FA448617R00100004.pdf

F2N33Q7145A001

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose for this amendment is to make some corrections in the solicitation, specifically on Subfactor 2-Staffing Plan, w here it reads "paving" should read "roofing".

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 30-Jun-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA448617R0010

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

12-Jun-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

26-Jun-2017

CODE

65 CONF/LGCA

65TH CONTRACTING FLIGHT

APO AE 09720-7710

FA4486 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA448617R0010

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

SECTION M -EVALUATION FACTORS

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION CRITERIA

1. BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD

1.1 This is a competitive best value source selection in which the government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the government, price and technical acceptability considered. The government intends to make the award to the lowest priced, technically acceptable offeror. The government intends to award without discussions with respective offerors. The government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussion if deemed in its best interest. The following list are evaluation factors that shall be used in the evaluation process:

a. Price

b. Technical Acceptability

1.2 First, offers shall be ranked according to price. The offers will be evaluated based on completeness and reasonableness of the overall proposed price. All offerors must therefore propose on all line items in Section “B” of the SF Form 1442. The government intends that only one contract will be awarded as a result of this solicitation. The government shall evaluate the Technical Proposal Information submitted only from the lowest priced offeror under this acquisition. If the lowest priced offeror meets the government’s technical standards of acceptability as defined under Section M, it will be awarded the contract. If the lowest priced offeror fails to meet the government’s technical standards acceptability as defined under Section M, that offeror will be eliminated from consideration for award. The government will then evaluate the next lowest priced offeror’s technical acceptability in the same manner. This process will continue until an offeror is found to meet the government’s technical standards of Offeror’s Technical Proposal that is evaluated will be rated as Acceptable or Unacceptable.

1.3 Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in Section L. Offeror’s may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal. Communications conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

2. PRICE PROPOSAL EVALUATION

Price proposals will be evaluated based on completeness and reasonableness of the overall proposed price. All offerors must therefore propose on all line items in Section “B” of the standard Form 1442. The lowest complete and reasonable price proposal will be ranked highest.

Price analysis will be used to determine the total evaluated price to support the selection of the lowest priced, technically acceptable offeror. Although when the determination of fair and reasonable price requires additional information, cost analysis may be conducted to support the determination of whether the proposed price is fair and reasonable.

3. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION

3.1 Technical Acceptability. The offeror’s technical capability will be evaluated against the Government’s requirement to determine whether the proposal is technicallly acceptable or unacceptable.

Technical capability will be considered acceptable if both sub factors listed below receive an acceptable rating.

Sub factor 1 - Alvara Certification: Offeror’s provided one (1) current copy, in Portuguese, and one (1) officially translated English copy of the Alvara Certification for their company, and if necessary or applicable, offeror provides a valid Alvara Certification for any sub-contractors.

Alvara Certification shall prove that they are certified to conduct business in the country of Portugal within the scope and magnitude of this requirement. If the Alvara Certification is invalid or not provided, the technical capability will be considered unacceptable.

Sub factor 2 – Staffing Plan: is sub-factor shows the offeror’s proposed methodology to meet the unique staffing and manning requirements for roofing projects as described in the attached specifications (Attachment 1), to include organization structure, and recruitment and coverage of key positions. The offeror’s proposal shall include, at a minimum, the following positions:

Project Manager Site Superintendent Quality Control Manager

3.2 Technical Factor: The Government’s technical evaluation team shall evaluate the proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each subfactor. Any subfactor evaluated as “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, ineligible for award. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award.

However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions.

TABLE 1 - TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation per DoD Source Selection Guide April 2016.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation per DoD Source Selection Guide April 2016.

3.3 The proposals shall be evaluated against the following technical sub factors:

Subfactor 1: Alvara Certification

Description: This subfactor evaluates if the offeror is certified to conduct business in the country of Portugal using the trades and magnitude of this requirement.

Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the offeror’s proposal provides one (1) current copy, in Portuguese and one (1) officially translated English copy of the Alvara Certification. If offeror proposes to use a sub-contractor, they must provide the Alvara Certification of this company with the sub-contractor’s consent in accordance.

Subfactor 2: Staffing Plan

Description: This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s proposed methodology to meet unique staffing and manning requirement for roofing projects as described in the attached specifications (Attachment 1), to include organization structure, and recruitment and coverage of key positions.

Measure of Merit: An acceptable rating is met when the plan demonstrates an appropriate staffing and manning requirement capable of completing roofing projects satisfactorily and includes, at a minimum, the following key personnel:

Project Manager Site Superintendent Quality Control Manager

(End of Summary of Changes)