Attachment_J.1_and_J.2.docx

DOCX document 30 KB Posted

Attached to
FHA TOTAL Scorecard Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
DU206SF-17-R-0004
Issued by
Department of Housing and Urban Development Fort Worth Regional Office

About this file

Past Performance chart and Past Performance Survey

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to FHA TOTAL Scorecard, newest first.
File Type Posted
DU206SF-17-R-0004__-_RFP_-_May_11-17.pdf PDF
Atch_J.4_-__DU206SF-17-R-0004_Price_Volume_Labor_Hours_and_Rates.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_J.3_-__DU206SF-17-R-0004_Labor_Mix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 2SCORCECARD SERVICES
POLICY DEVELIPMENT AND RESEARCHDU206SF-17-R-0004

Attachment 1

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (relevant services performed in the 3 years prior to submission of proposal)

PRIME CONTRACTOR OR PARTNER/SUBCONTRACTOR NAME_____________________________

CLIENT NAME *
POINT OF CONTACT NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE
TYPE OF SERVICES PROVIDED
CONTRACT NUMBER AND VALUE OF CONTRACT
DATE SERVICES PROVIDED
PRINCIPAL PARTNERS/KEY PERSONNEL

PPIRS

On File

HUD Office of Public and Indian Housing
John Doe, PIH Office of Technical Assistance, 1234 7th St, Washington, DC 78945 202-555-1234
Technical Assistance to public housing agencies
C-DEN-12345 $1,000,000
1/07 - 1/09
John Smith, Project Manager; Jane Doe, TA Specialist; John Smith Jr, Accounting Specialist

* If performance was as a subcontractor, this will be the name of the prime contractor.

ATTACHMENT 1SCORCECARD SERVICES
POLICY DEVELIPMENT AND RESEARCHDU206SF-17-R-0004

Attachment 2 - Past Performance Survey

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY

PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):

CONTRACTOR NAME:
Click here to enter text.
CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER:
Click here to enter text.
PROJECT TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS
Click here to enter text.

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Reference):

NAME:
Click here to enter text.
TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
AGENCY or CUSTOMER:
Click here to enter text.
PHONE:
Click here to enter text.
E-MAIL
Click here to enter text.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is procuring the services described in the box below. You have been selected by the contractor identified above to provide past performance information to HUD to be used in evaluating the offeror’s proposal for this acquisition. Thank you for your input.

CO to summarize the services acquired here.

The purpose of this task order is to obtain contractor services to provide for another round of performance evaluations, updates, and re-estimation of the confidential scorecard algorithms using FHA data and performance experience from loans insured from 1997 through current day with associated credit histories procured through other contracts that culminates in a final report reassessing scorecard performance in the context of alternative formulations with respect to scorecard prediction of loans likely to default and claim from borrower credit issues as well as fair lending impacts at alternative cutpoints.

For each of the Five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

2. SCHEDULE

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

3. COST CONTROL

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

Click here to enter text.

4. BUSINESS RELATIONS

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .