Amendment_03_(Released).pdf

PDF 73 KB Posted

Attached to
Radon Mitigation (144 Units) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA5270-18-R-0014
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Pacific Air Forces

About this file

Amendement 03

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this 3rd Amendment is to add Attachment 18 - Past Performance Questionnaire (Section J) and update the provisions and clauses.

1. Added Attachment 18 - Past Performance Questionnaire

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 13-Sep-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA527018R0014

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

16-Aug-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13-Sep-2018

CODE

18 CONS/INFRASTRUCTURE ACQUISITION

POC: GINA MORIARTY

UNIT 5199, BLDG 95 KADENA AB

APO AP 96368

FA5270 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA527018R0014

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been added by reference:

252.225-7993 (Dev)

The following have been modified:

252.229-7001 TAX RELIEF (SEPT 2014)

(a) Prices set forth in this contract are exclusive of all taxes and duties from which the United States Government is exempt by virtue of tax agreements between the United States Government and the Contractor's government. The following taxes or duties have been excluded from the contract price:

NAME OF TAX: (Offeror Insert) RATE (PERCENTAGE): (Offeror Insert)

Customs Duties 8% Consumption Tax 8%

(b) The Contractor's invoice shall list separately the gross price, amount of tax deducted, and net price charged.

(c) When items manufactured to United States Government specifications are being acquired, the Contractor shall identify the materials or components intended to be imported in order to ensure that relief from import duties is obtained. If the Contractor intends to use imported products from inventories on hand, the price of which includes a factor for import duties, the Contractor shall ensure the United States Government's exemption from these taxes. The Contractor may obtain a refund of the import duties from its government or request the duty-free import of an amount of supplies or components corresponding to that used from inventory for this contract.

(End of clause)

The following have been deleted:

52.246-12 252.204-7007

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 18 – Past Performance Questionnaire

SECTION K - REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

The following have been added by reference:

52.225-25

The following have been deleted:

52.203-11 52.203-18

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

GENERAL PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts; Part I – Summary and Miscellaneous Data, Part II - Price Proposal, and Part III - Past Performance Proposal.

B. Specific Instructions:

1. PART I – SUMMARY AND MISCELLANEOUS DATA. Submit one CD and two copies.

(a) The offeror shall provide a concise summary and master table of contents of the entire proposal.

(b) Complete blocks 14, 15, 16, and 19 of the RFP Section A, SF1442 . In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP Sections A through K. These sections constitute the model contract.

(c) Your acknowledgement of any and all Amendments to the solicitation in accordance with the instructions on the Standard form 30 Amendment. (Amendments will not be counted against the page limits).

http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/formslibrary.do?viewType=DETAIL&formId=4E179AB32AF6652285256A260054D101

(d) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Sections I through K. Section K shall be returned in its entirety. For Sections C through I, the offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.

(e) Joint Venture Offerors: If the offeror is a joint venture, the offeror shall provide all required solicitation information for all parties including a copy of the joint venture agreement. The agreement shall include information which identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract. The agreement shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind each entity of the joint venture.

(f) Teaming/Partnering Offerors: If the offer is based on a teaming/partnering relationship, the offeror shall provide all required solicitation information for all parties including a copy of the teaming/partnership agreement. The agreement shall include information, which identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract. The agreement shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind each entity of the teaming/Partnering relationship.

(g) Incurred Expenses: The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

(h) Licensing Requirement: Any contract resulting from this solicitation will be awarded and performed in its entirety in the country of Japan. Contractors must be duly authorized to operate and conduct business in Japan, and must fully comply with all laws, decrees, labor standards, and regulations of Japan during the performance of the contract. Offerors must be registered to do business in Japan and possess a construction license (Kensetsu-Gyo Kyokasho) issued by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, or prefectural government.

2. PART II – PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit one CD and two copies.

(a) Insert proposed unit and extended prices for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN)

0001 in Schedule B. Pricing shall be your best offer to include but not limited to indirect costs such as overhead, profit, bond, insurance, etc. It is imperative that mathematical calculations are correct.

(b) Extreme care should be exercised to ensure that no proprietary data of any kind are included in the proposal.

3. PART III – PAST PERFORMANCE PROPOSAL - Limited to no more than 5 pages per contract listed. Only references for past efforts/contracts of relevance are desired. Submit one CD and two copies.

(a) Project Information Sheet included in this solicitation, is provided for the offeror to submit previous radon mitigation construction-only projects experience whose past performance is to be considered under this solicitation.

(1) Submit no more than (3) in total relevant projects. If more than three (3) projects are submitted, only the first three (3) projects will be considered for evaluation. The fourth (4th) and any additional project will not be considered for evaluation. This is regardless whether or not the first three (3) projects are classified as “relevant” or “not relevant” by Government evaluators. Offerors shall use Project Information Sheet when submitting past performance information.

(2) If an offeror has no past performance history of relevance, the offeror must state affirmatively it possesses no past performance history of relevance. The offeror shall ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

(b) Past Performance Information: Only recent and relevant Radon Mitigation projects are requested for evaluation. For the purposes of this solicitation, “recent” is defined as within the last five (5) years prior to the solicitation issuance date. “Relevant” projects include the following and must be submitted in Part III of the offeror’s proposal.

(1) General description: The scope includes but is not limited to: design and perform the work to provide reliable and functional radon mitigation systems for housing units. And demonstrated ability to upgrade, or replace existing radon mitigation systems in order to bring them into compliance with exposure limits.;

(2) At least one radon mitigation project of contract value at least $200,000 (or Yen equivalent);

(3) Were completed on a DoD Installation;

(4) Were completed by the Offeror as the prime contractor;

Note: For purposes of evaluating past performance as a prime contractor, the offeror and prime contractor are defined as the contractor identified in Block 14 of SF 1442. If a Joint Venture (JV) is identified in Block 14 of the SF 1442 as the “prime contractor”, then a signed joint venture agreement must be submitted with the proposal and the joint venture shall be registered as such in the System for Award Management (SAM).

(i) Projects performed by contractors other than the offeror (such as teaming partners) will not be evaluated as construction experience by a prime contractor unless those other contractors are part of a joint venture for this solicitation as demonstrated by a signed joint venture agreement.

(ii) For projects in which your firm or a joint venture partner firm performed the role of a subcontractor, this will not count as experience as a prime contractor.

(iii) If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner(s). If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of recent relevant past performance.

(iv) Teaming arrangements are subject to the same past performance submission requirements.

(c) Quality and Satisfaction Rating of Contracts: Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) shall be used by the offeror in obtaining and providing past performance information. The government requires the offeror send out a PPQ to EACH of the Points-of-Contact (POCs) identified in the submitted Project Information Sheet (para (a) above). The offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ for every Project Information Sheet.

The offeror shall send out the PPQ, using the Past Performance Evaluation Cover Letter to each of its references.

THE RESPONSIBILITY TO SEND OUT THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE RESTS

SOLELY WITH THE OFFEROR. OFFERORS SHOULD FOLLOW-UP WITH CLIENTS/REFERENCES TO

ENSURE TIMELY SUBMITTAL OF QUESTIONNAIRES. PPQS ARE DUE BACK TO THE GOVERNMENT

BY THE PROPOSAL DUE DATE LISTED IN BLOCK 13 OF THE SF 1442.

Once the questionnaires are completed by the POCs, the information contained therein will be considered source selection sensitive and will not be released outside the Government. The POCs shall forward their completed questionnaires directly to the Government – NOT BACK TO THE OFFEROR.

PPQs shall be sent directly from your reference to this office marked to the attention of Ms Gina Moriarty, via e-mail to gina.moriarty@us.af.mil or mailed to the following address:

18th Contracting Squadron Attn: Ms. Gina Moriarty Unit 5199, Bldg 95

APO AP 96368-5199

(d) In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team member (joint venture, teaming arrangement) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

(e) The evaluation of past performance information will not take into account past performance regarding predecessor companies, will not take into account past performance of key personnel who have relevant experience, and will not take into account past performance regarding subcontractors that will perform major aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this acquisition.

(f) Joint Venture/Teaming Arrangement: If the offeror is part of a team arrangement as defined in FAR

9.601 (Joint Venture, Teaming/Partnering), the offeror shall provide all required solicitation information for all parties including a copy of the joint venture or teaming/partnership agreement. The agreement shall include information that identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract. The agreement shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify teaming/partnership relationship.

D. General Information:

1. Information regarding submission of proposals: Hand carried or mailed proposals must be delivered to the following address:

18th Contracting Squadron/PKC Attn: Ms. Gina Moriarty Unit 5199, Bldg 95

APO AP 96368-5199

2. The sealed envelope or package used to submit your proposal must show the time and date specified for receipt, the solicitation number, and the name and address of the offeror.

3. Offerors are cautioned that Kadena Air Base has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. SOME DELAY SHOULD BE EXPECTED WHEN HAND-CARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at 18th Contracting Squadron, Kadena Air Base prior to the time specified for receipt. Late proposals are defined as being received by the 18th Contracting Squadron after the solicitation closing date and time and will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(3),“Submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals.”

4. FEDERAL HOLIDAYS: The following Federal Legal Holidays are observed by this base:

New Year’s Day 1 January Birthday of Martin Luther King Third Monday in January Washington’s Birthday Third Monday in February

Memorial Day Last Monday in May Independence Day 4 July Labor Day First Monday in September Columbus Day Second Monday in October Veterans Day 11 November Thanksgiving Day Fourth Thursday in November Christmas Day 25 December

Note: The offeror and prime contractor are defined as the contractor identified in Block 14 of SF 1442. If a Joint Venture (JV) is identified in Block 14 of the SF 1442 as the “prime contractor”, then a signed joint venture agreement must be submitted with the proposal and the joint venture shall be registered as such in the System for Award Management (SAM).

5. Submission of Complete Proposals: All proposals must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. Failure to furnish a complete proposal, at the time of proposal submission, may result in the proposal being unacceptable to the Government and elimination from consideration for award.

The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. Any commitments made in the proposal shall become a part of the resultant contract.

6. Incurred Expenses: The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation. The offeror is required to submit an offer on all items. Failure to do so may disqualify the proposal.

7. In compliance with FAR Subpart 4.8, the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals and will destroy all extra copies. No destruction certificate will be provided.

8. Amendments prior to receipt of proposals: The Government reserves the right to revise or amend the solicitation, specifications and/or drawing, prior to the date of receipt of proposals. If, in the opinion of the Contracting Officer, revisions or amendments require material changes in the quantity or price of items, the date of receipt of proposals may also be changed. Such revisions or amendments, or change in the date for receipt of proposals will be announced by an amendment to the Request for Proposal.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

SECTION M INSTRUCTIONS

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD

This is a competitive Lowest Price Acceptable Performance (LPAP) source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15, Department of Defense (DoD) FAR Supplement Procedures, Guidance and Information Subpart 215.3, and Air Force FAR Supplement (AFFARS) Mandatory Procedures (MP)

5315.3. By submission of its offer in accordance with the instructions provided in provision FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition, the offeror accedes to the terms of this model contract. Failure to meet a solicitation requirement may result in an offer being determined unacceptable. Award will be made to the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP) that meets the acceptability standards for non-price factors. The evaluation process will include the following:

A. Past Performance Factor. The government will evaluate recent and relevant performance information on all offerors based on (i) the past/current projects provided by the offeror using the Project Information Sheet (Attachment 17), and (ii) any past performance information obtained from survey/questionnaires (Attachment 18), and (iii) any data independently obtained by the government. If a reference identified by the offeror in accordance with Section L, Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors, para B.3(c), does not submit a survey/questionnaire, the government will follow up with the reference POC, but it is not responsible for the failure of a reference POC to provide a survey/questionnaire.

1. Recent past performance information includes contracts performed and/or being performed for any customer within the last five (5) years prior to the issuance date of the solicitation.

2. Relevant contracts performance effort involved similar scope, magnitude of effort, and complexities to that required by this solicitation as outlined below.

(a) General description: Work to include but is not limited to: design and perform the work to provide reliable and functional radon mitigation systems for housing units.

And demonstrated ability to upgrade, or replace existing radon mitigation systems in order to bring them into compliance with exposure limits.;

(b) At least one radon mitigation project of contract value at least $200,000 (or Yen equivalent);

(c) Were completed on a DoD Installation;

(d) Were completed by the Offeror as the prime contractor;

The government will assess relevancy for each project and assign a rating as described in Table 1 below:

Table 1. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Rating Definition

Relevant Present/past performance involved similar scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity that this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

3. Performance Quality Assessment: For each of the recent and relevant past performance information reviewed, the performance quality of work will be assessed based on the (i) Quality Assessment Criteria evaluated under Section L, para B.3(b), Performance Surveys/Questionnaires and (ii) the evaluation ratings in the Federal Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), if available. Each recent and relevant past performance information reviewed will be assigned a rating as described in Table 2 below:

Table 2. Quality Assessment Ratings Rating Rating Definition

Satisfactory (S)

During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.

Unsatisfactory (U) During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) contract requirements. For any problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.

The past performance evaluation is an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. Offerors must receive a past performance rating of “Acceptable” to be eligible for award. For offerors in a teaming arrangement where two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture (JV), at least one partner must be rated “Acceptable;” in order for the partnership to be rated “Acceptable” as a whole.

As a result of the recency, relevancy, and performance quality assessments, offerors will receive an integrated past performance rating as described in Table 3 below:

Table 3. Past Performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating cannot be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have an unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral shall be considered “acceptable.”

C. Price Evaluation Factor.

The Government shall rank all technically acceptable offeror’s Total Evaluation Price (TEP).

The price evaluation will document the fair and reasonableness of the TEP.

D. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in Section L of this solicitation. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposals. Exchanges conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.

E. Award will be made to the lowest priced offer, based on TEP, which meets the acceptability standards for non-price factors.

(End of Summary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it.