning such personnel that is relevant to standards for assignment under the PRP.

g. Assign to PRP positions only those personnel whom the certifying official has determined to be eligible under the standards of the PRP.

h. Temporarily remove personnel from assignment to the duties of a PRP position immediately on notice of data or information that is, or appears to be, reason for decertification for such assignment under the standards of the PRP.

i. Notify the certifying official immediately of such temporary removal of personnel and of the reasons therefore.

j. Notify appropriate activities so that entry authority and access lists may be updated to bar decertified personnel from assuming or conducting PRP responsibilities.

k. Immediately remove personnel from a PRP position on notification by the certifying official that the person has been temporarily decertified.

l. On notice by the certifying official of permanent decertification, advise the person of the right to submit information on his or her behalf for use by the reviewing official.

m. When notified by the reviewing official that the person has been determined to be unacceptable for failure to meet reliability standards and has been permanently decertified, the contractor shall reassign the person to non-PRP tasks.

n. Update the PRP Implementation Plan whenever permanent changes occur in PRP certified positions or personnel (CDRL No. A007; DI-MGMT-81737).

o. Apply the PRP to any subcontractors holding PRP positions.

p. Arrange for all candidates, including any subcontractor personnel, for PRP positions to travel to

HAFB and/or Host Wing for PRP training and interviews.

q. The AFNWC/NI and/or Host Wing Certifying Official will act as the Certifying Official for the

HSEP Contractor Personnel as long as the personnel are in the Utah area. When the Contractor Personnel transfer to a Wing to perform tasks identified in this PWS, the PCO or ACO will identify a new Certifying Official, if required, by letter prior to transfer.

r. Ensure that only United States citizens are identified for PRP positions.

s. Ensure that no individuals who have previously been permanently decertified, whether as a military member, DOD civilian, or contractor performing PRP duties, are identified for PRP duty.

t. Ensure that the contractor security officer is knowledgeable of all PRP requirements.

u. Ensure that no punitive measures are taken against an employee as a result of their certification status.

5.4 Two-Person Concept Control

The contractor shall provide personnel who shall be qualified for critical access to implement the requirements of the Two-Person Concept based on AFI 91-104. The contractor shall ensure that personnel included in Two-Person Concept teams are PRP certified IAW the requirements of AFMAN 13-501. The contractor shall notify the Program Manager, the AFNWC/NI and/or Host Wing Nuclear Surety Monitor, PRP monitor, and the Certification Official of any potential compromise, involving Two-Person Concept team; and then proceed as directed by the PCO.

5.5 Physical and Information Security Recuirements

The contractor shall comply with the requirements of the Department of Defense (DOD) National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (DOD 5220.22-M) unless contractually modified.

The contractor shall control access to the facilities occupied by the contractor. Access to keys and combinations used to secure Government property and classified material shall be limited to authorized persons.

The contractor shall maintain an account with the Defense Courier Service, and use it for all Top Secret transmittals.

5.6 Classified Information

This contract requires that the contractor have access to classified information. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requires that a DD Form 254 be incorporated in each classified contract. The DD Form 254 provides to the contractor the security requirements and the classification guidance that would be necessary to perform on a classified contract.

6 QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

6.1 Inspection Program

The contractor shall establish and implement an inspection system that meets the requirements specified in the general provisions of the contract. This program shall also apply to all subcontractors. The contractor shall ensure that all test equipment is properly calibrated and functioning prior to test execution.

7 SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

7.1 System Safety

Safety features shall preclude or limit hazards to personnel and equipment IAW MIL-STD 882E.

System Safety Program.

The contractor shall implement a System Safety Program IAW MIL-STD 882E Task 101. Program provisions shall apply to all subcontractors as well. Status and progress shall be reported at TIMs, design reviews, and program review meetings. This status and progress shall include identification and discussion on all newly recognized significant hazards and hazard control status. The contractor shall review all testing/inspection efforts and development of test plans/procedures accomplished under this contract for system safety implications. The contractor shall ensure compliance with safety engineering principles and weapon system safety criteria IAW MIL-STD-882E. The contractor shall analyze development of plans and procedures for testing activities on a continuing basis to ensure that any potential safety deficiency/hazard is detected, evaluated and resolved. The contractor shall advise AFNWC/NI System Safety Office of safety issues/concerns involving repair or test programs. The contractor shall notify the AFNWC/NI System Safety Office by telephone followed by a written notification of hazardous conditions or safety implications identified or on determination that the criteria and requirements of MIL-STD 882E have not been satisfied. (CDRL No. A018; DI-SAFT-81626)

7.2 Safety Compliance Assessment Report

The contractor shall update as necessary the Safety Compliance Assessment Report (SCAR) IAW MIL- STD-882E, Task 402, for the development and testing of the HSEP and the development of procedures, for the testing, operation, and maintenance for this effort (CDRL No. A013).

7.3 Safety Engineering Analysis

The contractor shall update as necessary the Safety Engineering Analyses (SEAs) to support the HSEP based upon the requirements of AFI 21-202 and MIL-STD-882E.

7.4 Nuclear Safety Support

The contractor shall provide support to AFNWC/NI System Safety Office for Nuclear Surety Impact Statement (NSIS) development based upon requirements found in AFI 91-103, Attachment 2, paragraph A2.3. The contractor shall provide technical support to the Nuclear Surety Working Group (NSWG). The NSWG meetings will be held approximately three times per year. Also, the contractor shall be prepared to discuss nuclear safety issues at all other meeting required by this effort. (CDRL No. A019; DI-NUOR- 81888A).

7.5 Nuclear Safety Analysis

The contractor shall update as necessary, the Nuclear Safety Analysis Report (NSAR) on the HSEP program. The analysis shall address the HSEP PRP program, configuration and control of HSEP equipment and procedures, LF and MAF intrusion detection systems, site deposture, site preparation, HSEP testing site checkout, and reposture phases of the HSEP. The contractor shall generate a NSAR which addresses, but will not be limited to the following (CDRL No. A021; DI-NUOR-81405A/T) (CDRL No. A022; DI-

SAFT-81563):

a. MAF/LF isolation

b. Re-entry System (RS) removal/replacement

c. Emplacement and use of RS simulator

d. Removal/replacement/control of operational codes and critical components

e. LF/Missile safing

f. Ordnance removal/safing

g. All HSEP test activities

h. Interface and use of test equipment and overlay software

i. LF/MAF Security and No Lone Zones IAW AFI 91-104 and AFI 91-105, paragraph 9

j. Refurbishment and checkout of damaged equipment

k. Checkout/recertification of nuclear safety critical components

l. Post-test checkout of LF/MAF

m. MAF/LF de-isolation

n. Weapon System Verification testing

o. Design and use of overlay tapes

p. Design and operation of new test equipment IAW AFI 91-107 paragraph 2.2

q. Summary of testing

r. Configuration control of HSEP equipment and procedures.

7.6 Nuclear Safety Certification

If the contractor plans to perform field or laboratory tests/inspections involving nuclear certified items, the HSEP will require a Nuclear Safety Certification by the Government. The certification effort will be completed approximately 180 calendar days following receipt of the draft NSAR. The contractor shall take this delay into account for scheduling purposes. (CDRL No. A020; DI-NUOR-81409A)

7.7 Nuclear Surety Training

The contractor shall update, as necessary, the nuclear surety training program and materials. The contractor shall conduct training for all individuals who will be PRP certified after the program and materials have been approved by the Government, but prior to PRP certification. Guidelines for training are found in AFI 91-101, paragraph 2.1.5. (CDRL No. A023; DI-ILSS-80872)

8 SUPPLY SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS

8.1 Government Owned Facilities

The contractor will be allowed access to appropriate locations at Government facilities. Access to these facilities is not unlimited; therefore, the contractor shall coordinate the times and dates with AFNWC/NIEI through the ACO at least 90 calendar days prior to need. Control of the facilities will remain with the Government. Following use for contractor conducted activities, the contractor shall restore the Government facility to the original configuration.

8.2 Contractor Furnished Facilities

The contractor shall provide any office, laboratory, warehouse, or support facilities required to accomplish the tasks in this PWS. The contractor may negotiate facilities at ICBM SMWs through the Base Support Agreement.

The contractor shall furnish and install office and shop equipment, reproduction equipment, test equipment etc. necessary to support this contract in facilities operated by the contractor.

8.3 Government Furnished Property

The Government property listed in Appendix B is available for the contractor to use as Government Furnished Property (GFP). The contractor shall package and ship GFP as required to support its use at all locations according to approved plans and schedules. The contractor shall plan and conduct maintenance and operations of the GFP in such a way as to minimize wear and tear on the equipment. The contractor shall repair GFP as required to maintain functionality (CDRL No. A024; DI-MGMT-80269)

Modification of GFP The contractor shall plan and perform any modification the GFP may require to make it usable according to the contractor's technical approach. Costs associated with this task shall be included in the firm fixed price line item.

8.4 Contractor Furnished Equipment

The contractor shall furnish all equipment required to perform HSEP testing which is not outlined in Appendix B, to include High altitude burst pulser.

8.5 Contractor Support Data

The contractor is authorized access to Air Force data as applicable and available to support the efforts required by this program. Assistance in obtaining data may be obtained from AFNWC/NIEI through the

PCO.

8.6 Spares Acquisition

The contractor shall identify equipment (including GFP) parts and components which (CDRL No. A024;

DI-MGMT-80269):

a. will need frequent replacement, or

b. will result in a possible program delay for procurement of replacements. The contractor shall procure a sufficient supply of these parts and components to assure minimum program delay for repair of equipment (including GFP).

9 TRANSITION PLAN

9.1 The Contractor shall have up to 90 days from date of contract award to ensure an orderly transition from the incumbent or stand up manning for new workload without impact on Government operations. This transition shall be accomplished in accordance with the Transition Plan, which is incorporated into the contract.

9.2 The incoming Contractor is responsible for all efforts and material related to transition. Prior to cutover date, the incoming contractor shall make all necessary efforts to provide a seamless transition to the Government.