E.5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 58 KB Posted

Attached to
State Medicaid Program Integrity Audits Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
75FCMC24RJ002
Issued by
Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity for State Medicaid Program Integrity Audits (SMPIA). The purpose of the SMPIA contract is to assist the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) with reviewing state Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) program integrity oversight functions, including compliance with Medicaid PI regulations and beneficiary eligibility requirements.

The questionnaire requests information on an offeror's past performance in the areas of quality, cost control, schedule, and management. Respondents are asked to provide numerical ratings and detailed comments on the offeror's performance. The completed questionnaires will be used by CMS to evaluate the past performance of offerors for the SMPIA contract, which has the solicitation number RFP-75FCMC24RJ002. The questionnaire includes instructions for submitting the completed form via email to the CMS Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to State Medicaid Program Integrity Audits, newest first.
File Type Posted
75FCMC24RJ002_Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
E.1 - SMPIA Questions Submission - Response.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J.1 - SMPIA SOW.docx DOCX document
J.3 - Conflict of Interest Template.docx DOCX document
E.7 - Prime Proposal Checklist.docx DOCX document
E.3 - Scenario 2 - Review Guide Module.docx DOCX document
E.4 - Scenario 2 - Response Template.docx DOCX document
E.11 - CMS 508 PDF Checklist.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
E.6 - Responsibility Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
E.8 - Consent to Subcontract.docx DOCX document
75FCMC24RJ002.pdf PDF
E.12 - CMS 508 Webapps Checklist.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J.2 - CFM Report.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
E.15 - CMS 508 PowerPoint Checklist.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
E.9 - Business Proposal Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
E.13 - CMS 508 Word Checklist.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
E.14 - CMS 508 Excel Checklist.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
E.1 - SMPIA Questions Submission Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
E.10 - 508 Checklist Instructions.docx DOCX document
E.2 - Scenario 1 - Compliance Plan.docx DOCX document
Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP-75FCMC24RJ002

Exhibit E.5 Past Performance Questionnaire

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Sample Cover Letter

[COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Prime or subcontractor)]

Reference Name, Address and Contact information Date

SUBJECT: RFP- 75FCMC24RJ002 - State Medicaid Program Integrity Audits (SMPIA)

Dear _________________:

We are currently responding to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Request for Proposal number RFP- 75FCMC24RJ002 (as a subcontractor to______ (If applicable)). The purpose of this contract is to perform ____________________________________________ (to be filled in by Offeror).

There is an increased emphasis on past performance in the federal source selection process. The CMS is requesting that customers and clients of Offerors provide the information as described within the attached questionnaire and return it to them for evaluation. We have identified you as one of our references and respectfully request that you complete and sign the attached questionnaire and then return it to CMS.

Questionnaires are due to CMS no later than ____________ (to be filled in by Offeror); however, we would appreciate an earlier response if at all possible.

We sincerely appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely, Reference Name Title

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop B3-30-03 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850 Office of Acquisition and Grants Management

SUBJECT:Solicitation RFP-75FCMC24RJ002
State Medicaid Program Integrity Audits (SMPIA)
Past Performance Questionnaire

To Whom It May Concern:

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) very much appreciates your time and thoughtfulness in completing the attached questionnaire. The information obtained from this questionnaire will be utilized to evaluate the past performance of Offerors/Contractors who wish to be awarded a contract with CMS.

CMS may engage in exchanges with offerors regarding past performance information submitted to CMS in connection with the subject solicitation. If CMS engages in such exchanges, CMS may share information disclosed in this survey with the Offeror to whom it pertains, as permitted or required by the FAR. Otherwise, CMS will only share information from this survey outside the agency pursuant to a protective order or as otherwise required by law

The questionnaire is arranged by quality of service/performance, cost control, timeliness and management. Each area consists of one or more basic questions relating to these aspects of performance with regard to the Offeror/Contractor with which you worked. Please complete the questionnaire as indicated on the form.

Finally, please sign your name and identify your position during your association with the referenced Offeror/Contractor. Once completed, please submit the questionnaire to:

Email PDF:Contract Specialist: Kyle.Patton@cms.hhs.gov
Contracting Officer: Jennifer.Kuhn@cms.hhs.gov

Thank you for taking the time to complete the questionnaire.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Kuhn
Contracting Officer

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CMS Solicitation No. RFP-75FCMC24RJ002

(Company Being Evaluated) (Offeror)

Offeror/Contractor:___________________________
Address:___________________________
___________________________

Title/ Name of Contract (being Evaluated):__________________________________________________

Brief Description of Work: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Contract Type:________________________________________________________________________ Total Contract Value:___________________________________________________________________ Performance Period:____________________________________________________________________

Please complete the following questionnaire about the Offeror/Contractor and indicate your responses in the blocks or columns, as appropriate. Numerical ratings are as indicated in the Rating Scale below. Other Ratings are as indicated in each block.

Rating Scale:

N/A
Not Applicable: Question does not apply to the contract discussed in this report
0
Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
1
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
2
Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
3
Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government/Business Entity’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
4
Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Business Entity’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

We request that you justify each of your ratings with a comment. Please be as specific in your comment as possible, especially in situations that warrant very high or very low ratings. Use extra pages as necessary or expand the form electronically as needed.

Q1. Quality: Did the Offeror demonstrate the execution of quality efforts resulted in effective performance outcomes for work activities?

Comments:
Rating:

Q2. Cost Control: Did the Offeror demonstrate the ability to ensure costs were within budget?

Comments:
Rating:

Q3. Schedule: Did the Offeror demonstrate the ability to consistently meet project milestones and deliverables on time?

Comments:
Rating:

Q4. Management: Did the Offeror demonstrate a past track record of notifying its contractors/customers of problems, remaining flexible and reliable, and being responsive to contract requirements and recommending solutions? How well did the Offeror match the qualifications of the key position, as described in the contract, with the person that filled the key position? Did the Offeror support key personnel so they were able to work effectively?

Comments:
Rating:

Agency/Company COMPLETING Questionnaire

Agency/Company Name: ___________________________

Address: ___________________________

Signature of Individual Completing the Questionnaire: ____________________________________ Date

Name: ___________________________ Telephone No.: ________________________

Title:___________________________Email Address:________________________
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104Page | 2

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .