Site_Visit_Meeting_Minutes_-_23_August_2016.pdf

FA4897-16-B-0013

GUNFIGHTER CLUB RESTROOM RENOVATION

SITE VISIT QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

ATTACHMENT #2

6 SEPTEMBER 2016

1. Please provide As-builts for the Building and Fire Alarm system.

Answer: See Attachment #3.

2. How do you propose we replace all of the cast iron underground between the main restrooms without removing the walls to the chase and then replacing them?

Answer: The Statement of Work defines end results. The contractor is responsible for including all necessary work in their proposal required to complete the project as stated in the solicitation.

3. Do the copper waterlines need replaced?

Answer: All waterlines within the project footprint require replacement.

4. Has the waterline insulation, sheetrock, flooring etc. been surveyed for Asbestos? If so can we have the results?

Answer: See Attachment #4.

5. Please verify. Which exhaust fan grills are mechanical. According to our observations at the site visit none of them are.

Answer: Site visit observations are to be used to determine existing conditions.

6. Please provide model numbers for the Exhaust fans so we can replace the motor and the fan. Instead of having to replace the whole ducting system.

Answer: Attachment #3 contains all available information.

7. Can you use DWV PVC for the Sewer system?

Answer: The sewer and drain lines may be DWV PVC installed in accordance with the 2015 International Plumbing Code, (IPC).

8. If the chase walls in the main restroom are demo’ed will this affect the support structure for the hard lids.

Answer: It appears that ceilings are suspended on wires from roof structure on as-built drawings. Recommend confirming by looking above ceiling through access panel prior to demo.

9. If the Interior walls in the Lounge bathroom are demo’ed will this affect the support structure for the hard lids.

Answer: It appears that ceilings are suspended on wires from roof structure on as-built drawings. Recommend confirming by looking above ceiling through access panel prior to demo.

10. Is the bathroom fixture for the lounge men’s room supposed to be an emergency fixture? Page A-3.0 detail 2 shows women’s bathroom having an emergency light per note (8a). The men’s bathroom shows light fixture but not called out as a 8a fixture.

Answer: Note under detail 3, Women’s restroom states: “Men’s restroom is mirror image.” Therefore emergency light in Women’s restroom also applies in Men’s restroom, in mirror image.

11. Do the drinking fountains require power?

Answer: Standard ADA Hi-Low refrigerated drinking fountains are to be installed.

D RAF T In sp e c t i on Repo r t

Environmental Sampling Report Associated with Restrooms within

Facility 195

Mountain Home AFB, Idaho

Prepared for

Mountain Home AFB, Idaho

August 10, 2016

Contents

Section Page

Introduction

Scope of Work

Survey Limitations

Facility Description – Building 195

Inspection Methodology

Asbestos Building Inspection

Lead-Based Paint Building Inspection

Mercury and PCB Inspection

Findings

Asbestos

Lead-Based Paint

Recommendations

Budget for Abatement

Class, Resources, and Markups

Assumptions and Exclusions

Appendixes

A Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Building Inspector Certificates B Pictures C Building 195 Diagrams and Sampling Locations D Laboratory Accreditations E Laboratory Results and COCs F Estimate of Budget for Abatement

I

Introduction

The 366th Civil Engineer Squadron manages and maintains more than 1,400 facilities at Mountain Home AFB (MHAFB) and the Mountain Home Range Complex. The process of preparing facilities and sites for demolition or renovation requires hazardous materials surveys, including but not limited to inspections for asbestos and lead-based paint and hazardous waste characterization.

Scope of Work

MHAFB contacted CH2M to perform partial environmental inspections of (originally) four buildings including 195, 205, 208, and 1365. The environmental inspections were to be limited to bathroom facilities in the four buildings only, as shown in the “Hazardous Materials Survey” scope of work dated 1 March 2016. However, MHAFB determined that additional space needed to be included in the environmental inspection for buildings 205 and 208 and elected to remove 1365 from the scope, as shown in “Hazardous Materials Survey Addendum #1” dated 11 July 2016.

As indicated in the scope of work, site surveys were to be completed within 20 business days of the Notice to Proceed (NTP) date and were performed within, and around, restrooms of buildings 195, 205, and 208 in preparation for future renovation. The areas of each building that will be impacted by the renovation and require hazardous material survey was outlined in the floorplans attached to the scope of work.

Each environmental inspection included the following tasks:

• Sampling to determine asbestos containing buildings materials (ACBMs)

• Sampling to determine building materials that contain lead-based paint (LBP)

• The presence of mercury and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in building equipment located within the selected bathrooms.

Survey Limitations

The environmental inspections on the three building were limited to the bathrooms identified by MHAFB in the Statement of Work dated March 1, 2016 and updated Addendum #1 dated 11 July 2016 that removed Building 1365 from the work plan and added additional areas (immediately adjacent to the bathrooms) in Building 205 and 208.

MHAFB requested that fixtures not be altered or taken apart in any way; identification of the presence of mercury in fluorescent lights or PCBs in light ballasts was limited to what could be visually seen during the inspection. Where it is unclear whether or not a fluorescent light or ballast contains mercury and/or PCBs, a determination will need to be made at the time of the demolition. For the purposes of developing an abatement budget, fluorescent light tubes were assumed to contain mercury and light ballasts were assumed to contain PCBs.

During demolition, fluorescent light tubes will be assumed to contain mercury (Hg) unless they are marked that they do not contain mercury (stamped on the light tube). As specified in 40 CFR 761.40(g), light ballasts shall be labeled as “No PCBs” by the manufacturer if they do not contain PCBs. If there is no clear indication that fluorescent light ballasts contain no PCBs, then they should be handled and disposed of as containing PCBs.

Due to the hidden nature of many building components, not all the hazardous building materials may have been located, areas such as wall cavities were not included in this survey, and therefore we cannot guarantee that all ACBM has been located. The survey and method of sampling reflects our best efforts in the determination of ACBM in the bathrooms surveyed. Finally, quantities provided are rough order of magnitude estimates only.

Facility Description – Building 195

Building 195 was constructed in 1978 and contains eight bathrooms total, of which six were originally included in the Statement of Work. However, at the time of the inspection, it was determined that the two other (service staff bathrooms) contained the same materials as the other bathrooms and were included in the inspection.

Inspection Methodology

On July 7, 2016, Michael Wirtz performed an environmental inspection on eight individual bathrooms in Building 195 for the presence of asbestos containing building materials (ACBM), lead-based paint (LBP), mercury and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Mr. Wirtz is a trained and certified AHERA Building Inspector and United State Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) certified lead based paint building inspector (see Appendix A).

Asbestos Building Inspection

During the asbestos inspection, Mr. Wirtz performed a visual inspection of the bathrooms to identify any suspect asbestos containing building materials (ACBM). The asbestos inspection was limited to the bathrooms. A total of sixteen (16) bulk samples were collected, representing one homogeneous sampling area. Homogeneous sampling areas are areas containing building materials of similar color, texture, and appearance with a common construction area. The asbestos building inspection was performed in accordance with the USEPA Guidance for Controlling Asbestos-Containing Materials in Buildings (EPA 560/5- 85/024, June 1985). The bulk samples collected for the presence of asbestos included flooring materials, glues/mastics, and miscellaneous building materials found within the bathrooms.

Bulk samples of suspect ACBM were collected using sampling methods to reduce the risk of dust. Each sample was assigned a unique sample identification based on the homogeneous sampling material and sample number. The location of each sample was logged onto facility diagrams, and a photograph was taken of each suspect building material (Appendix B).

Each sample was placed into a clean plastic bag with the sample identification written on the outside of the bag. Diagrams showing the approximate location of each suspect ACBM sample collected are included in Appendix C.

All suspect ACBM samples were sent to TestAmerica Laboratory in Nashville, TN (TestAmerica) for analysis using Chain-of-Custody (COC) sample tracking procedures.

TestAmerica is a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited asbestos laboratory. Laboratory accreditations are provided in Appendix D.

Samples were analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM), EPA Method 600/R- 93/116.

Lead-Based Paint Building Inspection

A LBP inspection was also conducted on the bathrooms using a modified assessment plan following the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (2012 Revision). The LBP inspection was limited to the bathrooms only. Sixteen (16) physical samples of each homogeneous sampling area were collected. Homogeneous sampling areas are areas containing building materials of similar color, texture, and appearance with a common construction area. Painted surfaces were analyzed for lead by collected paint chip samples and sent to a laboratory for analysis.

Bulk samples of suspect LBP were collected with a cutter or other tool, as appropriate. Each paint sample was assigned a unique sample identification number. The location of each paint sample was logged onto a facility diagram, and a photograph was taken of each suspect painted building material (Appendix B). Each paint sample was placed into a clean plastic bag with the sample identification written on the outside of the bag. Facility diagrams showing the approximate location of each suspect paint sample collected are included in Appendix C.

All suspect LBP samples were sent to TestAmerica Laboratory in Nashville, TN (TestAmerica) for analysis using COC sample tracking procedures. Samples were analyzed using EPA Method SW 846 6010B.

Mercury and PCB Inspection

The bathrooms were visually inspected for the presence of potential mercury and PCB containing components. No thermostats were seen in the bathrooms. In all, 27 fluorescent lights, 6 can lights, 6 screen in lights, and possibly 23 ballasts (in fluorescent light fixtures) were identified. Taking apart lighting fixtures during the inspection was not allowed per owner’s request. In the men’s bathroom shown in Figure 2 (Appendix C), the covers had been previously removed, and the lamps had “Hg” on the label indicating that the fluorescent tubes contained mercury. All other fluorescent lights are also assumed to contain mercury and must be disposed of as such; however, marks found on a lamp at the time of removal may change disposal if the marks indicate that the lamp does not contain mercury. Ballasts are assumed to contain PCBs and must be managed as such; however marks found on the ballast at the time of removal may change disposal requirements if the marks indicate that the ballast does not contain PCBs. Pictures of the lighting are provided in Appendix B.

Findings

Asbestos

None of the sixteen (16) suspect ACBM samples tested positive (greater than 1-percent) for the presence of asbestos. Laboratory results and COCs are included in Appendix E.

Lead-Based Paint

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has defined lead-based paint as any paint, varnish, shellac or other coating that contains lead equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm2 as measured by x-ray fluorescence or laboratory analysis, or 0.5 percent by weight (5,000 mg/kg) as measured by laboratory analysis. Table 1 shows the laboratory analysis of the positive samples and location. Laboratory results and COCs are included in Appendix E.

Two LBP samples contained lead greater than 5,000 mg/kg. The yellow painted dividers located in the men’s bathroom (Figure 6) was found to contain 24,700 mg/kg lead. The cabinet surface found in the women’s bathroom in Figure 3 (also the main bathroom for the facility) was found to contain 16,400 mg/kg of lead. There is an orange undercoat to the surfacing material on the cabinets that is a binding material applied and may be the source of the lead. Approximately 30 ft2 of cabinet surface material and orange binder is present in the bathroom.

Recommendations

Any construction or demolition within the bathrooms that has the potential to impact the LBP should follow all Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements.

Fluorescent lights that are unknown (no labels) should be assumed to contain mercury.

Only if the label on the light indicates it contains no mercury should the light be handled and disposed of or recycled as being mercury free.

Light ballasts that indicated they are PCB free on the manufacturer label shall be treated as being PCB free. If there is no indication on the label, or the label indicates they contain PCB, then the ballast should be handled and disposed or recycled as containing PCBs.

Budget for Abatement

The following is an overview of estimated probable costs associated with removal and abatement of hazardous materials within the scope of this effort. These costs do not capture any repair, renovation, or construction efforts. As with all estimates, this estimate should be evaluated for market changes after 90 days of the issue date.

Low Range (-15%) Estimated Costs a High Range (+30%)

$4,675 $5,500 $7,150 a See Appendix F for cost estimate details

This cost estimate has been prepared for guidance in project evaluation and implementation from the information available at the time of the estimate. Final costs of the project will depend on actual field conditions, discoveries made in areas not available for testing, labor and material costs, competitive market conditions, final project costs, implementation schedule and other variable factors. As a result, the final project costs will vary from the estimate presented herein. Because of this, project feasibility and funding needs must be carefully reviewed prior to making specific financial decisions to help ensure proper project evaluation and adequate funding.

Class, Resources, and Markups

This cost estimate, as prepared, is considered a Class 4 as defined by ASTM E 2516-06, Standard Classification for Cost Estimate Classification System. It is considered accurate to - 15% to +30%. This Class 4 cost estimate is assumed to represent the actual total installed cost within the range of -15 percent to +30 percent of the cost indicated. This is not an offer for construction and/or project execution. It would appear prudent that internal budget allowances account for the highest cost indicated by this range as well as other site specific allowances. The cost estimate has been prepared for guidance in project evaluation and implementation from the information available at the time of the estimate. The final costs of the project will depend on actual labor and material costs, competitive market conditions, implementation schedule, and other variable factors. As a result, the final project costs will vary from the estimates presented herein. Because of this, project feasibility and funding needs must be carefully reviewed prior to making specific financial decisions to help ensure proper project evaluation and adequate funding.

The following is a list of the various cost resources used in the development of the cost estimate:

• R.S. Means 2016 Facilities Construction Cost Data

• CH2M Historical Data

• Budget Quotes

• Estimator Judgment

Project markups are based upon general assumptions about how the project will be contracted. Actual markup percentages may vary from those shown here, and are the responsibility of the bidding contractor. Below outlines the markups applied to the estimate for execution of the work. A scenario of a prime contractor overseeing the performance of key subcontractor has been assumed.

Hazardous Materials Abatement Subcontractor Markups

Subcontractor Overhead and Profit 25.00%

Prime Contractor Markups

Mobilization/Demobilization 5.00%

Prime Contractor Field Office Overhead (JOOH) 10.00%

Prime Contractor Home Office Overhead (HOOH) 4.00%

Prime Contractor Profit 10.00%

Bond Premium 2.50%

Construction Contingency 10.00%

Owner Markups (Excluded)

Owner Contingency 0.00%

SIOH 0.00%

Assumptions and Exclusions

The cost estimate is based on the following major assumptions:

• Labor costs used in this estimate are based on R.S. Means 2016 U.S. National average rates.

• The environmental inspections were limited to the bathroom in Facility 195 as per the Statement of Work dated March 1, 2016. MHAFB requested that fixtures not be altered or taken apart in any way; identification of the presence of mercury in fluorescent lights or PCBs in light ballasts was limited to what could be visually seen during the inspection. Where it is unclear whether or not a fluorescent light or ballast contains mercury and PCBs, a determination will need to be made at the time of the demolition. Fluorescent light tubes are to be assumed to contain mercury (Hg) unless they have indication that they do not contain mercury (stamped on the light tube). Light ballasts within the fluorescent lighting will be assumed to contain PCBs unless the manufacturer label identifies them to be PCB free.

• Due to the hidden nature of many building components, it is impossible to determine if all the building materials have been located. Areas such as wall cavities were not included in this survey and there is no guarantee that all ACBM has been located and therefore is not included in this estimate.

• Quantities included in this estimate are based on the quantities provided in subject report. Additional materials that may be encountered above and beyond those listed have been excluded.

• Labor costs used in this estimate are based on R.S. Means 2016 U.S. National average rates.

• Work will be done on a competitive bid basis and the contractor will have a reasonable amount of time to complete the work. All contractors are equal, with a reasonable project schedule, with no overtime, constructed as under a single contract, and no liquidated damages.

The following costs have been excluded in the cost estimate:

• Costs associated with the repair, replacement, renovation or construction within the restroom or adjoining spaces.

• No allowances or fees have been included in this estimate for additional testing or inspection costs associated with potential or additional hazardous materials encountered during construction have been included in this estimate.

• This project is assumed to be tax exempt therefore no taxes of any form have been included.

• This estimate does not include any costs associated with escalation.

• Non-construction or soft costs for design, services during construction, land, legal and owner administration costs.

• Material Adjustment allowances above and beyond what is included specifically in site inspection reports and at the time cost estimate was prepared.

I

TABLE 1

Building 195 Bathrooms Positive Lead-Based Paint Sample Results (Greater than 5,000 mg/kg LBP)

Sample ID Laboratory ID Description Results Quantity and Location

LBP-06 490-107586-6 Yellow divider in men’s bathroom

24,700 mg/kg Two dividers and a stall door

LBP-09 490-107586-9 Brown counter top in women’s bathroom (orange binding material under counter most likely source of lead)

16,400 mg/kg Approximately 30 ft2 of counter surface material with orange binder under.

Appendix A

Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Building Inspector Certificates

Appendix B

Pictures

PHOTO LOG

APPENDIX B CH2M HILL, INC 1

Photo 1 - AS-01 Floor tile, LBP-04 Floor tile

Photo 2 - AS-02 4 x 4 wall tile, AS-04 Drywall, LBP-01 4 x 4 wall tile, LBP-05 Wall paint

2 CH2M HILL, INC APPENDIX B

Photo 3 - AS-03 Brick mortar

Photo 4 - LBP-06 divider

APPENDIX B CH2M HILL, INC 3

Photo 5 - LBP-02 Door (metal)

Photo 6 - LBP-03 Door jamb (metal)

4 CH2M HILL, INC APPENDIX B

Photo 7 - A-05 Carpet

Photo 8 - AS-06 Floor tile, AS-07 4 x 4 wall tile, LBP-07 Floor tile, LBP-08 4 x 4 wall tile

APPENDIX B CH2M HILL, INC 5

Photo 9 - AS-08 Cove (carpeted)

Photo 10 - AS-09 Cabinet top, LBP-09 Cabinet top (right side of picture), AS-16 Drywall, fluorescent lamps (typical)

6 CH2M HILL, INC APPENDIX B

Photo 11 - AS-10 Floor tile, AS-11 4 x 4 wall tile, AS-12 Drywall, LBP-10 floor tile, LBP-11

4 x 4 wall tile

Photo 12 - AS-13 Floor tile, LBP-13 Floor tile

APPENDIX B CH2M HILL, INC 7

Photo 13 - LBP-12 Dark brown door and jam (right), LBP-13 Light brown door and jam

(left)

Photo 14 - LBP-15 white door jam

8 CH2M HILL, INC APPENDIX B

Photo 15 - AS-14 porous ceiling tile

Photo 16 - AS-15 Dense ceiling tile (little to no holes)

APPENDIX B CH2M HILL, INC 9

Photo 17 - LBP-16 cream divider

Photo 18 - Mercury containing fluorescent light (two seen during inspection)

10 CH2M HILL, INC APPENDIX B

Photo 19 - Fluorescent lamps (typical)

Appendix C

Building 195 Diagrams and Sampling Locations

0.75 pt line, black space = x space of logo (pg 9, brand guidelines)

Footer, or Slugline:

Calibri Light, 6pt.

Alwasy include JETT number and FileName.

Figure Number - Calibri, bold, 10/13 Figure Title - Calibri, bold, 10/13 Project Name - Calibri, light, italic, 10/13 Project Location - Calibri, light, 9/12

3.5” from edge of paper

Use this North arrow if working with GIS.

Calibri light, 6 pt

Calibri, light, 8/11

Calibri, bold, 8/11, all caps

0.25 pt line, 1/16” (4.5 pt) high

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

EN0728161127BOI

Figure 1.

MHAFB Building 195 Environmental Inspections Building Layout

7'-91 2"

6'-10"

27'-61 2"

63'-8" 12'-21

2"

12'-31 2"

8'-11 2"

6'-4"

14'-7"

11'-4"

13'-1" 15'-81

2" 17'-9"

17'-3"

25'-51 2"

7'-61 2"

11'-71 2"

7'-6"

17'-9"

15'-2"

7'-91 2" 7'-6"

10'

20'

10'-41 2"

5'-21 2"

35'-6"

20'-91 2"

51'-8"

44'-3"

126'-41 2"

4'-01 2"

17'-9" 3'-3"

9'-111 2" 8'-10"

10'-1"

17'-111 2"

29'-61 2"

9'-01 2"

7'-2"

53'-11 2" 43'-9"28'-111

2"

31'-1"

30'-111 2"

5'-61 2"4'-71

2"

11'-10"

12'-111 2"

11'-7"

12'-111 2"

4'-71 2"

5'-91 2"

37'-11 2"

67'-3"

24'-31 2" 4'-61

2"

36'-1"

7'-4"

15'-5"

19'-101 2"

22'-51 2" 12'-11"

18'-91 2"

10'-31 2" 10'-10" 12'-10"

8'-101 2"

9'-21 2"

12'-10"11'8'-5"

25'-1"

51'-8"

21'-101 2"

20'-21 2"9'-11

2"

4'-41 2"

43'-51 2"

26'-81 2"

48'-01 2"

15'-71 2"

19' 18'-6"

27'

30'-111 2"

16'-10"

10'-41 2"

9'-41 2"

13'-41 2"

13'-11 2"

6'-10" 5'-6"

16'-6" 8'-6"

8'-2" 4'-2" 4'-11" 7'-9"

17'-10"

8'-8"

5'-71 2"

7'-51 2"

8'-81 2"

9'-41 2"

6'-8"

6'-1"

5'-10"

9'-41 2"

15'-81 2"

12'-21 2"3'-11

2"11'-7"

10'-71 2"

23'-01 2"

15'-31 2"10'-1"

9'-5"

17'-7"

28'-81 2"

5'-11"32'-5"

28'-4"

10'-21 2"

2'-31 2"

9'-7"

10'-31 2"

12'-61 2"

10'-31 2"

7'-01 2"

12'-9" 11'-11"

21'-10"

10'

17'-51 2"

14'-91 2"

BLDG 195

LEGEND

= Primary Bathrooms = Additional Bathrooms

Figure 2

Figure 3 Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6 space = x space of logo (pg 9, brand guidelines)

Footer, or Slugline:

Calibri Light, 6pt.

Alwasy include JETT number and FileName.

Figure Number - Calibri, bold, 10/13 Figure Title - Calibri, bold, 10/13 Project Name - Calibri, light, italic, 10/13 Project Location - Calibri, light, 9/12

3.5” from edge of paper

Use this North arrow if working with GIS.

Calibri light, 6 pt

Calibri, light, 8/11

Calibri, bold, 8/11, all caps

0.25 pt line, 1/16” (4.5 pt) high

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

EN0728161127BOI

Figure 2.

MHAFB Building 195 Bathrooms Environmental Inspections Building Layout

LEGEND

= Asbestos Sample = Lead Sample

5'-31

5'-91

11'-10"

10'-31 2"

12'-61 2"

2'-7"

9'-7"

2'-31 2"

10'-21 2"

10'-31 2"

BLDG 195

3 Fluorescent Lights

2 Fluorescent Lights (Hg)

LBP -12

LBP -13

AS-12

space = x space of logo (pg 9, brand guidelines)

Footer, or Slugline:

Calibri Light, 6pt.

Alwasy include JETT number and FileName.

Figure Number - Calibri, bold, 10/13 Figure Title - Calibri, bold, 10/13 Project Name - Calibri, light, italic, 10/13 Project Location - Calibri, light, 9/12

3.5” from edge of paper

Use this North arrow if working with GIS.

Calibri light, 6 pt

Calibri, light, 8/11

Calibri, bold, 8/11, all caps

0.25 pt line, 1/16” (4.5 pt) high

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

EN0728161127BOI

Figure 3.

MHAFB Building 195 Bathrooms Environmental Inspections Building Layout

LEGEND

= Asbestos Sample = Lead Sample = Cabinet Surface

12'-9" 11'-111 2"

14'-91 2"

21'-10"

17'-6"

2'-81 2"

9'-41 2"

8'-81 2"

BLDG 195

5 Fluorescent Lights

LBP-09

AS-16

5 Fluorescent Lights

6 Screw-in Lights

AS-10

AS-11

LBP-10, 11

AS-16

AS-03, 04, 05

AS-09

AS-06, 07LBP-07, 08

space = x space of logo (pg 9, brand guidelines)

Footer, or Slugline:

Calibri Light, 6pt.

Alwasy include JETT number and FileName.

Figure Number - Calibri, bold, 10/13 Figure Title - Calibri, bold, 10/13 Project Name - Calibri, light, italic, 10/13 Project Location - Calibri, light, 9/12

3.5” from edge of paper

Use this North arrow if working with GIS.

Calibri light, 6 pt

Calibri, light, 8/11

Calibri, bold, 8/11, all caps

0.25 pt line, 1/16” (4.5 pt) high

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

EN0728161127BOI

Figure 4.

MHAFB Building 195 Bathrooms Environmental Inspections Building Layout

LEGEND

= Asbestos Sample = Lead Sample

8'-6" 4'-9"

18'-6"

7'-4"

5'-1"

BLDG 195

4 Fluorescent Lights 3 Can Lights

AS-14

LBP-16

AS-15

LBP-16

AS-15

LBP-14, 15

space = x space of logo (pg 9, brand guidelines)

Footer, or Slugline:

Calibri Light, 6pt.

Alwasy include JETT number and FileName.

Figure Number - Calibri, bold, 10/13 Figure Title - Calibri, bold, 10/13 Project Name - Calibri, light, italic, 10/13 Project Location - Calibri, light, 9/12

3.5” from edge of paper

Use this North arrow if working with GIS.

Calibri light, 6 pt

Calibri, light, 8/11

Calibri, bold, 8/11, all caps

0.25 pt line, 1/16” (4.5 pt) high

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

EN0728161127BOI

Figure 5.

MHAFB Building 195 Bathrooms Environmental Inspections Building Layout

LEGEND

= Asbestos Sample = Lead Sample (No samples, same materials sampled prior)

BLDG 195

17'-10"

8'-2" 8'-8"

7'-9"

4'-11"4'-2"

4 Fluorescent Lights 3 Can Lights space = x space of logo (pg 9, brand guidelines)

Footer, or Slugline:

Calibri Light, 6pt.

Alwasy include JETT number and FileName.

Figure Number - Calibri, bold, 10/13 Figure Title - Calibri, bold, 10/13 Project Name - Calibri, light, italic, 10/13 Project Location - Calibri, light, 9/12

3.5” from edge of paper

Use this North arrow if working with GIS.

Calibri light, 6 pt

Calibri, light, 8/11

Calibri, bold, 8/11, all caps

0.25 pt line, 1/16” (4.5 pt) high

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

0.75” margin

EN0728161127BOI

Figure 6.

MHAFB Building 195 Bathrooms Environmental Inspections Building Layout

LEGEND

= Asbestos Sample = Lead Sample = Bathroom Dividers with Yellow Lead-based Paint

AS-01

LBP-05

LBP-06

LBP-01

AS-02

LBP-03

LBP-02

LBP-04

2 Fluorescent Lights 2 Fluorescent Lights

Appendix D

Laboratory Accreditations

Appendix E

Laboratory Results and COCs

ANALYTICAL REPORT

TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.

TestAmerica Nashville 2960 Foster Creighton Drive Nashville, TN 37204 Tel: (615)726-0177

TestAmerica Job ID: 490-107786-1 TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: Bldg 195 Client Project/Site: MHAFB

For:

CH2M Hill, Inc.

322 E. Front St.

Suite 200 Boise, Idaho 83702

Attn: Mike Wirtz

Authorized for release by:

7/21/2016 3:15:34 PM

Roxanne Cisneros, Senior Project Manager (615)301-5761 roxanne.cisneros@testamericainc.com

The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accredited parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.

This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.

Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.

https://secure.testamericainc.com/TotalAccess/login.aspx http://www.testamericainc.com/AskTheExpert/Expert_index.htm http://www.testamericainc.com mailto:roxanne.cisneros@testamericainc.com

Table of Contents

Client: CH2M Hill, Inc.

Project/Site: MHAFB

TestAmerica Job ID: 490-107786-1 SDG: Bldg 195

TestAmerica Nashville

7/21/2016

Cover Page

Table of Contents

Sample Summary

Definitions

Method Summary

Certification Summary

Subcontract Data

Chain of Custody

Receipt Checklists

Sample Summary TestAmerica Job ID: 490-107786-1Client: CH2M Hill, Inc.

SDG: Bldg 195Project/Site: MHAFB

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix

490-107786-1 195-AS-01-floor tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-2 195-AS-02-4x4 tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-3 195-AS-03-morter Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-4 195-AS-04-drywall Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-5 195-AS-05-carpet Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-6 195-AS-06-floor tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-7 195-AS-07-4x4 tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-8 195-AS-08-cover Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-9 195-AS-09-cabinet Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-10 195-AS-10-floor tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-11 195-AS-11-4x4 tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-12 195-AS-12-drywall Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-13 195-AS-13-floor tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-14 195-AS-14-porus ceiling tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-15 195-AS-15-dense ceiling tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

490-107786-16 195-AS-16-drywall Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/15/16 10:05

TestAmerica Nashville

Page 3 of 17 7/21/2016

Definitions/Glossary

SDG: Bldg 195Project/Site: MHAFB

Glossary

These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.

¤ Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis

Abbreviation

%R Percent Recovery

CFL Contains Free Liquid

CNF Contains no Free Liquid

DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference)

Dil Fac Dilution Factor

DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample

DLC Decision level concentration

MDA Minimum detectable activity

EDL Estimated Detection Limit

MDC Minimum detectable concentration

MDL Method Detection Limit

ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)

NC Not Calculated

ND Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)

PQL Practical Quantitation Limit

QC Quality Control

RER Relative error ratio

RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)

RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points

TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)

TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)

TestAmerica Nashville

Page 4 of 17 7/21/2016

Method Summary

SDG: Bldg 195Project/Site: MHAFB

Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol

NONESubcontract -

Asbestos

General Sub Contract Method EMLab FL

Protocol References:

NONE = NONE

Laboratory References:

EMLab FL = EMLab P&K - Fort Lauderdale, 6301 NW 5th Way, Suite 2850, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309, TEL (954)776-8400

TestAmerica Nashville

Page 5 of 17 7/21/2016

Certification Summary Client: CH2M Hill, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 490-107786-1 Project/Site: MHAFB SDG: Bldg 195

Laboratory: TestAmerica Nashville The certifications listed below are applicable to this report.

Authority Program EPA Region Certification ID Expiration Date

Utah TN000328NELAP 07-31-16 *

Laboratory: EMLab P&K - Fort Lauderdale All certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report.

Authority Program EPA Region Certification ID Expiration Date

AIHA-LAP, LLC 173067EMLAP 03-01-18

AIHA-LAP, LLC IHLAP 173067 03-01-18

TestAmerica Nashville

* Certification renewal pending - certification considered valid.

Page 6 of 17 7/21/2016

Approved by:

Approved Signatory Tracy Garcia

Report for:

Ms. Roxanne Cisneros TestAmerica-Nashville, TN 2960 Foster Creighton Drive Nashville, TN 37204

Regarding: Project: 490-107786-1; MHAFB

EML ID: 1571086

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. The results relate only to the items tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data for sample results with >1% asbestos concentration can be provided when requested.

EMLab P&K ("the Company") shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:

Asbestos PLM: 07-21-2016

Service SOPs: Asbestos PLM (EPA Methods 600/R-93/116 & 600/M4-82-020, SOP EM-AS-S-1267)

EMLab ID: 1571086, Page 1 of 5EMLab P&K, LLC

Page 7 of 17 7/21/2016

EMLab P&K 6500 McDonough Dr, Suite C-10, Norcross, GA 30093

(866) 871-1984 Fax (954) 776-8485 www.emlab.com

Client: TestAmerica-Nashville, TN C/O: Ms. Roxanne Cisneros Re: 490-107786-1; MHAFB

Date of Sampling: 07-07-2016 Date of Receipt: 07-19-2016 Date of Report: 07-21-2016

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Total Samples Submitted: 16 Total Samples Analyzed: 16

Total Samples with Layer Asbestos Content > 1%: 0

Location: 195-AS-01-Floor Tile (490-107786-1) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286354-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Ceramic Tile ND

Yellow Fibrous Material ND Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 3% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: 195-AS-02-4x4 Tile (490-107786-2) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286355-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Ceramic Tile ND

White Mortar ND Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: 195-AS-03-Mortar (490-107786-3) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286356-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Beige Cementitious Material ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Poor

Location: 195-AS-04-Drywall (490-107786-4) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286357-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Beige Compound with Paint ND

White Drywall with Brown Paper ND Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 13% Cellulose

< 1% Glass Fibers Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

EMLab ID: 1571086, Page 2 of 5EMLab P&K, LLC

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Page 8 of 17 7/21/2016

(866) 871-1984 Fax (954) 776-8485 www.emlab.com

Client: TestAmerica-Nashville, TN C/O: Ms. Roxanne Cisneros Re: 490-107786-1; MHAFB

Date of Sampling: 07-07-2016 Date of Receipt: 07-19-2016 Date of Report: 07-21-2016

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Location: 195-AS-05-Carpet (490-107786-5) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286358-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Brown Carpet ND

Yellow Non-Fibrous Material /Gray Fibrous Material ND Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 90% Synthetic Fibers Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: 195-AS-06-Floor Tile (490-107786-6) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286359-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Brown Ceramic Tile ND

Gray Mortar ND Tan Tape ND Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 8% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: 195-AS-07-4x4 Tile (490-107786-7) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286360-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Beige Ceramic Tile ND

Tan Mastic /White Compound ND Yellow Paint ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Poor

Location: 195-AS-08-Cover (490-107786-8) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286361-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Brown Carpet ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 90% Synthetic Fibers Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

EMLab ID: 1571086, Page 3 of 5EMLab P&K, LLC

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Page 9 of 17 7/21/2016

(866) 871-1984 Fax (954) 776-8485 www.emlab.com

Client: TestAmerica-Nashville, TN C/O: Ms. Roxanne Cisneros Re: 490-107786-1; MHAFB

Date of Sampling: 07-07-2016 Date of Receipt: 07-19-2016 Date of Report: 07-21-2016

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Location: 195-AS-09-Cabinet (490-107786-9) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286362-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Brown Debris /White Paint ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: < 1% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Poor

Location: 195-AS-10-Floor Tile (490-107786-10) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286363-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Blue Ceramic Tile ND

Tan Mastic ND Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: 195-AS-11-4x4 Tile (490-107786-11) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286364-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Blue Ceramic Tile ND

Gray Grout ND Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

Location: 195-AS-12-Drywall (490-107786-12) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286365-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Compound with Beige Paint ND

White Cementitious Material ND Sample Composite Homogeneity: Poor

EMLab ID: 1571086, Page 4 of 5EMLab P&K, LLC

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Page 10 of 17 7/21/2016

(866) 871-1984 Fax (954) 776-8485 www.emlab.com

Client: TestAmerica-Nashville, TN C/O: Ms. Roxanne Cisneros Re: 490-107786-1; MHAFB

Date of Sampling: 07-07-2016 Date of Receipt: 07-19-2016 Date of Report: 07-21-2016

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Location: 195-AS-13-Floor Tile (490-107786-13) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286366-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Beige Ceramic Tile ND

White Grout ND Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: 195-AS-14-Porus Ceiling Tile (490-107786-14) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286367-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Gray Ceiling Tile with White Surface ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 65% Mineral Wool Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: 195-AS-15- Dense Ceiing Tile (490-107786-15) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286368-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Gray Ceiling Tile with White Surface ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 40% Cellulose 2% Mineral Wool

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: 195-AS-16-Drywall (490-107786-16) Lab ID-Version‡: 7286369-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Compound with Paint ND

Off-White Drywall with Brown Paper ND Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 10% Cellulose

< 1% Glass Fibers Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

EMLab ID: 1571086, Page 5 of 5EMLab P&K, LLC

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Page 11 of 17 7/21/2016

Page 12 of 17 7/21/2016

Page 13 of 17 7/21/2016

Page 14 of 17 7/21/2016

Page 15 of 17 7/21/2016

Page 16 of 17 7/21/2016

Login Sample Receipt Checklist

Client: CH2M Hill, Inc. Job Number: 490-107786-1

SDG Number: Bldg 195

Login Number: 107786

Question Answer Comment

Creator: Stvartak, Anthony Q

List Source: TestAmerica Nashville

List Number: 1

TrueRadioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey meter.

TrueThe cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.

TrueSample custody seals, if present, are intact.

TrueThe cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or tampered with.

TrueSamples were received on ice.

TrueCooler Temperature is acceptable.

TrueCooler Temperature is recorded.

TrueCOC is present.

TrueCOC is filled out in ink and legible.

TrueCOC is filled out with all pertinent information.

TrueIs the Field Sampler's name present on COC?

TrueThere are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.

TrueSamples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate HTs)

TrueSample containers have legible labels.

TrueContainers are not broken or leaking.

TrueSample collection date/times are provided.

TrueAppropriate sample containers are used.

TrueSample bottles are completely filled.

N/ASample Preservation Verified.

TrueThere is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested MS/MSDs

TrueContainers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4").

TrueMultiphasic samples are not present.

TrueSamples do not require splitting or compositing.

N/AResidual Chlorine Checked.

TestAmerica Nashville Page 17 of 17 7/21/2016

ANALYTICAL REPORT

TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.

TestAmerica Nashville 2960 Foster Creighton Drive Nashville, TN 37204 Tel: (615)726-0177

TestAmerica Job ID: 490-107586-1 TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: Bldg 195 Client Project/Site: MHAFB

For:

CH2M Hill, Inc.

322 E. Front St.

Suite 200 Boise, Idaho 83702

Attn: Mike Wirtz

Authorized for release by:

7/26/2016 2:33:33 PM

Roxanne Cisneros, Senior Project Manager (615)301-5761 roxanne.cisneros@testamericainc.com

The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accredited parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.

This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.

Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.

https://secure.testamericainc.com/TotalAccess/login.aspx http://www.testamericainc.com/AskTheExpert/Expert_index.htm http://www.testamericainc.com mailto:roxanne.cisneros@testamericainc.com

Table of Contents

Client: CH2M Hill, Inc.

Project/Site: MHAFB

TestAmerica Job ID: 490-107586-1 SDG: Bldg 195

TestAmerica Nashville

7/26/2016

Cover Page

Table of Contents

Sample Summary

Case Narrative

Definitions

Client Sample Results

QC Sample Results

QC Association

Chronicle

Method Summary

Certification Summary

Chain of Custody

Receipt Checklists

Sample Summary TestAmerica Job ID: 490-107586-1Client: CH2M Hill, Inc.

SDG: Bldg 195Project/Site: MHAFB

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix

490-107586-1 195-LBP-01-4X4 tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-2 195-LBP-02-door Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-3 195-LBP-03-jam Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-4 195-LBP-04-floor tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-5 195-LBP-05-wall Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-6 195-LBP-06-divider Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-7 195-LBP-07-floor tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-8 195-LBP-08-4x4 tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-9 195-LBP-09-cabinet Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-10 195-LBP-10-floor tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-11 195-LBP-11-4x4 tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-12 195-LBP-12-dk brown door Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-13 195-LBP-13-lt brown door Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-14 195-LBP-14-floor tile Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-15 195-LBP-15-white door Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

490-107586-16 195-LBP-16-divider Solid 07/07/16 00:01 07/13/16 09:25

TestAmerica Nashville

Page 3 of 35 7/26/2016

Case Narrative Client: CH2M Hill, Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 490-107586-1 Project/Site: MHAFB SDG: Bldg 195

Job ID: 490-107586-1

Laboratory: TestAmerica Nashville

Narrative

Job Narrative 490-107586-1

Comments

No additional comments.

Receipt

The samples were received on 7/13/2016 9:25 AM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice.

The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 20.1º C.

Metals Method(s) 3051A: There was insufficient amount of these samples provided by the client. Report Limits are elevated. 195-LBP-02-door

(490-107586-2), 195-LBP-06-divider (490-107586-6), 195-LBP-09-cabinet (490-107586-9), 195-LBP-12-dk brown door (490-107586-12), 195-LBP-13-lt brown door (490-107586-13), 195-LBP-15-white door (490-107586-15), and 195-LBP-16-divider (490-107586-16).

No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page.

TestAmerica Nashville Page 4 of 35 7/26/2016

Definitions/Glossary

SDG: Bldg 195Project/Site: MHAFB

Qualifiers

Metals

Qualifier Description

4 MS, MSD: The analyte present in the original sample is greater than 4 times the matrix spike concentration; therefore, control limits are not applicable.

Qualifier

F2 MS/MSD RPD exceeds control limits

F1 MS and/or MSD Recovery is outside acceptance limits.

Glossary

These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.

¤ Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis

Abbreviation

%R Percent Recovery

CFL Contains Free Liquid

CNF Contains no Free Liquid

DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference)

Dil Fac Dilution Factor

DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample

DLC Decision level concentration

MDA Minimum detectable activity

EDL Estimated Detection Limit

MDC Minimum detectable concentration

MDL Method Detection Limit

ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)

NC Not Calculated

ND Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)

PQL Practical Quantitation Limit

QC Quality Control

RER Relative error ratio

RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)

RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points

TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)

TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)

TestAmerica Nashville

Page 5 of 35 7/26/2016

Client Sample Results

SDG: Bldg 195Project/Site: MHAFB

Lab Sample ID: 490-107586-1Client Sample…