Questionarie.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Seismic Station Mission Support (SSMS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA7022-10-R-0030
About this file
SSMS Questionaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey SOFA.pdf | ||
| PWS and GFE Revised 2 Sep 2010.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| 0001.pdf | ||
| SSMS DD254.pdf | ||
| SSMS Phone Log.pdf | ||
| FA702210R0030.doc | DOC document | |
| SSMS CDRLs.pdf | ||
| PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| SSMS Collective Agreement.pdf | ||
| SSMS Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| DD_1423-2 | — | |
| SSMS PWS - 7 Sep 09.pdf | ||
| DD_1423-2 | — |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3
FA7022-10-R-0030
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a service contract at Patrick AFB, FL.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at 321-494-0998.
| //signed// | ||
| Patricia Bosinger | Contracting Officer |
Atch: Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
| __________________________ |
| __________________________ |
(The government enters the following information based on list of references provided by the offeror. The offeror will enter this information if the solicitation requires him to submit questionnaires to the references.)
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________
| Address: _____________________ | Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ | Fax Number: | _____________________ |
| _____________________________ | Email Address: _____________________ |
C. EMAIL OR FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Patricia Bosinger; Email: patricia.bosinger@patrick.af.mil; Fax # 321-494-5403.
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. |
| Demonstrated ability to manage teams in multiple remote locations. |
| 4. |
| Demonstrated ability to perform complex tasks required to sustain and maintain a systems network of some kind at multiple locations. |
| 5. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 6. |
| Followed Technical Instructions and Technical Orders in place at each site. |
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and ensured required delivery items continued to be on-time. |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 11. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 12. |
| Developed real time and realistic solutions to problems |
| 13. |
| Met established data deliverable requirements consistently over the life of the contract. |
| 14. |
| Provided timely procurement of necessary parts and equipment. |
| 15. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 16. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 17. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 18. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 19. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 20. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 21. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
| 22. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
| 23. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________
Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note: While these questions are generic and will work as written in many acquisitions, consider them as they relate to each individual acquisition and tailor them as needed and appropriate. Also, when tailoring the form, consider leaving space between questions for comments.
Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .