FA8101-14-R-0001-0004.pdf
PDF 89 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Base Supply and Munitions Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8101-14-R-0001
About this file
Attached solicitation corrects a typographical error. It does not extend the proposal due date. Electronic submission of signed amendment is acceptable.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA8101-14-R-0001-0003.pdf | ||
| PWS_-_Base_Supply_and_Munitions_(17_Sept_14).pdf | ||
| CBA_reprint.pdf | ||
| Questions_to_RFP_17_Sept.pdf | ||
| FA8101-14-R-0001-0002.pdf | ||
| FA8101-14-R-0001-0001.pdf | ||
| DD_Form_254_(Base_Supply-Munitions_Contract_Renewal).pdf | ||
| PWS_-_Base_Supply_and_Munitions_(28_AUG_14).pdf | ||
| Current_Wage_Det_25_July.pdf | ||
| GFP_Base_Supply-Munitions_Contract_Renewal.pdf | ||
| CBA_WAGE_DET.pdf | ||
| FA8101-14-R-0001.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
F3Y0AQ3099A001
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
The purpose of this amendment is to make correct typographical error in Section L.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 25
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 14-Oct-2014
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA8101-14-R-0001
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
28-Aug-2014
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
14-Oct-2014
CODE
AFSC/PZIOA
APRIL D. DAVISON/405-739-4183
7858 5TH ST, STE 1
TINKER AFB OK 73145-9025
FA8101 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
FA8101-14-R-0001
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
Section L
INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO RESPONDENTS FOR
PROPOSAL PREPARATION USING TRADEOFF SOURCE SELECTION
PROCEDURES
1.0 Program Structure and Objective
1.1.1. The Government plans to award a single contract for Base Supply and Munitions program. The contract will primarily include requisition, receiving, storing, issuing, delivering and disposing of supplies and equipment assets to support customers on Tinker AFB, to include tenant units and transient customers.
1.1.2. Award will be made on the basis of “best value” utilizing Tradeoff Source Selection Procedures. Award will be made to the contractor that provides the “best value” to the Government over the entire period of performance.
1.2. Budget/Funding Information
Funding will be obligated for the Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) for the base period, to include the phase-in period.
2.0 General Instructions
2.1.1. This section of the Instructions to Offerors (ITO) provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information requested by the ITO and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. Any Offeror who submits an incomplete package may be considered ineligible for award. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and appendices. Non-conformance with the instructions provided in the ITO may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.
2.1.2. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal.
2.1.3. Elaborate brochures, documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.
2.1.4. The proposal acceptance period is specified in Section A of the model contract/solicitation. The offeror shall make a clear statement in Section A of the proposal documentation volume that the proposal is valid until this date.
2.1.5. In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.
2.2. General Information
2.2.1. Point of Contact
The Contracting Officer (CO) and Contract Specialist (CS) are the sole point of contact for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns you may have to the CO and CS. Written requests for clarification may be sent to the CO and CS at the address located in Section A of the model contract/solicitation.
2.2.2. Debriefings
The CO will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range, whereupon they may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505.
Offerors excluded from the competitive range may request a pre-award debriefing or they may choose to wait until after the source selection decision to request a post-award debriefing.
However, offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to no more than one debriefing for each proposal. The CO will notify unsuccessful offerors in accordance with FAR
15.503. Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing.
Offerors desiring a debriefing must make their request in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.
2.2.3. Discrepancies
If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the CO in writing with supporting rationale as well as the remedies the offeror is asking the CO to consider as related to the omission or error. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions. This reservation includes matters of additional or substitute pages of the initial proposal.
2.2.4. Electronic Reference Documents
All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) web site at http://www.fbo.gov. Potential Offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.
2.2.5. Oral Presentation
Oral presentations will not be utilized.
2.2.6. Amendments to Solicitation
If this RFP is amended, all terms and conditions that are not amended remain unchanged and in full force and effect. Offerors shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment and provide confirmation upon submission of the offeror’s proposal. Any unacknowledged amendments in the offeror’s proposal are subject to solicitation provision in Sections L and M.
2.2.7. Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal of Proposals Proposals and modifications to proposals shall be submitted in sealed envelopes or packages in paper media and electronic media addressed to the CO at the address shown in Section A of the model contract/solicitation, and showing the time and date specified for receipt, the solicitation number, and the name and address of the offeror.
2.3. Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits
2.3.1. The Title Page of each volume must show solicitation number, name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the offeror and electronic e-mail address if available.
2.3.2. A Team List of the offeror’s primary Point of Contacts shall be submitted in each volume using the format shown in Attachment 2 of the ITO.
2.3.3. The Offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Proposal Organization Table (Table 2.2 below). The titles and contents of the volumes shall be as defined in this table, all of which shall be within the required page limits and with the number of copies as specified in Table 2.2. The attachments identified in the table shall be separately bound in three-ring, loose-leaf binders, as necessary. The contents of each proposal volume are described in the ITO paragraph as noted in the table below.
Table 2.3. Proposal Organization
Volume
ITO
Paragraph Number
Volume Title
Hard Copies
Disk
Copies
Page Limit
I 3 Technical 5/1 65
2.2.1 Title Page (Not included in 65 page limit) 1
2.2.2 Team List (see Attach 2.0)(Not included in
65 page limit)
2.2.7 Table of Contents Unlimited
2.2.8 List of Tables and Figures Unlimited
2.2.9 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms Unlimited
II 4 Past Performance 4/1 Unlimited
2.2.1 Title Page 1
2.2.2 Team List (See Attach 2.0) 5
4.2.2 Present/Past Performance Information
Sheets (PPIS) (See Attach 1.1)
4.1.2 Consent Letter (See Attach 1.4) Unlimited
4.1.2 Client Authorization Letters (See Attach
1.5) Unlimited
4.2.2 Present/Past Performance Questionnaires
(See Attach 1.2)
Tab Only
4.3.2 Relevant Contract Narrative Max 5 pages
per contract
4.3.3 Roadmap 2
III 5 Cost/Price Volume 2/2 Unlimited
5.2 General Information Unlimited
5.3 Volume Organization Unlimited
IV 6 Contract Documentation 2/1 Unlimited
2.2.1 Title Page (SF30) 1
2.2.2 Team List (see Attach 2.0) 5
2.2.7 Table of Contents Unlimited
2.2.8 List of Tables and Figures Unlimited
2.2.9 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms Unlimited
2.2.2 Team List, Arrangements, and/or Letters of
Intent (see Attach 2.0)
6.1 Model Contract (Sections A-J) N/A
6.1.4 Representations and Certifications (Section
K) N/A
6.3.2-6.3.4 Contact Information Unlimited
7.3.5 Attachments to the Model Contract Unlimited
2.3.4. Page Limitations
Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal and (for paper copies) will be returned to the Offeror as soon as practicable. Page limitations may also be placed on responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs). The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offerors. Each page shall be counted except the following: blank pages, title pages, tables of contents, tabs, indexes, glossaries, and those noted in the Proposed Organization Chart as unlimited.
2.3.5. Cost or Pricing Information
All cost or pricing information shall be addressed ONLY in the Cost/Price Proposal and Contract Documentation volumes. Cost trade-off information, work hour estimates, and material kinds and quantities may be used in other volumes only as appropriate for presenting rationale for alternatives or design and trade-off decisions.
2.3.6. Cross Referencing
Each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated without cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation, which is not found in its designated volume, will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted when its use would conserve space without impairing clarity.
2.3.7. Indexing
Each volume shall contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections.
2.3.8. Include an indexed list of Tables and Figures.
2.3.9. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, and with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.
2.4. Page Size and Format
2.4.1. A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Page size shall be 8.5 x 11 inches, not including foldouts. Page line spacing shall be 1.5 lines. Except for the reproduced sections of the solicitation document, the text size shall be no less than Arial 12 points. Tracking, kerning, and leading values shall not be changed from the default values of the word processing or page layout software. Use at least 1 inch margins on the top and bottom and 3/4 inch side margins. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume. These page format restrictions shall apply to responses to Evaluation Notice (ENs). These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals.
2.4.2. Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated and shall not exceed 11 x 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume, and count as a single page. Foldout pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams and schematics; not for pages of text. The following limitation only applies to the Technical Volume. Text intended for evaluation within all figures, charts, tables, and graphs, to include imbedded images, shall be no less than Arial 8-pt. These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals. Any text within figures, charts, tables, and graphs which do not meet this requirement will not be considered in the evaluation. These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals.
2.5. Binding and Labeling
Each volume of the proposal should be separately bound in a three-ring, loose-leaf binder permitting the volume to lie flat when open. Staples shall not be used. A cover sheet should be bound in each book, clearly marked as to volume number, title, copy number, solicitation identification and the offeror’s name. The same identifying data should be placed on the spine of each binder. All unclassified document binders shall have a color other than red or other applicable security designation colors. Be sure to apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(e), Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data, and FAR 3.104-4, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information.
2.6. Electronic Offers
The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. When discrepancies exist between the written hard copies and those provided in electronic format, the written hard copies will take precedence in all cases. For electronic copies, indicate on each Compact Disc Read Only Memory (CD-ROM) the volume number and title. Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions, including subfactors, required plans, exhibits, appendices, and attachments, if any. The offeror shall submit volumes I through IV in electronic format.
Each volume shall be submitted on a separate CD. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included. The electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft (MS) Word 2007/2010, MS Excel 2007/2010, and MS-Power Point 2007/2010, or Microsoft Office XP as applicable.
2.7. Distribution
The "original" proposal shall be clearly identified. Proposals shall be addressed to the Contracting Specialist and mailed to:
1.0 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
2.0 OFFICE: ATTN: April Davison
Tinker AFB: Bldg 3, AFSC/PZIOA, 7858 5th Street, Tinker AFB OK 73145-3020
Telephone: 405-739-4183
April.Davison@us.af.mil
3.0 Factor 1: Technical
3.1. General
The Technical Volume should be specific and complete. Legibility, clarity and coherence are very important. Your responses will be evaluated against the Technical subfactors defined in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award. Using the instructions provided below, provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology you would use for accomplishing/satisfying these subfactors. All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory. By your proposal submission, you are representing that your firm will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation. It is neither necessary nor desirable for you to tell us so in your proposal. Do not merely reiterate the objectives or reformulate the requirements specified in the solicitation.
3.2. Format and Specific Content
3.2.1. Technical
In the Technical Volume, address your proposed approach to meeting the minimum performance or capability requirements of each technical subfactor.
3.2.2. Volume Organization
The Technical Volume shall be organized according to the following general outline:
(1) Team List Attach 2.0
(2) Table of Contents
(3) List of Table and Drawings
(4) Glossary
(5) Subfactor One – Program Management and Orientation
(6) Subfactor Two – Manpower and Organization Chart
(7) Subfactor Three – Execution Plans
3.2.3. Subfactor One: Program Management and Orientation
The Offeror shall provide an approach for program management and orientation for the Base Supply and Munitions program. As a minimum, the approach shall provide the following essential components:
a. An approach for performing mobility support requirements IAW PWS paragraph
1.3. At a minimum the approach must address how the offeror shall store, manage, maintain, inventory and deploy Mobility Bags, Mobility Readiness Spares Packages (MRSP), Mission Support Kits (MSK), Gas Masks and IBA.
b. An approach for performing the munitions requirement IAW AFI 21-200, AFI 21-201, AFMAN 91-201, DOD 4145.26M and PWS paragraph 1.4. At a minimum the approach must address how the offeror shall receive, store, handle, issue and transport munitions, provide courtesy storage for organizations with no secure storage capability, prepare and schedule munitions for shipment.
c. Verification of the On-Site Manager and Alternate’s qualifications and experience IAW PWS 1.10.1 and 1.10.1.1.
d. An approach describing how the following certification and documentation requirements will be met IAW PWS paragraph 1.4 and 1.10.1.6.
1) In accordance with AFI 21-201, paragraph 3.8.3.1, munitions inspectors must have completed Munitions Inspector Training and Certification using the USAF Qualification Training Package (AFQTP) for Munitions Inspector Training and Certification, located on the AFMC2 SharePoint Site and any local requirements (e.g., Senior Inspector Assessment, Quality Assurance evaluations).
2) Contractor personnel required to transport munitions shall possess a valid Commercial Driver's License (CDL), according to the class of vehicle being driven IAW PWS paragraph 1.10.1.6.
e. An approach for meeting the following security and security clearance requirements in accordance with PWS paragraphs 1.12.1, 1.12.2, and 1.12.7.
1) At the close of each work period, Government real property, equipment, materials and unattended storage areas shall be secured.
2) The Contractor shall possess or obtain an appropriate facility clearance, SECRET, prior to performing work on a classified Government contract. The following personnel shall have a SECRET security clearance: Contract Manager, Alt. Contract Manager, Supply and Munitions War Reserve Material Managers.
3) The security manager shall provide employees with training required by DOD
5220.1-R and AFI 31-401, Information Security Program, Chapter 10. The Contractor shall establish a Security Program Plan IAW AFI 31-501, Chapters 1-11 and AFI 31-601, Chapters 3 and 5, and provide initial and follow on training to Contractor personnel who work in Air Force controlled/restricted areas.
f. An approach for control, accountability, and security of all Government property, facilities, documents, and technical data IAW PWS paragraph 1.12.1, 1.15. and 1.15.1.
At a minimum the approach must address how the offeror will be responsible for safeguarding Government property provided for Contractor use. At the end of each work period, all Government facilities, equipment and materials shall be secured.
Establish and implement key control procedures, to ensure all keys issued to the Contractor by the Government are properly safeguarded, are not lost or misplaced and are not used by unauthorized persons.
g. An orientation approach for assuming responsibility from the existing work force
IAW PWS paragraph 1.27, 1.31.1.2, 1.31.1.3 and 1.31.2. At a minimum the approach must address how the offeror will obtain required security clearances, badges, Common Access Card (CAC). Complete personnel requirements (work force) including the hiring of personnel to assure satisfactory performance. Observe work accomplished by current workforce without interfering with the production efforts of current Government or Contractor personnel.
A transition plan to manage and accomplish contract transition and phase in to include: hiring and training personnel, completing all workforce requirements, strategy to meet contractual requirements at the beginning of the contract period.
Include transition milestones and an organization chart demonstrating a single point of contact and identifying key positions IAW PWS: 1.27 and all sub-paragraphs.
3.2.4. Subfactor Two: Manpower and Organization Chart
The Offeror shall provide an approach for manpower and organization. As a minimum the proposal must describe the offeror’s organization chart and include manning numbers by all functional areas to include overall and total manning numbers for each specific functional area with an approach for sustaining proposed manpower levels during the contract performance period IAW PWS paragraph 1.10.1.12.
3.2.5 Subfactor Three: Execution Plans
Quality Control The offeror shall provide an approach for quality control. As a minimum the proposal must provide procedures for interfacing with Government representatives (i.e., Contracting Officer’s Representative, Contract Administrators, and Contracting Officers), approach to requirements listed in the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan and description of the internal feedback system and lines of authority for Quality Control personnel IAW PWS paragraph 1.14.1a), d) and h).
Safety Plan The offeror shall provide an approach for safety. As a minimum the proposal must provide surveillance for safety, how safety problems will be handled, and how it will be documented. Proposed inspection procedures to meet the Safety Plan and a description of how performance will be measured for safety control deficiencies to be corrected IAW PWS paragraph 1.20.2 and 1.20.6.
Environmental Plan The offeror shall provide an environmental approach. As a minimum the proposal must provide all of the following essential components:
management of hazardous material/waste, Satellite Accumulation Point management, waste accumulation/collection, storage, turn-in and personnel training, approach for environmental mishaps, small spill cleanup and spill prevention and response training IAW PWS paragraph 1.18.1 and 1.18.6.
4.0. Factor 2: Past Performance
4.1. General
4.1.1. Each offeror shall submit a past performance volume with its proposal, containing past performance information in accordance with the format contained in Attachment 1.1 of the ITO.
This information is required on the offeror and all subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners proposed to perform the work outlined in the solicitation. Offerors are cautioned that the Government will use data provided by each offeror in this volume and data obtained from other sources in the evaluation of past performance.
4.1.2. Along with the information required in this paragraph, the offeror shall submit a consent letter (Attachment 1.4) executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information to the offeror so the offeror can respond to such information. For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter (Attachment 1.5) authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the offeror’s performance.
4.2. Early Proposal Information
4.2.1 Each offeror is requested to submit Volume II Past Performance for each relevant contract fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the solicitation closing date. Failure to submit early proposal information will not result in offeror disqualification.
4.2.2. As soon as practicable, offerors shall complete Section 1 of the attached Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 1.2) and e-mail it and the Performance Questionnaire Letter (Attachment 1.3) to all points of contacts (POCs) the offeror has listed in the PPIS (Attachment 1.1). The POCs will complete the questionnaires and forward them by FAX, directly to the Performance Confidence Assessment Group (PCAG). Fax copies to 405-736-8731 (Attn: April Davison) or e-mail April.Davison@us.af.mil. RESPONDENTS TO THE QUESTIONNAIRES
SHALL NOT SEND THE COMPLETED INFORMATION SHEETS BACK TO THE OFFEROR.
Offerors shall not follow-up with respondents to ensure they have completed the questionnaires.
The PCAG will conduct such follow-up with any POC as necessary.
4.3. Relevant Contracts
4.3.1. Request each PPIS not exceed a target of 8 pages, although more or less may be submitted if necessary and relevant to the base supply and munitions effort. Request each offeror submit up to four (4) PPIS forms for the prime Contractor and up to three (3) for each significant subcontractor/teaming partner limited to the last 3 years. The target of 8 pages for PPIS does not include the allowable 5 pages for ITO Paragraph Number 4.3.2, Relevant Contract Narrative.
NOTE: The requested number of PPIS forms for the prime and subcontractors are preferences, and not requirements. Offerors who submit less than the preferred number of PPIS forms are not automatically assigned an “Unknown Confidence” rating. Fewer numbers may be acceptable if the Government determines there is sufficient information to determine a confidence rating.
Please only submit information on subcontractors and teaming partners performing key or critical portions of the base supply and munitions effort. There is no limit on the number of PPIS forms allowed per team; however, offerors are requested to limit responses to those efforts necessary for evaluation and relevant to the base supply and munitions effort.
4.3.2. Specific Content
Offerors shall provide a narrative explaining what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate. This may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk. Merely having problems does not automatically equate to a limited or no confidence rating, since the problems encountered may have been on a more complex program, or an offeror may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to overcome the problems encountered. The offeror shall clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. This may allow the offeror to be considered a higher confidence candidate. For example, submittal of quality performance indicators or other management indicators that clearly support that an Offeror has overcome past problems is required. Categorize the relevance information into the specific technical subfactors and Cost /Price assessment used to evaluate the proposal.
4.3.3. Organizational Structure Change History
Many companies have acquired, been acquired by, or otherwise merged with other companies and/or reorganized their divisions, business groups, subsidiary companies, etc. In many cases, these changes have taken place during the time of performance of relevant past efforts or between the conclusion of recent past efforts and this source selection. As a result, it is sometimes difficult to determine what past performance is relevant to this acquisition. To facilitate this relevancy determination, offeror’s shall include a "roadmap" describing all such changes in the organization of the offeror’s company. A pamphlet or other commercial document describing such reorganizations may suffice. As part of this explanation, show how these changes impact the relevance of any efforts you identify for past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment. Since the Government intends to consider past performance information provided by other sources as well as that provided by the offeror(s), the "roadmap" should be both specifically applicable to the efforts identified, yet general enough to apply to efforts on which the Government receives information from other sources.
5.0. Factor 3: Cost/Price
5.1. In the price volume, the Offeror shall provide the following information in addition to the pricing in Supplies or Services and Prices/Cost Section (Part B) of the solicitation. These instructions are to assist you in submitting information required to evaluate the reasonableness of your proposed cost/price. Compliance with these instructions is mandatory and failure to comply may result in rejection of your proposal.
5.2. General Instructions
Information beyond that required by this instruction shall not be submitted, unless you consider it essential to document or support your cost/price position. All information relating to the proposed price including all required supporting documentation must be included in the section of the proposal designated as the Cost/Price Volume. Under no circumstances shall this information and documentation be included elsewhere in the proposal.
5.2.1. Pricing Information Requirements
FAR part 15 applies. In accordance with FAR 15.403-3-1(b), prices based on adequate price competition do not require submission of certified cost or pricing data. In accordance with FAR 15.403-3(a), however, information other than cost or pricing data may be required to support price reasonableness. FAR 15.403-3(a) (1) provides for obtaining information other than cost or pricing data if needed to determine price reasonableness. Therefore, the FAR does not preclude the requirement for obtaining other than cost or pricing data under certain circumstances and the Government reserves the right to obtain data as appropriate. Should the CO determine proposed prices to appear unreasonable or the possibility that an Offeror does not fully understand the requirement, the Offerors may be required to support price reasonableness via other than cost or pricing data. If, after receipt of proposals, the CO determines that there is insufficient information available to determine price reasonableness and none of the exceptions in FAR 15.403-1 apply, the offeror shall be required to submit cost or pricing data.
5.2.2. Rounding
All dollar amounts shall be rounded to the nearest penny.
5.3. Volume Organization.
The Price volume shall consist of the following sections:
SECTION 1 - Table of Contents; summary descriptions of estimating, purchasing, and accounting systems; changes to estimating, and accounting practices.
SECTION 2 - Cost or pricing information and supporting data, to include estimating methodology.
SECTION 3 - Other information such as Government Furnished Property/Government
Furnished Equipment (GFP/GFE), long lead costs, termination costs, labor cost, inflation rate summary and explanation. List each exception to the ground rules and assumptions provided in the solicitation and each qualification of the Cost/Price volume, if any.
Provide complete rationale for any exceptions.
SECTION 4 - Copy of “Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs” (Section B) from RFP with Offeror’s proposed prices included.
5.4. Pricing Support Information
5.4.1. Estimating System
Provide a summary description of your standard estimating system or methods. Also, identify any deviations from your standard estimating procedures in preparing this proposal volume.
Indicate whether you have Government approval of your system and if so, provide evidence of such approval.
5.4.2. Purchasing System
Provide a summary description of your purchasing system or methods (e.g., how material requirements are determined, how sources are selected, when firm quotes are obtained, what provision is made to ensure quantity and other discounts). Also, identify any deviations from your standard procedures in preparing this proposal. Indicate whether you have Government approval of your system and if so, provide evidence of such approval.
5.4.3. Accounting System
Indicate whether you have Government approval of your accounting system and if so, provide evidence of such approval. Also, identify any deviations from your standard procedures in preparing this proposal.
5.4.4. Annual Price Changes
Proposed price increases greater than 5% per period shall be verified and addressed for reasonableness in this section.
5.4.5. SCA/CBA
It is the responsibility of the Offeror and the subsequent contract awardee to comply with the Services Contract Act (SCA) or Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). In this section of the Cost/Price Volume, a table shall be provided conforming (linking) the Offeror’s proposed job categories/skill levels considered subject to the SCA or CBA with the job categories/skill levels of the Wage Determination (WD). This cross-reference provides a tie between the labor categories/skill levels proposed and the labor categories/skill levels listed in the SCA WD or
CBA.
5.4.6. Government Field Support Agencies
72 LRS/LGLOC and AFSC/PZIOA are responsible for administration of the Offeror’s Government contracts.
5.4.7. Other Documentation
Other documentation considered by Offerors to be essential for support of proposed prices shall be presented in this section. Pursuant to paragraph 6.1.1 below, Offerors are requested to address any proposed prices which reflect a business decision to offer prices at or below cost.
5.4.8. Probable Subcontractors
Submit a list of the proposed probable subcontractors and inter-divisional transfers showing (a) the supplier and (b) description of effort.
5.4.9. Submission of Price/Cost Models
Submit an electronically encoded price/cost model in support of the proposed Total Evaluated Price (TEP). Any price/cost model submitted must be consistent with your approved estimating system and must duplicate the logic and mathematical formulas reflected in the paper copy of your proposal. Cost/price models submitted must comply with the following format requirements:
(a) Data file should be submitted on a CD.
(b) Data file should be .XLS file format (MS-Excel 2007 or earlier) compatible format.
6.0. Contract Documentation
6.1. Model Contract/Representations and Certifications
The purpose of this volume is to provide information to the Government for preparing the contract document and supporting file. The offeror's proposal shall include a signed copy of the Model Contract, and Sections A through K.
6.1.1. Solicitation/Contract Form (Section A)
Completion of blocks 12 through 18 of the SF30. Signature by the offeror on the SF30 constitutes an offer, which the Government may accept. The "original" copy should be clearly marked under separate cover and should be provided without any punched holes.
6.1.2. Supplies or Services and Costs/Prices (Section B)
Completed pricing information in Section B of the model contract.
6.1.3. Contract Clauses (Section I)
The offeror shall provide required information to complete clauses as required.
6.1.4. Representations, Certifications, and other Statements of Offerors (Section K) The offeror has completed the annual representations and certification electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) website at http://www.sam.gov. After reviewing the SAM database information, the offeror verifies by submission of this offer that the representation and certifications currently posted electronically at FAR 52.204-8, Annual Representations and Certifications, as well as 52.204-7, System for Award Management.
6.2. Exceptions to Solicitation Requirements
Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken.
Provide rationale in support of the exception and fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, cost, and specific requirements of the solicitation. This information shall be provided in the format and content of Table 6.2.
Table 6.2 - Solicitation Exceptions
Solicitation Document
Page/ Paragraph
Requirement/ Portion
Rationale
SOO, SOW, SPEC,
Model Contract, ITO, etc.
Applicable Page and Paragraph Numbers
Identify the requirement or portion to which exception is taken
Describe why the requirement can/will not be met
6.3. Other Information Required
6.3.1. Ombudsman
An Ombudsman has been appointed to hear concerns from offerors or potential offerors during the proposal development phase of this acquisition. The Ombudsman for this acquisition is AFSC/PZIOA. This does not diminish the authority of the program director or CO, but communicates offeror concerns, issues, disagreements and recommendations to the appropriate Government personnel. When requested, the Ombudsman shall maintain strict confidentiality as to the source of the concern. The Ombudsman does not participate in the evaluation of proposals or in the source selection process; interested parties are invited to call AFSC/PZIOA at (405) 739-4183.
6.3.2. Authorized Offeror Personnel
Provide the name, title, and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government.
6.3.3. Government Offices
Provide the mailing address, telephone and fax numbers and facility codes for the cognizant Contract Administration Office, DCAA, and Government Paying Office. Also, provide the name and telephone and fax number for the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO).
6.3.4. Company/Division Address, Identifying Codes, and Applicable Designations Provide company/division's street address, county and facility code; CAGE code; DUNS code;
TIN; size of business (large or small); and labor surplus area designation. This same information must be provided if the work for this contract will be performed at any other location(s). List all locations where work is to be performed and indicate whether such facility is a division, affiliate, or subcontractor, and the percentage of work to be performed at each location.
ITO ATTACHMENTS
3.0 PAST PERFORMANCE PACKAGE ATTACHMENT
ITO Attachment – 1.1 PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
SHEET
ITO Attachment – 1.2 PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
ITO Attachment – 1.3 SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER
ITO Attachment – 1.4 SAMPLE CONSENT LETTER
ITO Attachment – 1.5 SAMPLE CLIENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER
ITO Attachment – 2.0 PROPOSED TEAM LIST
ITO ATTACHMENT 1.1
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SHEET
Provide the information requested in this form for each contract/program being described.
Provide frank, concise comments regarding your performance on the contracts you identify.
Request each offeror submit between 4 and 3 PPIS forms for the prime Contractor and between 3 and 2 for each significant subcontractor/teaming partner.
A. Offeror Name (Company/Division):
CAGE Code:
DUNS Number:
(NOTE: If the company or division performing this effort is different than the offeror or the relevance of this effort to the instant acquisition is impacted by any company/corporate organizational change, note those changes. Refer to the "Organizational Structure Change History" you provided as part of your Past Performance Volume).
B. Program Title:
C. Contract Specifics:
1. Contracting Agency or Customer:
2. Contract Number:
3. Contract Type:
(If multiple types (i.e. Firm-Fixed Price with Time & Material), list percentage and dollar amount of Firm-Fixed Price portion)
4. Period of Performance:
5. Original Contract $ Value: (Do not include unexercised options)
6. Current Contract $ Value: (Do not include unexercised options)
7. If Amounts for 5 and 6 above are different, provide a brief description of the reason:
D. Brief Description of Effort as Prime or Subcontractor (Please indicate whether it was development and/or production, or other acquisition phase and highlight portions considered most relevant to current acquisition)
E. Completion Date:
1. Original date:
2. Current Schedule:
3. Estimate at Completion:
4. How Many Times Changed:
5. Primary Causes of Change:
F. Are there Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARS) or other Past Performance Reports available for this contract? YES NO
G. Primary Customer Points of Contact: (For Government contracts, provide current information on all three individuals. For commercial contracts, provide points of contact fulfilling these same roles).
1. Program Manager and/or Name:
Site Manager Office:
Address:
Telephone:
Fax Number:
Email:
2. Contracting Officer Name:
Office:
Address:
Telephone:
Fax Number:
Email:
3. Administrative Name:
Contracting Specialist Office:
Address:
Telephone:
Fax Number:
Email:
H. Address any technical (or other) area about this contract/program considered unique.
I. For each of the applicable subfactors under the technical factor in the “Evaluation Criteria for Award, illustrate how your experience on this program applies to that subfactor, if you are to perform the same effort on the proposed contract.
J. Specify, by name, any key individual(s) who participated in this evaluated program and are to support the proposed effort. Also, indicate their contractual roles for both acquisitions.
K. Describe the nature or portion of the work on the proposed effort to be performed by the business entity being reported here. Also estimate the percentage of the total proposed effort to be performed by this entity, and whether this entity will be performing as the prime, subcontractor or a corporate division related to the prime (define relationship).
ITO ATTACHMENT 1.2
4.0 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION
IAW FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor:
B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________
C. Contract number: _______________________________________
D. Contract type: ______________________________
(If multiple types (i.e. Firm-Fixed Price with Time & Material), list percentage and dollar amount of Firm-Fixed Price portion)
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
F. Period of performance:
G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
J. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name:
B. Evaluator's title:
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:____________________________________________________________________
D. Evaluator’s email:
E. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
Program Management and Orientation Plan
G Y R N
P1. Ability to provide a qualified, experienced program manager who is knowledgeable and able to meet program milestones, requirements, resolve problems, communicate with customer and report program status.
P2. Ability to document and manage quality standards and maintain Supply and Munitions requirements.
P3. Ability to manage and smoothly transition resources and personnel during contract phase-in.
P4. Ability to store, manage, maintain, inventory and deploy Mobility Bags, Mobility Readiness Spares Packages (MRSP), Mission Support Kits (MSK), Gas Masks and IBA.
P5. Ability to receive, store, handle, issue transport and schedule munitions for shipment.
P6. Ability to provide knowledgeable, qualified and experienced munitions inspectors that meet the Training and Certification requirements.
P7. Ability to secure government real property, equipment and materials.
Manpower and Organizational Chart
M1. Ability to provide an organizational chart with manning numbers by functional area that will sustain uninterrupted Supply and Munitions operations.
Quality Control Plan
S1. Ability to provide approach to Quality Control and interfacing with Government representatives.
S2. Ability to provide approach to requirements listed in the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan and description of the internal feedback system and lines of authority for Quality Control personnel
Safety Plan
S1. Ability to provide a safety plan that will address how safety problems will be handled and documented.
S2. Ability to provide inspection procedures to meet Safety Plan and how performance will be measured for safety control deficiencies.
Environmental Plan
E1. Ability to manage the hazardous material/waste program, Satellite Accumulation Point, waste accumulation/collection, storage, turn-in and personnel training.
E2. Ability to provide an approach for environmental mishaps, small spill cleanup and spill prevention.
Pricing Did the contractor live by that price?
2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?
What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract?
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
5.0 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
6.0 AFSC/PZIOA
7.0 ATTN: April Davison
8.0 7858 5th ST Tinker AFB OK 73145-3020 Telephone: 405-739-3368 Fax: 405-736-8731 April.Davison@us.af.mil
ITO ATTACHMENT 1.3
SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER
LETTERHEAD
(Date)
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SUBJECT: Present/Past Performance Questionnaire for the Base Supply and Munitions Solicitation Concerning Contract Numbers(s) (CONTRACT AND ORDER NUMBER (IF APPLICABLE) TO BE EVALUATED). The effort was performed by (SPECIFIC ENTITY THAT PERFORMED THE WORK) under (CAGE CODE).
(a) We are currently responding to AFSC/PZIOA, Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, Request for Proposal (RFP) FA8101-14-R-00___ for the Base Supply and Munitions requirements. This acquisition is being conducted as a price performance trade-off source selection.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .