APFIT-FYXX-X-Submission-Briefing_YYYMMDD.pptx
PPTX presentation 597 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- F3J6AF-27-SS001
- Issued by
-
Department of the Air Force
About this file
This file is a submission briefing template for the Accelerate the Procurement and Fielding of Innovative Technologies (APFIT) program, designed to guide organizations in presenting innovative technology procurement proposals to Department of Defense assessment panels.
The template provides a structured nine-slide format that organizations must follow without altering slide order or the standard 4:3 slide size. Submitters must remove all access controls, replace instructional text with their own content, insert their organization logo, and tailor content to their specific capability while maintaining the prescribed flow. The briefing structure requires: (1) title slide with organization information and proposal name; (2) operational impact slide describing capability gaps and warfighter impact with metrics; (3) APFIT procurement overview detailing the system, vendor, quantity, funding breakdown, and key performance characteristics; (4) APFIT alignment showing development history, acceleration timeline, sustaining organization commitment, and out-year funding; (5) company impact discussing business expansion, personnel changes, and supply chain improvements; (6) project information including points of contact, contracting path, and milestone schedule; and (7-9) backup slides with success stories, technical details, use cases, warfighter endorsements, and operational impact descriptions. For classified content above Unclassified, submitters must apply appropriate portion markings per the CUI Handbook and DoD Manual 5200.01 Volume 2. Submissions should be directed to the APFIT portfolio manager or osd.apfit@mail.mil for assistance. This template applies specifically to the Project Iron Sentry RFI for counter-small unmanned aircraft system capabilities in the Korean Theater of Operations, with responses due October 12, 2026.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| APFIT-FYXX-X-LoA-Template_Project-Name_YYYYMMDD.pdf | ||
| APFIT-FYXX-X-Quad-Chart_Project-Name_YYYYMMDD.pptx | PPTX presentation |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Formatting Instructions Submit this briefing at the necessary classification level that allows the greatest amount of context and impact to be discussed.
Remove ALL access controls on this briefing and the quad chart. (File > Info > Protect Presentation) Delete this slide upon submission.
Replace all instructional text (italicized blue text) throughout the deck with your own content.
Place your organization logo/badge in the top right corner of each slide, replacing the dashed circles.
Do not change the slide size from the standard 4:3 format.
Feel free to adjust slide layout and formatting. (e.g. font size, picture size/placement, etc.)
Not all fields may be required depending on your system/capability. Tailor slides to your needs.
For a briefing containing information above Unclassified, please mark slides, to include portion markings, as per the CUI Handbook and/or DoW Manual 5200.01 Volume 2.
(https://www.archives.gov/files/cui/documents/20161206-cui-marking-handbook-v1-1-20190524.pdf) (https://www.esd.whs.mil/portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/DoWm/520001m_vol2.pdf)
Content Instructions Do not change the order of the slides.
Complete each slide prior to the back-up.
The slides are purposely ordered to tell the story of your capability to the assessment panel.
Please reach out to your APFIT portfolio manager or email osd.apfit@mail.mil if assistance is needed Submission Briefing Deck Instructions
Template: 27-1
Place Submitting Government Organization Logo Here Accelerate the Procurement & Fielding of Innovative Technologies (APFIT) FYXX-X Submission Briefing Name of Briefer Title (Proposal name should be self-explanatory: i.e. does not need to be clever, not the name of the partnered company, doesn’t have to be the internal organization project name) Submitting Organization Date
Controlled by: OUSW(R&E) Controlled by: MDJO/APFIT Category: BUDG, PROCURE Distribution: FEDCON POC: Devin Bohanan Distribution Statement C: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies and their contractors (FEDCON). Other requests for this document shall be referred to the Program Manager of APFIT, Office of the Under Secretary of War for Research & Engineering, 3030 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3030
CUI
Name of Briefer, Position, Nominating Organization, Date. Add control markings, as necessary.
Operational Impact
Replace with an OV-1 or similar graphic (After Proposed Technology)
Replace with an OV-1 or similar graphic (Before Proposed Technology)
Capability Gap Capability Gap Statement
New Capability What new capability does this provide?
What’s the new CONOP?
Impact to the Warfighter (add metrics where applicable)
-An OV-1 or similar CONOPS graphic is suggested to be used for this slide with a bumper sticker/slogan (NOT a picture of the capability to be acquired) -State the problem or solution space as a requirement (e.g. The Warfighter currently cannot/has a gap and proposed solutions does ____.)
-This slide should be used to orient the audience / reader to the mission set and the operational problem you’re hoping to solve with the capability
APFIT procures X systems from [Company Name] System Description System description including key performance metrics.
Additional system information. Ensure the reader knows specifically what the APFIT money is being used for.
System is currently at TRL X Delivery Details X systems delivered to [DoW Organization] repeat this bullet as needed Low-rate Initial Production Cost: $X per unit (APFIT cost) Anticipated Full-rate Production Cost: $X per unit (post APFIT cost, based on number of anticipated out-year procurements) Deliveries Begin: MM/YYYY; Deliveries Complete: MM/YYYY
APFIT Procurement Overview
Replace with an image of the system
(Adjust number/size of pictures as necessary)
Replace with an image of the system
| Deliverable | |||
| Vendor | APFIT Quantity | APFIT Funding Breakout | |
| Name of System / Component | $XX,XXX,XXX.XX | ||
| Name of System / Component | $XX,XXX,XXX.XX | ||
| Name of System / Component | $XX,XXX,XXX.XX | ||
| Add’l components / support items | $XX,XXX,XXX.XX | ||
| Total: | $XX,XXX,XXX.XX |
Replace with an image of the system
-This slide should be used to clearly describe what the APFIT funding will purchase -Brief capability description -Highlight anything noteworthy about this capability:
-First of its kind to ___.
-X patents generated during development.
-Where does this product live in the DoW infrastructure? (i.e. Sub-component to larger system, one of many systems in a portfolio, etc.)
-What quantity would APFIT purchase and what is the total need? (e.g. 1 of 15 satellites, 3,000 of 15,000 sensors) -Provide representations or pictures of the capability or system as applicable
APFIT Alignment
| Funding ($M) | Type | FYXX-XX | FYXX | FYXX | FYXX | FYXX | FYXX | FYXX |
| OUSW(R&E) APFIT | PROC | XX.XXX | ||||||
| e.g. SBIR (FY#-#) | RDT&E | XX.XXX | ||||||
| e.g. Service/PAE POM | PROC | |||||||
| e.g. Service/PAE POM | O&M |
No. Units Procured X X X X X X
Consolidate development funding here ↓ Development before APFIT Development began as a [insert DARPA/Service/SBIR/DIU/etc] project in FY X.
Highlight key development details.
Provide when and/or how it ‘graduated’ from development to a production ready capability.
Acceleration through APFIT APFIT accelerates procurement from QX/FYX to QX/FYX.
Provide additional data points as applicable, such as what APFIT funding does to IOC / FOC timeline.
Sustained Procurement after APFIT APFIT procures X systems. The total DoW need is Y systems.
Which organizations are driving that need and how did you arrive at that number?
What are those organizations doing to secure out-year funding for continued procurement? Out-year funding commitments should be shown in the table below.
-Provide the development backstory and highlight when it ‘graduated’ from development to a production ready capability -Identify interest from a sustaining organization (ideally a Program Office) -Describe requirements and funding situation of that sustaining organization.
-Would they buy the systems now if they could?
-What is preventing them from buying the systems now?
-How many will they procure after the initial APFIT purchase?
-Include funding table (preferably two years prior and through the FYDP)
APFIT Impact to Company Company Information Company Name, HQ Location, Work Location (if different) Specific to the APFIT procurement, describe key partnerships with other vendors as applicable.
Number of employees: (at time of submission) Annual Revenue: (last reported) Provide details of Venture Capital and/or Private Equity as applicable.
Company Qualifications Specific to the APFIT procurement, what makes this company uniquely positioned to provide this capability? (e.g. novel tech, first to field, competition winner, patents) Impact of APFIT Award Ex. [Company name] will expand from x manual production lines to y automated production lines. Throughput capacity will expand from X to Y as a result of APFIT funding.
Will funding allow the company to hire more personnel, make supply chains more robust? (Provide actual metrics; i.e. % increase in number of employees) This section can also be used to describe any risk to losing this company as a supplier without an APFIT award.
-Provide the name of the small business/non-traditional, their HQ location (city, state), and location of where the work will take place (city, state). Recall this is a Congressional item of interest, and these details are important to Senators and Congressional Representatives.
-Identify the business category: Small business AND/OR Non-traditional performer -Provide what the APFIT funding will do for the company.
-Is this the company’s first/only product?
-Will funding stand up production capability while awaiting increased POM funding?
-Does the company’s ability to remain a viable supplier depend on immediate funding?
-Explain why this company is best suited to provide the DoW with this capability.
-{Company name] will expand from x manual production lines to y automated production lines. Throughput capacity will expand from X to Y.
Project Information
| Project POCs | Name(s) | NIPR Email(s) | Unclass Phone(s) |
| Gov Program Manager(s) | |||
| Gov Technical SME(s) | |||
| Contracting Org FM(s) | |||
| Sustaining Program Office POC(s) |
| Contracting Path | ||
| Contracting Path Description | Estimated Obligation | |
| (SBIR Ph III/Prod OTA/ | ||
| Conventional FAR-based) | E.g. Existing contract owned by Organization X has $XM of ceiling remaining. Contract can accept procurement funding and will be modified to add APFIT funding. Time to perform a modification is typically 30 days. |
MM/YYYY
| Summary of Major Tasks, Milestones, & Deliverables | Est. Start Date | Est. End Date |
| MM/YYYY | MM/YYYY | |
| MM/YYYY | MM/YYYY | |
| MM/YYYY | MM/YYYY | |
| MM/YYYY | MM/YYYY | |
| MM/YYYY | MM/YYYY | |
| MM/YYYY | MM/YYYY |
Show each ‘lot’ of deliveries as applicable
-Program Manager and Financial Manager points of contact -Explain your contracting path (SBIR phase III, Production OTA, conventional contract) and provide the contracting office with which you are working -Breakout of how allocated funds will be dispersed from the prime to any subcontractors (table – contractor name, description of work, funding)
Provide any additional information the selection panel should know about, such as the following:
Success stories Technical details Detailed use case/mission CONOPS info Graphics depicting the system in use Warfighter endorsement(s)/testimonial(s) from operational users here, example on following slide.
Other Letters of Support (send the document(s) separately) Backup Slide(s)
-List endorsement(s) from operational users here (If Letters of Support, include a graphic and send the document separately)
Brief Endorsements/Quotes from Warfighter(s)/Operational User(s) E.g. Commander NORTHCOM is strongly endorsing the requested Project X capabilities for accelerated procurement and fielding. The Project X capabilities will significantly increase our ability to provide decision advantage and situational awareness to decision makers. I encourage your office to select Project X for APFIT funding. If selected for APFIT, my command will support the program’s efforts to deliver this capability into the hands of warfighters.
Endorsements are not required – they are an opportunity to provide further context from leadership and operators
Endorsements
-Describe how this capability will affect the Warfighter -Who are the users of the system and in what environment?
-How will this improve the warfighter’s functions or change CONOPS? (i.e. Highlight quantifiable mission/process improvements) -Increases data speeds by ________.
-Reduces process from X days to X hours.
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .