Attach_3_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Dual Spindle CNC Lathe Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4620-15-Q-A017
About this file
Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA4620-15-Q-A017-0003.pdf | ||
| FA4620-15-Q-A017-0002.pdf | ||
| FA4620-15-Q-A017-0001.pdf | ||
| FA4620-15-Q-A017 _Dual_Spindle_Lathe.pdf | ||
| Attach_2_Technical_Evaluation_Sheet.pdf | ||
| Attach_1 _SOW.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA4620-15-Q-A017
Attachment 3 Present/Past Performance Questionnaire
PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
92 CONS/LGCA
ATTN: SSgt Zachery Ray, zachery.ray@us.af.mil and Mr. Edward Campbell, edward.campbell.2@us.af.mil
FAX: (509) 247-8685
DSN FAX: 657-8685
If you have questions regarding this questionnaire, please call SSgt Zachery Ray at (509) 247-2608.
Performance Evaluation Instructions: When responding to the descriptive statements, select the number which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. If the contractor has no record of past performance relevant to a particular question, select “5” for “Neutral”.
Evaluation of the Contractor’s Performance: For any ratings less than satisfactory confidence, please provide explanation in Remarks section below.
SERVICE PERFORMANCE
1. How well did the contractor coordinate delivery and programing efforts? 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
2. How responsive was the contractor to the customer’s needs i.e.
Addressing shipment damage, helping program electronics etc. 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
3. Did the contractor deliver items on schedule? 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
4. How was support after delivery? 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS
Rating Description
1. Exceptional Based on the offeror’s performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
2. Good Based on the offeror’s performance record, little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
3. Satisfactory Based on the offeror’s performance record, some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
4. Marginal Based on the offeror’s performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Changes to the offeror’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements.
5. Neutral No performance record identifiable.
FA4620-15-Q-A017
Attachment 3 Present/Past Performance Questionnaire
EVALUATION SUMMARY:
1. Overall evaluation of the goods and services provided? (Circle one and explain.) 1 2 3 4 5
2. Would you award another contract to this contractor again? (circle one)
YES NO N/A
If no, please explain.
3. Overall evaluation of the contractor. (Circle one and explain.) 1 2 3 4 5
Additional Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .