Additional_Questions.pdf

1) The electrical drawings were not provided in the revision, but it does state they would be provided in the answers to the Q and A. Please provide. Attached as requested.

2) The SOO still contains wording that includes voice recording, but this is contradicted by the Q and A where it is stated "no new recording capability is needed." (Page 4 e.), is voice recording required or not required? Voice recording capability is already being met, therefore it is not needed. Paragraph has been removed from the SOO.

3) Are the speaker requirements in the SOO the minimum or is this the amount the Government has determined are what is required even if it does not provide adequate coverage as discussed during the site walk through. The speaker listed and shown on drawings, are all that is needed.

4) As the new camera locations are inside the bays and this was changed after the site visit, can the government provide pictures of the new camera locations? Locations are indicated on DrawingsV2.

More-specific locations can be provided after award.

5) There is no mention of video recording, as video recording was mentioned during the site walk visit and is typical of "security cameras," is this no longer a requirement? Not a requirement.

6) We do not see where in the SOO or RFQ the shipping receiving address. To provide a complete cost to include the FOB destination, we will require a complete receiving address where the equipment is going to be shipped to.

31 CES/CEF

Unit 6110

APO AE 09604

7) Previously the entry door cameras required two way audio for communication to the dispatch workstation, however that no longer appears in the SOO. Is this no longer a requirement? If not, does a mechanism for contacting the dispatch need to be provided for when someone is at the door? Capability is already met.