Vendor+Response+Evaluation+Worksheet.docx

DOCX document 17 KB Posted

Attached to
Grant Writer Services Pool
Contract number
344-WSB
Issued by
North Dakota

About this file

This document is a Vendor Response Evaluation Worksheet for State Contract 344 related to Grant Writer Services, which provides a structured framework for evaluating vendor proposals. The document appears to be from a state procurement office, specifically referencing North Dakota (area code 701), and outlines a comprehensive evaluation process for selecting vendor proposals through a participating addendum.

The worksheet establishes a technical evaluation process with three primary criteria: Vendor Solution (30 points), Qualifications and Availability of Vendor Staff (40 points), and Cost (30 points). The evaluation methodology allows for nuanced scoring ranging from 0-30 points per criterion, with detailed rating scales that assess applicability and quality of vendor responses. The document indicates this is for a Grant Writer Services pool, suggesting multiple vendors may be selected, with the ultimate goal of choosing the most advantageous proposal after a seven-day review period.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Change+Order+Form.docx DOCX document
Notice+of+Grant+Writing+Services+Award.docx DOCX document
Task+Order+Request+Form.docx DOCX document
344_State+Contract+Summary-+Update+05-07-2024.docx DOCX document
Amendment+1.pdf PDF
WSB+Amendment+2.pdf PDF
WSB+Amendment+3+Signed.pdf PDF
WSB+Contract+6-2024.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

VENDOR RESPONSE EVALUATION WORKSHEET

INSTRUCTIONS: REVISE EVALUATION CRITERIA AND POINTS TO MATCH #10 OF THE PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM

DELETE ALL INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE PRINTING.

THE EVALUATION SUMMARY MUST BE SENT ALONG WITH THE PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM SO VENDORS HAVE THE SAME INFORMATION THAT WILL BE USED TO SCORE THEIR RESPONSES

INSTRUCTIONS FOR EVALUATORS

When preparing a participating addendum, the association must develop evaluation criteria that will be used to evaluate the vendor responses. Assign each evaluation criterion, including cost, a specific number of points totaling 100. The questions under each evaluated area help you measure the quality of the offeror’s response. All items in blue can be edited to meet association needs. Do not assign points to individual questions; instead, award a total score for each evaluation criterion.

RATING SCALE FOR ASSESSING VENDOR RESPONSES

Rating scales are intended to establish guidelines for awarding points within an evaluation criterion. You may assign any value for a given criteria from 0 to the maximum number of points. A zero value typically constitutes no response or an inability of the vendor to meet the criterion. In contrast, the maximum value should constitute a high standard of meeting the criterion.

If a specific criterion would only yield a yes or no response (e.g., offeror can submit an electronic report in required format by noon Friday), the evaluator should award either the maximum points or a zero. For Example: “Vendor Solution” is an evaluation criteria receiving a weighting of 30% of the total possible points. The rating scale would be:

* Be sure the evaluation criteria and associated point values on the evaluation worksheet correspond with item 10 of the Participating Addendum Request

Rating Scale (30 POINT Maximum)

Point Value

Explanation

0-5
None. Not addressed or no applicability.
5-10
Poor. Minimal applicability.
11-15
Fair. Limited applicability
16-20
Good. Some applicability
21-25
Very Good. Substantial applicability
25-30
Excellent. Total applicability

ASSISTANCE

Contact the State Procurement Office at 701-328-2773 for assistance in developing evaluation criteria and evaluating proposals.

AWARD NOTICE

After selecting the most advantageous proposal, send out a notice of award to all vendors that responded to the Participating Addendum. Association and vendor must wait for seven (7) days before executing the Participating Addendum

State Contract 344 Grant Writer Services Pool Proposal Evaluation Worksheet

Association Name:

Evaluator Name:

Date:

Vendor:

Technical Evaluation Criteria

Maximum Possible Points
Score of Vendor Proposal
Comments on Vendor Proposal

1. Vendor Solution Consider:

What is the quality of the proposed solution?

How well does the proposed solution meet the requirements stated in the scope of work?

2. Qualifications and Availability of Vendor Staff Consider:

What is the availability of vendor staff?

What are the qualifications of the vendor staff based upon vendor staff resumes and reference checks?

Cost Evaluation Price of Lowest Cost Proposal Price of Proposal Being Rated X Points Assigned to Cost = Awarded Points

3. Cost

Total

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .