Atch 8 Performance Plan 11 Mar 2010.pdf
PDF 189 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Base Wide Laundry and Dry Cleaning Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4855-10-R-0002
About this file
RFP ATCH 8 Example Performance Plan
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment0002.pdf | ||
| Amend0002_Atch 2 Price List 28Apr2010.pdf | ||
| TOC_Amend0002_28Apr2010.pdf | ||
| LaundryMap.pdf | ||
| Amend1_Questions.pdf | ||
| Final_PreProposalMinutes_24Mar2010.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Contract Table of Contents - Amend 1.pdf | ||
| PreProposalConf_slides.pdf | ||
| Revised Atch 1 PWS 31Mar2010.pdf | ||
| Atch 2 Price List 31Mar2010.pdf | ||
| Atch 6 Past Present Perf References.pdf | ||
| Atch 1 PWS 11Mar2010.pdf | ||
| FA4855-10-R-0002.pdf | ||
| Atch 2 Price List 11Mar2010.pdf | ||
| Atch 4 Addendum 52212-1 11Mar2010.pdf | ||
| Atch 7 Past Present Perf Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Atch 5 Addendum 52212-2 11Mar2010.pdf | ||
| Atch 3 Wage Determination 2005-2517 Rev 12_11Mar2010.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation: FA4855-10-R-0002 11 Mar 2010 Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 1 of 16 Attachment 8
EXAMPLE
PERFORMANCE PLAN
FOR
BASEWIDE LAUNDRY &
DRYCLEANING SERVICES
CANNON AFB, NEW MEXICO
Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 2 of 16 Attachment 8
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. OBJECTIVE OF THE REQUIREMENT 3
2. PURPOSE OF MANAGING THE REQUIREMENT 3
2.1. Government’s Responsibility 3
2.2. Services Summary (SS) 3
2.3. Non Services Summary (Non SS) 4
3. MULTI-FUNCTIONAL TEAM (MFT) 4
4. ASSESSING CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE 4
4.1. Scheduling Surveillance Visits 4
4.1.1. Methods of Surveillance 5
4.1.2. Surveillance Schedule 5
4.2. Conducting Surveillances 5
4.3. Documenting Surveillance Results 5
4.4. Surveillance Ratings 6
4.4.1. Unacceptable Surveillance Ratings 6
4.4.2. Unacceptable Re-performance 6
4.4.3. Exceeding Performance Threshold 7
4.4.4. Performance Assessment Report (PAR) 7
4.5. Customer Complaints 7
4.5.1. Educating the Customer 7
4.5.2. Documenting Complaints 7
4.5.3. Validating Complaints 7
4.6. Submitting Surveillance Documentation 7
4.7. Certifying Receipt of Contractor Services 7
4.7.1. Wide Area Workflow Training 8
4.7.2. Processing Invoices 8
4.7.3. Expenditure Log 8
4.8. Progress Meetings 8
4.9. Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) 8
4.9.1. CPAR Submittal 8
4.9.2. Substantiating the Rating 9
4.9.3. Annual CPAR 9
5. PROGRAM MANAGER/QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL APPOINTMENT 9
5.1. Program Managers 9
5.2. Quality Assurance Personnel 9
6. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL (HAZMAT) – QAP RESPONSIBILITIES 9
7. PERFORMANCE PLAN REVISIONS OR NEW BRAG MEMBERS 9
Appendix A – BRAG Charter 11
Appendix B – QAP Surveillance Schedule 14
Appendix C – QAP Surveillance Checklist 15
Appendix D – Performance Plan Signature Page 16
Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 3 of 16 Attachment 8
1. OBJECTIVE OF THE REQUIREMENT The government’s objective in contracting for this requirement is to provide quality laundry and dry cleaning services for seven agencies in four squadrons:
27th Special Operations Force Support Squadron (Caprock Inn, The Landing, The Pecos Trail
(the dining facility), and Honor Guard)
27th Special Operations Medical Support Squadron (Medical Treatment Facility)
27th Special Operations Civil Engineer Squadron (Fire Department)
27th Special Operations Logistics Readiness Squadron (Mobility)
2. PURPOSE OF MANAGING THE REQUIREMENT:
2.1. GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY. The government recognizes that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions required to meet the terms of the contract. However, the government must verify that services for which the contractor invoices were received and the services were in compliance with the performance thresholds identified in the Services Summary below. The purpose of this Performance Plan is to provide Quality
Assurance Personnel (QAP) with an effective, systematic method for evaluating contractor’s performance in order to ensure the government is receiving the services for which it pays. For this requirement, the 27th Special Operations Force Support Squadron (Caprock Inn, Honor
Guard, The Pecos Trail, and The Landing) and the Medical Treatment Facility rely on two categories of personnel in determining if the contractor is meeting the contract’s terms. These personnel are the QAP and the government representative; their responsibilities are outlined below. For the 27th Civil Engineer and Logistics Readiness Squadrons and the remaining
Services agencies, the QAP are responsible for determining if the contractor is meeting contract requirements.
2.2. SERVICES SUMMARY (SS). The contract service requirements are summarized into performance objectives that relate directly to the mission of the 27th Special Operations Wing.
The performance threshold briefly describes the minimum acceptable level of service for each requirement. These minimums do not relieve the contractor from performing 100 percent of all work requirements. These thresholds are critical to mission success; work must be accomplished according to the contract’s terms, conditions, and specifications.
SERVICES SUMMARY
SS
DESCRIPTION
Pickup & Delivery Service
PWS REF
1.2 & Appendix I
METHOD OF SURVEILLANCE
Customer Complaint
Performance Objective: Pickup/Delivery Services are accomplished within the hours specified
Performance Threshold: No more than 3 late Pickups/Deliveries per month
Scheduling Procedures: Once Weekly/Monthly/Quarterly (see Paragraph 4.1).
Inspection Procedures: Customer Complaint
SS
DESCRIPTION
Correct Quantities
PWS REF
1.2, 1.4 and 1.13
METHOD OF SURVEILLANCE
Customer Complaint
Performance Objective: Correct quantities of articles of laundry are delivered
Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 4 of 16 Attachment 8
Performance Threshold: No more than 3 incorrect quantities of articles (quantity of articles is less than quantity picked up) delivered per month
Scheduling Procedures: Once Weekly/Monthly/Quarterly (see Paragraph 4.1).
Inspection Procedures: Customer Complaint.
SS
DESCRIPTION
Laundry and Dry Cleaning Services
PWS REF
1.2 thru 1.13
METHOD OF SURVEILLANCE
Customer Complaint
Performance Objective: Laundry & Dry Cleaning Services: Finished packaging conforms to the accepted industry standards of quality, cleanliness, and appearance (free of odors and stains)
Performance Threshold: No more than 3 packages returned for re-performance per month
Scheduling Procedures: Once Weekly/Monthly/Quarterly (see Paragraph 4.1).
Inspection Procedures: Customer Complaint
SS
DESCRIPTION
Packaging
PWS REF
Appendix II thru
Appendix VIII
METHOD OF SURVEILLANCE
Customer Complaint
Performance Objective: Packaging: Laundry is packaged as specified in Appendix II thru Appendix VIII
Performance Threshold: No more than 3 incorrect packagings per month
Scheduling Procedures: Once Weekly/Monthly/Quarterly (see Paragraph 4.1).
Inspection Procedures: Customer Complaint
2.3. NON SERVICES SUMMARY (NON SS). Although the SS contains only the items considered most important for mission accomplishment, the government retains the right to surveil all requirements of the contract. QAP may choose to periodically surveil requirements not listed on the SS; these services are referred to as non SS items and may include, but are not limited to, the items identified in the table below. NOTE: Currently, this requirement does not identify any non SS items; references to non SS items throughout this plan shall remain in case non SS items are later added. The contractor’s failure to perform these requirements could also result in issuance of unacceptable inspection ratings and/or a PAR (see Paragraph 4.4.4).
3. MULTI-FUNCTIONAL TEAM (MFT). The MFT is a customer-focused team formed under the guidelines of AFI 63-124, Performance-Based Services Acquisition, and is instituted under the authority of the Wing Commander. At this base, the MFT is called the Business
Requirements Advisory Group (BRAG). The BRAG plans and manages this requirement throughout the life of the contract. BRAG members and their roles and responsibilities are outlined in a BRAG Charter, which can be found at Appendix A.
4. ASSESSING CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE. The following paragraphs outline the strategy, methods, and tools the BRAG shall use to assess the contractor’s performance against the performance objectives and thresholds identified in the SS.
4.1. SCHEDULING SURVEILLANCE VISITS:
4.1.1. Methods of Surveillance. The government shall perform surveillances to ensure the contractor is performing satisfactorily. The types of surveillance methods used for this requirement are outlined below. At the start of contract performance, QAP may conduct more frequent surveillances (i.e., weekly) until the government is satisfied the contractor is performing in accordance with contract requirements. Upon determining contractor is performing satisfactorily, QAP may change the frequency to that outlined in the SS. The QAP may revert to more frequent surveillances should the contractor’s performance warrant increased surveillance.
Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 5 of 16 Attachment 8
The QAP shall advise the Contract Administrator (CA) immediately when the frequency of surveillance changes.
4.1.1.1. Customer Complaints. During the contract performance period, QAP may receive complaints about the quality of service or may observe unacceptable performance by the contractor on days other than scheduled surveillance days. QAP shall follow the procedures outlined in Paragraph 4.4 and 4.5 and subparagraphs contained therein.
4.1.2. Surveillance Schedule. The QAP shall prepare a schedule for surveillance visits for all
SS and non SS items, and submit the schedule to the CA 10 workdays prior to the surveillance period. The schedule may be prepared on a monthly, quarterly, or annual basis. The schedule shall coincide with the surveillance requirements outlined in Paragraphs 2.2 and 2.3 of this plan.
The QAP shall notify the CA in advance of any changes to the schedule. A calendar or a form such as that found at Appendix B may be used to set up the surveillance schedule. The schedule is “For Official Use Only” and shall not be provided to the contractor. The CA shall assess QAP performance during a surveillance at least once quarterly. The Quality Assurance Program
Coordinator (QAPC) shall assess QAP and CA performance at least once annually.
4.2. CONDUCTING SURVEILLANCES. The QAP shall conduct surveillances on the dates noted on the surveillance schedule. QAP must inspect task performance by watching actual task performance, physically checking an attribute of the completed task, or otherwise surveilling the task or its results to determine whether or not the performance meets the standards contained in the contract. QAP must be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating contractor performance against contract requirements.
4.3. DOCUMENTING SURVEILLANCE RESULTS. Accurate QAP documentation is an important component of the official Air Force record of the contractor’s performance. The contracting officer cannot properly administer the contract without documentation of actual surveillance. Therefore, QAP must document surveillance as it is accomplished. A locally-developed form (QAP Surveillance Checklist - Appendix C) may be used to document and collect this information. The surveillance checklist must include:
Contract number and title
The name, title, and initials of the individual performing the surveillance
Date and time the surveillance was performed
Description of the service being monitored
Method of surveillance
Surveillance results and explanation of performance above/below performance thresholds
Location for contractor’s representative to initial notification of unacceptable performance
4.4. SURVEILLANCE RATINGS. QAP shall document acceptable and unacceptable perform-ance. QAP surveillance documentation and the interim submission of the Contractor
Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) are used to develop the annual CPAR (see Paragraph
4.9). QAP shall annotate positive and negative performance (as appropriate).
Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 6 of 16 Attachment 8
4.4.1. Unacceptable Surveillance Ratings. When results of surveillance net an unacceptable rating, the QAP must document the area of non-compliance. Customer complaints and comments from other sources shall be validated by the QAP to ensure the complaint relates to the actual requirement of the contract (see Paragraph 4.5 below). Should results of surveillance net an unacceptable rating, the QAP shall monitor the performance threshold assigned to each SS and notify the contract administrator (see Paragraph 4.4.1.4). Any non-conformance with contract requirements is considered a “defect.” The term “defect” is used in reference to a performance objective in the SS that does not meet the objective’s associated performance threshold. The preferred course of action upon discovery of unacceptable performance is to require the contractor to re-perform at no additional cost to the government. When unacceptable performance is documented, QAP shall take the following actions:
4.4.1.1. If government actions caused the unacceptable performance, the QAP shall take steps to prevent such actions in the future. Government-caused complaints/defects shall not be counted against the contractor.
4.4.1.2. If QAP determines unacceptable performance is not government-caused, QAP shall request performance or re-performance of all identified defects. The QAP shall inform the contractor’s on-site representative of the unacceptable performance, annotate the reasons why, and request his/her initials and date on the surveillance checklist. By initialing and dating the form, the contractor’s on-site representative is acknowledging notification of, not agreement with, the unacceptable performance. If the contractor wants to dispute the results of the surveillance, QAP must refer him/her to the contracting officer for resolution.
4.4.1.3. Re-surveil the service found defective, and document the rating, date, and time of re-surveillance. NOTE: The initial unacceptable rating (even after re-performance) counts toward the performance threshold.
4.4.1.4. Notify the CA immediately of unacceptable performance and requests for re-performance (if applicable) and results thereof (see Paragraph 4.4.1).
4.4.2. Unacceptable Re-performance. When re-performance is determined unacceptable, the
QAP shall inform the contractor’s on-site representative that performance is still unacceptable, annotate the reasons why, and request the on-site representative’s initials and date on the surveillance checklist. By initialing and dating the form, the contractor’s on-site representative is acknowledging notification of, not agreement with, the unacceptable performance. If the contractor wants to dispute the results of the surveillance, the QAP must refer him/her to the contracting officer for resolution. See Paragraph 4.4.4 regarding Performance Assessment
Report (PAR) actions.
4.4.3. Exceeding Performance Threshold. If the number of complaints/defects exceeds the performance threshold for any SS item, the QAP shall initiate a PAR (see Paragraph 4.4.4) for issuance by the contracting officer. If re-performance is not practical, or if serious unacceptable performance trends develop with the contractor’s performance, the following actions may be taken, at the contracting officer’s discretion:
Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 7 of 16 Attachment 8
Performance Assessment Report (PAR)
Letter of Concern (LOC)
Inspection of Services Clause Remedies
Past Performance Documentation
Cure Notice
Show-Cause Notice
Termination for Default/Cause
4.4.4. Performance Assessment Report (PAR). A PAR shall be issued when unacceptable per-formance exceeds the performance threshold, as identified in the SS. A PAR shall also be issued when non-performance, after notification to perform, or when re-performance (due to an unacceptable surveillance rating), was not accomplished within the terms of the contract. The
PAR form and the instructions for completing the form are located on the base shared drive:
P:\27_SOMSG\27_SOCONS\QAPC\Performance Plan Forms.
4.5. CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS:
4.5.1. Educating the Customer. The key to the success of a customer complaint system is customer education. QAP must familiarize their customers with applicable contract require-ments and the customer complaint process. If customers are aware of the services they are entitled to receive and the contract standards for those services, the result should be fewer complaints caused due to misunderstandings. An active customer education program may include briefings upon changes in key personnel, brochures, letters, e-mail reminders, etc.
4.5.2. Documenting Complaints. A customer feedback form or the Customer Complaint
Record may be used to document complaints received from customers. A locally-developed form or log that consistently captures the pertinent information regarding feedback and resolutions may also be used. The Customer Complaint Record and the instructions for completing the form are located on the base shared drive:
P:\27_SOMSG\27_SOCONS\QAPC\Performance Plan Forms.
4.5.3. Validating Complaints. The QAP shall review all customer feedback for complaints and suggestions and validate the complaint’s applicability to the contract requirements. Other government offices shall also notify the QAP directly for complaints related to contractor performance. If the complaint is not valid, the QAP shall advise the customer of contract requirements. If complaint is valid, QAP shall process the Customer Complaint Record (see
Paragraph 4.5.2).
4.6. SUBMITTING SURVEILLANCE DOCUMENTATION. All documentation resulting from surveillance becomes a permanent part of the contract file. QAP shall submit surveillance results (documentation) to the contracting officer no later than the 5th workday following the end of the surveillance period. The QAP shall forward the results and the CPAR (see Paragraph 4.9) to the Functional Commander/Program Manager (see Appendix A) for review and coordination/signature prior to submitting surveillance results to the CA.
4.7. CERTIFYING RECEIPT OF CONTRACTOR SERVICES:
Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 8 of 16 Attachment 8
4.7.1. Wide Area Workflow Training. QAP are responsible for certifying receipt of the contractor’s services in Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) and for determining payment due on a monthly basis. Prior to certifying receipt of services for the month, the QAP must review the surveillance documentation to ensure that all performance was at or above the performance thresholds of the SS for the month and that all services were received. In order to access
WAWF, QAP shall complete WAWF training through the following website:
https//wawf.eb.mil/. The training consists of separate modules, each with its own training certificate. Upon completion of all training modules, the QAP shall ensure DD Form 2875, System Authorization Access Request (SAAR), is completed and delivered (along with copies of the training certificates) to the Budget & Accounting Liaison Office to receive a WAWF user ID and password.
4.7.2. Processing Invoices. When the contractor generates an invoice in WAWF, the QAP should receive a system-generated e-mail advising of the invoice’s existence. QAP are responsible for processing invoices immediately upon receipt, but shall verify that services being invoiced were received prior to accepting the invoice. QAP shall ensure a copy of the invoice and receiving report are printed and filed in their contract file.
4.7.3. Expenditure Log. The CA maintains an expenditure log which tracks the starting amount for each year of the contract, all increases and decreases made to the contract via modifications, decreases made via invoice payments, and the ending balance for each contract line item number
(CLIN). Tracking the amounts remaining on each CLIN aids in ensuring an anti-deficiency action is not committed and identifying excess funds for de-obligation as we near end of year
(specifically for estimated quantity CLINs). The QAP shall develop a similar tracking system and periodically (at least quarterly) check balances with the CA to ensure the dollar amounts match.
4.8. PROGRESS MEETINGS. The CA shall schedule regular performance progress meetings, or the meetings may be held when requested by the contracting officer, QAP, or the contractor.
Initially, progress meetings may be held more frequently (i.e., weekly, monthly) until a comfort level is reached that performance is well underway or parties agree that meetings should continue on a more frequent basis. Upon reaching the performance comfort level or BRAG members agree that progress meetings could be held less frequently, progress meetings for this requirement shall be held on a quarterly basis. QAP are required to attend these meetings. The
CA shall write and distribute meeting minutes. Meeting attendees have 10 calendar days from receipt of the minutes to advise the contracting officer of non-concurrence with any portion of the meeting minutes. Non-concurrence shall be provided in writing. NOTE: The frequency of meetings shall not necessarily indicate poor contractor performance.
4.9. CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (CPAR):
4.9.1. CPAR Submittal. The QAP shall submit a monthly CPAR to the contracting officer no later than the 5th workday following the end of the surveillance period. Prior to submitting the
CPAR to the contracting officer, the QAP shall forward the CPAR, along with the contractor performance surveillance results (see Paragraph 4.6) to the Functional Commander/Program
Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 9 of 16 Attachment 8
Manager (see Appendix A) for review and coordination/signature. The CA shall provide the results to the contractor at the regularly scheduled progress meeting. The CPAR form and the instructions for completing the form are located on the base shared drive: P:\27_SOMSG\
27_SOCONS\QAPC\Performance Plan Forms.
4.9.2. Substantiating the Rating. When providing the CPAR ratings, the QAP shall provide a narrative substantiating the rating for each of the assessment elements. The narrative shall contain what the contractor did that warrants stated rating, how the contractor performed said action, and what the result of the action was (i.e., the benefit to the government). By providing concrete narratives, the QAP is supplying the required documentation for the annual CPAR.
4.9.3. Annual CPAR. The BRAG shall compile the interim CPAR inputs in order to develop the annual CPAR. The BRAG shall review and finalize the annual assessment and forward to the contractor via the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). The contractor shall have 30 calendar days to respond to the assessment before it is permanently documented in the automated collection system and the Past Performance Information Retrieval
System (PPIRS).
5. PROGRAM MANAGER/QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL APPOINTMENT.
5.1. PROGRAM MANAGERS. In accordance with AFI 63-124, Performance-Based Services
Acquisition, the Functional Commander may delegate his/her duties. The individual(s) to whom these duties are delegated is called the Program Manager. The Functional Commander shall complete the appointment letter located on the base shared drive: P:\27_SOMSG\27_SOCONS\
QAPC\Performance Plan Forms and submit the letter to the QAPC. Upon receipt of the letter, the QAPC shall provide the Program Manager with the required training.
5.2. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL. Prior to performing any QAP duties, all QAP shall complete QAP Phase I and Phase II training and shall be provided with a letter from the CO delegating CO duties and responsibilities to the QAP. Functional Commanders and/or the
Program Manager shall complete the appointment letter located on the base shared drive:
P:\27_SOMSG\27_SOCONS\QAPC\Performance Plan Forms and submit the letter to the
QAPC. The QAPC shall schedule appointee(s) for Phase I training (if needed) and upon completion of Phase I, the QAPC shall forward appointment letter and request for Phase II training to the contract administrator.
6. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL (HAZMAT) – QAP RESPONSIBILITIES. When the contractor is required to submit paperwork to the QAP for reporting HAZMAT, the QAP shall be responsible for ensuring said paperwork is coordinated through the Natural Resources Manage-ment Element (27 SOCES/CEAN) and the HAZMAT Pharmacy.
7. PERFORMANCE PLAN REVISIONS OR NEW BRAG MEMBERS. Revisions to this
Performance Plan are the joint responsibility of the BRAG. Revisions may be made at any time changes are deemed necessary and are agreed upon by the BRAG. BRAG members shall sign the initial Performance Plan at Appendix D of the plan and upon revision. Upon assumption of duties as a new BRAG member, new appointees shall read this Performance Plan and
Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 10 of 16 Attachment 8 acknowledge their understanding of their duties and responsibilities as part of the BRAG by signing at Appendix D of the plan.
Solicitation: FA485-10-R-0002 11 March 2010 Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 11 of 16 Attachment 8 Appendix A
APPENDIX A
BRAG CHARTER
1. NAME. Business Requirements Advisory Group (BRAG) – Basewide Laundry & Dry
Cleaning Services
2. AUTHORITY. AFI 63-124, Performance-Based Services Acquisition
3. PURPOSE. AFI 63-124 requires the formation of a Multi-Functional Team (MFT) to create an environment that shapes and executes the acquisition. The BRAG is a customer-focused, MFT instituted under the authority of the Wing Commander. The BRAG plans the acquisition and then remains responsible for assessing contractor performance and managing the requirement throughout the life of the contract. Following are the roles and responsibility of
BRAG members.
4. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
4.1. FUNCTIONAL COMMANDER (FC) (May delegate duties):
Ensures the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and Performance Plan are prepared in performance-based format, foster innovation, and define metrics; and obtains contracting officer coordination on the final product.
Ensures the requirements documents (PWS, Performance Plan, Independent Government
Estimate (IGE), and funding document) are submitted to the contracting officer.
Nominates qualified individuals as primary/alternate Quality Assurance Personnel (QAP).
Reviews Quality Assurance Personnel’s (QAP’s) surveillance schedule and surveillance checklist, which contains contractor performance documentation, prior to submission to the
Contract Administrator (CA) to ensure performance is compatible with contract and mission objectives.
Ensures QAP compliance with Performance Plan procedures.
4.2. PROGRAM MANAGER (PM): Delegated by the FC to oversee the contracted services for the functional area. When appointed as the delegated FC, assumes the responsibilities performed by the FC. The
4.3. CONTRACTING OFFICER (CO):
The only agent authorized to bind the government in a contractual relationship.
The only agent whose interpretation of the contract is legally binding.
Ensures performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting and compliance with the terms of the contract.
The CO safeguards the interests of the government in the contractual relationship.
Ensures open communication is maintained between all parties, pre and post award.
Delegates authority to QAP for inspection and acceptance in accordance with the terms of the contract.
Manages the listing of QAP assigned to the contract.
Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 12 of 16 Attachment 8 Appendix A
Informs the contractor of the names, duties, and limitations of authority for all QAP assigned to the contract.
Takes appropriate action should unacceptable contractor performance occur.
Advises the BRAG on developing incentives/remedies, as appropriate, tied to performance objectives and thresholds.
Advises the BRAG on developing the Performance Plan.
Maintains, in the contract file, documentation of training provided by contracting personnel and/or Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC).
4.4. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR (CA):
Responsible for the day-to-day administration of the contract.
Reviews QAP documentation and identifies deficiencies for QAP corrective action.
Periodically assesses QAP performance, and advises the QAPC of any problems.
Manages contractor performance assessment data, includes consolidating interim Contractor
Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs) to develop the annual CPAR.
Processes contract modifications as necessary.
Schedules and conducts progress meetings.
Documents progress meeting minutes and distributes to BRAG members.
Business advisor to the customer throughout development and administration of the contract.
4.5. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL (QAP):
Complete surveillance schedule and documentation and forward to the CA.
Evaluate and document the contractor’s performance in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Performance Plan.
Notify the CO of any performance deficiencies.
Complete surveillance schedule and documentation, and forward to the CA.
Analyze, quantify, prepare, and forward contractor performance assessment results to the
CA. Monthly contractor performance assessment results shall be used as a metric to track contractor progress in meeting performance objectives.
Certify acceptance of services.
Develop technical requirements and IGE for contract services.
Perform market research throughout the life of the requirement to ensure the team is knowledgeable of the commercial marketplace and remains current with the most efficient and effective performance assessment methods and techniques.
Identify opportunities to improve performance throughout the life of the contract, including benchmarking against industry, identifying initiatives, assessing the risk associated with these initiatives, using the Performance Plan for implementing initiatives brought forward, and monitoring the success of implementation.
Recommends any changes necessary to the contract, PWS, Performance Plan, or other requirements to provide more effective operations or eliminate unnecessary costs.
Issue work in accordance with the PWS.
DO NOT have the authority to make any contractual commitments or authorize any changes on the government’s behalf. Any changes shall be referred to the CO.
Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 13 of 16 Attachment 8 Appendix A
4.6. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM COORDINATOR (QAPC):
Ensures quality assurance procedures are IAW AFI 63-124 and local procedures.
Participates in the BRAG.
Supports the BRAG in developing contract requirements.
Reviews and coordinates all PWSs and Performance Plans. Ensures requirements documents are clear and enforceable.
Reviews and coordinates all changes to the PWS and Performance Plan.
Provides training for the FCs and QAP as required.
Processes and maintains quality assurance appointments and delegation memos.
Assists with market research in determining commercial quality assurance practices.
Assists, as required, with evaluation of the contractor’s Quality Control Plan (QCP).
4.7. CONTRACTOR:
Complies fully with the terms and conditions of the contract.
Participates as a member of the BRAG, post-award.
Maintains and implements a QCP that ensures services tendered to the government for acceptance conform to contract requirements.
Ensures that non-conforming contract services are identified and corrected. Revises quality control as required to prevent recurrence of non-conforming contract services.
Recommends any changes to the contract that will provide more effective operations or eliminate unnecessary costs.
Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 14 of 16 Attachment 8 Appendix B
APPENDIX B
QAP SURVEILLANCE SCHEDULE
This appendix can be found under the separate Excel file: the form and the instructions for completing the form are located on the base shared drive:
P:\27_SOMSG\27_SOCONS\QAPC\SurveillanceSchedule.
Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 15 of 16 Attachment 8 Appendix C
APPENDIX C
QAP SURVEILLANCE CHECKLIST
This appendix can be found under separate Excel file: the form and the instructions for completing the Surveillance Checklist are located on the base shared drive:
P:\27_SOMSG\27_SOCONS\QAPC\SurveillanceChecklist.
Contract: FA4855-XX-X-XXXX 16 of 16 Attachment 8 Appendix D
APPENDIX D
PERFORMANCE PLAN SIGNATURE PAGE
I have read the Performance Plan and understand the role I play as a member of the BRAG.
NAME/TITLE SIGNATURE DATE
Functional Commander or Program Mgr
Quality Assurance Personnel – Pri
Quality Assurance Personnel – Alt
Contract Administrator - Pri
Contract Administrator - Alt
Contracting Officer
Quality Assurance Program Coordinator
Contractor (after award)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .