FA481418R0002.pdf

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

FA481418R0002 03-Jul-2018

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

968-6322

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

01:00 PM 03 Aug 2018

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

FA48149. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

COLIN P. JOHNSON

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

0 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED OR X

SMALL BUSINESSX

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

6TH CONTRACTING SQ

2610 PINK FLAMINGO AVE

MACDILL AFB FL 33621-5119

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE F2VAGS 16. ADMINISTERED BY

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

6TH AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE SQ

FRANK GUARNIERI

6 AMXS RA

7607 HANGAR LP DR MACDILL AFB

TAMPA FL 33621

TEL: 968-8441 FAX:

FAX:

TEL: 813-828-4766 SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

SIZE STANDARD:

$32,500,000

NAICS:

488190

X

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)

ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

(813)828-7483 ramon.jimenez.7@us.af.mil 7/03/2018

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF54

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES MAX

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0001 1,294 Job 6th MXG Aircraft Wash Service

FFP

The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and services necessary to provide KC-135 Aircraft Washing with Corrosion Prevention Services for MacDill Air Force Base in accordance with the Perfomance of Work Statement. Period of Performance: 3 September 2018 to 2 September 2023 FOB: Destination

MAX

NET AMT

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0002 1 Job 6th MXG Aircraft Wash Mobilization

FFP

(Mobilization) The contractor shall provide all preparatory work and operations necessary for the movement of personnel, equipment, supplies, and incidentals to the work area; for the establishment of offices, buildings, and other facilities necessary for the provide KC-135 Aircraft Washing with Corrosion Prevention Services for MacDill Air Force Base in accordance with the Perfomance of Work Statement.

NET AMT

CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CONTRACT VALUE

The minimum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity and contract value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity and contract value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

142.00 1,294.00

DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

1.00 258.00

CLIN MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CLIN VALUE

The minimum quantity(s) and CLIN value(s) for all orders issued against the CLIN(s) on this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity(s) and CLIN value(s) stated in the following table. The maximum quantity(s) and CLIN value(s) for all orders issued against the CLIN(s) on this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity(s) and CLIN value(s) stated in the following table.

CLIN

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

0001 142.00 1,294.00

CLIN DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CLIN ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

CLIN

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

0001 1.00

258.00

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government 0002 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 POP 03-SEP-2018 TO

02-SEP-2023

N/A 6TH AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE SQ

FRANK GUARNIERI

6 AMXS RA

7607 HANGAR LP DR MACDILL AFB

TAMPA FL 33621

968-8441

F2VAGS

0002 POP 03-SEP-2018 TO

02-SEP-2019

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

F2VAGS

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.203-18 Prohibition on Contracting With Entities That Require Certain

Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements-- Representation

JAN 2017

52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal JAN 2017 52.209-7 Information Regarding Responsibility Matters JUL 2013 52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding

Responsibility Matters

JUL 2013

52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Items JAN 2017 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns NOV 2016 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

DEC 2013

252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

NOV 2011

252.204-7000 Disclosure Of Information OCT 2016 252.204-7002 Payment For Subline Items Not Separately Priced DEC 1991 252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992 252.204-7006 Billing Instructions OCT 2005

252.204-7008 Compliance With Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls

OCT 2016

252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting

OCT 2016

252.204-7015 Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation Support

MAY 2016

252.205-7000 Provision Of Information To Cooperative Agreement Holders DEC 1991 252.208-7000 Intent To Furnish Precious Metals As Government--Furnished

Material

DEC 1991

252.209-7002 Disclosure Of Ownership Or Control By A Foreign Government

JUN 2010

252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By The Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism

OCT 2015

252.215-7008 Only One Offer OCT 2013 252.222-7007 Representation Regarding Combating Trafficking in Persons JAN 2015 252.223-7006 Prohibition On Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of Toxic or

Hazardous Materials

SEP 2014

252.225-7001 Buy American And Balance Of Payments Program-- Basic (Dec 2017)

DEC 2017

252.225-7005 Identification Of Expenditures In The United States JUN 2005 252.225-7012 Preference For Certain Domestic Commodities DEC 2017 252.225-7031 Secondary Arab Boycott Of Israel JUN 2005 252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUN 2013 252.225-7050 Disclosure of Ownership or Control by the Government of a

Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism

JAN 2018

252.226-7001 Utilization of Indian Organizations and Indian-Owned Economic Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns

SEP 2004

252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports

JUN 2012

252.232-7007 Limitation Of Government's Obligation APR 2014 252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.237-7010 Prohibition on Interrogation of Detainees by Contractor

Personnel

JUN 2013

252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012 252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items JUN 2013

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (JULY 2013)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--

Administrative proceeding means a non-judicial process that is adjudicatory in nature in order to make a determination of fault or liability (e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Proceedings, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings, and Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings). This includes administrative proceedings at the Federal and State level but only in connection with performance of a Federal contract or grant. It does not include agency actions such as contract audits, site visits, corrective plans, or inspection of deliverables.

Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than $10,000,000 means--

(1) The total value of all current, active contracts and grants, including all priced options; and

(2) The total value of all current, active orders including all priced options under indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity, 8(a), or requirements contracts (including task and delivery and multiple-award Schedules).

Principal means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager; head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The offeror ( ) has ( ) does not have current active Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than $10,000,000.

(c) If the offeror checked “has” in paragraph (b) of this provision, the offeror represents, by submission of this offer, that the information it has entered in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) is current, accurate, and complete as of the date of submission of this offer with regard to the following information:

(1) Whether the offeror, and/or any of its principals, has or has not, within the last five years, in connection with the award to or performance by the offeror of a Federal contract or grant, been the subject of a proceeding, at the Federal or State level that resulted in any of the following dispositions:

(i) In a criminal proceeding, a conviction.

(ii) In a civil proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in the payment of a monetary fine, penalty, reimbursement, restitution, or damages of $5,000 or more.

(iii) In an administrative proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in--

(A) The payment of a monetary fine or penalty of $5,000 or more; or

(B) The payment of a reimbursement, restitution, or damages in excess of $100,000.

(iv) In a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding, a disposition of the matter by consent or compromise with an acknowledgment of fault by the Contractor if the proceeding could have led to any of the outcomes specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), or (c)(1)(iii) of this provision.

(2) If the offeror has been involved in the last five years in any of the occurrences listed in (c)(1) of this provision, whether the offeror has provided the requested information with regard to each occurrence.

(d) The offeror shall post the information in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(iv) of this provision in FAPIIS as required through maintaining an active registration in the System for Award Management database via https://www.acquisition.gov (see 52.204-7).

(End of provision)

52.209-11 REPRESENTATION BY CORPORATIONS REGARDING DELINQUENT TAX LIABILITY OR A

FELONY CONVICTION UNDER ANY FEDERAL LAW (FEB 2016)

(a) As required by sections 744 and 745 of Division E of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235), and similar provisions, if contained in subsequent appropriations acts, the Government will not enter into a contract with any corporation that--

(1) Has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability, where the awarding agency is aware of the unpaid tax liability, unless an agency has considered suspension or debarment of the corporation and made a determination that suspension or debarment is not necessary to protect the interests of the Government; or

(2) Was convicted of a felony criminal violation under any Federal law within the preceding 24 months, where the awarding agency is aware of the conviction, unless an agency has considered suspension or debarment of the corporation and made a determination that this action is not necessary to protect the interests of the Government.

(b) The Offeror represents that--

(1) It is [ ] is not [ ] a corporation that has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability; and

(2) It is [ ] is not [ ] a corporation that was convicted of a felony criminal violation under a Federal law within the preceding 24 months.

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 2017)

The following additions/changes are made to FAR provision 52.212-1, which is incorporated by reference.

Information found in this addendum supersedes FAR 52.212-1.

1. Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Items.

(A) The Government reserves the right to revise or amend the specifications, drawings or the solicitation prior to the Request For Proposal (RFP) closing time. Such revisions or amendments, will be communicated by amendments to this RFP. If such amendments require material changes in quantities or prices, the RFP closing date may be postponed by enough days to enable offerors to revise their proposals. In such cases, the amendment will include an announcement of the new RFP closing date and time. Amendments will be posted on the Internet with the solicitation documents without notice. Offerors are responsible for accessing all amendments prior to proposal submission at www.fbo.gov. All solicitation amendments must be acknowledged and turned in with offer.

2. General Information.

(A) Solicitation number: FA481418R0002

(B) A site visit will be held on 13 July 2018 from 0900 to 1130 AM Eastern Standard Time. Offerors must email colin.johnson.6@us.af.mil and ramon.jimenez.7@us.af.mil NLT 11 July 2018 with a notice of intent to attend the site visit. Base entry instructions/procedures will be provided upon receipt of email notice of intent.

Attendance will be limited to no more than two representatives per company.

(C) Requests for clarification. Address any questions or concerns you have to the CO or CA. Written requests for clarification may be sent by e-mail to colin.johnson.6@us.af.mil or ramon.jimenez.7@us.af.mil or by mail to the address located in block 9 of the standard form 1449. No phone calls will be taken. All requests for clarification/questions are due no later than 20 July 2018 at 12:00 PM Eastern Standard Time.

(D) Receipt of offerors. Offers are due no later than 03 August 2018 at 1:00 PM Eastern Standard Time to the 6th Contracting Squadron, 2610 Pink Flamingo Avenue, Building 147, MacDill AFB, FL 33621-5119 (2nd

Floor, Rm. 211). No faxed or emailed offers will be accepted. The offeror is solely responsible to make sure their offers are received by the deadline.

(E) Points of Contact – The Contracting Officer (CO) and Contract Administrator (CA) are the sole points of contact for this acquisition. The CA for this solicitation is 2d Lt Colin Johnson and can be reached by phone at

(813) 828-6322 or by email colin.johnson.6@us.af.mil. The CO for this solicitation is Ramon Jimenez and can be reached by phone at (813) 828-7483 or by email at ramon.jimenez.7@us.af.mil.

(F) Period for acceptance of offers. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 120 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers, unless another time period is specified in an addendum to the solicitation.

(G) NOTICE: Offerors are cautioned that MacDill AFB has stringent visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass and be cleared by the Government point of contact to be visited prior to entrance. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE POINT OF CONTACT MAY NOT BE

AVAILABLE TO CLEAR OFFERORS FOR ENTRANCE WHICH MAY PROHIBIT SUBMISSION OF

HANDCARRIED OFFERS; CONSEQUENTLY, OFFERORS ELECTING TO HANDCARRY THEIR

PROPOSALS FOR SUBMITTAL JUST PRIOR TO THE RFP CLOSING TIME DO SO AT THEIR OWN

RISK.

3. Proposal Preparation Instructions.

(A) This section provides general guidance as well as specific instructions on the format and content of an offerors submissions. The offeror’s submission must include all data and information requested and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. Any offeror who submits an incomplete package will be considered nonresponsive to this solicitation and will not be evaluated for award. For the purposes of this solicitation, nonresponsiveness refers to (but is not limited to): Failure to follow submission procedures and format (as contained/described herein), Failure to provide a Unit Price and Extended Total/Amount for each Contract Line Item, failure to provide the required number of past performance references required by this solicitation and/or failure to comply with section 4(C)(vi) below (if applicable). The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

(B) Offers shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Offeror submissions should not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather shall provide supporting evidence reflecting an offerors ability to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s submission.

(C) Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

(D) In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful submissions. The Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful submissions.

(E) Discrepancies – If an offeror believes the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the CO in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial submissions, as received, without discussion.

(F) To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors.

Failure to meet a requirement will result in an offer being ineligible for award. The offeror shall prepare submissions as set forth in the organizational table below. The titles and contents of the volumes are defined in the below table, all of which shall be within the required page limits and with the number of copies shown below.

VOLUME VOLUME CONTENTS COPIES PAGE LIMIT

I Contract Documentation, Cost/Price Original Plus three (3) Copies & 1 Digital Copy

No Limit

II Technical Approach Original Plus three (3) Copies & 1 Digital Copy

III Past Performance Original Plus three (3) Copies & 1 Digital Copy

i. Page Limitations – Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read nor considered in the evaluation of the proposal and (for paper copies) will be distroyed in accordance with local policy. Each page shall be counted except the following: cover page, table of contents, tabs, and glossaries.

ii. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms – Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

iii. Page Size and Format – A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Page size shall be 8.5 X 11 inches, not including foldouts. Pages shall be single-spaced and text size shall be no less than 12 point. Use at least 1-inch margins on top and bottom and ¾ inch side margins. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume. Legible tables, charts, graphs, and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible and shall not exceed 11 X 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume and count as a single page. Foldout pages shall not be used for text. These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy submissions.

iv. Binding and Labeling – Each volume should be separately bound in a three-ring loose-leaf binder. A cover sheet should be bound in each book, clearly marked as to volume number, title, copy number, solicitation identification and the offeror’s name. 1.2.7 Electronic Offers – The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. For electronic copies, submit via email to the contacts provided in section 2.(F). Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions, including subfactors, exhibits, annexes, and attachments if any. Electronic copies shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft Office.

v. Electronic Offers – The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. For electronic copies, indicate on each file the volume number and title. Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions, including subfactors, exhibits, annexes, and attachments if any.

Electronic copies shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft Office. As part of the provided digital copy, offerors must provide the completed Excel document (not a scanned or copied) for evaluation.

4. General Format and Content

The offeror shall submit the following volumes of material. A complete proposal consists of the following volumes:

(A) Volume I – SF 1449, Proposal Schedule, Representations and Certifications, and any parts of the request for proposal with fill-in blanks and solicitation attachments as applicable.

All cost or pricing information shall be addressed only in Volume I. Insert proposed unit prices for each Contract Line Item (CLIN 0001 and 0002). Failure to provide a complete pricing will result in that offeror being determined non-responsive and remove them from consideration. Complete the Representations and Certifications IAW 52.212- 3 and/or SAM website (https://www.sam.gov/portal/SAM/). Fill in blanks, when appropriate in any sections of the request for proposal.

(B) Volume II – As part of an offerors Technical Approach, each Subfactor must be individually responded to. Responses must demonstrate a clear understanding of the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and provide specific evidence of compliance. Failure to address all Subfactors will result in that offeror being determined non-responsive and remove them from consideration. The Government shall evaluate an offerors Technical Approach using the ratings identified in Table 1.

Table 1 – Technical Approach RATINGS

Rating Description

ACCEPTABLE

Offeror’s has provided clear evidence that they meet the requirements of SubFactors 1-4 and the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

UNACCEPTABLE

Offeror’s has not provided clear evidence that they meet the requirements of SubFactors 1-4 and the Government does not have a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

(C) Volume III – Past Performance.

i. Offerors must provide (as part of Volume III) two (2) of their most recent and relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers. No more than two (2) past performance references will be evaluated or considered. Offerors whom identify less than two (2) references due to a lack of relevant past performance must comply with section (vi) below. Offerors whom provide less the minimum number (2) of past performance references and fail to comply with section (vi) below, will result in that offeror being determined “non- responsive” and remove them from consideration.

Furnish the following information for each reference provided:

- Company/Division name

- Product/Service

- Contracting Agency/Customer

- Contract Number

- Contract Dollar Value

- Period of Performance

- Verified, up-to-date name, address, telephone number and email address of the contracting officer or any representative able to validate performance history

- Summary of services provided and a description of how closely the provided services performed under those contracts relate to the Performance Work Statement

- Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

- Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

FA481418R0002

ii. The government will evaluate the quality and extent of offeror’s performance deemed relevant to the requirements of the PWS. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel (if applicable) who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this acquisition. The Government shall evaluate an offerors Past Performance using the ratings identified in Table 2.

Table 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE RATINGS

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

iii. The Government will use the following recency and relevancy definitions when assessing recent and relevant contracts:

a) Recency Assessment: An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past five (5) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

b) Relevancy Assessment: As described in Table 3 below, the Government will conduct an in- depth evaluation of all recent performance information obtained to determine how closely the provided products/services performed under those contracts relate to the Performance Work Statement (to include magnitude of effort) provided and assign a rating of “Relevant or “Not Relevant. Magnitude of effort is defined by dollar value. Failure to provide references considered within the magnitude of effort and will receive a rating of “Not Relevant”. A relevancy determination of the offeror’s past performance will be made based upon the aforementioned considerations, including joint venture partner(s) and major and critical subcontractor(s). In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the offeror, teaming partner, or subcontractor whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated.

Table 3 – RELEVANCY ASSESSMENTS

RELEVANT

Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities described in the PWS.

NOT RELEVANT

Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities described in the PWS.

iv. In conducting the Past Performance evaluation, the Government reserves the right to use both the information provided in the offeror’s Past Performance proposal volume and information obtained from other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers and Fee Determining Officials; the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), and commercial sources.

v. Assigning Ratings: Past performance submissions determined to be neither recent and/or relevant, will result in an offeror receiving a performance confidence assessment of “Unacceptable”. Negative past performance found using sources described in section iv above, may result in a past performance confidence rating of “Unacceptable”.

vi. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Offerors without a record (2 references) of relevant past performance will be required to affirmatively demonstrate its responsibility by providing supporting documentation. Supporting documentation must provide evidence that the offeror:

(a) Has adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them;

(b) Is able to comply with the required or proposed delivery or performance schedule, taking into consideration all existing commercial and governmental business commitments;

(c) Has a satisfactory performance record;

(d) Has a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics;

(e) Has the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them (including, as appropriate, such elements as production control procedures, property control systems, quality assurance measures, and safety programs applicable to materials to be produced or services to be performed by the prospective contractor and subcontractors);

(f) Is otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations.

vii. Should supporting documentation be evaluated to reflect an offeror lacks certain elements of responsibility the contracting officer shall –

(a) Withhold contract award (see 19.602-3); and

(b) Refer the matter to the cognizant SBA Government Contracting Area Office (Area

Office) serving the area in which the headquarters of the offeror is located, in accordance with agency procedures.

(c) Within 15 business days (or a longer period agreed to by the SBA and the contracting agency) after receiving a notice that a small business concern lacks certain elements of responsibility, the SBA Area Office will notify the concern and the contracting officer that the COC is denied or is being issued. Failure to be issued a COC will result in that offeror being determined ineligible for award.

(End of Provision Addendum)

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

1. The Government will award an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

a. Price

b. Technical Approach

c. Past Performance

2. Basis for Contract Award:

(a) This solicitation is conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12

Acquisition of Commercial Items, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS). These regulations are available electronically at the Air Force (AF) FARSite, http://farsite.hill.af.mil.

(b) A contract will be awarded to the lowest priced technically acceptable offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Addendum to 52.212-1) and receives an “Acceptable” Technical Approach and Past Performance rating. Failure to provide a complete offer conforming to the entire solicitation (i.e. 52.212-1, 52.212-2, Applicable Addendums & contract provisions/clauses) will result in that offeror not being eligible for award.

3. Number of Contracts to be Awarded:

(a) The Government intends to award one (1) contract as a result of this solicitation.

4. Evaluation Process:

(a) First, the Government will arrange all proposals conforming to the solicitation by Total Evaluated Price (TEP) from lowest to highest and evaluate prices in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b)(2).

(b) Secondly, the Government will evaluate the Technical Approach of the eligible lowest priced offeror and assign a rating of either “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”. If the eligible lowest priced offeror receives a Technical Approach rating of “Unacceptable”, the Government evaluation team will evaluate the next eligible offeror (in order by price) until an “Acceptable” rating is achieved or until all offerors are evaluated. As part of an offerors Technical Approach, each Sub factor must be individually responded to. Responses must demonstrate a clear understanding of the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and provide clear evidence of compliance. A failure to address all sub factors and/or provide clear evidence will result in that offeror being determined non-responsive and remove them from consideration.

(c) Thirdly, the lowest priced offer with a Technical Approach rating of “acceptable” will be evaluated for Past Performance; if the offer’s Past Performance is rated as “acceptable” award will be made; if a lower rating is assigned, the evaluation team will review the next lowest priced proposal and the process will restart until a Technically Acceptable proposal with a Past Performance rating of “acceptable” is found.

5. Evaluation Factors & Subfactors:

(a) Factor One, Price: For the purpose of evaluation the Government will evaluate an offeror’s proposed price utilizing one or more of the techniques located at FAR 15.404- 1(b)(2). Proposed prices shall be fully burdened inclusive of all direct and indirect costs (e.g., profit, fringe benefits, salary, indirect rates and overtime hours.) An offeror’s Total Evaluated Price will be determined by adding the CLINs (0001 and 0002). As part of an offeror’s pricing volume, you are required to provide a completed Bid Schedule provided as attachment #3. As part of the digital copy, offerors must provide the completed Excel document (not scanned or copied) for evaluation. The attachment #3 has preloaded formulas to calculate totals but offerors are individually responsible for ensuring proposed pricing is accurate. Failure to provide a complete bid schedule will result in that offeror being determined “non-responsive” and removed from consideration.

(b) Factor Two, Technical Approach: The purpose of the technical factor(s) is to assess the offeror’s proposed approach, as detailed in its proposal, to satisfy the Government’s requirements.

1. Sub Factor 1, Contractor thorough understanding of Performance Work Statement: Does the Contractor have an understanding and ability to provide a detailed narrative of how the company plans to meet technical requirements and performance standards of the PWS IAW T.O.s and AFIs.

Failure to address each performance objective will result in an “Unacceptable” Technical Approach rating and that offeror will not be considered for award. The sub factor is met when the offeror provides a detailed narrative demonstrating a clear understanding of all technical requirements and performance standards required in support of this contract.

2. Sub Factor 2, Required Equipment: Does the contractor have the required equipment (trucks, wash equipment, etc.) or ready ability to procure the required equipment to fulfill requirements in the PWS. The sub factor is met when the offeror provides a detailed narrative demonstrating a clear understanding of all the equipment required to provide in support of this contract.

3. Sub Factor 3, Quality Control Plan: The sub factor is met when the offeror provides a detailed narrative presenting what quality control methods you will have in place to ensure you meet all requirements in the PWS.

4. Sub Factor 4, Employee Qualifications: Offeror shall provide a detailed and effective staffing plan containing a personnel matrix which identifies the personnel resources to perform the PWS tasks. The plan shall provide a logical approach to ensure timely support. In addition, the plan shall include sample resumes that provide employee qualifications and certifications that showcase their training, technical expertise and experience with aircraft inspections and washes that allow them to meet the requirements in this PWS. Refer to sections 4.0, 5.0, 16.0, 17.0, 19.0, and 22.0 in the PWS for specific expectations. The sub factor is met when the offeror provides a detailed narrative demonstrating qualifications for all personnel required to provide support to this contract.

The Government shall evaluate an offeror’s Technical Approach using the ratings identified in Table 1.

TABLE 1

TECHNICAL APPROACH RATINGS

Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

(c) Factor Three, Past Performance: The past performance evaluation factor assesses the degree of confidence the Government has in an offeror’s ability to supply services that meets users’ needs, based on a demonstrated record of performance. Offerors must provide a list (references) of two (2) of their most recent and relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers (only the first two references found in Volume III will be evaluated). Offerors must furnish the following information for each reference provided:

- Company/Division name

- Product/Service

- Contracting Agency/Customer

- Contract Number

- Contract Dollar Value

- Period of Performance

- Verified, up-to-date name, address, telephone number and email address of the contracting officer or any representative able to validate performance history

- Summary of services provided and a description of how closely the provided services performed under those contracts relate to the Performance Work Statement

- Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

- Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions

The Government shall evaluate an offerors Past Performance using the ratings identified in Table 2.

TABLE 2

Table 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE RATINGS

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required

The Government will use the following recency and relevancy definitions when assessing recent and relevant contracts:

1. Recency Assessment: An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past five

(5) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

2. Relevancy Assessment: As described in Table 3 below, the Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of all recent performance information obtained to determine how closely the provided products/services performed under those contracts relate to the Performance Work Statement (to include Magnitude of effort) provided and assign a rating of “Relevant” or “Not Relevant”. A relevancy determination of the offeror’s past performance will be made based upon the aforementioned considerations, including joint venture partner(s) and major and critical subcontractor(s). In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the offeror, teaming partner, or subcontractor whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated.

TABLE 3

RELEVANCY ASSESSMENTS

RELEVANT

Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and

NOT RELEVANT

Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and

(a) In conducting the Past Performance evaluation, the Government reserves the right to use both the information provided in the offeror’s Past Performance proposal volume and information obtained from other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers and Fee Determining Officials; the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), and commercial sources.

(b) Assigning Ratings: Past performance submissions determined to be neither recent and/or relevant, will result in an offeror receiving a performance confidence assessment of “Unacceptable”. Negative past performance found using sources described in section (a) above, may result in a past performance confidence rating of “Unacceptable”.

(c) In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Offerors without a record (2 references) of relevant past performance will be required to affirmatively demonstrate its responsibility by providing supporting documentation. Supporting documentation must provide evidence that the offeror:

(1) Has adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them;

(2) Is able to comply with the required or proposed delivery or performance schedule, taking into consideration all existing commercial and governmental business commitments;

(3) Has a satisfactory performance record;

(4) Has a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics;

(5) Has the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them (including, as appropriate, such elements as production control procedures, property control systems, quality assurance measures, and safety programs applicable to materials to be produced or services to be performed by the prospective contractor and subcontractors);

(6) Is otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations.

(d) Supporting documentation will be referred to the cognizant SBA Government Contracting Area Office (Area Office) serving the area in which the headquarters of the offeror is located, in accordance with agency procedures and FAR 19.6. Failure to be issued a COC will result in that offeror being determined ineligible for award.

(e) Offerors must provide two (2) of their most recent and relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the past five (5) years. No more than two (2) past performance references will be evaluated or considered. Offerors whom identify less than two (2) references due to a lack of relevant past performance must comply with section 4(C)(vi) of Addendum to 52.212-1. Offerors whom provide less the minimum number (2) of past performance references and fail to comply with section 4(C)(vi) of Addendum to 52.212-1, will result in that offeror being determined “non-responsive” and remove them from consideration.

(f) If all proposals are either determined to be technically unacceptable and/or receive an unacceptable past performance rating, the Government reserves the right to not award a contract and will cancel the Request For Proposal and re-post the solicitation at a later date.

6. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.

Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

52.212-3 OFFEROR REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (NOV 2017)

The Offeror shall complete only paragraph (b) of this provision if the Offeror has completed the annual representations and certification electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) Web site located at https://www.sam.gov/portal. If the Offeror has not completed the annual representations and certifications electronically, the Offeror shall complete only paragraphs (c) through (u) of this provision.

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision --

“Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) Concern” means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent directly and unconditionally owned by, and the management and daily business operations of which are controlled by, one or more women who are citizens of the United States and who are economically disadvantaged in accordance with 13 CFR part 127. It automatically qualifies as a women-owned small business eligible under the WOSB Program.

"Forced or indentured child labor" means all work or service-

(1) Exacted from any person under the age of 18 under the menace of any penalty for its nonperformance and for which the worker does not offer himself voluntarily; or

(2) Performed by any person under the age of 18 pursuant to a contract the enforcement of which can be accomplished by process or penalties.

“Highest-level owner” means the entity that owns or controls an immediate owner of the offeror, or that owns or controls one or more entities that control an immediate owner of the offeror. No entity owns or exercises control of the highest level owner.

“Immediate owner” means an entity, other than the offeror, that has direct control of the offeror. Indicators of control include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following: Ownership or interlocking management, identity of interests among family members, shared facilities and equipment, and the common use of employees.

“Inverted domestic corporation” means a foreign incorporated entity that meets the definition of an inverted domestic corporation under 6 U.S.C. 395(b), applied in accordance with the rules and definitions of 6 U.S.C. 395(c).

“Manufactured end product” means any end product in product and service codes (PSCs) 1000-9999, except--

(1) PSC 5510, Lumber and Related Basic Wood Materials;

(2) Product or Service Group (PSG) 87, Agricultural Supplies;

(3) PSG 88, Live Animals;

(4) PSG 89, Subsistence;

(5) PSC 9410, Crude Grades of Plant Materials;

(6) PSC 9430, Miscellaneous Crude Animal Products, Inedible;

(7) PSC 9440,…