Answer_to_Question_dtd_17_Apr_13.pdf

PDF 22 KB Posted

Attached to
Human Resources/Multiple Personnel Functions (MPF) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4890-12-R-0019
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

Answer to Industry Question dtd 17 Apr 13

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Human Resources/Multiple Personnel Functions (MPF), newest first.
File Type Posted
Attch_16_05-2307_Rev_14_(Whiteman_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_6_05-2485_Rev_12_(Ellsworth_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_5__05-2517_Rev_17_(Dyess_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_10__05-2159_Rev_14_(Mt._Home_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_7_05-2511_Rev_17_(Holloman_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_4_WD_05-2025_Rev_15_(Davis-Monthan_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_13_05-2475_Rev_15_(Shaw_AFB).pdf PDF
FA4890-12-R-0019-0005.pdf PDF
Attch_8_05-2543_Rev_15_(Langley_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_9__05-2131_Rev_14_(Moody_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_18 _Section_6a _Addendum_to_52.212-2_dtd_26_Apr_13.pdf PDF
Attch_19 _Section_7 _Addendum_to_52.212-2_dtd_17_Apr_13.pdf PDF
Answers_to_Questions_as_of__16_Apr_13.pdf PDF
MPF_RFP_Section_6a _Attch._1 _PPI__11_Apr_13.rtf RTF text file
FA4890-12-R-0019-0002.pdf PDF
Attach_1_MPF_PWS__11_April_13.pdf PDF
Attch_17_MPF_CLIN_Spdsht_(3_Apr_2013).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
MPF_PWS_Appendix_4_(29_Mar_13).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attch_1_MPF_12-R-0019_PWS__3_April_13.pdf PDF
Attch_18 _Section_6a_-_Addendum_to_52.212-1_dtd_3_Apr_13.pdf PDF
Responses_to_Industry_Questions_on_Official_RFP__3_Apr_13_.pdf PDF
Attch_10_WD_05-2159_(Mountain_Home_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_6_WD_05-2485_(Ellsworth_AFB).pdf PDF
MPF_RFP_Section_6a _Addendum_to_52.212-1.pdf PDF
Attch_11_WD_05-2331_(Nellis_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_1_MPF_PWS_21_Mar_13.pdf PDF
Attch_9_WD_05-2131_(Moody_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_2_ACC_DD_254_Draft.pdf PDF
MPF_RFP_Section_6a _Attch._1 _PPI__21_Mar_13.rtf RTF text file
Attch_16_WD_05-2307_(Whiteman_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_5_WD_05-2517_(Dyess_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_4_WD_05-2025_(Davis_Monthan_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_3_AFGSC_DD_254_Draft.pdf PDF
Attch_7_WD_05-2511_(Holloman_AFB).pdf PDF
MPF_RFP_FA4890-12-R-0019 _21_Mar_13.pdf PDF
Questions_from_Industry_6_Mar__13.docx DOCX document
Attch_15_WD_05-2407_(Minot_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_12_WD_05-2393_(Seymour_Johnson_AFB).pdf PDF
FA4890-12-R-0019__19_Feb_13_.pdf PDF
Attch_9_WD_05-2131_(Moody_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_2_ACC_DD_254_Draft.pdf PDF
Attch_16_WD_05-2307_(Whiteman_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_11_WD_05-2331_(Nellis_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_4_WD_05-2025_(Davis_Monthan_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_5_WD_05-2517_(Dyess_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_1_Draft_MPF_PWS__14_Feb_13.pdf PDF
Attch_3_AFGSC_DD_254_Draft.pdf PDF
Attch_10_WD_05-2159_(Mountain_Home_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_13_WD_05-2475_(Shaw_AFB).pdf PDF
Attch_6_WD_05-2485_(Ellsworth_AFB).pdf PDF
Show all 50

Human Resources/Multiple Personnel Functions (MPF) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

17 Apr 13

Government Responses to Additional Industry Question on the MPF RFP FA4890-12-R-0019 as of 17 Apr 13

#1. GENERAL INFORMATION. 1.1. This competitive best value source selection will be conducted in accordance with FAR Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation, DoD Source Selection Procedures effective 1 Jul 2011 and Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation (AFFARS) Mandatory Procedures (MP) 5315.3 for Source Selection as revised 4 May 2011 using the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process. In accordance with FAR 52.212-1, the Government reserves the right to award without discussions, but may conduct discussions if the Government determines it is necessary.

Although the solicitation is for a PWS LPTA procurement, Section 3.3.1.2. states the that …”the Government reserves the right to, but is not required to conduct analysis on offers that appear to be exceptionally low and not supported by the offeror’s technical approach.” This appears to be inconsistent with DOD Source Selection Procedures referenced in Section 7. Specifically, what means will the government use to determine a bid to be “exceptionally low” ? The DOD Source Selection Procedures referenced in Section 7, states in Section A.5. Price that “The LPTA procedure is applied to known, firm requirements, usually readily available in the commercial marketplace where a fair and reasonable price determination is based on adequate price competition. Therefore, price analysis will normally be used to determine the total evaluated price to support the selection of the lowest priced, technically acceptable offeror. Although in exceptional cases when the determination of fair and reasonable price requires additional information, the PCO may conduct a cost analysis to support the determination of whether the proposed price is fair and reasonable. Regardless of the specific evaluation methodology, in order to enable offerors to make informed decisions on how best to propose, every solicitation will provide an adequate description of the cost or price evaluation.”

Consequently, what specific cost analysis /evaluation methodology will be used to determine if an exceptionally low offer should be rejected? With the past cost history associated with this procurement, will a government estimate be used as one of the elements of cost analysis to ensure that the technical approach is appropriate, a fair and reasonable price and the avoidance of an acceptance of a unconscionable low bid and contract?

Government Response: The RFP has been amended (FA4890-12-R-0019-0003) to remove the following language from Section 7, Addendum to 52.212-2 para. 3.3.1.2:

As an LPTA source selection, the Government reserves the right to, but is not required to conduct analysis on offers that appear to be exceptionally low and not supported by the offeror's technical approach.

The specific analysis techniques/evaluation methodology used to determine if an exceptionally low offer should be rejected are outlined in FAR 15.404-1 as stated in paragraph Section 7, para. 3.3.1.1.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .