Appendix_A_02_83_33__MAFB_Bldg_1867_Asbestos_-_Lead_Paint_Report__.pdf

1800 River Drive North Great Falls, MT 59401 (406) 761-3010 FAX (406) 727-2872

August 31, 2015

FA4626 341st Contracting Squadron

Ms. Jennifer George

7015 Goddard Drive - Building 145

Malmstrom AFB, MT 59402-6863

RE: Pre- Renovation Asbestos and Lead-In-Paint Reinspection

Building 1867, NZAS 04-1062

Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana

TD&H Project No. 14-260-070

Dear Ms. George, In accordance with your Notice to Proceed, TD&H Engineering, Inc. (TD&H) performed a confirmation-of-materials pre-renovation asbestos inspection and lead-in-paint survey on August

27, 2015, on Building 1867. The inspections were performed in order to confirm that building materials identified during an inspection performed on March 22, 2012, were the same and determine if any renovation of the building since that time may have occurred. Also, interior areas of the south half of the building had been excluded from the original inspection. The original inspection and report were completed by TD&H. The original report, titled "Limited

Asbestos Inspection and Lead-In-Paint Survey, Building 1867 - Weapons Storage Area" dated

April 16, 2012, is contained in Attachment A.

Additional homogeneous areas (HAs) of suspect-for-asbestos building material were identified and sampled during this current reinspection. Homogeneous areas of painted surfaces of building materials appeared to remain the same with no new HAs observed during the current investigation.

ASBESTOS INSPECTION

The Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM) 17.74.354 require an asbestos inspection be completed for all building materials prior to scheduled renovation activities to determine if asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM) are present. The National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP – 40 CFR 61) and the ARM regulate asbestos due to the respiratory hazard that airborne asbestos fibers present. The reinspection was performed by Oran

Grotbo of TD&H, a Montana-accredited asbestos inspector, in accordance with the

APPENDIX A

SPECIFICATION 02 83 33

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – Asbestos Hazards and Emergency Response Act

(AHERA) regulation 40 CFR 763. Documentation of accreditation is provided in Appendix B.

Building materials were identified, categorized, numbered, and placed into homogeneous areas for sample collection and laboratory analysis. The number of samples collected from building materials identified in the inspection is based on the following:

Surfacing Materials: three samples for surfacing materials between 1 and 1,000 square feet (SF), five samples for surfacing materials between 1,000 and 5,000 SF, seven samples for surfacing materials over 5,000 SF.

Thermal System Insulation: three samples from each homogeneous area (HA) of thermal system insulation, which may include boiler insulation, mudded fittings, and/or expanded vermiculite insulation.

Miscellaneous Materials: At least three samples from each homogeneous area of miscellaneous material, such as floor tile, plaster, sheetrock (drywall), cove base, vinyl floor coverings, concrete, roofing, and brick and mortar.

Patching Materials: At least one sample from each homogeneous area of patching material, such as replacement floor tiles or patching plaster, or materials of less than 3 SF in total area.

Three additional suspect building materials were identified during the inspection. Bulk samples were collected from the building in accordance with the currently recognized standard protocol developed under AHERA. Bulk samples were placed into containers and shipped to Crisp

Analytical, LLC (CA Labs) located in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for analysis using Polarized

Light Microscopy (PLM) in accordance with the EPA Method 600/R4-93-116. CA Labs is accredited through the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) National

Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). The point-counting technique employed by CA Labs in the analysis of these samples has a limit of detection of approximately 0.1 percent by volume.

Results

All building materials described in the 2012 report remain, but two new materials (sheet vinyl flooring and mastic) had been added since the inspection. One existing HA, mudded pipe joint insulation not included in the original 2012 inspection, was sampled in this current investigation.

All HAs from this inspection were analyzed by the laboratory as "None Detected" for asbestos.

The results are shown in Table 1. The analytical reports provided by CA Labs are provided in

Appendix C. Sample identification and locations are shown on Figure 1 in Appendix D.

APPENDIX A

Table 1

Non-Asbestos-Containing Building Materials

Building 1887

Malmstrom Air Force Base

Homogenous Area

(HA)

Sample Description Location

T1.1 Mudded Pipe Joint Insulation Janitor's Closet/ Mechanical Room

F2.1/M2.1 Sheet Vinyl Flooring (SVF) - Terrazzo Pattern w/Mastic Throughout

M5.1 Addition Sample of Previously Tested Ceiling

Panels Throughout

LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION

A lead-in-paint paint survey was conducted to identify painted components that may require specialized handling to comply with the requirements of OSHA or special disposal under the

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which is administered by the EPA. The original 2011 survey and this current survey were performed by an experienced technician with training as a LBP risk assessor. No additional HAs of painted surveys were observed during the current investigation, although additional samples of previously listed HAs from the 2011 report were analyzed to confirm lead content.

Lead-Based Paint

Lead-based paint (LBP) is of concern both as a source of direct exposure through ingestion of paint chips and as a contributor to lead in interior dust and exterior soil. Regulatory agencies, which have addressed lead-based paint, include the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), OSHA, and the Consumer Products

Safety Commission (CPSC). There is no state program for lead.

HUD guidelines define lead-based paint as:

Paint in liquid form which contains 0.06%, by weight, calculated as lead metal in total nonvolatile content of the liquid paint, or

Paint already applied which tests equal to or greater than 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) when using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) technology, or 5,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (0.5% by weight) when using atomic absorption spectroscopic analysis (AA).

Lead-Containing Paint (LCP)

The term “lead-containing paint” is used for paint that has lead concentrations at less than the

HUD guidelines or EPA disposal regulations. The OSHA standard for lead in the construction industry does not recognize a minimum safe concentration of lead. If any painted surface has any detectable level of lead, it must be presumed to present an occupational exposure to lead for

APPENDIX A

OSHA-regulated construction work until a negative exposure assessment or exposure monitoring establishes otherwise.

Methods

A Niton X-ray fluoroscope (XRF) was used to test paint for lead. The XRF instrument provided a real concentration of LBP based on the generated spectra and an algorithm programmed into the instrument. The XRF was standardized prior to the start, mid-day, and after the conclusion each day of LBP surveying against lead-based paint standards provided by the manufacturer of the XRF.

Results

None of the sample locations in Building 1867 during this current survey tested positive for LBP, and eight were analyzed as LCP. All sample results are list in Table 2 below. XRF sample locations are contained in Attachment E.

Table 2

Analytical Paint Content Results Using XRF

Building 1867, MAFB

Test # Substrate Color Component Location XRF Reading

(mg/cm2)

LCP/LBP

1 CMU Off-White Wall Electrical Room -

South Side

0.17 LCP

2 Concrete Off -White Column Electrical Room -

East Side

0.12 LCP

3 Wallboard Off-White Wall Electrical Room -

North Side

0.00 -

4 Wallboard Off-White Ceiling Electrical Room

Middle

0.04 LCP

5 Wallboard Off-White Wall Hallway -

West Side

0.00 -

6 Wallboard Off-White Wall Bathroom -

West Side

0.00 -

7 Metal Dark Brown Door Mechanical Room

- East Side

0.27 LCP

8 Metal Dark Brown Door Casing Mechanical Room

- East Side

0.09 LCP

9 CMU Off-White Wall Mechanical Room

- North Side

0.08 LCP

10 CMU Gray Lower Wall Mechanical Room

- South Side

0.25 LCP

11 Metal Off-White Roof Truss Janitor's Closet 0.15 LCP

APPENDIX A

RECOMMENDATIONS

Asbestos

Since all of the samples were analyzed as “none detected,” no further action is required before renovation may begin.

Lead-In-Paint

Work involving components covered with paint containing lead is governed by regulations of the

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Disposal of lead, paint containing lead or building materials covered with paint containing lead is governed by regulations of the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Environmental Protection Agency. None of the painted surfaces tested positive for lead-based paint. Only the OSHA regulations listed below will apply for locations tested as lead-containing.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

The OSHA standard for Lead in Construction, 29 CFR 1926, does not recognize a safe level of lead in dried paint to which workers may be exposed in an occupational setting. Consequently, any disturbance to painted surfaces which contain a measurable quantity of lead must be considered as having the potential to create a risk to workers.

The OSHA standard cites a Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air (μg/m3) and an Action Level (AL) of 30 μg/m3. Any amount above these levels triggers several safety and health provisions, including, but not limited to:

1. A respiratory protection program

2. Personal protective clothing and equipment

3. Changing areas including segregated storage of work and non-work clothing

4. Hand-washing facilities

5. Blood testing

6. Employee training

If an employee is performing any of the following tasks:

1. Manual demolition, dry scraping, or dry sanding

2. Heat gun applications

3. Power tool cleaning

4. Other industrial operations involving lead as specified in the OSHA standard, then all of the above-mentioned safety items must be provided to the employees. If it is found that either the AL or the PEL is being exceeded, then other safety requirements must be met.

A negative exposure assessment (NEA) should be completed on employees that are performing the work. The NEA would document that good work practices are effective in preventing employee exposure to elevated concentrations of airborne lead. The NEA should be performed

APPENDIX A

on the same employees, using the same methods, and using the same tools that will be used for the duration of the project.

LIMITATIONS

This asbestos and lead-in-paint report was prepared based on information gathered during one site visit and results contained in the original 2011 report. The inspection report has been prepared to confirm that information concerning the various types of building materials that were considered suspect for containing asbestos remained the same from the original April 16, 2012, inspection and to inform the owner of any new building materials that may have been identified and tested positive for asbestos.

Most building components were visible and accessible at the time of our site visits. However, additional suspect materials may be encountered during renovation. This asbestos inspection report is intended for use by RSCI and their clients. The scope of services performed by TD&H

Engineering, Inc., may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and any use or re-use of this document, or the findings presented herein is at the sole risk of the user.

We appreciate this opportunity to provide these industrial hygiene-consulting services to you and look forward to assisting you through the remainder of the project. Should you have questions or need further clarification about information contained herein, please feel free to contact us at

761-3010.

Sincerely, TD&H Engineering, Inc.

Mr. Oran Grotbo Peter Klevberg, P.E.

MTA-2256 Exp. 4/30/2016 MTA-0627 Exp. 4/30/2016

Industrial Hygiene Technician Project Manager

Attachment A: TD&H Asbestos/Lead-In-Paint Report, Building 1867, Dated April 16, 2102

Attachment B: Documentation of Accreditation

Attachment C: Asbestos Laboratory Report

Attachment D: Asbestos Sample Locations

Attachment E: XRF Sample Locations

APPENDIX A

ATTACHMENT A

APRIL 16, 2012, REPORT

1200 25 th Street South Great Falls, MT 59405 (406) 761-3010 FAX (406) 727-2872

April 16, 2012

Mr. Tony Perpigano

CWG Architects

650 Power Street

Helena, MT 59601

RE: Limited Asbestos Inspection and Lead-In-Paint Survey

Building 1867 – Weapons Storage Area

TD&H Job Number 11-274-001

Dear Mr. Perpigano, In accordance with your notice to proceed dated November 4, 2011, Thomas, Dean, & Hoskins, Inc.

(TD&H) performed a limited asbestos inspection and lead-based paint survey on March 22, 2012. The surveys were completed for the interior and exterior portions of the building on areas designated by Air

Force personnel as likely to be impacted in a proposed renovation.

BUILDING DESCRIPTION

The building is a single-level slab-on-grade with reinforced concrete and metal walls and roof. The interior floors are covered by rubber floor mats or resilient floor tiles. The walls and ceilings are gypsum wallboard over concrete. The ceiling is covered by drop-in ceiling panels. The exterior walls are either concrete or concrete masonry units (CMUs). The roof is covered with a membrane roofing system.

ASBESTOS INSPECTION

The Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM) 17.74.354 and the National Emissions Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP – 40 CFR 61) require an asbestos inspection be completed for all building materials prior to scheduled renovation or demolition activities to determine if asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM) are present. NESHASP and the ARM regulate asbestos due to the respiratory hazard that airborne asbestos fibers present.

April 12, 2012

The inspections were performed by a Montana-accredited asbestos inspector in accordance with the

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – Asbestos Hazards and Emergency Response Act (AHERA) regulation 40 CFR 763 and ARM 17.74.362 . Documentation of accreditation is provided in Appendix

A.

Building materials were identified, categorized, numbered, and placed into homogeneous areas for sample collection and laboratory analysis. The number of samples collected from building products identified in the inspection is based on the following:

Surfacing Materials (S): three samples for surfacing materials between 1 and 1,000 square feet

(SF), five samples for surfacing materials between 1,000 and 5,000 SF, seven samples for surfacing materials over 5,000 SF.

Thermal System Insulation (T): three samples from each homogeneous area (HA) of thermal system insulation, which may include boiler insulation, mudded fittings, and expanded vermiculite insulation.

Miscellaneous Material (M): At least three samples from each homogeneous area of miscellaneous material, such as ceiling tile, sheetrock (drywall), cove base, electrical wiring insulation, concrete, and brick and mortar.

Seven building materials were identified during the inspection as likely to be impacted during the proposed renovation. Bulk samples were placed into uniquely labeled containers and shipped to Pace

Analytical, Inc in Billings, Montana, for analysis using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) in accordance with the EPA Method 600/R4-93-116. Pace Analytical, Inc is accredited through the

National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation

Program (NVLAP). The limit of detection for this method is approximately 1% by volume.

Findings

There were no HAs determined by laboratory analysis to contain asbestos in quantities greater than 1%.

All HAs were described as “None Detected” by the laboratory and are listed in Table 1 below. The laboratory analytical report provided by Pace Analytical is included in Appendix B. Sample identification and locations are shown on Figure 1 in Appendix C.

Non-Asbestos Building Materials

Building 1867 – Malmstrom Air Force Base

Homogenous

Area (HA) Sample Description Location-Room No.

M15.1 Exterior CMU Mortar Exterior Walls

M14.1 Concrete

Interior and Exterior Building

Components

M5.1

2’ x 2’ Lay-In

Ceiling Panels All Interior Ceilings

F5.1

Mastic Under

Rubber Flooring

Alarm Operator Room, Personnel

Entrapment Room

M2.1

Mastic Under 4” Dark

Gray Cove Base

Alarm Operator Room, Personnel

Entrapment Room

M1.1

Wallboard Mud over

Window Casings

Alarm Operator Room, Personnel

Entrapment Room

M1.2 Gypsum Wallboard

Interior Walls - Alarm Operator

Room, Personnel Entrapment Room

LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION

A LBP survey was conducted to identify painted components that may require specialized handling to comply with the requirements of OSHA or special disposal under the Resource Conservation and

Recovery Act (RCRA), which is administered by the EPA. The survey was performed by an experienced technician with training as a LBP risk assessor.

Regulations and Definitions

Lead-based paint. Lead-based paint (LBP) is of concern both as a source of direct exposure through ingestion of paint chips and as a contributor to lead in interior dust and exterior soil. Regulatory agencies which have addressed lead-based paint include the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Occupational Safety and Health

Administration (OSHA), and the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC). There is no state program for lead.

HUD guidelines define lead-based paint as:

Paint in liquid form which contains 0.06%, by weight, calculated as lead metal in total nonvolatile content of the liquid paint, or

APPENDIX A

Paint already applied which tests equal to or greater than 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm ) when using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) technology, or 5,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (0.5% by weight) when using atomic absorption spectroscopic analysis (AA).

Lead-Containing Paint. Lead-containing paint is defined as paint that has lead concentrations at less than the HUD guidelines or EPA disposal regulations. The OSHA standard for lead in the construction industry does not recognize a minimum safe concentration of lead. If any painted surface has any detectable level of lead, it must be presumed to present an occupational exposure to lead for OSHA-regulated construction work until a negative exposure assessment or exposure monitoring establishes otherwise.

A Niton XRF was used to test paint for lead. The XRF instrument provided a real concentration of LBP based on the generated spectra and an algorithm programmed into the instrument. The XRF was standardized prior to and after the conclusion of the LBP survey against lead-based paint standards provided by the manufacturer of the XRF.

Findings

The survey resulted in no locations testing positive for lead-based paint and seven sample locations testing as lead-containing. All tested locations were conclusive with no paint chip sampling or analysis required. Homogeneous areas of lead-containing paint are shown in Table 2. Descriptions of testing locations that were negative for lead and XRF analysis results are provided in Appendix D. XRF sample locations are listed on Figure 1 in Appendix E.

Table 2

Lead-Containing Paint

Building 1867 – Malmstrom Air Force Base

Test

No. Component Substrate Color Location

Lead

Content

(mg/cm

Square

Footage

Exterior

Overhang Support

Post Metal Light Yellow Side D 0.30 16

9 Wall Concrete Light Yellow Side D 0.04 25

10 Conduit Metal Light Yellow Side D 0.04 4

Table 2 (cont.)

Lead-Containing Paint

Building 1867 – Malmstrom Air Force Base

Overhang Support

Post Metal Light Yellow Side A 0.25 16

25 Window Casing Concrete

Chocolate

Brown Side C 0.4 6

27 Conduit Metal Light Yellow Side D 0.04 15

29 Light Pole Metal Dark Brown Side D 0.13 15

Interior

35 Window Casing Metal White AOR Room Side C 0.10 15

Side A = West, Side B = South, Side C = East, Side D = North

RECOMMENDATIONS

Asbestos

No asbestos-containing material was encountered in the area included in this inspection. No asbestos-related procedure is therefore required for the building areas and components included in this survey.

However, since the roof was covered by a one-piece rubber membrane, sampling from this layer or any layers below this membrane was not done. If there are layers of a former roof remaining, then these materials must be assumed to be asbestos-containing until further sampling and testing determines otherwise.

Lead in Paint

Since OSHA does not recognize any safe concentration of lead in paint, if any painted surface has a detectable level of lead, it must be presumed to present an occupational exposure to lead for OSHA-regulated constructions work until a negative exposure assessment or exposure monitoring establishes otherwise. Consequently, any disturbance to painted surfaces which contain a measurable quantity of lead must be considered as having the potential to create a risk to workers.

The OSHA standard cites a Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) of 50 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air (μg/m ) and an Action Level (AL) of 30 μg/m

. Any amount above these levels triggers several safety and health provisions a contractor must comply with, including, but not limited to:

1. A respiratory protection program

2. Personal protective clothing and equipment

3. Changing areas including segregated storage of work and non-work clothing

4. Hand-washing facilities

5. Blood testing

6. Employee training

If an employee is performing any of the following tasks then all of the above-mentioned safety items must be provided to the employees.

1. Manual demolition, dry scraping, or dry sanding

2. Heat gun applications

3. Power tool cleaning

4. Other industrial operations involving lead as specified in the OSHA standard

Prior to disposal of demolition waste, the EPA under the RCRA hazardous waste program requires that the waste stream be characterized. Sampling of building materials for analysis using the Toxicity

Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) is routinely done to determine if materials are hazardous.

Since there were no testing locations that were above the lead-based paint concentration threshold, then a TCLP analysis is not necessary. TD&H recommends the data contained in this report be made available to the landfill prior to transporting waste with LCP.

LIMITATIONS

This asbestos inspection and lead in paint survey report was prepared based on information gathered during one site visit and interpretations of laboratory analytical results provided by Pace Analytical, Inc.

The inspection report has been prepared to provide information concerning the various types of building materials that were considered suspect for containing asbestos or lead and to inform the owner of the materials that tested positive for asbestos or paint containing lead. Most building components were visible and accessible at the time of our site visits. However, it is possible that additional suspect materials may be encountered during demolition. The roof of Building 1867 was covered by a rubber membrane. There may be additional layers of roofing below this membrane that, if present, would have to be assumed to be asbestos-containing until further sampling and testing determine otherwise.

This asbestos inspection and lead in paint survey report is intended for use by CWG Architects. The scope of services performed by Thomas Dean & Hoskins, Inc., may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and any use or re-use of this document, or the findings presented herein is at the sole risk of the user.

We appreciate this opportunity to provide these industrial hygiene consulting services to you and look forward to assisting you through the remainder of the project. Should you have questions or need further clarification about information contained herein, please feel free to contact either Peter Klevberg or me at 761-3010.

Sincerely, THOMAS, DEAN & HOSKINS, INC.

Oran Grotbo Peter Klevberg, P.E.

Senior Industrial Hygiene Technician Project Manager

Appendices: A Document of Accreditation

B Laboratory Report

C Asbestos Sample Locations

D XRF Analytical Results

E XRF Sample Locations

DOCUMENT OF

ACCREDITATION

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX B

LABORATORY

REPORT

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX C

ASBESTOS SAMPLE

LOCATIONS

APPENDIX A

BOILER ROOM

RESTROOM

BREAK ROOM

JAN.

ELECTRICAL

ROOM

CORR.

ALARM

OPERATOR

ROOM

PERSONNEL

ENTRAPMENT

Room

Room

�� �� � � � � � APPENDIX A

APPENDIX D

XRF ANALYTICAL

RESULTS

APPENDIX A

XRF Sample Locations and Results

Building 1867 – WSA

Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana

Test # Substrate Component Color Location Side Lead Content (mg/cm ) Classification

1 CMU Wall Light Yellow Exterior D 0.0 Negative

2 Metal Wall Access

Chocolate

Brown Exterior D 0.0 Negative

3 Metal Window Casing Silver

Exterior D 0.0 Negative

5 Concrete Overhang Support Beam Light Yellow

6 Concrete Overhang Support Ceiling Light Yellow

7 Metal Door Casing

Brown

8 Metal Door

11 Metal Turn-Stile Support Silver

12 Metal Entrance Door (Wind Break)

Exterior A 0.0 Negative

13 Metal

Entrance Door Frame

(Wind Break)

15 Metal Entrance Door Frame White

16 Metal Entrance Door White

17 Metal Entrance Door

18 Metal Entrance Door Casing

19 CMU Wall Light Yellow Exterior A 0.0 Negative

20 Concrete Wall Light Yellow Exterior A 0.0 Negative

21 Concrete Upper Wall Light Yellow Exterior A 0.0 Negative

APPENDIX A

Table 1 (cont.)

XRF Sample Locations and Results

Building 1867 – WSA

22 Concrete Soffit Light Yellow Exterior A 0.0 Negative

23 Metal Rain Gutter

Brown Exterior A 0.0 Negative

24 CMU Wall Light Yellow Exterior C 0.0 Negative

26 Concrete Window Sill Light Yellow Exterior C 0.0 Negative

28 Metal Wall Access

Chocolate

Brown Exterior C 0.0 Negative

30 Metal Light Pole - Base Dark Brown Exterior

D 0.0 Negative

31 Metal Rain Gutter - Downspout

Brown Exterior D 0.0 Negative

32 Wallboard Wall Off-White Interior – AOR Room C 0.0 Negative

33 Wallboard Wall Off-White Interior – AOR Room D 0.0 Negative

34 Wallboard Wall Off-White Interior – AOR Room A 0.0 Negative

36 Metal Window Sill Off-White Interior – AOR Room C 0.0 Negative

37 Metal Security-Window Sill

Brown Interior – AOR Room A 0.0 Negative

38 Metal Window Frame Silver Interior – AOR Room D 0.0 Negative

39 Metal Door Casing

Interior – AOR Room B 0.0 Negative

40 Metal Door

Interior – AOR Room B 0.0 Negative

41 Wallboard Wall Off-White Interior – Entrapment Room C 0.0 Negative

42 Wallboard Wall Off-White Interior – Entrapment Room D 0.0 Negative

43 Vinyl Wall Panel White Interior – Entrapment Room B 0.0 Negative

APPENDIX E

SRF SAMPLE

LOCATIONS

APPENDIX A

BOILER ROOM

RESTROOM

BREAK ROOM

JAN.

ELECTRICAL

ROOM

CORR.

ALARM

OPERATOR

ROOM

PERSONNEL

ENTRAPMENT

Room

Room

� � �' () *+ , - ./0 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9: ;

7 8 9: <

7 8 9: =

7 8 9: >

APPENDIX A

SPECIFICATION 02 83 33

OJG

Arrow

ATTACHMENT B

DOCUMENTATION OF ACCREDITATION

ATTACHMENT C

ASBESTOS LABORATORY REPORT

Customer Project:

Reference #: Date: 9/1/2015

Analysis and Method

1800 River Drive North Great Falls, MT 59401

Building 1867 14-260-070

CBR15083246

Summary of polarizing light microscopy (PLM / Stereomicroscopy bulk asbestos analysis) using the methods described in 40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E (Interim and EPA 600 / R-93 / 116 (Improved). The sample is first viewed with the aid of stereomicroscopy. Numerous liquid slide preparations are created for analysis under the polarized microscope where identifications and quantifications are preformed. Calibrated liquid refractive oils are used as liquid mouting medium. These oils are used for identification (dispersion staining). A calibrated visual estimation is reported, should any asbestiform mineral be present. Other techniques such as acid washing are used in conjugation with refractive oils for detection of smaller quantities of asbestos. All asbestos percentages are based on calibrated visual estimation traceable to NIST standards for regulated of asbestos.

Traceability to measurement and calibration is achieved by using known amounts and types of asbestos from standards where analyst and laboratory accuracy are measured. As little as 0.001% asbestos can be detected in favorable samples, while detection in unfavorable samples may approach the detection limit of 0.50% (well above the laboratory definition of trace).

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.

1929 Old Denton Road Carrollton, TX 75006 Phone 972-242-2754 Fax 972-242-2798

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32 Baton Rouge, LA 70809 Phone 225-751-5632 Fax 225-751-5634

Materials Characterization - Bulk Asbestos Analysis Laboratory Analysis Report - Polarized Light

TD & H Engineering

Labs

A

C

Discussion

Qualifications

Some samples (floor tiles, surfacings, etc.) may contain fibers too small to be delectable by PLM analysis and should be analyzed by TEM bulk protocols.

A "trace asbestos" will be reported if the analyst observes far less than 1% asbestos. CA Labs defines "trace asbestos" as a few fibers detected by the analyst in several preparations and will indicate as such under these circumstances.

Quantification of <1% will actually be reported as <=1% (allowable variance close to 1% is high). Such results are ideal for point counting, and the technique is mandatory for friable samples (NESHAP, Nov. 1990 and clarification letter 8 May 1991) under 1% percent asbestos and the "trace asbestos". In order to make all initial PLM reports issued from CA Labs NESHAP compliant, all <1% asbestos results (except floor tiles) will be point counted at no additional charge.

CA Labs is accredited by the National Voluntary Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for selected test methods for airborne fiber analysis (TEM), and for bulk asbestos fiber analysis (PLM). All analysts have a college degree in a natural science (geology, biology, or environmental science) or are recognized by a state professional board in one these disciplines .Extensive in-house training programs are used to augment education background of the analyst. The group leader of polarized light has received supplemental McCrone Research training for asbestos identification. This report is not covered by the scope of AIHA accreditation. Analysis performed at CA Labs, LLC 12232 Industriplex, Suite 32 Baton Rouge, LA 70809.

Baton Rouge NVLAP Lab Code 200772-0 TEM/PLM TDH 30-0370

LDEQ

Vermiculite containing samples may have trace amounts of actinolite-tremolite, where not found be PLM should be analyzed using TEM methods and / or water separation techniques. Suspected actinolite/vermiculite presence will be indicated through the sample comment section of this report.

Fibrous talc containing samples may even contain a related asbestos fiber known as anthophyllite. Under certain conditions the same fiber may actually contain both talc and anthophyllite (a phenomenon called intergrowth). Again, TEM detection methods are recommended. CA Labs PLM report comments will denote suspected amounts of asbestiform anthophyllite with talc, where further analysis is recommended.

APPENDIX A

Overview of Project Sample Material Containing Asbestos

Customer Project: Building 1867 14-260-070 CA Labs Project #: CBR15083246

No Asbestos Detected.

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.

1929 Old Denton Road Carrollton, TX 75006 Phone 972-242-2754 Fax 972-242-2798

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32 Baton Rouge, LA 70809 Phone 225-751-5632 Fax 225-751-5634

Sample # Layer

Analysts Physical Description of Subsample

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

List of Affected Building Material Types

Labs

A

C

Glossary of abbreviations (non-asbestos fibers and non-fibrous minerals):

This report relates to the items tested. This report is not to be used by the customer to claim product certification, approval or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, AIHA LAP, LLC, or any other agency of the federal government. This report may not be reproduced except in full without written permission from CA Labs. These results are submitted pursuant to CA Labs' current terms and sale, condition of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitations of liability provisions and no responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted. Unless notified in writing to return the samples covered by this report, CA Labs will store the samples for a period of ninety (90) days before discarding. A shipping or handling fee may be assessed for the return of any samples.

Baton Rouge NVLAP Lab Code 200772-0 TEM/PLM TDH 30-0370

LDEQ

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot - other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay)

APPENDIX A

Polarized Light Asbestiform Materials Characterization

Customer Info: Attn: Customer Project:

9/1/2015 2 day 8/28/2015

Phone # Fax #

70% qu,ma,ca

2 Tan Insulation Y None Detected 15% fg 85% qu,ca

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type / percent

T1.1A 1 Tan Wrap Y None Detected 8% fg 22% ce

406-761-3010 Date Of Sampling:

406-727-2872 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of Subsample

Homo-geneo us (Y/N)

TD & H Engineering Building 1867 14-260-070

CBR15083246

1800 River Drive North Great Falls, MT 59401 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.

1929 Old Denton Road Carrollton, TX 75006 Phone 972-242-2754 Fax 972-242-2798

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32 Baton Rouge, LA 70809 Phone 225-751-5632 Fax 225-751-5634

CA Labs Project #:

Labs

A

C

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Stanley Massett III Senior Analyst Analyst Alicia Stretz

4% ce 96% qu,ma Baton Rouge NVLAP Lab Code 200772-0 TEM/PLM TDH 30-0370

LDEQ

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

F2.1/M2.1-A 1 Gray Linoleum Y None Detected

8% fg 22% ce 70% qu,ma,ca

2 Tan Insulation Y None Detected 15% fg 85% qu,ca

T1.1C 1 Tan Wrap Y None Detected

8% fg 22% ce 70% qu,ma,ca

2 Tan Insulation Y None Detected 15% fg 85% qu,ca

T1.1B 1 Tan Wrap Y None Detected

APPENDIX A

Polarized Light Asbestiform Materials Characterization

Customer Info: Attn: Customer Project:

9/1/2015 2 day 8/28/2015

Phone # Fax #

100% qu,bi

F2.1/M2.1-B 1 Gray Linoleum Y None Detected 4% ce 96% qu,ma

Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent

Non-asbestos fiber type / percent

Non-fibrous type / percent

2 Tan Mastic Y None Detected

406-761-3010 Date Of Sampling:

406-727-2872 Purchase Order #:

Sample # Com ment

Layer

Analysts Physical Description of Subsample

Homo-geneo us (Y/N)

TD & H Engineering Building 1867 14-260-070

CBR15083246

1800 River Drive North Great Falls, MT 59401 Date:

Turnaround Time: Samples Received:

CA Labs

Dedicated to

Quality

Crisp Analytical, L.L.C.

1929 Old Denton Road Carrollton, TX 75006 Phone 972-242-2754 Fax 972-242-2798

CA Labs, L.L.C.

12232 Industriplex, Suite 32 Baton Rouge, LA 70809 Phone 225-751-5632 Fax 225-751-5634

CA Labs Project #:

Labs

A

C

Laboratory Director

Chris Williams

1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers

2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages

3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite

4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected

5. Not enough sample to analyze

6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc

7. Contamination suspected from other building materials

8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method

9. < 1% Result point counted positive

10. TEM analysis suggested

Stanley Massett III Senior Analyst Analyst Alicia Stretz

20% fg 60% ce 20% qu,pe,ma

Baton Rouge NVLAP Lab Code 200772-0 TEM/PLM TDH 30-0370

LDEQ

Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)

Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.

ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:

2 Tan Ceiling Tile Y None Detected

100% qu,bi

M5.1D 1 White Surfacing Y None Detected 100% qu,bi

2 Tan Mastic Y None Detected

100% qu,bi

F2.1/M2.1- C 1 Gray Linoleum Y None Detected 4% ce 96% qu,ma

2 Tan Mastic Y None Detected

APPENDIX A

ATTACHMENT D

ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATIONS

ATTACHMENT D

XRF SAMPLE LOCATIONS