18-R-4005_Attach_G_PPQ.pdf

PDF 95 KB Posted

Attached to
Renovate Building 18-C Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA2823-18-R-4005
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center

About this file

Attachment G / PPQ

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Renovate Building 18-C, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sanitary_Line.pdf PDF
Q&A_-_2.pdf PDF
FA282318R40050003.pdf PDF
18-R-4005_Amendment-2.pdf PDF
18-R-4005_Renovate_Bldg._18-C_Q&A.pdf PDF
18-R-4005_Attach_F_PPI.pdf PDF
Section_07_60_00_-_Flashing_and_Sheet_Metal.pdf PDF
Section_09_29_00_-_Gypsum_Board.pdf PDF
Section_07_41_13_-_Metal_Roof_Panels.pdf PDF
18-R-4005_Amendment-1.pdf PDF
18-R-4005.pdf PDF
18-R-4005_Site_Visit_Sign-In_Sheet.pdf PDF
Attch_E._FL262.pdf PDF
18-R-4005_Statement_of_Work.pdf PDF
18-R-4005_Specs_Addendum-1.pdf PDF
Attach_D_-_Eglin_Specific_Contract_Language.pdf PDF
18-R-4005_Attachment_I.xls XLS spreadsheet
18-R-4005_Attach_H_FRQ.pdf PDF
FA2823-18-R-4005.pdf PDF
18-R-4005_Attach_G_PPQ.pdf PDF
18-R-4005_Drawings.pdf PDF
Technical-Specifications-SCIF-Construction.pdf PDF
18-R-4005_Attach_F_PPI.pdf PDF
18-R-4005_Specifications.pdf PDF
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT G

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Request for Proposal: FA2823-18-R-4005 FTFA 16-1182 / Renovate Building 18-C to SCIF / SAPF

Eglin AFB, FL

1. Name of Contractor: ____________________

Contract or Identifying Number: ______________

Title/Description of Contract: ____________________

2. Brief description of scope of work: _______

EVALUATION: Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

A. Did the contractor have any non-conformance issues? If so, what kind?

B. Did the contractor have adequate resources to complete the required performance?

C. Were there issues with the subcontractor’s testing lab and/or material suppliers?

D. Did the contractor submit required documents on time and answer questions in a timely manner?

Assessment Definition

Substantial Confidence

(SC)

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.

Satisfactory Confidence

(SAT)

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.

Limited Confidence

(LC)

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.

No Confidence

(NC)

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has no expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral) (UC)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Based upon the assessment definitions above, indicate your assessment of the contractor’s performance on your contract described above. Your assessment should consider the contractor’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements. Circle all that apply.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: __________________________ CONTRACT NO.: _______________________

01 Contractor developed realistic progress schedules & completed the project within the established schedule.

SC SAT LC NC UC

02 Contractor provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.

SC SAT LC NC UC

03 Contractor provided timely and accurate payrolls with no known labor violations (Davis-Bacon Act) or labor claims.

SC SAT LC NC UC

04 Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SC SAT LC NC UC

05 Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed them.

SC SAT LC NC UC

06 Contractor identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation to solve problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.

SC SAT LC NC UC

07 Contractor provided effective quality control, which resulted in a quality-finished product.

SC SAT LC NC UC

08 Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain in comments section, SC SAT LC NC UC

09 Would you hire this contractor again? If no, explain in comments section

SC SAT LC NC UC

OVERALL RATING: ______________________________

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF OVERALL RATING GIVEN:

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Name of Person Completing Evaluation:

Base/Company: Date:

Position Title/Grade: Phone:

Email: Fax:

File details come from the government source that posted it.