Report_2_Bridge_Inspection_Report.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

STONE BRIDGE

FIRST MANASSAS TRAIL OVER BULL RUN

MANASSAS NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARK

LE

STRUCTURE NO. 3840-001S

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 7/23/14

Report prepared by: SD

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 3840-001S

STONE BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 7/23/14

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... MASONRY NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... ARCH - DECK NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 47.0 FT (14.3 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 22.8 FT (6.9 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 24.8 FT (7.6 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 20.8 FT (6.3 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... MASONRY YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. 1925 (EST.)

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... N/A / N/A SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 6 - RESTRICTED FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1862 - Bridge destroyed by bombing. 1920s-Modern spans built, original abuts & NW wingwall retained. 1960s & 1982-Bridge reconstructed. 1992-Repointing, new capstones.

LOCATION

MANASSAS NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 0.00 (KM PT 0.00)

STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: Approximately 1.5 miles east on U.S.

Route 29 from intersection with VA Route 234, then FACILITY CARRIED: ............ FIRST MANASSAS TRAIL

Approximately 50 yds. from stop 11 along U.S. Route

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. BULL RUN 29

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This historic masonry arch bridge is in fair structural condition, but exhibits some problems that require attention.

These include widespread deterioration of the mortar in the masonry joints, particularly at the north end of the pier and at the parapets; moderate efflorescence, severe cracking, and spalling of the cement parging on the underside of the arches; scour along the substructure units with minor undermining in some locations; several missing stones at the upstream end of the pier, resulting in sizeable voids at these locations; and vertical cracks in both faces of the pier at the upstream end, possibly due to settlement.

It should also be noted that additional stones from the upstream nose of the pier have washed out since the previous inspection, and that the cracked and bulged area along the east face of the pier appears to have worsened.

The deteriorated cement parging should be removed from the underside of the arches, the missing stones should be replaced, and the mortar joints throughout the structure should be cleaned and repointed as necessary. All areas of undermining should be repaired, and the substructure units and channel banks should be protected from further scour and erosion with engineered riprap.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems. Loads should be restricted to a maximum of 15 tons until repairs are completed (see page 5). It is also recommended that the structure be checked for damage following high water events.

INSPECTION TEAM: C. CASTRO, , R. SILVESTRY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

CARLOS CASTRO, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 571-434-1546

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 11/24/14

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3840-001S

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.3 CLEAN AND SEAL CRACKS IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT WITH FLEXIBLE SEALANT. 200 LF

222.5 REPAIR EROSION AT WEST APPROACH. 1 LS

58.7, 60.6 REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM WINGWALLS AND CURBLINES. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

58.6, 59.3, 60.6,13

REMOVE CEMENT PARGING ON UNDERSIDE OF ARCHES. CLEAN

AND REPOINT MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS THROUGHOUT

STRUCTURE. REPLACE MISSING STONES AS NECESSARY.

1 LS

60.9,17, 61.2, 223.4

REPAIR UNDERMINING AT PIER (SEE REMARKS BELOW). REPAIR

SCOUR AND EROSION THROUGHOUT STRUCTURE SITE WITH

ENGINEERED RIPRAP.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates are based on historical data, including costs for similar projects when available.

Undermining repair estimate assumes use of a cofferdam.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3840-001S

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N

N N F N N N N N G

N G

F F N F G N

N

N

N

N

58.3 MODERATE CRACKING AND DETERIORATION (LOOSE AGGREGATE)

THROUGHOUT ASPHALT PAVEMENT OVER STRUCTURE.

MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKS IN PAVEMENT NEAR WEST END

AND OVER PIER; MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH IN CRACKS.

58.6 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF MORTAR IN MASONRY JOINTS AT

PARAPETS.

MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING IN NORTH PARAPET, INSIDE FACE, AT

JUNCTION WITH BOTH EAST AND WEST WINGWALLS.

5/8" SAG IN NORTH PARAPET CAPSTONES OVER PIER (MEASURED

OVER LENGTH OF 5 CAPSTONES).

58.7 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG BASE OF PARAPETS,

HINDERS DRAINAGE SLIGHTLY.

59.3 SEVERE CRACKING AND SPALLING OF CEMENT PARGING

THROUGHOUT UNDERSIDE OF ARCHES; EFFLORESCENCE AND

STAINING ALSO PRESENT.

FULL-LENGTH LONGITUDINAL CRACKS ON UNDERSIDE OF BOTH

ARCHES; SOME CRACKS APPEAR TO CONTINUE IN VERTICAL WALL.

TWO BROKEN RING STONES IN EAST ARCH AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE

NEAR PIER. DETERIORATED RING STONES IN WEST ARCH AT

DOWNSTREAM SIDE.

60.1 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS IN

BOTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS ALONG WATERLINE.

MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF WEST

ABUTMENT.

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. F

PILE BENTS2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. N

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. N

FOUNDATIONS5. (CONCRETE FTG) G

WINGWALLS6. F

WEEP HOLES7. F

EXPANSION JOINTS8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. F

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION11. N

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. F

PILE BENTS14. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS15. N

FOUNDATIONS16. (CONCRETE FTG) F

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR17. F

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION18. G

OTHER 19. N

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 6

F F N F N

MED

SUFF

20 FT.

ROCK

222. APPROACHES 5

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. N

N G F F G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL 5

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL F

F N F G N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. N

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

60.6,7,9 MODERATE WASHOUT OF MORTAR JOINTS AT BASE OF

NORTHWEST WINGWALL WITH ONE STONE MISSING, CREATING A

18" DEEP VOID.

MODERATE MORTAR LOSS IN APPROXIMATELY 12" X 4' AREA AT

BASE OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL.

MODERATE DIAGONAL CRACKING IN NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST

WINGWALLS. MINOR CRACKING OF MORTAR JOINTS THROUGHOUT

WINGWALLS; SOME EFFLORESCENCE PRESENT. MODERATE

VEGETATION GROWTH ON NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST

WINGWALLS.

MINOR EROSION BY NORTHEAST WINGWALL.

CLOGGED WEEP HOLE AT NORTHEAST WINGWALL.

60.9 SCOUR ALONG BOTH ABUTMENTS; FOOTING AND APRON

EXPOSED AT EAST ABUTMENT. MINOR UNDERMINING OF APRON.

9" DEEP EROSION HOLE BEHIND EAST ABUTMENT WINGWALL,

DOWNSTREAM SIDE. UP TO 9" UNDERMINING IN ONE SMALL AREA

NEAR CENTER OF WEST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

60.13 MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF PIER MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS ALONG WATERLINE; SEVERAL MISSING STONES

AT UPSTREAM NOSE, ADDITIONAL STONES WASHED OUT SINCE

PREVIOUS INSPECTION. CRACKED AND BULGED AREA AT EAST

FACE OF PIER NEAR NORTH END APPEARS MORE PROMINENT

SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.

VERTICAL CRACKS ON BOTH SIDES OF PIER NEAR UPSTREAM END,

MAY INDICATE SETTLEMENT.

MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH IN MORTAR JOINTS AT UPSTREAM

END. MODERATE FLOOD DEBRIS AND TREE TRUNKS AT UPSTREAM

PIER NOSE.

60.16,17 SCOUR ALONG BOTH SIDES OF PIER WITH FOOTING AND APRON

EXPOSED; UP TO 5" UNDERMINING OF APRON NEAR DOWNSTREAM

END, UP TO 24" NEAR UPSTREAM END.

3'-10" DEEP SCOUR HOLE NEAR UPSTREAM NOSE OF PIER (WEST

SIDE), MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINTS

WITH SEVERAL MISSING STONES.

MODERATE TO SEVERE CRACKING AND SPALLING OF EXPOSED

CONCRETE APRON AROUND UPSTREAM PIER NOSE. CONCRETE

APRON APPEARS TO HAVE SETTLED AT THIS LOCATION.

61.1,4 HEAVILY VEGETATED SAND BAR DOWNSTREAM OF PIER; CHANNEL

FLOWS ON EITHER SIDE OF BAR. VA ROUTE 29 HIGHWAY BRIDGE

APPROXIMATELY 100' DOWNSTREAM FROM STRUCTURE. TREE

TRUNKS IN CHANNEL AT UPSTREAM NOSE OF PIER.

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61.2 MODERATE EROSION OF CHANNEL BANKS ADJACENT TO ABUTMENTS.

SEVERAL UNDERMINED TREES ALONG WEST BANK, UPSTREAM SIDE. EXPOSED ROOT SYSTEM OF LARGE TREE

AND SEVERAL SMALLER TREES JUST DOWNSTREAM OF EAST ABUTMENT.

222.3 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF MORTAR IN MASONRY JOINTS ALONG UPPER SECTION OF BOTH PARAPETS AT

EAST APPROACH.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACK IN OUTSIDE FACE OF PARAPET AT NORTH SIDE OF WEST APPROACH. SPLIT RAIL

FENCE AT EAST APPROACH.

222.5 MINOR EROSION AT EAST APPROACH, MODERATE AT WEST APPROACH DUE TO ROADWAY RUNOFF.

223.1 MINOR CRACKING OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS THROUGHOUT NORTHEAST RETAINING WALL;

EFFLORESCENCE FROM JOINTS AND MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ALSO PRESENT.

223.2,4 MODERATE EROSION BEHIND NORTHEAST RETAINING WALL AND ALONG BASE OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.

UP TO 9" UNDERMINING OF NORTHWEST RETAINING WALL.

12" DRAINAGE PIPE AND TWO WEEP HOLES IN NORTHEAST RETAINING WALL. WEEP HOLES CLOGGED.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 3840-001S

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 10 9 15 14

HS

TYPE 3

TYPE 3S2

TYPE 3-3

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)

CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: LOAD SHOULD BE RESTRICTED TO A MAXIMUM OF 15 TONS UNTIL STRUCTURE IS REHABILITATED.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3840-001S

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: MANASSAS NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... STONE BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 153 - PRINCE WILLIAM

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 3840-001S (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 2 - NATIONAL CAPITAL (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 0 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... BULL RUN

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 001S (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. FIRST MANASSAS TRAIL

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 6 - RESTRICTED (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 3840001S0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ Approximately 1.5 miles e

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ N/A (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 0.00 (KM PT 0.00)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... N/A (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 1 - ON NATIONAL REGISTER

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

8 - MASONRY

11 - ARCH - DECK

22.8 FT (6.9 M)

47.0 FT (14.3 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING:

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 7/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3840-001S

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 38°49'27.90" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 20.8 FT (6.3 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 77°30'13.70" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 24.8 FT (7.6 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 20.0 FT (6.1 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 01 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 3 - PEDESTRIAN-BICYCLE RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 0 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 0 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 20.0 FT (6.1 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 3 - PARAPET ONLY

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... 1 - NAV PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED MATERIAL: .............................. 9 - OTHER

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.30 FT (0.70 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... NNNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK: .............. 35 - GENERAL REHAB

(75B) WORK DONE BY: ............. 1 - CONTRACT

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: .. 47.0 FT (14.3 M)

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

4 - Stable; action required to pro

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

C - MODERATE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1862 - Bridge destroyed by bombing. 1920s-Modern spans built, original abuts & NW wingwall retained. 1960s & 1982-Bridge reconstructed.

1992-Repointing, new capstones.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:77�30'13.70 http:38�49'27.90

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 3840-001S

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 3840-001S

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF ASPHALT

PAVEMENT, CRACKS OVER PIER SHOWN; NOTE VEGETATION

GROWTH IN CRACK

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE FROM BRIDGE PARAPET

MORTAR JOINTS, SOUTH PARAPET SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION AND LOSS OF MORTAR JOINTS

IN PARAPETS, NORTH PARAPET NEAR EAST APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - MORTAR JOINT DETERIORATION ALONG UPPER SECTION

OF SOUTH PARAPET AT EAST APPROACH

PHOTO #8 - CRACKING OF NORTH PARAPET AT JUNCTION WITH

NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #9 - EROSION OF WEST APPROACH EMBANKMENT

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF WEST SPAN

PHOTO #11 - CLOSE UP OF UNDERSIDE OF

WEST ARCH LOOKING NORTH; NOTE TYPICAL

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE OF

CEMENT PARGING

PHOTO #12 - DETERIORATION OF CONCRETE

PARGING ALONG NORTH SIDE OF WEST

ARCH; NOTE ALSO LACK OF MORTAR JOINT

AROUND ARCH BRICKS

PHOTO #13 - UNDERSIDE OF CROWN, EAST ARCH LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #14 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF EAST SPAN

PHOTO #15 - CLOSE UP OF UNDERSIDE EAST

ARCH, NEAR PIER; NOTE CRACKING AND

SPALLING OF CEMENT PARGING; NOTE ALSO

VOIDS IN ARCH

PHOTO #16 - LONGITUDINAL AND

TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE AT SOUTHEAST END OF

EAST ARCH

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #18 - DETERIORATED MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS AT EAST ABUTMENT; ALSO

NOTE DIAGONAL CRACKING AT BASE OF

ARCH

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #20 - VOIDS IN WEST ABUTMENT ALONG WATER LINE

PHOTO #21 - WEST FACE OF PIER

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER, EAST FACE SHOWN

PHOTO #23 - DISLODGED STONES AND VOIDS IN EAST FACE OF PIER

NEAR UPSTREAM END; NOTE AREA OF BULGING APPEARS MORE

PROMINENT SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION

PHOTO #24 - SCOUR AT UPSTREAM NEAR NOSE OF PIER; NOTE ALSO

TREE TRUNK AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATED AT NOSE OF PIER

PHOTO #25 - FRACTURED FOOTING NEAR NORTH END OF PIER; ALSO

NOTE UNDERMINING AND DETERIORATION OF FOOTING SIDES, WEST

SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #26 - DIAGONAL CRACKING OF PIER NEAR SOUTH END, EAST

FACE SHOWN

PHOTO #27 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT

SOUTH END OF PIER

PHOTO #28 - UNDERMINING OF NORTHWEST

RETAINING WALL

PHOTO #29 - VOID ALONG BASE OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE

ALSO CLOGGED WEEP HOLE AT WINGWALL

PHOTO #30 - EROSION AT END OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #31 - UTILITY SIGN AT SOUTHEAST CORNER

PHOTO #32 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM BRIDGE

PHOTO #33 - LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM BRIDGE