E.5 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 58 KB Posted
- Attached to
- State Medicaid Program Integrity Audits Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 75FCMC24RJ002
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity for State Medicaid Program Integrity Audits (SMPIA). The purpose of the SMPIA contract is to assist the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) with reviewing state Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) program integrity oversight functions, including compliance with Medicaid PI regulations and beneficiary eligibility requirements.
The questionnaire requests information on an offeror's past performance in the areas of quality, cost control, schedule, and management. Respondents are asked to provide numerical ratings and detailed comments on the offeror's performance. The completed questionnaires will be used by CMS to evaluate the past performance of offerors for the SMPIA contract, which has the solicitation number RFP-75FCMC24RJ002. The questionnaire includes instructions for submitting the completed form via email to the CMS Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP-75FCMC24RJ002
Exhibit E.5 Past Performance Questionnaire
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Sample Cover Letter
[COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Prime or subcontractor)]
Reference Name, Address and Contact information Date
SUBJECT: RFP- 75FCMC24RJ002 - State Medicaid Program Integrity Audits (SMPIA)
Dear _________________:
We are currently responding to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Request for Proposal number RFP- 75FCMC24RJ002 (as a subcontractor to______ (If applicable)). The purpose of this contract is to perform ____________________________________________ (to be filled in by Offeror).
There is an increased emphasis on past performance in the federal source selection process. The CMS is requesting that customers and clients of Offerors provide the information as described within the attached questionnaire and return it to them for evaluation. We have identified you as one of our references and respectfully request that you complete and sign the attached questionnaire and then return it to CMS.
Questionnaires are due to CMS no later than ____________ (to be filled in by Offeror); however, we would appreciate an earlier response if at all possible.
We sincerely appreciate your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely, Reference Name Title
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop B3-30-03 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850 Office of Acquisition and Grants Management
| SUBJECT: | Solicitation RFP-75FCMC24RJ002 | |
| State Medicaid Program Integrity Audits (SMPIA) | ||
| Past Performance Questionnaire |
To Whom It May Concern:
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) very much appreciates your time and thoughtfulness in completing the attached questionnaire. The information obtained from this questionnaire will be utilized to evaluate the past performance of Offerors/Contractors who wish to be awarded a contract with CMS.
CMS may engage in exchanges with offerors regarding past performance information submitted to CMS in connection with the subject solicitation. If CMS engages in such exchanges, CMS may share information disclosed in this survey with the Offeror to whom it pertains, as permitted or required by the FAR. Otherwise, CMS will only share information from this survey outside the agency pursuant to a protective order or as otherwise required by law
The questionnaire is arranged by quality of service/performance, cost control, timeliness and management. Each area consists of one or more basic questions relating to these aspects of performance with regard to the Offeror/Contractor with which you worked. Please complete the questionnaire as indicated on the form.
Finally, please sign your name and identify your position during your association with the referenced Offeror/Contractor. Once completed, please submit the questionnaire to:
| Email PDF: | Contract Specialist: Kyle.Patton@cms.hhs.gov | |
| Contracting Officer: Jennifer.Kuhn@cms.hhs.gov |
Thank you for taking the time to complete the questionnaire.
Sincerely,
| Jennifer Kuhn |
| Contracting Officer |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CMS Solicitation No. RFP-75FCMC24RJ002
(Company Being Evaluated) (Offeror)
| Offeror/Contractor: | ___________________________ | |
| Address: | ___________________________ | |
| ___________________________ |
Title/ Name of Contract (being Evaluated):__________________________________________________
Brief Description of Work: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract Type:________________________________________________________________________ Total Contract Value:___________________________________________________________________ Performance Period:____________________________________________________________________
Please complete the following questionnaire about the Offeror/Contractor and indicate your responses in the blocks or columns, as appropriate. Numerical ratings are as indicated in the Rating Scale below. Other Ratings are as indicated in each block.
Rating Scale:
| N/A |
| Not Applicable: Question does not apply to the contract discussed in this report |
| 0 |
| Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| 1 |
| Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| 2 |
| Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| 3 |
| Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government/Business Entity’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| 4 |
| Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Business Entity’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
We request that you justify each of your ratings with a comment. Please be as specific in your comment as possible, especially in situations that warrant very high or very low ratings. Use extra pages as necessary or expand the form electronically as needed.
Q1. Quality: Did the Offeror demonstrate the execution of quality efforts resulted in effective performance outcomes for work activities?
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
Q2. Cost Control: Did the Offeror demonstrate the ability to ensure costs were within budget?
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
Q3. Schedule: Did the Offeror demonstrate the ability to consistently meet project milestones and deliverables on time?
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
Q4. Management: Did the Offeror demonstrate a past track record of notifying its contractors/customers of problems, remaining flexible and reliable, and being responsive to contract requirements and recommending solutions? How well did the Offeror match the qualifications of the key position, as described in the contract, with the person that filled the key position? Did the Offeror support key personnel so they were able to work effectively?
| Comments: |
| Rating: |
Agency/Company COMPLETING Questionnaire
Agency/Company Name: ___________________________
Address: ___________________________
Signature of Individual Completing the Questionnaire: ____________________________________ Date
Name: ___________________________ Telephone No.: ________________________
| Title: | ___________________________ | Email Address: | ________________________ | |
| Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 | Page | 2 |
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .