ATTACHMENT_F_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace Approach Lighting Duke Field Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA2823-16-R-4007
About this file
ATTACHMENT F Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA2823-16-R-4007_Proposal_Hand_Carry_Base_Access_Instructions_for_Offerors.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFIs_FA2823-16-C-4007_Approach_Lights_Duke.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA282316R4007_Q A_1__20160412.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT_D_WD_FL160222_08Jan2016.pdf | ||
| FA2823-16-R-4007_Replace_Approach_Lighting_Duke_Field.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT_G_Financial_Responsibility_Questionaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT_H_HOLD_HARMLESS_AGREEMENT.doc | DOC document | |
| ATTACHMENT_E_Past_Performance_Project_Information.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT_B_FTFA_11-1058_Drawings_14AI.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT_C_FTFA11-1058_Specifications_14AI.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT_I_Base_Access_Affidavit_and_letter.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT_A_SOW_26_Jan_2016_FTFA_11-1058.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT F
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Request for Proposal: FA2823-16-R-4007 Replace Approach Light Structures, Runway 18, Duke Field, FTFA 11-1098, Eglin AFB, FL 32542
1. Name of Offeror:
Contract or Identifying Number:
Title/Description of Contract:
Based upon the definitions below, indicate your assessment of the Offeror’s performance on your contract described on Appendix A. Your assessment should consider the Offeror’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements.
2. Brief description of scope of work:
EVALUATION: Please rate the Offeror utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
1. Did the contractor have any non-conformance issues? If so, what kind? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. Did the contractor have adequate resources to complete the required performance? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. Were there issues with the subcontractor’s testing lab and/or material suppliers? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. Did the contractor submit required documents on time and answer questions in a timely manner? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assessment Definition
| Substantial Confidence (SC) |
| Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again. |
Satisfactory Confidence
(SAT)
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.
Limited Confidence
(LC)
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.
No Confidence
(NC)
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has no expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.
| Unknown Confidence (Neutral) (UC) |
| No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. |
OFFEROR’S NAME: __________________________ CONTRACT NO.: ___________________________
| 01 |
| Offeror developed realistic progress schedules & completed the project within the established schedule. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UC |
| 02 |
| Offeror provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UC |
| 03 |
| Offeror provided timely and accurate payrolls with no known labor violations (Davis-Bacon Act) or labor claims. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UC |
| 04 |
| Offeror provided experienced managers and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UC |
| 05 |
| Offeror hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed them. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UC |
| 06 |
| Offeror identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation to solve problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UC |
| 07 |
| Offeror provided effective quality control, which resulted in a quality-finished product. |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UC |
| 08 |
| Was the Offeror ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain in comments section, |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UC |
| 09 |
| Would you hire this Offeror again? If no, explain in comments section |
| SC |
| SAT |
| LC |
| NC |
| UC |
OVERALL RATING: ______________________________
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF OVERALL RATING GIVEN:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Name of Person Completing Evaluation:
Base/Company: Date:
Position Title/Grade: Phone:
Email: Fax:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .