Attachment_4_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 91 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair/Replace SFS HVAC Bldg 3501 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA3010-16-R-0010Houston
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions_1-2.docx | DOCX document | |
| MAHG141067_Repair_HVAC_B3501_drawings.pdf | ||
| FA3010-16-R-0010_Solicitation.doc | DOC document | |
| Wage_Det.pdf | ||
| Attachment_6_SF_1444word.rtf | RTF text file | |
| MAHG141067_Repair_HVAC_B3501_specs.pdf | ||
| Attachment_5_Past_Performance_Reference_List.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_7_Notice_of_Compliance.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Attachment 4
FA3010-16-R-0010
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number: Point of Contact:
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: *
Contract Number Provided by Offeror:
Dollar Amount: *
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: * Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: Title:
Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number: Email Address:
C. FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: 81st Contracting Squadron, Keesler AFB, MS Attn: Kirshell LaCroix Fax # 228-377-3298
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
| Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the |
contractor were effective.
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against. |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 5. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to |
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
meet contract requirements.
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 11. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 12. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 13. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 14. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| 15. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 16. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 17. |
| Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in- progress increased. |
| 18. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 19. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 20. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 21. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 22. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
| 23. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
| 24. |
| Is the contractor rated in CCASS? |
| YES/NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER
Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .