DTRT5717R20017,_000002.pdf

(x)

DTRT5717R20017

x x

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

V221

Cambridge MA 02142-1001 55 Broadway, V221 Off-Site Eng & R&D Contracts Branch USDOT/Volpe Center

V221

Cambridge MA 02142-1001 55 Broadway V221 Off-Site Eng & R&D Contracts Branch USDOT/Volpe Center

10/30/2017000002

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

09/28/2017

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

See continuation sheet for details.

RECOVERY: NON-RECOVERY

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

Michael Griffin

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

Solicitation No. DTRT5717R20017 Amendment No. 000002

The purpose of this amendment is to do the following:

1. The pre-proposal slides and attendance list are included at the end of this amendment.

2. As a result of this amendment paragraph L.3.B “Volume II – Technical Proposal” changes:

From:

Volume II – Technical Proposal

This volume shall be submitted in the following five clearly labeled sections.

Section 1 – Technical Understanding Section 2 – Management Approach Section 3 – Staffing Section 5 – Past Performance

To:

Volume II – Technical Proposal

This volume shall be submitted in the following three clearly labeled sections.

Section 1 – Technical Understanding Section 2 – Management Approach/Staffing Section 3 – Past Performance

3. As a result of this amendment paragraph L.3.C PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS changes:

L.3.C PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

From:

Proposals are due no later than 2 PM on Friday, October 27, 2017. Proposals shall be delivered to the following address

United States Department of Transportation OST-R/Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Attn: Michael P Griffin, V-221 55 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142-1001

Note: Only hard copies (along with a virus-free CD – electronic version of the Cost/Business Proposal) of proposals will be accepted. When proposals are hand-carried or sent by courier service, the Offeror assumes full responsibility for ensuring that the offer is received at the address designated above on or before the specified due date and time for submission of proposals. All proposals must be closed and sealed for mailing, and complete proposal identification information must be identified on the sealed envelope/package. Please note that there are no provisions for acceptance of late offers sent by overnight courier service (except U.S. Postal Service Express Mail), regardless of the date of mailing.

Each volume of the proposal shall be contained in a separate binder of minimum size to adequately contain the material. A binder cover sheet shall be affixed to the outer cover of each volume, clearly identifying each volume by volume number, copy number, the solicitation number, date of submission, and the Offeror's name. Tab indexing shall be used to identify all sections within a particular proposal volume. There shall be no writing on the tab index pages other than writing required to identify the particular section.

Prices and dollar values shall be stated only in the Cost and Business Proposal (Volume I) and shall be omitted from the Technical Proposal (Volume II).

To:

Proposals are due no later than 4:30 PM EST on Tuesday, November 14, 2017. Proposals shall be emailed to the following address

Michael.griffin@dot.gov

Note: Only electronic proposals will be accepted. The Offeror assumes full responsibility for ensuring that the offer is received at the address designated above on or before the specified due date and time for submission of proposals.

Each volume of the proposal shall be contained in a separate file, and clearly labeled

Prices and dollar values shall be stated only in the Cost and Business Proposal (Volume I) and shall be omitted from the Technical Proposal (Volume II).

4. As a result of this amendment paragraph L.3.D COPIES changes:

From:

L.3.D COPIES

Offerors must submit one (1) Original and two (2) copies each of the Cost and Business Proposal (Volume I) and one (1) Original and six (6) copies each of the Technical Proposal (Staffing and Past Performance) (Volume II). The Cost and Business Proposal and Technical Proposal must also be submitted on a CD in a virus-free format compatible with Microsoft Office. Offerors should ensure that their subcontractors also submit the required number of copies.

To:

L.3.D COPIES

Offerors must submit one Cost and Business Proposal (Volume I) and one (1) Technical Proposal (Staffing and Past Performance) (Volume II) via email to michael.griffin@dot.gov. All files must be less than 10MB per email. Offerors shall confirm that the Government has received their proposal with a separate email to the contracting officer (Michael Griffin). The Cost and Business Proposal and Technical Proposal must be submitted virus-free and compatible with Microsoft Office and Adobe Acrobat.

5. As a result of this amendment paragraph K.4 FAR 52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS

AND CERTIFICATIONS (APR 2016) (a)(1)(2)

From:

K.4 FAR 52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (APR 2016)

(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 541611.

(2) The small business size standard is $15.0 million.

To:

K.4 FAR 52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (APR 2016)

(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 562910.

(2) The small business size standard is 750 employees.

Pre‐Proposal Conference Environmental Remediation and Decommissioning

Services (ERDS) Solicitation DTRT5717R20017

The National Transportation Systems Center

Advancing transportation innovation for the public good

U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Research and Technology

John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center

October 17, 2017

Today’s Agenda

Introduction

Ground Rules and Logistics

Volpe Center Overview

ERDS Overview & Procurement Objectives

RFP Highlights

Technical Proposal

Cost/Business Proposal

Proposal Submission Reminders

Ground Rules and Logistics

Any statements, remarks or explanations made during this pre‐proposal conference shall not qualify the terms of the RFP, unless an amendment is issued.

A copy of today’s presentation and list of attendees will be provided as an amendment to the solicitation.

No questions will be entertained during this webinar.

Ground Rules and Logistics – cont’d

Any questions, clarification requests, or other inquires pertaining to the solicitation must be submitted, via e‐mail, no later than 4:30 p.m. ET on Wednesday, November 1, 2017

Written questions received after November 1, 2017 will be answered by amendment only if determined by the CO to be in the best interest of the Government.

An amendment will be issued answering written questions received by the CO

Today’s Presenters

Michael Griffin, Office of Acquisitions, Contracting Officer, V‐221

Joseph Sposato, Environmental Science and Engineering Division, V‐326

Volpe Center Overview

Background Volpe established in 1970

Part of U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of Research and Technology

Named after former DOT Secretary and MA Governor John A. Volpe

Volpe supports DOT goals Safety

State of good repair

Economic competitiveness

Livable communities

Environmental sustainability

About Volpe

Operations Offices

Volpe Center organization

Technical Centers

Safety Management and Human Factors Jeff Bryan

Policy, Planning, and Environment Gregg Fleming

Air Traffic Systems and Operations Greg Joyner

Infrastructure Systems and Technology

Luisa Paiewonsky

Chief Financial Officer William Henrikson

Chief Counsel Monica Conyngham

EEO Officer Karen Kowalewski

Acting Director Anne Aylward

Human Resources

Michael Osakowicz

Acquisitions Mary Doherty

Information Technology

Eric Frykenberg

Facilities Management David Duncan

Communication and Knowledge Management

Cassandra Allwell

Comm & Knowledge Management Ellen Bell

Strategic Management Rachel Winkeller

Deputy Director for Research and Technology

Stephen Popkin

Deputy Director for Operations Susan Connors

Organizational Culture and Work Life Helen Blackman

Multimodal Programs and Partnerships Mike Dinning

Research Infrastructure and Operations

Bob Dorer

Technical organizations

Safety Management and Human

Factors

Policy, Planning, and Environment

Safety Information

Systems

Safety Measurement and Analysis

Aviation Safety

Management Systems

Surface Transportation

Human Factors

Aviation Human Factors

Economic Analysis

Transportation Planning

Organizational Performance

Environmental Measurement and Modeling

Environmental Science and Engineering

Energy Analysis

CAFE

Program

Office

Infrastructure Systems and

Technology

Air Traffic Systems and Operations

Aviation Systems

Engineering

Situational Awareness and

Logistics

Systems Safety and

Engineering

Structures and Dynamics

Advanced Vehicle

Technology

Infrastructure Engineering and Deployment

Technology Innovation and Policy

Air Navigation and

Surveillance

Air Wakes and

Weather

Air Traffic Management

Systems

Aviation Facilities and Business Services

NextGen Program

Office

Safety Information

Systems

Safety Measurement and Analysis

Aviation Safety

Management Systems

Surface Transportation

Human Factors

Aviation Human Factors

Economic Analysis

Policy, Planning, and Environmental Focus

Our Work Has

• Assessed the costs and benefits of national fuel economy standards

• Supported transit and multi‐use trail systems accessing national parks and public lands

• Created national transportation workforce development strategies and programs

• Developed policies and supported rulemaking that drive reductions in transportation energy use and greenhouse gas emissions

• Modeled and helped mitigate environmental impacts of infrastructure investments

Our Center for Policy, Planning, and Environment provides a full range of planning, evaluation, compliance, and implementation assistance to transportation decision makers at the local, regional, state, and federal levels.

We equip transportation decision makers with the information and tools necessary to plan, develop, manage, operate, and finance the nation’s transportation system and build the capacity of the organizations that support that system.

We analyze, synthesize, and communicate data to support environmentally sustainable, economically efficient, and socially just transportation decisions.

Environmental Remediation & Decommissioning Services

(ERDS)

ERDS - Procurement Objective

The objective for this total Small Business Set‐Aside (SBSA) acquisition is to obtain the services of a diverse pool of resources, industries, and disciplines needed to provide Environmental Remediation and Decommissioning Services (ERDS) in support of the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center).

The work will require multiple contractors to respond to numerous and often simultaneous requests for the Volpe Center’s ERDS support from sponsors within and outside of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT).

ERDS – Background – History

In February 2010, in support of the FAA’s ECU and FD Programs through a Full and Open competition, the Volpe Center awarded four Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)‐type contracts.

Although encompassing similar work, the subject ERDS contract has a different scope and is not considered a follow‐on to the prior contract.

The prior contract supported remediation efforts such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in Libby, MT, and other projects mostly in support of the FAA.

ERDS – Acquisition Strategy (cont’d)

SBSA – Multiple Award ID/IQ Anticipated Award Date 3/13/2018

First Task Order(s) awarded after Master Contract awards.

Cost‐Plus‐Fixed‐Fee(CPFF) and Firm‐Fixed Price (FFP) Task Orders

ERDS - Procurement Overview

Funded by Intra‐Agency Agreements

Federal Acquisition Certification‐certified personnel will ensure appropriate management controls and perform contracting functions under the contracts and all task orders

ERDS SOW – Task Areas

The ERDS Contractor will support the following task areas:

1. Environmental Remediation Services

2. Decommissioning Services

ERDS SOW – Task Area 1 – Environmental Remediation Services

Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Functions

Containment, Removal, Treatment (on site, off site, in‐situ), Sampling and Analysis, Monitoring and Control, Transportation, and Disposal

Decontamination of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear material

Bioremediation

Thermal destruction

In‐situ chemical oxidation

Permeable reactive barriers

Water treatment

Air injection

Free‐product recovery

Groundwater extraction and dewatering

Underground storage tank removal, closure and replacement

Septic system and leach field closure

Landfill development, operation and closure

Slurry walls/subsurface barriers

Drum bulking

Excavation

Dredging

Soil/sludge stabilization and solidification

Soil vapor extraction

Air stripping

Soil washing

Asbestos and lead‐based paint abatement

Treatment and disposal of heavy metals, PCBs, commercial chemical products, equipment fluids, containerized gas, universal waste, exempt quantities of radioactive materials, non‐regulated electronic equipment, investigation‐derived wastes and decontamination‐derived wastes

Field Activities

Drilling for soil sampling, well installation, or instrumentation installations

Vadose zone fluid/air flow measurement

Aquifer testing

Sampling and analysis of soil, sediment, ground water, surface water, biota, hard surface, tank/drum contents, air and soil vapor

Surface and borehole geophysics

Excavation of test pits/trenches

Sampling and testing of geotechnical materials

Site restoration activities

ERDS SOW – Task Area 2 –

Project planning

Cost estimating

Engineering evaluations

Permitting

Replacement infrastructure siting

Utility disconnect or relocation

Modification or relocation of facilities/infrastructure

Demolition or deconstruction of facilities, buildings, ships and other infrastructure

Disposal

Site restoration and closure

ERDS SOW – Task Area 2 –

Field Activities

Site preparation

Mobilization

Demolition, deconstruction, modification or relocation

Construction

Site restoration activities

Demobilization

ERDS SOW – Other Tasks Surveys and Mapping

Topographic, orthomosaic, hydrographic surveys

Boundary surveys and property searches

Monitoring/baseline and utility location

GIS

Plans and Reports Design Drawings

Hazardous Material Survey and Report

Risk Management Plan

Quality Control Assurance Plan

Project Management Plan

Site Health and Safety Plan

Field Sampling Plan

Progress and Closeout Reports

RFP – Section L

L.4.A – Award Without Discussions

RFP Questions – NLT 4:30PM EST on November 1, 2017 (e‐ mail only)

Proposal Validity – Minimum of 180 Calendar Days

RFP – Section L – cont’d

L.5.II – Proposal Organization Volume I – Cost/Business Proposal (three labeled sections) o Three (3) copies of Cost/Business (original and two copies) and one (1) copy on virus‐free CD (including subcontractors) o CD Must include the completed cost proposal schedules in Microsoft Excel 2010. Excel file must include shall be used to verify calculations (no encrypted or protected cells) o Narrative (such as other business proposal documents) must be provided in Microsoft Word 2010 or compatible format.

o NOTE CDs MUST CLEARY BE LABELED WITH COMPANY NAME, IDENTIFICATION

AS AN OFFEROR OR SUBCONTRATCOR, AND RFP NUMBER.

Volume II – Technical Proposal Cost/Business Proposal (three labeled sections) o Six (6) copies of Technical Proposal (original and five copies) and one (1) copy on virus‐free CD o The Technical Proposal CD must be in Adobe Acrobat or compatible format.

RFP – Section L –Technical Proposal

Written Technical Proposal Submission (No Oral Presentations)

Consisting of Three (3) Sections Technical Understanding – contains two (2) subfactors

Management Approach / Staffing – contains four(4) subfactors

Past Performance – contains two (2) subfactors

Unless otherwise noted, subfactors are rated equally

L.5.V – Proposal Format

NO COST INFORMATION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

ERDS – Section L – Cost/Business Proposal Follow the guidance as provided in Section L.4

Identification of uncompensated overtime (FAR Provision 52.237‐10)

Include information required under FAR Provision 52.222‐46 (Evaluation of Compensation of Professional Employees)

Proposals must contain sufficient information for the Government to complete its evaluation (completely filled out Cost Proposal Schedules )

Supporting documentation must be clear, complete, and convincing

Proposals need to be stand‐alone proposals and not reference previously submitted proposals or other provided documentation

Proposal cont’d Prime Offerors must complete all Cost Proposal Schedules

Cost Type Subcontractors must Complete Schedules 1 through 5, Schedule 8, and other items as identified on the Attachment J.7 Checklist NOTE: Cost type subcontractors must provide evidence that their accounting system has been approved by a Federal Government Audit Agency or describe how their accounting system could be reviewed and approved.

Cost Type Subcontractors – when completing Schedules 2 and 3, enter $0 for subcontracts and $0 or RFP‐stipulated. Those are reserved for the prime offeror.

Note that the second‐tier subcontracting is only permissible unless the Offeror can provide a strong technical rationale for inclusion of a second‐tier subcontract and demonstrate what steps have been taken to prevent layering of costs and profit.

Cost Type Subcontractors shall also enter 20% of their direct labor to Schedule 2 and the remaining 80% to Schedule 3.

Time and Material (T&M) Subcontractors

Consent for T&M type subcontractors will be based on cost build up or commerciality of billing rates (fully loaded).

If consent is based on commerciality, the offeror must provide information and statistical information demonstrating the use of billing rates in substantial quantities to the on‐Government public

Burden of proof rests with the offeror and subcontractor

If based on commerciality, Include a signed statement that the offered rate is “most favored customer rate”.

Schedule 1

ESTIMATED COST: Enter Estimated Cost (from the totals in Schedule 2 & 3) o Note to include the RFP stipulated ODCs shown on Schedules 2 and 3 o Offeror estimated ODC may be proposed provided that a detailed breakdown is provided. The Master Contract will include a list of offeror proposed ODCs

Fixed Fee: Enter fee from the totals in Schedule 2

Profit: Enter the profit from Schedule 3

The evaluated value will be based on the Total provided in this Schedule

Schedule 2

Complete the elements of cost for each cost element.

Totals Cost and Fee will be used for Schedule 1

Direct Labor comes from the CPFF labor calculations of Schedule 5 (20% of Direct Labor Costs)

Fixed fee comes the calculations provided in Schedule 4

Schedule 3 Complete the elements of cost for each cost element

Total Cost and Profit will be used for Schedule 1

Direct Labor comes from the Schedule 5 (80% of Direct Labor Costs)

Profit comes the calculations provided in Schedule 4

Schedule 4

Prime Offerors shall complete the schedule for the purpose of indicating the maximum factors for fixed fee and profit

The total fixed fee and profit percentages shall be entered in Clause H.9 of the contract

Note that the Government reserves the right to negotiate lower percentages (if the Government decides to negotiate instead of awarding without discussions).

The Government shall analyze proposed fixed fee and profit based on DOT Weighted Guidelines. NOTE: A proposal that proposes fixed fee in excess of statutory limitations shall be eliminated from consideration.

Schedule 5 Prime Offeror Labor is entered on this schedule o Prime labor hours (excluding subcontractor assigned LOE) is provided in Section A of this schedule o 20% of the annual direct labor total costs is entered in Schedule 2 (by contract year) o 80% of the annual direct labor total costs is entered in Schedule 3 (by contract year)

Schedule 6

Complete the Labor Cost Realism Schedule by providing the Labor Category for the Resumed Person, the Resumed Person’s Name, their Company Affiliation, their current unburdened labor rate and the Contract Year 1 unburdened labor rate for that labor category (from Schedule 5).

If the resume person rate is greater or lower than 5% of the Schedule 5 rate, the offeror must provide an explanation on why the rate is higher or lower.

Schedule 7 Offerors shall provide the allocation of direct labor hours for the prime and each proposed subcontractor stated LOE

Schedule 8

Prime Offerors shall indicate their indirect rates by their Fiscal Year

Schedule 9 Complete the amount proposed for each subcontract. In addition to the amount indicate the type of subcontract and the total number of technical hours proposed.

20% of the total for subcontractors is entered in Schedule 2 while the remaining 80% is entered in Schedule 3

ERDS – Section L – Business Proposal

Cost Control Plan

Subcontract Consent Offeror compliance with FAR Part 44

Limitations on Subcontracting Compliance with FAR 52.215‐14

Cost and Business Proposal, that at least 50 percent of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for employees of the concern

ERDS – Section M – Evaluation Factors for Award Basis for Award

Award to be made to the responsive and responsible offeror whose proposal provides the best value to the Government

Award may be made based on initial offers

However, the Government may determine during proposal evaluation that discussions may be necessary

Award – cont’d Order of Importance

Technical Proposal significantly more important than the Cost Business Proposal

Offerors are cautioned not to minimize the importance of the Cost Business proposal.

Technical Proposal Factors for Evaluation Technical Understanding

Management Approach / Staffing

Past Performance

Award – cont’d Cost Proposal Evaluation Criteria

Cost Proposal for Master Contract to be evaluated for Realism, Reasonableness and Completeness

Analysis will include a probable cost determination

Best Value Determination will be based on Cost Realism

Cost/Business Proposal Evaluation by the Government will also include:

Evaluation for Consistency

Evaluation of Proposed Fee

Assignment of Risk

Evaluation of Uncompensated Overtime, Compensation for Professional Employees.

Evaluate the Acceptability of the Cost Control Plan

Amendment 00002

To Be Issued NLT October 24, 2017 Provide Webinar PowerPoint Slides

Correct L.3.B Volume II should state 3 sections not 5

Correct L.3.C to 4:30 PM on November 14, 2017

Important Dates and Reminders

Offerors are encouraged to ask questions.

RFP Questions due NLT 4:30 PM, November 1, 2017 via e‐mail to michael.griffin@dot.gov

Terms and Conditions of the Solicitation remain unchanged unless the CO issues an Amendment

Proposals must remain valid for a minimum of 180 calendar days effective from the proposal due date (November 14, 2017)

Proposals Due at 4:30 PM ET, on November 14, 2017.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE

LastName FirstName Email Title Company City State/Province Akuthota Nithin nakuthota@lata.com Vice President BD LATA Westerville OH

Besswanger Natalia nbesswanger@gesonline.com GES, Inc

Billo DAvid dbillo@sovcon.com LSP / Office Manager Sovereign Consulting Foxborough MA

Bourdeau Sandra sandra.bourdeau@watermarkenv.com Director of Business Development Watermark Lowell MA

Brandon Lisa brandonlo@cdmsmith.com Vice President CDM Smith Boston Massachusetts

Burke Ann aburke@cabreraservices.com Director Cabrera Services Buffalo NY

Butlien Larry lbutlien@trcsolutions.com TRC

Calarie Jeff jeffrey.calarie@aecom.com Sr. Proj. Mgr AECOM Pittsburgh PA

Carmichael Kellie kcarmichael@lata.com Environmental Scientist LATA Westerville OH

Conrad Christina cconrad@charter.us Charter C Charter Contracting Company

Cox Rick rcox@dandp.com BMT Designers and Planners Alexadnria VA

DiCesare Dave david.dicesare@watermarkenv.com Watermark

Doubleday Edward edoubleday@trcsolutions.com TRC

Eagleston Suzie eaglestons@cdmsmith.com Business Development Specialist CDM Smith Denver CO

Grumski Kenneth ken@securllc.com Sr VP SECUR LLC Sewickley PA

Hyland Shannon shyland@kemron.com KEMRON Environmental Services, Inc.

Karius Cynthia cynthia.karius@aecom.com Contracts Manager AECOM Aiken SC

Kershaw Michelle mkershaw@plexsci.com Plexus Scientific

Kindig David dkindig@dandp.com Environmental Engineer BMT Designers & Planners Alexandria VA

McGetrick Lee lee.mcgetrick@aecom.com Director of Business Development AECOM Oak Ridge TN

McNicholas Connor cmcnicholas@entact.com Business Development ‐ Account Manager Entact, LLC Westmont IL

Nicolson David davidn@nwe‐llc.com MANAGER NWE,LLC FAIRHOPE Alabama

Oliva Jean joliva@trcsolutions.com Principal Engineer TRC Environmental Corporation Windsor CT

Omalley Diane domalley@briceenvironmental.com DIRECTOR OF MKTG BRICE ENVIRONMENTAL ANCHORAGE ALASKA

Persall Vivian vivian.persall@aecom.com BUSINESS DIRECTOR AECOM AIKEN SC

Plourde Kim plourdek@wseinc.com Marketing Manager Weston & Sampson Peabody Massachusetts

Ricciardi Frank ricciardif@wseinc.com VP Weston & Sampson MA

Sadrieh Ali asadrieh@plexsci.com Plexus Scientific corporation Virginia

Schadler Mark mark.schadler@watermarkenv.com Watermark

Siddique Farooq fsiddique@fsengrs.com Principal FS Engineers, Inc. Acton MA

Siddoway Jade rsiddoway@northwindgrp.com Proposal Center Director North Wind Idaho Falls ID

Spawn Peter pspawn@trcsolutions.com Vice President TRC Companies Lowell A

Swantko Mark mswantko@northwindgrp.com Regional BD North Wind Group

Tomitsch Melanie tomitsch@msn.com FacetEight Co

Van Norman Holly hvannorman@geosyntec.com Geosyntec Consultants Raleigh North Carolina

Walling Mac mac.walling@aecom.com FAA Program Manager AECOM Atlantic City NJ

Willis Les lwillis@tikigaq.com Proposal Coordinator AGVIQ LLC Virginia Beach VA