Questionarie.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
Seismic Station Mission Support (SSMS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA7022-10-R-0030
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

SSMS Questionaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Seismic Station Mission Support (SSMS), newest first.
File Type Posted
Turkey SOFA.pdf PDF
PWS and GFE Revised 2 Sep 2010.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
0001.pdf PDF
SSMS DD254.pdf PDF
SSMS Phone Log.pdf PDF
FA702210R0030.doc DOC document
SSMS CDRLs.pdf PDF
PWS.docx DOCX document
SSMS Collective Agreement.pdf PDF
SSMS Wage Determination.pdf PDF
DD_1423-2 —
SSMS PWS - 7 Sep 09.pdf PDF
DD_1423-2 —
Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 3

FA7022-10-R-0030

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a service contract at Patrick AFB, FL.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at 321-494-0998.

//signed//
Patricia BosingerContracting Officer

Atch: Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

__________________________
__________________________

(The government enters the following information based on list of references provided by the offeror. The offeror will enter this information if the solicitation requires him to submit questionnaires to the references.)

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________Fax Number:_____________________
_____________________________Email Address: _____________________

C. EMAIL OR FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Patricia Bosinger; Email: patricia.bosinger@patrick.af.mil; Fax # 321-494-5403.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Demonstrated ability to manage teams in multiple remote locations.
4.
Demonstrated ability to perform complex tasks required to sustain and maintain a systems network of some kind at multiple locations.
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.
6.
Followed Technical Instructions and Technical Orders in place at each site.
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and ensured required delivery items continued to be on-time.
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12.
Developed real time and realistic solutions to problems
13.
Met established data deliverable requirements consistently over the life of the contract.
14.
Provided timely procurement of necessary parts and equipment.
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.
17.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
18.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
19.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
20.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
21.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

22.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

23.
Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________

Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Note: While these questions are generic and will work as written in many acquisitions, consider them as they relate to each individual acquisition and tailor them as needed and appropriate. Also, when tailoring the form, consider leaving space between questions for comments.

Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .