Attachment 2-Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 46 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Internet-based Contractor Operated Parts Store (ICOPARS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4803-10-R-0014
About this file
Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ICOPARS Question and Answers | — | |
| Attachment 2a-Past Performance Questionnaire-Not Digitally Signed.docx | DOCX document | |
| ICOPARS Solicitation Amendment 1 22 Oct 10.doc | DOC document | |
| ICOPARS Question and Answers | — | |
| Exhibit A-Bid Schedule ICOPAR.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Appendix C to SOW Vehicle Master list 2010 xls.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1-SOW ICOPARs Reacquisition | — | |
| Attachment 2-Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| ICOPARS Solicitation 15 Oct 10.doc | DOC document | |
| Exhibit A-Bid Schedule ICOPAR.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| ICOPARS Solicitation 15 Oct 10.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 1-SOW ICOPARs Reacquisition | — | |
| Appendix C to SOW Vehicle Master list 2010 xls.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FA4803-10-R-0014-SOW-ICOPARS-Synopsis.doc | DOC document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
MEMORANDUM FOR: ALL PROSPECTIVE EVALUATORS
FROM: 20th CONTRACTING SQUADRON
| 321 CULLEN ST |
| SHAW AFB, SC 29152 |
SUBJECT: Solicitation FA4803-10-R-0014, Internet-based Contractor Operated Parts Store (ICOPARS).
1. The contractor listed in Section I of the attached questionnaire has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance and it also authorizes release of this information to our office. Under the solicitation, Offerors receiving an acceptable rating on Technical Management will be evaluated using Performance Price Tradeoff (PPT) where Past Performance is significantly more important than Price when being evaluated. The results of this questionnaire will assist in establishing the basis for award.
2. Your evaluation/rating of contractor past performance is extremely valuable in our evaluation. The 20th Contracting Squadron depends on information received from agencies/companies such as yours, which have firsthand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror’s past performance. Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire.
3. Any additional information that you think would benefit the Government in our evaluation would be appreciated. It may be necessary for the Government to contact the offeror to inquire what corrective action has been taken or will be taken on the problem areas or concerns identified.
4. Your time and effort in providing this vital information is greatly appreciated and is critical to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as accurately as possible and submit it to my attention by September 1, 2010. You may fax the completed questionnaire to (803)895-5339, mail it to the above address or you may email the questionnaire to: barbara.bonnette@shaw.af.mil. Please direct questions or comments to myself at 803-895-5349 (DSN 965-5349). Your prompt attention is greatly appreciated.
Attachment:
Past Performance Questionnaire
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (WHEN COMPLETED)
When Completed This Document Is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
THE OFFEROR SHALL PROVIDE THIS ATTACHMENT TO CUSTOMERS, INDIVIDUALS, OR OTHER GOVERNMENT OFFICES WHO HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF THER OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE
I. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION (To be completed by Offeror): Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Company/Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number
Contractor Point of Contact:
Brief Description of Work or Project Title:
II. EVALUATOR INFORMATION (To be completed by referenced evaluator):
Contract Number: Dollar Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance:
| Contract Type: ____ Firm-Fixed-Price | ___ Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite Quantity | |
| ____ Fixed Price ___ Cost-Reimbursement |
____ Other (Please describe): ___________________________
Contractor Performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor
Brief Description of Work performed by aforementioned contractor:
Evaluated By:
(Signature) (Date)
(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)
NOTE: The identity of individual(s) providing reference information shall not be disclosed.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Name of Evaluator: Title:
Address:
Telephone Number: DSN (If Applicable):
Fax Number: E-mail:
III. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by circling the appropriate rating using the scale provided. For ratings above or below satisfactory, please comment on how the contractor either exceeded your requirement or how the contractor failed to meet the requirement. If the contractor had problems in a specific area, but you determined them to have no impact on the mission, please specify in your narrative remarks.
RATING DESCRIPTIONS: Use the following ratings and definitions as guidance in providing ratings.
Ratings are defined below and should be used as a reference in rating past performance:
| # |
| Rating |
| Definition |
| U |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractual performance was accomplished with serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| M |
| Marginal |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| U |
| Unknown |
| Offerors with NO past performance information, or with respect to which past performance information is not available, “may not be rated favorably or unfavorably.” |
| S |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance met contract requirements. Contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| VG |
| Very Good |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. Contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| E |
| Exceptional |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
Narrative explanations are very useful in determining past performance. There is space provided for amplifying information that is pertinent to any performance attribute rating. Please support your ratings with a narrative explanation. This information is essential by providing the Source Selection Authority (SSA) with information to make an informed and reasoned “Best Value,” selection.
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Please rate the contractor on the following:
1. Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with U M U S G E the specifications and contractual terms and conditions?
2. Ability to perform in an orderly and professional U M U S G E manner (without serious delays in service).
3. Key personnel (Project Management) were knowledgeable about U M U S G E contractual requirements and had authority to commit the company?
| 4. Hired, retained, trained, and utilized employees who possessed | U M U S G E | |
| the appropriate skills, training, and competencies necessary for your | ||
| contract throughout the period of performance of the contract? |
5. Provided adequate number of customer focused personnel for services required. U M U S G E
6. Demonstrated knowledge of and ability to comply with government U M U S G E or industry law, regulations, policies, procedures, and standards.
7. Timeliness, accuracy, and completeness of contractor’s U M U S G E submitted reports, documentation, and submittals.
8. Effectiveness of Contractor’s Quality Control program. U M U S G E
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
| 9. Contractor’s compliance with quality control plan. | U M U S G E | |
| ______________________________________________________________________ |
10. Adhered to and implemented all necessary U M U S G E security, safety, and environmental regulations.
11. Responsiveness to contract modification and technical directions. U M U S G E
| 12. Has a Contract Discrepancy Report ever been issued? | Yes | No | |
| (If YES, please explain) | |||
| ______________________________________________________________________ |
| 13. Deficiency reports or corrective action requests were handled satisfactorily. | U M U S G E |
| __________________________________________________________ |
| 14. Have you ever issued a cure/show cause notice, a termination for cause Yes | No | |
| or default, or just elected to not exercise an option or continue contract services |
due to contractor's poor performance? (If YES to any, please explain)
15. Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality Yes No plan/procedures.
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
| 16. Quality of contractor’s overall performance. | U M U S G E | |
| ______________________________________________________________________ |
17. How well did the contractor work independent of Government guidance, U M U S G E oversight and assistance?
18. How flexible, cooperative, and reasonable was the contractor in meeting U M U S G E mission requirements?
| 17. Would you award another contract to this contractor? (If NO, please explain) | Yes | No |
| ______________________________________________________________________ |
19. What were the contractor’s top documented strengths, if any, in performing the contract requirements?
20. What were the contractor’s top documented weaknesses, if any, in performing the contract requirements?
Thank you for your ratings and remarks. Please do NOT return to the evaluated contractor. Please use the additional remarks page if needed and provide any additional information you feel is important not covered elsewhere.
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
ADDITIONAL REMARKS PAGE IF NEEDED:
Again, thank you for your time and effort in assisting us with our requirement.
BARBARA V. BONNETTE, Civ, USAF Contracting Officer image1.emf image2.emf
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .