Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Remove and Install Floor Coverings Basewide
- Solicitation number
- FA7012-08-R-0001
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Site visit question answers.doc | DOC document | |
| SOW BASE FLOORING.docx | DOCX document | |
| Base Flooring Site Visit.doc | DOC document | |
| FA7012-08-R-0001 Base Flooring.rtf | RTF text file | |
| Performance Plan FA7012-08-R-0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| BID SCHEDULE BASE FLOORING.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Present/Past Performance
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION (To Be Completed By Contractor)
1. Contractor’s Name and Address:
2. Point of Contact:
3. Phone Number:
4. Contract Number:
Contract Type:
5. Project Title:
6. Period of Performance:
SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To Be Completed By Evaluation Respondent)
1. Respondent’s Company Name & Address:
2. Respondent’s Name:
3. Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail:
4. Contract Number:
Contract Type:
5. Award Amount:
Final Amount:
6. Project Title:
7. Period of Performance:
Performance Evaluation Instructions
· When responding to the descriptive statements, select the letter, which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. If the contractor has no record of past performance relevant to a particular question, select “Neutral.”
· E – Exceptional/High Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the successful offeror will successfully perform its required effort.
· V – Very Good/Significant Confidence
Base on the offeror’s performance record, little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
· S – Satisfactory/Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
· N – Neutral/Unknown Confidence
No performance record identifiable (see FAR 15.306(a)(2)(iii) & (iv))
· M – Marginal/Little Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Changes to the offeror’s existing processes may be necessary on order to achieve contract performance.
· U – Unsatisfactory/No Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Solicitation Number FA7012-08-R-0001
ATTACHMENT 4
| I. Quality Control |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| 1. Quality of contractor’s workmanship |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 2. Quality of the contractor’s cleaning frequency schedule |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 3. Quality of the contractor quality control documentation |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 4. Storage of materials |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 5. Adequacy of materials |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
6. Use of specified materials
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 7. Identification/correction of deficient work in a timely manner |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 8. Suggested solutions and displayed initiative to implement solutions |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 9. Elimination of repeat discrepancies |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 10. Quality, proficiency, and professionalism of customer service department |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| II. Timely Performance |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| 1. Implementation of the contractor’s cleaning frequency schedule |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 2. Re-performance of discrepancies in a timely manner |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 3. Resolution of delays |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
III. Management Effectiveness
| A. General Business Practices |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
1. Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 2. Hired experienced subcontractors |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 3. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 4. Provided substantiated pricing data for modifications |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
5. Contractor provided timely and satisfactory response to warranty/ re-performance issues
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
6. The contractor cooperated to resolve problems, attending meetings and maintained communication to assure satisfactory resolution
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| B. Pricing |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| 1. The contractor submits proposals that accurately represent the work required |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
2. Contractor understood the request for proposal and accurately price the proposal
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 3. Contractor’s correctly proposed pricing eliminated need for modifications |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
4. The contractor’s supporting price/cost information for modifications is accurate, complete and reasonable (not over inflated or under estimated)
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 5. How would you rate the contractor’s overall Pricing performance |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| C. Site Management/Superintendence |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
1. Program Manager ensured compliance to contact requirements and safety regulations
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 2. Program Manager acted promptly to resolve problems and ensure work quality |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
3. Program Manager had sufficient authority to make decisions or take actions during contract performance
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 4. Program Manager consistently present on site when work was performed |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
D. How would you rate the contractor’s overall Management Effectiveness performance
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
Comments:
| IV. Compliance With Labor Standards |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| 1. Submitted payrolls in a timely manner |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 2. Payrolls were complete and correct |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
3. Compliance with labor laws and regulations with specific attention to the Service Contract Act
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| V. Compliance With Safety Standards |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| 1. Adequacy of Safety Plan |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 2. Implementation of Safety Plan |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| Based on the contractor’s overall performance, would you rehire this contractor? |
| YES |_| |
| NO |_| |
Comments:
Please provide any comments that will help in assessing the contractor’s overall performance.
Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .