J.4__Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 172 KB Posted

Attached to
DOCKSIDE REPAIRS, NOAA SHIP OKEANOS EXPLORER
Solicitation number
EA-133M-18-RP-00005
Issued by

About this file

J.4 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
EX_Gauge_List_2017.pdf PDF
A0002_EA-133M-18-RP-00005.pdf PDF
GFOE-2068--VSAT LADDER--REV-05_101946070.pdf PDF
436-6233675 Redline.pdf PDF
GFOE-2065--VSAT INSTALL ASSY--REV-07_101930705_101949668.pdf PDF
OE-123-101.pdf PDF
555-6233815 —
T1651142 ABS Review Letter_OKEANOS EXPLORER VSAT_07-26-17_101949568.pdf PDF
TECHNICAL MEMO 060217-01-Seatel 5012 Installation-Okeanos Explorer--REV-..._101930706_101944382.pdf PDF
OE-436-001 Rev A Fire and General Alarm Mods —
GFOE-2066--VSAT BASE WELDEMENT--REV-06_101931310_101946860.pdf PDF
OE-601-101 —
J.5__Subcontracting_Plan.pdf PDF
1760_001.pdf PDF
514-6629787.pdf PDF
512-6233801.pdf PDF
TECHNICAL MEMO 060217-01-Seatel 5012 Installation-Okeanos Explorer--REV-..._101930706_101944382 —
RFP_EA-133M-18-RP-00005.pdf PDF
OE-555-001 —
436-6233675.pdf PDF
512-6233792.pdf PDF
J.3_Past_Performance_Information_Form.pdf PDF
GFOE-2067--VSAT PLATFORM WELDEMENT--REV-05 —
OE-436-001 Rev A Fire and General Alarm Mods.pdf PDF
512-6233802.pdf PDF
J.1_OKEANOS_EXPLORER_FY18_DOCKSIDE_REPAIRS_SPECIFICATION.pdf PDF
512-6233797.pdf PDF
OE-601-101.pdf PDF
512-6233800.pdf PDF
1761_001.pdf PDF
555-6233815.pdf PDF
GFOE-2069--VSAT GRATING--REV-05_101947380.pdf PDF
J.2__USDL_Poster.pdf PDF
T1651142 ABS Review Letter_OKEANOS EXPLORER VSAT_07-26-17_101949568 —
512-6233799.pdf PDF
GFOE-2070--VSAT LOCATIONS OKEANOS EXPLORER--REV-05_101949669.pdf PDF
Show all 36

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation #: EA-133M-18-RP-00005

Source Selection Information

Attachment: J.4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #: _______________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Sarah Rall no later than December 4, 2017, 10:00 am EST:

Sarah.rall@noaa.gov

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

Attachment: J.4

Source Selection Information

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the

Source Selection Information

3. COST CONTROL

Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the

Source Selection Information

4. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the

Source Selection Information

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name: ___________________________

Rater’s Signature: ________________________

Date: ____________________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Sarah Rall no later than December 4, 2017, 10:00 am EST:

Sarah.rall@noaa.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .