Question_and_Answers_9.22.2017.pdf

PDF 80 KB Posted

Attached to
Gear Shop Crane Replacement Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA812517Q0107
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Tinker Air Force Base

About this file

Q&A

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Gear Shop Crane Replacement, newest first.
File Type Posted
Gear_Crane_SOW_Revised_19_Sept_2017.pdf PDF
Amendment_3_FA8125-17-Q-0107.pdf PDF
Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Gear_Crane_SOW_Revision_01.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001_Gear_Crane_(FA8125-17-Q-0107).pdf PDF
FA812517Q0107_Gear_Shop_Crane_Replacement.pdf PDF
FA812517Q0107_Gear_Crane_SOW.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Question 1: The current air hoist is chain, the SOW has requested a wire rope hoist, which offers less lift height. Is an electric chain hoist acceptable?

Answer 1: Yes, an electric chain hoist is acceptable.

Question 2: The existing hoist has a max hook height of 10'3", 12' is requested in the SOW. Is 10'3" acceptable?

Answer 2: Yes, 10'3" is acceptable and should have been the original height requested in the SOW.

Question 3: Will the shop still be working during the retrofit?

Answer 3: Yes, part of the shop will still be working during the retrofit, but production located underneath the hoist/crane will cease until retrofit completed.

Question 4: What is the linear footage, including rise and fall from the electrical panel location to the landing gear shop. (overall footage of conduit required)? Shop layout drawing available?

Answer 4: Total length including rise and fall from power panel to the closest gantry leg is approximately 38 to 40 feet. I do not have a drawing of the shop that I can provide.

Question 5: Is the technical information for the existing crane available (factory specifications)?

Answer 5: The hoist is a Chester Hoist, Model ALP0200S. It can be found on the chesterhoist.com.

Question 6: Due to the short runway and asset being lifted, 120 fpm is an unsafe travel speed, is this correct?

Answer 6: I do not know what is considered unsafe, but a motor with a variable speed up 120 fpm would be acceptable, especially if maximum limits can be set during installation and usage.

Question 7: Due to the positioning required to place asset in fixture is 65 fpm correct for trolley speed?

Answer 7: A motor with a variable speed up 65 fpm would be acceptable, especially if maximum limits can be set during installation and usage.

September 22, 2017 Questions & Answers: Crane Replacement FA8125‐17‐Q‐0107

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .