Amendment 4 to Solicitation.pdf

PDF 140 KB Posted

Attached to
Full Service Western Style Restaurant Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4885-11-R-0007
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Headquarters Air Force

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Full Service Western Style Restaurant, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment 5 to Solicitation.pdf PDF
FA4885-11-R-0007 Original Solicitation_RH.docx DOCX document
Questions Answers 2.pdf PDF
Amendment 3 FA4885-11-R-0007.pdf PDF
Amendment 2 FA4885-11-R-0007.pdf PDF
Amendment 1 FA4885-11-R-0007.pdf PDF
QuestionsandAnswers.docx DOCX document
FA4885-11-R-0007 Original Solicitation_RH.pdf PDF
Appendix J Document —
Appendix J Reference Document.pdf PDF
Past Performance Info Sheet.pdf PDF
Past Performance Questionaire.pdf PDF
Subcontractor Authorization.pdf PDF
LETTER TO OFFERORS.pdf PDF
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to rescind Amendment 3 of Solicitation FA4885-11-R-0007 w hich deletes and modif ies a few of the questions in the Past Performance Questionaire. All offerors are now instructed to utlize the original Past Performance Questionaire attached to FA4885-11-R-0007.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 10

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 28-May-2011

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA4885-11-R-0007

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

30-Apr-2011

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

28-May-2011

CODE

HQ USMTM/CONTRACTING

P.O. BOX 22488

RIYADH 11495

FA4885 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA4885-11-R-0007

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

When filled in this document is Source Selection Sensitive Information

IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104

The Department of Defense (DOD) is conducting a competitive procurement for American Style

Restaurant and Catering Service. The contractor shall perform provide all management, labor and materials necessary except subsistence (food product) purchasing and cashiering duties. The service requires breakfast, lunch, and dinner meal services 365 days per year between the hours 0630 to 2100

(06:30am to 9:00pm), excluding down time, preparation, and breakdown. In addition to the normal operations, the contractor shall provide full catering and banquet services as requested throughout the installation. The contractor shall prepare and serve quality food resulting in a satisfied and loyal customer base. Provide the information requested in this form for each contract/program being described. Provide frank, concise comments regarding your performance on the contracts you identify. Provide a separate completed form for each contract/program submitted.

Recency: Please provide information on contractor performance that is recent. IAW IG5315.101-1, and for this solicitation, recent is defined as performance occurring within the last three years.

Relevancy: IAW IG5315.101-1, and for this solicitation, relevant means the performance being considered must have a logical connection to the work described in the solicitation.

To assist in evaluating proposals under this procurement, you have been requested to provide descriptive information for the following contractor:

Contractor Name_______________________________________________________________

Address:_______________________________________________________________________

Contractor Division): ____________________

CAGE Code: ____________________

DUNS Number: ____________________

(NOTE: If the company or division performing this effort is different than the offeror or the relevance of this effort to the instant acquisition is impacted by any company/corporate organizational change, note those changes. Refer to the "Organizational Structure Change History" you provided as part of your Past

Performance Volume).

Current Program Manager or main Point of Contact_____________________________________

Current Contact Phone/Fax Number(s): ______________________________________________

Procurement Contracting Officer:___________________________________________________

Address:_____________________________________________________________________

Contracting Officer (CO) _________________Phone/Fax Number(s)_______________________

Current Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO):______________________________________

Address:______________________________________________________________________

ACO Phone/Fax Number(s):______________________________________________________

Contract Type:_______________________Period of Performance_________________________

Original Contract Value: _______________Final Contract Value:__________________________

Description of Services provided in the as Prime Contractor for

Contract:_____________________________________________________________________________

Identify whether a subcontracting plan was required by the contract you are submitting. If one was required, identify, in percentage terms, the planned versus achieved goals during contract performance. If goals were not met, please explain.

Brief Description of Subcontractor (mark prime or subcontractor) Please highlight portions considered most relevant to current acquisition.

Completion Date:

1. Original date: ____________________

2. Current Schedule: ____________________

3. Estimate at Completion: ____________________

4. How Many Times Changed: ____________________

5. Primary Causes of Change:

Specify, by name, any key individual(s) who participated in this program and are proposed to support the instant acquisition. Also, indicate their contractual roles for both acquisitions.

Questionnaire Instructions:

Please provide your assessment of the level of performance associated with the contract for which you are a reference. Mark the appropriate block, indicating the contractor’s past performance with the ratings provided below.

Rating Definitions to be used:

Narrative comments would be particularly useful and greatly appreciated. Space is provided for comments, and additional pages may be used if desired.

1. Your Organization Name and Address:

Name:

Title:

Phone

Fax:

E-Mail

2. Contractor performed as the ____Prime Contractor ____Subcontractor ____Key Personnel

Comments:

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS

Rating Description

High Confidence (HC). Based on the offeror's performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort..

Significant Confidence (SC). Based on the offeror's performance record, little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

(SatC)

Based on the offeror's performance record, some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Little Confidence (LC). Based on the offeror's performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Changes to the offeror's existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements.

No Confidence (NC). Based on the offeror's performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral/Unknown Confidence

(N).

No performance record identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

3. Past Performance: Please characterize the level of the contractor’s overall performance by placing an

“X” in the appropriate block. (See previous page for Rating Definition Abbreviations).

Company Name:______________________________________________________________________

Q # Overall Work Area HC SC SatC LC NC N

1 Provided qualified/experienced personnel and management with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements

2 Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel who met the minimum qualifications of the position they were filling during the contract period.

3 Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4 Management team (including prime and/or sub-contractor) participated in solving significant local problems.

5 Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures to your satisfaction

6 Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

7 Identified problems as they occurred.

8 Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

9 Displayed initiative to solve problems.

10 Developed realistic progress schedules.

11 Was responsive to contract changes.

12 Provided adequate project supervision.

13 Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

14 Cooperated with company personnel after award.

15 How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

Technical Performance HC SC Sat

C

LC NC N

T1 Quality and repeatability of operations & maintenance.

T2 Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts.

T3 Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts.

T4 Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements.

T5 Ability to implement current standard practices for restaurant services, operation, maintenance, upgrades and management.

T6 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures.

Program Management HC SC Sat

LC NC N

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program).

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff

(including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes).

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements.

P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts.

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government

Furnished Property or Material).

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management.

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer.

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

Employee Retention/Attraction HC SC Sat

LC NC N

E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

Any additional comments:

4. Has any part of this contract been terminated for default or convenience?____YES____ NO

If YES, please explain the reasons for termination (i.e. inability to meet cost or delivery schedules, performance, etc.)

5. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance?

HC SC SatC LC NC N

Comments:

6. Would you award to this contractor again? ____YES____ NO

Explain:

7. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

8. Was there adverse past performance issues you’d like to make us aware of?

9 Was this adverse past performance discussed with the contractor? Was it resolved successfully?

10. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Please return your questionnaire directly to: HQ USMTM Contracting

Attn: Ms. R. Harris

P.O. Box 22488

Riyadh, 11495 KSA

Email: Rachel.m.harris@usmtm.swa.army.mil

Mobile: 050-520-6897

Commercial (Int'l): 011 (966) 1-498-3540 X2477

Commercial (Local): (01) 498-3540 x 2477

Please mark envelopes as follows: “TO BE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY”. Thank you for your time and information.

(End of Summary of Changes) mailto:Rachel.m.harris@usmtm.swa.army.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .