Evaluation Criteria (Comparative) (Stylus Pro).docx
DOCX document 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Stylus Profilometer
- Solicitation number
- W911QX23Q0166
About this file
This document outlines the evaluation criteria for a federal solicitation seeking a stylus profilometer. The government will utilize comparative evaluation procedures to compare all offers received against each other on an item-by-item basis to determine which offer provides the most benefit. Award will be made to the lowest priced offer meeting the minimum requirements, however the government reserves the right to award to a higher priced offer exceeding minimums if most advantageous. Evaluation factors include price, technical capabilities/specifications, and past performance with no order of relative importance. The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number W911QX23Q0166 for a stylus profilometer from the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Salient Characteristics (Stylus Pro).doc | DOC document | |
| Provisions and Clauses Full-Text Attachment (for Combo Synopsis-Solicitation) (Stylus Pro).doc | DOC document | |
| Combination Synopsis-Solicitation for Commercial Purchases (Under SAT) (Stylus Pro).docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria (Comparative)
In accordance with FAR 13.106-2(b)(3), comparative evaluation procedures will be utilized. Comparative evaluation is the comparison of all offers received in response to this solicitation against each other. An item-by-item comparison of each offer to one another will be performed to determine which offer provides the most benefit to the Government. Award will be made to the offer that is most advantageous to the Government. The Government may award to the lowest priced offeror that meets the Government’s minimum requirements; however, the Government reserves the right to award to a higher priced offeror exceeding the minimum requirements if it is most advantageous to the Government. In order to be considered for award, an offer must meet the Government’s minimum technical requirement contained in this solicitation. The below evaluation factors will be utilized during evaluation (in no order of relative importance):
Price Technical Capabilities/Specification Past Performance
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .