Report__Bridge_Inspection_4780-003P.pdf
PDF 5 MB Posted
- Attached to
- New River Gorge National River Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-17-B-00010
About this file
Report_ Bridge Inspection_4780-003P
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results_of_Bid_Opening_Schedule_A&B_-_NP-NERI_BMS(1).pdf | ||
| Report_NEPA_CE.pdf | ||
| Report__Bridge_Inspection_4780-002P.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-NERI_BMS(1).pdf | ||
| Report__Bridge_Inspection_4780-001P.pdf | ||
| Report__Bridge_Inspection_4780-015P.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_NP_NERI_BMS_(1).pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| Synopsis_-_NP_NERI_BMS(1).doc | DOC document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
FAYETTE STATION BRIDGE
FAYETTE STATION BRIDGE OVER WOLF CREEK
NEW RIVER GORGE NATIONAL RIVER
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 11/19/15
Report prepared by: WU
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P
FAYETTE STATION BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 11/19/15
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 4 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..
DECK TYPE: ......................... WOOD OR TIMBER MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
WEARING SURFACE: .......... WOOD OR TIMBER DECK WIDTH:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 0000000000 / NONE SKEW ANGLE:
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 3 - SPECIAL PURPOSE FRACTURE CRITICAL:
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2001-ABUTMENT UNDERMINING REPAIRED WITH CONCRETE.
LOCATION
53.0 FT (16.2 M)
51.1 FT (15.6 M)
14.3 FT (4.4 M)
9.9 FT (3.0 M)
0 °
NO
NEW RIVER GORGE NATIONAL RIVER MILE POINT: ..................... 0.00 (KM PT 0.00)
STATE: ................................. WEST VIRGINIA LOCATION: 0.01 MILES FROM WV ROUTE 82.
(ACCESS 82-ONE WAY- AFTER MAKING A RIGHT FACILITY CARRIED: ............ FAYETTE STATION BRIDGE
TURN AT NORTH OF NEW RIVER BRIDGE)
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WOLF CREEK
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This steel beam bridge is currently in poor condition due to decay and deterioration of the transverse timber deck planks, longitudinal runners, and railings. Additional problems include soil and debris accumulation on the deck surface and bearing seats; ponding of water at the approaches; and paint deterioration and rusting of the steel beams and diaphragms, with minor section loss evident in some locations.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. It should be noted that this bridge is scheduled for rehabilitation in the near future under Project NP NERI BMS(1). The scope of work includes cleaning and painting of the structural steel, and replacement of the timber deck and railings. The new deck will be a nail-laminated type, and the new railing will meet current safety standards. In addition, a pedestrian railing will also be installed to further improve visitor safety.
INSPECTION TEAM: C. CASTRO, R. SILVESTRY
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
CARLOS CASTRO, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 571-434-1546
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/14/16
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
B226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
61.3 REMOVE STUMP FROM UPROOTED TREE AT NORTHEAST EMBANKMENT AND
PLACE / REPAIR RIPRAP.
1 LS
58.1, 60.3 REMOVE SOIL AND DEBRIS FROM DECK SURFACE, AND BEARING SEATS. 1 LS
58.6 REPLACE MISSING SHIMS AT BLOCKING SUPPORT FOR FLOOR BEAM AT SOUTH
END.
1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
59.2,6,7 CLEAN AND PAINT ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL. 1 LS $0
58 REPLACE TIMBER DECK AND RUNNER BOARDS. REPLACE TIMBER
BRIDGE RAILING. INSTALL PEDESTRIAN RAILING.
1 LS $0
59 CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (APPROXIMATELY70%
TOTAL REHAB COST), PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.
1 LS $0
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : $0
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
$0
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
Existing paint on structural steel is likely lead-based and may require special environmental protection measures for removal.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
(REFLECTORS)
F F N N N F P N G
N G
P F F P G N
P
N
G
F
58.1,3 MODERATE CHECKING WITH MINOR DECAY OF 6" X 7" TRANSVERSE
DECK PLANKS AND 3" X 8" TIMBER RUNNERS. SEVERE DECAY AND
DAMAGE TO DECK PLANK AT NORTH END OF DECK. SEVERE
DECAY OF DECK PLANKS AT SPOTS. SEVERE DECAY AND DAMAGE
TO EAST RUNNING BOARDS.
SEVERE SOIL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON DECK SURFACE,
MAINLY ALONG CURBS. UNDERSIDE OF DECK PLANKS ARE WET.
58.5,6 MINOR TO MODERATE CHECKING OF TIMBER BRIDGE RAILINGS.
SEVERE DECAY OF RAILING SYSTEM AND DIAGONAL APPROACH
RAILS. MISSING LOWER HORIZONTAL RAIL OF EAST PEDESTRIAN
RAIL, MID-SPAN. NORTH RAILING LEANING TOWARDS UPSTREAM.
58.8 TWO GALVANIZED CONDUITS ATTACHED ABOVE BOTTOM FLANGE
OF EAST EXTERIOR GIRDER.
58.10 MISSING REFLECTORS AT ENDS OF RAILS.
59.1 ANCHOR BOLTS FOR WEST EXTERIOR BEAM ARE BENT AT BOTH
ABUTMENTS, LIKELY DUE TO HORIZONTAL LOADING FROM FLOOD
WATERS IN JULY 2001. ALL ANCHOR BOLT NUTS AT NORTH
ABUTMENT ARE LOOSE EXCEPT AT EAST EXTERIOR ANCHOR.
59.2,6,7 SEVERE PEELING OF PAINT ON INTERIOR BEAMS, EXTERIOR
BEAMS ARE NOT PAINTED. MODERATE RUSTING OF STEEL BEAMS,
DIAPHRAGMS, AND LATERAL BRACING.
MINOR TO MODERATE SECTION LOSS FROM BOTTOM FLANGES OF
ALL BEAMS NEAR ABUTMENTS; MINOR SECTION LOSS FROM WEB
OF BEAM #2 , 4" FROM BOTTOM OF FLANGE NEAR NORTH
ABUTMENT; MINOR SECTION LOSS FROM TOP FLANGE OF BEAM #2
NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT.
59.9,10 BEAM #4 (WEST EXTERIOR BEAM) APPEARS TO HAVE A SLIGHT,
PERMANENT HORIZONTAL DEFLECTION TOWARD EAST; LIKELY
DUE TO FLOOD DAMAGE IN JULY 2001.
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. G
PILE BENTS2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. G
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. G
FOUNDATIONS5. G
WINGWALLS6. G
WEEP HOLES7. N
EXPANSION JOINTS8. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. F
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G
SLOPE PROTECTION11. N
OTHER (SUPPORT COLUMNS) 12. F
PIER(S)
N13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
N14. PILE BENTS
N15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
N16. FOUNDATIONS
N17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
N18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
N19. OTHER
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL 7
G G G N N
MED
SUFF
10 FT.
ROCK, STONES, GRAVEL
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
2. RELIEF JOINTS
APPROACH SLABS1. G
N N F G G N F N
223. RETAINING WALL 6
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL F
N N G F N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
60.3 HEAVY ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ON BEARING SEATS.
60.6 MINOR SPALLING AT TOP OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL AND
HONEYCOMBING AT BASE.
60.9 SOUTH ABUTMENT FOOTING (CONCRETE REPAIR) AT UPSTREAM
JUNCTION WITH WINGWALL IS EXPOSED UP TO 30"; FOOTING
APPEARS TO BE WELL-FOUNDED ON LARGE ROCKS, HOWEVER.
60.12 TIMBER SUPPORT COLUMNS BRACE FLOOR BEAM OF PEDESTRIAN
SIDEWALK AT BOTH ENDS OF BRIDGE. MISSING SHIMS AT
BLOCKING SUPPORT OF FLOOR BEAM AT SOUTH END.
61.2,3 FLOOD IN JULY 2001 LOWERED STREAM BED APPROXIMATELY 4'.
LARGE CLASS RIPRAP HAS BEEN PLACED ON BANKS AND IN
CHANNEL FOR PROTECTION.
222.1,4 MINOR CRACKING OF CONCRETE APPROACH SLAB AT SOUTH
ABUTMENT.
DEBRIS AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION ON NORTH APPROACH
CONCRETE SLAB. WATER PONDING AT NORTH APPROACH.
222.8 SHARP CURVE OF NORTH APPROACH ROADWAY.
223.1,5 LOOSELY STACKED STONE WALLS ADJACENT TO SOUTH
WINGWALLS ALONG WV ROUTE 82 HAVE SETTLED AND DEFLECTED
SLIGHTLY.
LARGE TREE AT NORTHEAST CORNER HAS UPROOTED AND
FALLEN.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 19 17 32 29
TYPE 3 17 15 29 26
TYPE 3S2 27 24 45 41
TYPE 3-3 34 31 56 51
DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 3/16
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: GIRDER MOMENT CAPACITY
REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND
CONDITION.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NEW RIVER GORGE NATIONAL RIVER (1) STATE: ....................................... 543 - WEST VIRGINIA (WV)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... FAYETTE STATION BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 019 - FAYETTE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 4780-003P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 3 - NORTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 0 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... WOLF CREEK
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 003P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. FAYETTE STATION BRIDGE
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 3 - SPECIAL PURPOSE (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 4780003P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 0.01 MILES FROM WV ROUTE
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 0000000000 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 0.00 (KM PT 0.00)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
3 - STEEL
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
51.1 FT (15.6 M)
53.0 FT (16.2 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
8 - WOOD OR TIMBER
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 7 - WOOD OR TIMBER
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 19.0 TONS (17.2 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 32.0 TONS (29.0 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 11/15 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 38°03'56.30" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 9.9 FT (3.0 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 81°04'48.80" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 14.3 FT (4.4 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 13.0 FT (4.0 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 01 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 250 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2013 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 375 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 9.9 FT (3.0 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2033 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... 1 - NAV PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED MATERIAL: .............................. 7 - TIMBER
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.30 FT (0.70 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL:
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK: .............. 35 - GENERAL REHAB
(75B) WORK DONE BY: ............. 1 - CONTRACT
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: .. 25.0 FT (7.6 M)
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
7 - Countermeasures installed to
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
B - MAJOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2001-ABUTMENT UNDERMINING REPAIRED WITH CONCRETE.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; NOTE
DETERIORATION OF TIMBER RUNNERS AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION
ALONG CURBLINES
PHOTO #4 - DECAY OF TIMBER DECK PLANKS ABOUT 20' FROM NORTH
ABUTMENT ON WEST SIDE; CONDITION IS SIMILAR ALONG EAST SIDE
PHOTO #5 - DECAY OF TIMBER DECK PLANKS, APPROXIMATELY 11'
FROM SOUTH ABUTMENT ON EAST SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - DECAY OF TIMBER DECK PLANKS, 4' FROM NORTH
ABUTMENT ON EAST SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - SOME TIMBER RUNNERS HAVE
BEEN REPLACED; HOWEVER SEVERAL
RUNNERS SHOW CRACKING AND
DETERIORATION
PHOTO #8 - HEAVY DEBRIS ACCUMULATION
ALONG EAST CURBLINE
PHOTO #9 - TOP RAIL OF EAST TIMBER RAILING HAS BEEN REPLACED
SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION; NOTE DETERIORATION OF BOTTOM
RAIL
PHOTO #10 - MISSING LOWER HORIZONTAL RAIL OF EAST
PEDESTRIAN RAIL NEAR MID-SPAN
PHOTO #11 - DECAY OF TOP RAIL IN WEST
RAILING, SECTION NEAR MIDSPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - RECENTLY REPLACED EAST
DIAGONAL RAIL AT SOUTH APPROACH IS NOT
WELL ANCHORED AT BOTTOM AND IS
LEANING EAST
PHOTO #13 - ANCHOR OF EAST DIAGONAL RAIL AT SOUTH APPROACH
NOT PROPERLY CONNECTED
PHOTO #14 - WEST DIAGONAL RAIL AT SOUTH APPROACH IS NOT
PROPERLY ANCHORED
PHOTO #15 - DECAY OF WEST DIAGONAL
TIMBER RAILING AT NORTH END
PHOTO #16 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND
WATER PONDING AT NORTH APPROACH
PHOTO #17 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; NOTE WET
CONDITION; NOTE ALSO PAINT FAILURE AND RUSTING OF BEAMS
PHOTO #18 - DECAYED AND BROKEN TIMBER PLANKS AT WEST SIDE
OF STRUCTURE NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #19 - MISSING DECK PLANK APPROXIMATELY 10' SOUTH OF
NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL RUSTING, DETERIORATION, AND SECTION LOSS
ALONG BOTTOM FLANGE OF BEAMS; BEAM #2 FROM WEST NEAR
SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL RUSTING, DETERIORATION, AND SECTION LOSS
ALONG BOTTOM FLANGE OF BEAMS; BEAM #3 FROM WEST NEAR
SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL WET CONDITION OF STEEL BEAMS, CENTER
BAY NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE PITTING AND
CORROSION OF BOTTOM FLANGES; NOTE ALSO FLAKING PAINT
PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BEARING SEAT
AREA, SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #24 - ANCHOR NUT NOT FULLY THREADED ON NORTH END OF
EAST EXTERIOR BEAM
PHOTO #25 - BENT ANCHOR BOLT AND NOT FULLY THREADED NUT
ON WEST EXTERIOR BEAM AT NORTH END; NOTE ALSO TYPICAL
DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BEARING SEAT AREA
PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #27 - MISALIGNMENT OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE VOIDS
BETWEEN STACKED STONES
PHOTO #28 - LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM BRIDGE
PHOTO #29 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM; NOTE FALLEN TREE ACROSS
CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .