PP_QUESTIONNAIRE_WTB.rtf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FA3016-14-T-0047

WARRIOR TRANSITION BATTALION VEHICLE OPERATORS

DUE DATE: 5 AUG 2014, 12:00PM CST

Please complete this questionnaire. Handwritten responses are sufficient. If you need more space than that provided, please attach additional pages or write on the back. Responses will be treated as source selection sensitive information, email the completed questionnaire to:

Fort Sam Houston TX 78234

Email ronin.walker.civ@mail.mil

Explanation of codes:

CODE - PERFORMANCE LEVEL

E - EXCEPTIONAL - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V - VERY GOOD - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S - SATISFACTORY - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M - MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U - UNSATISFACTORY - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N - NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

Please complete the following identifying information and past performance assessment:

Contractor:

Circle the appropriate letter for each item on the questionnaire and provide supporting narrative.

Did the contractor’s experience demonstrate the firm’s managerial and technical capability to perform the work required?

E V S M U N file_0.wmf file_1.wmf file_2.wmf

How well did the contractor plan for and achieve Vehicle Operator services? E V S M U N file_3.wmf file_4.wmf file_5.wmf

(3) How well did the contractor meet and improve proposed schedules?

E V S M U N file_6.wmf file_7.wmf file_8.wmf

(4). Rate the contractor on timeliness and accuracy of invoices or change proposals.

E V S M U N file_9.wmf file_10.wmf file_11.wmf

How well did the contractor provide trained, qualified, and experienced workforce in sufficient numbers to meet the requirements in the Performance Work Statement?

E V S M U N file_12.wmf file_13.wmf file_14.wmf

How well did the Contractor demonstrate the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period?

E V S M U N file_15.wmf file_16.wmf file_17.wmf

In the contractor’s internal corporate structure, did the quality control person report directly to corporate office or did he/she report to the on-site management? How did this structure work for you?

E V S M U N file_18.wmf file_19.wmf file_20.wmf

How well did the Contractor correct deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. How would you rate their process/responsiveness?

E V S M U N file_21.wmf file_22.wmf file_23.wmf

How well did the Contractor display a cooperative attitude with company/government personnel before and after award?

E V S M U N file_24.wmf file_25.wmf file_26.wmf

How well did the Contractor adhere to the contract delivery schedule?

E V S M U N file_27.wmf file_28.wmf file_29.wmf

How well did the Contractor meet performance standards tasks specified in the Performance Work Statement? E V S M U N file_30.wmf file_31.wmf file_32.wmf

How well did the contractor establish and maintain a quality program ensuring the ongoing quality of all significant processes performed in-house or by sub-contractors?

E V S M U N file_33.wmf file_34.wmf file_35.wmf

Overall, would you consider the contractor as being “Pro-Active” or “Re-Active” to the day-to-day tasks of performing vehicle operator services?

E V S M U N file_36.wmf file_37.wmf file_38.wmf

Overall, how would you rate the contractor’s quality control program?

E V S M U N file_39.wmf file_40.wmf file_41.wmf

What is your overall rating of the contractor's performance?

E V S M U N file_42.wmf file_43.wmf file_44.wmf

Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.

file_45.wmf file_46.wmf file_47.wmf

Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again? Why?

file_48.wmf file_49.wmf file_50.wmf

How well did the contractor establish and maintain requirements specified in the Performance Work Statement?

file_51.wmf file_52.wmf

(If more comment space needed, write on back, or attach pages.)

Please provide the name, title, address, and phone number of the person completing this questionnaire.

Name:_

Title:

Address:_ file_53.wmf

Phone:_

Fax:

Thank you (in advance) for your assistance in responding to this questionnaire. If you have any questions, please call Ronin Walker, Contract Specialist, (210) 808-6150.

Thank You, 502d Contracting Squadron Installation Acquisition Flight 2250 Engineer Rd, Ste 1, Bldg 4196 Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234