_3_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 133 KB Posted

Attached to
Repair HVAC Bldgs 8015 & 4201
Solicitation number
FA466115R0004
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_02.pdf PDF
CE_Responses_to_RFIs_signed.pdf PDF
HVAC_Bldgs_8015 4201_PPSV_Minutes_and_SignIn.pdf PDF
FA466115R0004.doc DOC document
Attachment_1_-_Specifications.pdf PDF
_4 _Site_Visit_Registration.doc DOC document
_5 _Question_Submission.doc DOC document
Attachment_2_-_Drawings.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

7th CONTRACTING SQUADRON

DYESS AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS

12 December 2014

MEMORANDUM FOR PROSPECTIVE EVALUATORS

FROM: 7 CONS/LGCA

381 THIRD ST

DYESS AFB, TX 79607-1581

SUBJECT: Solicitation FA4661-15-R-0004, Repair HVAC Bldgs 8015 & 4201, Past Performance Questionnaire

1. The 7th Contracting Squadron is conducting a proposal evaluation for subject solicitation at Dyess AFB, TX. Under the solicitation, the Air Force will perform a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) evaluation. The contractor listed in Section A of the attached questionnaire has identified your office as a source to evaluate the contractor’s past performance and it also authorizes release of this information to our office.

2. The individual most knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall condition of performance rendered should complete the survey. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge with the judgment of others in their organization.

3. Please complete the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible and providing comments wherever applicable. For any rating of N, we request you provide an explanatory narrative and attach to your response. The narratives need not be lengthy, but should be detailed and descriptive. Use separate evaluation forms for each contract/order being evaluated.

4. Your time and effort in providing this information is greatly appreciated. The requested information is critical to our evaluation. Please complete and return the completed package as quickly as possible but not later than 2:00 PM CST 21 January 2015. You may email a scanned copy to megan.vanhorn.1@us.af.mil , FAX it to (325) 696-4084, or mail it to the following address:

7th Contracting Squadron

Attn: 2Lt Megan VanHorn

381 Third Street

Dyess AFB TX 79607

5. If you have any questions, please call 2Lt Megan VanHorn at (325) 696-2288. Thank you for your cooperation and quick response to this request.

KIMBERLY B. WELCH

Infrastructure Flight Chief/

Contracting Officer SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor requesting evaluation prior to mailing. NOTE: Contractor shall also include a verbatim copy of each SECTION A (completed and mailed to the proposed respondents) and corresponding respondents’ name/address in VOLUME I (Past Performance), Refer paragraph L-3) A. Contractor’s name and address:

B. Point of Contact:

C. Phone/Fax Numbers (with area code) & E-mail Address:

D. Contract number:

E. Project Title or Description of Work performed under this project:

F. Contractor’s Role (Prime, sub, designer, etc.) _______________________________________________________________________

G. Contracting or Procurement Official (Name & Contact information): ____________________________________________________

H. Contract Type: Firm-Fixed-Price Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Task Order Cost-Reimbursement

I. Project Award Date:

Scheduled Completion Date:

Current/Final Completion Date:

J. Project Award Amount:

Current/Final Project Amount:

K. Comments (if desired): _________________________________________________________________________________________

L. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in SECTION B of this Questionnaire.

(Signature)

(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by respondent.)

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature) (Date)

Address:

(Typed or Printed Name)

(Title)

Phone/Fax Numbers (with area code) & E-mail Address

NOTE: The identity of individual(s) providing reference information shall not be disclosed.

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Answer the following Performance with a YES (Y) or NO (N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY “N” ON A SEPARATE SHEET (Part I, Question 1).

Y
Yes
N
No
N/A
Not Applicable

Evaluation Areas

I.
QUALITY CONTROL:
Y
N
N/A
1.
Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures that resulted in a quality-finished project.
2.
Contractor developed and submitted realistic progress schedule(s).
3.
Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements.
4.
Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications, resulting in minor, if any, punch list items.
II.
TIMELY PERFORMANCE:
Y
N
N/A
1.
Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time, as scheduled.
2.
Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a CURE NOTICE or a SHOW CAUSE LETTER (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances on a separate sheet of paper and identify if Liquidated Damages were assessed)
3.
Contractor provided timely cost proposals.
4.
Contractor submitted the progress schedule as required in a timely manner and did not start construction prior to its approval.
5.
Contractor provided on-time submittals as required.
6.
Contractor provided payrolls for both their firm and their subcontractors’ employees as required and scheduled.
7.
Contractor provided timely resolution of all punch list items.
8.
Contractor provided interim progress report as required in a timely manner
III.
MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS:
Y
N
N/A
1.
Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work.
3.
Contractor hired, maintained, and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers.
4.
Contractor ensured the site manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule.
5.
Contractor ensured the site manager was consistently present on site when work was performed.
6.
Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers as required.
7.
The contractor cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings and maintained communication to assure satisfactory resolution.
IV.
MANAGEMENT/SUPERINTENDENCE:
Y
N
N/A
1.
Site Manager ensured compliance to contract requirements and safety regulations.
2.
Site Manager acted promptly to resolve problems and ensure work quality.
3.
Site Manager had sufficient authority to make decisions or take actions during project performance.
4.
Site Manager consistently present on site when work was performed.
V.
COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR STANDARDS:
Y
N
N/A
1.
Submitted payrolls in a timely manner.
2.
Payrolls were complete and correct.
3.
Compliance with labor laws and regulations with specific attention to the Davis-Bacon Act.
VI.
COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY STANDARDS:
Y
N
N/A
1.
Adequacy of Safety Plan.
2.
Implementation of Safety Plan.
VII.
GENERAL PERFORMANCE:
Y
N
N/A
1.
Contractor complied with the Specifications.
2.
Contractor handled FOD (Foreign Object Damage) and responded to FOD issues.
3.
Contractor adhered to base standards for construction sites. (Example: Site Cleaned up)
4.
Contractor conducted and documented daily self-inspections
5.
Contractor complied with submittal requirements. (Example: Contractor installed/used materials that were submitted for approval)
6.
Contractor substituted “other materials” that were NOT approved by the government without notice.
7.
Contractor responded in a timely manner to warranty repair claims
8.
When the government claims salvage of materials to be removed, contractor removed them in an undamaged condition and promptly delivered them to the government.
9.
Contractor adequately reviewed the government Statement of Objectives (SOO) and noted any deficiencies
10.
Contractor coordinated work with government to identify solutions prior to their submission of initial Statement of Work (SOW) proposal packages
11.
Contractor complied with rules and regulations

Agile Combat Power

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .