RFI 1 Before Award Pavement Markings.pdf
PDF 251 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Maintain Pavement Markings, Airfield
- Solicitation number
- F5N3FQ0042AW02
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Beta.SAM Abstract of Offerc OF 1419 TOTALS PAGE.pdf | ||
| RFI 2 Before Award Pavement Markings.pdf | ||
| SOW Pavement Markings 3 June 2020.doc | DOC document | |
| Amendment FA660620B00020001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| SOW Pav Mkings YTPM 20-3001 3.5.20.doc | DOC document | |
| 2020 Airfield Marking Overall Plan.pdf | ||
| ttb1325d.pdf | ||
| Engineering Appendix A Airfield Runway Friction Testing.docx | DOCX document | |
| KTR Bid Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 32 17 23 01 Airfield Pavements and Roadways Marking.docx | DOCX document | |
| 32 01 11 52 Airfield Pavements Rubber and Paint Removal.docx | DOCX document | |
| Wage Determinations 3.13.2020.pdf | ||
| ttp1952e.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA660620B0002 Issued.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REPORT (RFI)
RFI NO. PAGE NO.
CONTRACT NO. CONTRACT TITLE
Maintain Pavement Markings YTPM 20-3001
PRIME CONTRACTOR
Contractor's Request for Information
REQUESTED BY: DATE REQUESTED Potential Cost Impact
[No] Potential Schedule
Impact [No]SUBCONTRACTOR
RFI
SUBJECT:
DRAWINGS
INFORMATION REQUESTED:
ATTACHMENTS FROM CONTRACTOR: (1 attachment)
Question:
Response:
NOTE: THE RFI SYSTEM IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE AN EFFICIENT MECHANISM FOR RESPONDING TO CONTRACTOR'S REQUESTS FOR
INFORMATION. IT DOES NOT PROVIDE AUTHORITY TO PROCEED WITH ADDITIONAL WORK. IF THE CONTRACTOR CONSIDERS
THE RFI RESPONSE A CHANGED CONDITION, PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT PROVISIONS.
QA REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE DATE
RFI FORM
FA6606-20-B-0002
In Regards to Bid Schedule 1.What is the intent of CLIN 006, and how will it be used ? If the intent is to cover the cost of the required glass beads for CLIN 001 & 002, then the contract language needs to be modified to eliminate the ambiguity that the glass beads are included in the cost of CLIN 001& 002.
Normally, the cost of the glass beads would be incorporated into the reflective paint line item and not separated out as its own line item.
2.There is no line item for Rubber Removal. Will the rubber removal be performed by the Government or another contractor prior to the airfield marking application? Or, will Rubber Removal be added to the line items and included in this solicitation?
3.Is the single runway friction test of CLIN 012 to be performed concurrently with the airfield marking? Usually friction testing is performed twice, once before rubber removal and once afterwards. With no rubber removal line items, what is the purpose of the friction test?
1. Yes CLIN 6 is for the glass beads required for CLINs 1 and 2.
2. There will be no rubber removal, just paint. Your concern is noted.
3. We are doing 1 friction test to establish the current condition of this runway. Since we are not doing rubber removal there is no need for the seconbd test.
RICHRD B. COLBURN, JR.
Chief of Construction
| 2020-06-02T07:13:39-0400 | |
| COLBURN.RICHARD.BRENNAN.JR.1005546342 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .