Attachment_5_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 786 KB Posted

Attached to
Apron Pavements Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA301019ApronPavements
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

This document includes a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for repair work on an airfield apron and wash rack at Keesler Air Force Base. The opportunity involves furnishing labor, materials and equipment to repair concrete surfaces as specified in the statement of work and drawings. The North American Industry Classification System code is 237310 for heavy and civil engineering construction, and the size standard is $39.5 million. The magnitude of proposed construction is between $1 million and $5 million. The solicitation package will be posted on October 11, 2019 on FedBizOpps with a closing date of November 12, 2019 and a contract performance period of 250 days after notice to proceed. Registration in the System for Award Management is required for contractors to do business with the government. The single point of entry for documentation is FedBizOpps, and questions can be directed to the identified contracting contacts.

See attached Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 5

FA301020R0003

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________*

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________

_____________________________ Fax Number: _____________________

_____________________________ Email Address: _____________________

C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: 81st Contracting Squadron, Keesler AFB, MS

Attn: Frederick Cherry Fax # 228-377-3298

Email: frederick.cherry@us.af.mil & Kimberley.alvarez.1@us.af.mil mailto:maxwell.watanga.1@us.af.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, VG, S, M, U, and N?A) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.

PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E VG S M U N/A

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Applicable

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Unable to provide a rating.

Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available.

Do not know.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: E VG S M U N/A

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their

The contractor: E VG S M U N/A quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules.

14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

15. Was responsive to contract changes.

16. Provided adequate project supervision.

17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” YES/NO

23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

24. Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________

Remarks:______________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .