Attachment_4_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 91 KB Posted

Attached to
Repair/Replace SFS HVAC Bldg 3501 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA3010-16-R-0010Houston
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Repair/Replace SFS HVAC Bldg 3501, newest first.
File Type Posted
Questions_1-2.docx DOCX document
MAHG141067_Repair_HVAC_B3501_drawings.pdf PDF
FA3010-16-R-0010_Solicitation.doc DOC document
Wage_Det.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_SF_1444word.rtf RTF text file
MAHG141067_Repair_HVAC_B3501_specs.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_Past_Performance_Reference_List.docx DOCX document
Attachment_7_Notice_of_Compliance.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Attachment 4

FA3010-16-R-0010

Contractor’s Name:

Address:

Telephone Number: Fax Number: Point of Contact:

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: *

Contract Number Provided by Offeror:

Dollar Amount: *

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: * Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: Title:

Address:

Telephone Number: Fax Number: Email Address:

C. FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: 81st Contracting Squadron, Keesler AFB, MS Attn: Kirshell LaCroix Fax # 228-377-3298

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the

contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to
The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N

meet contract requirements.

7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
13.
Met established project schedules.
14.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.
17.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in- progress increased.
18.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
22.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

23.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

24.
Is the contractor rated in CCASS?
YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER

Remarks:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .