Report__Bridge_Inspection_4780-003P.pdf

PDF 5 MB Posted

Attached to
New River Gorge National River Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
DTFH71-17-B-00010
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

Report_ Bridge Inspection_4780-003P

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to New River Gorge National River, newest first.
File Type Posted
Results_of_Bid_Opening_Schedule_A&B_-_NP-NERI_BMS(1).pdf PDF
Report_NEPA_CE.pdf PDF
Report__Bridge_Inspection_4780-002P.pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-NERI_BMS(1).pdf PDF
Report__Bridge_Inspection_4780-001P.pdf PDF
Report__Bridge_Inspection_4780-015P.pdf PDF
Plans_-_NP_NERI_BMS_(1).pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
Synopsis_-_NP_NERI_BMS(1).doc DOC document
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

FAYETTE STATION BRIDGE

FAYETTE STATION BRIDGE OVER WOLF CREEK

NEW RIVER GORGE NATIONAL RIVER

LS

STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 11/19/15

Report prepared by: WU

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P

FAYETTE STATION BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 11/19/15

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 4 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

DECK TYPE: ......................... WOOD OR TIMBER MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

WEARING SURFACE: .......... WOOD OR TIMBER DECK WIDTH:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 0000000000 / NONE SKEW ANGLE:

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 3 - SPECIAL PURPOSE FRACTURE CRITICAL:

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2001-ABUTMENT UNDERMINING REPAIRED WITH CONCRETE.

LOCATION

53.0 FT (16.2 M)

51.1 FT (15.6 M)

14.3 FT (4.4 M)

9.9 FT (3.0 M)

0 °

NO

NEW RIVER GORGE NATIONAL RIVER MILE POINT: ..................... 0.00 (KM PT 0.00)

STATE: ................................. WEST VIRGINIA LOCATION: 0.01 MILES FROM WV ROUTE 82.

(ACCESS 82-ONE WAY- AFTER MAKING A RIGHT FACILITY CARRIED: ............ FAYETTE STATION BRIDGE

TURN AT NORTH OF NEW RIVER BRIDGE)

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WOLF CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This steel beam bridge is currently in poor condition due to decay and deterioration of the transverse timber deck planks, longitudinal runners, and railings. Additional problems include soil and debris accumulation on the deck surface and bearing seats; ponding of water at the approaches; and paint deterioration and rusting of the steel beams and diaphragms, with minor section loss evident in some locations.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. It should be noted that this bridge is scheduled for rehabilitation in the near future under Project NP NERI BMS(1). The scope of work includes cleaning and painting of the structural steel, and replacement of the timber deck and railings. The new deck will be a nail-laminated type, and the new railing will meet current safety standards. In addition, a pedestrian railing will also be installed to further improve visitor safety.

INSPECTION TEAM: C. CASTRO, R. SILVESTRY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

CARLOS CASTRO, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 571-434-1546

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/14/16

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

B226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

61.3 REMOVE STUMP FROM UPROOTED TREE AT NORTHEAST EMBANKMENT AND

PLACE / REPAIR RIPRAP.

1 LS

58.1, 60.3 REMOVE SOIL AND DEBRIS FROM DECK SURFACE, AND BEARING SEATS. 1 LS

58.6 REPLACE MISSING SHIMS AT BLOCKING SUPPORT FOR FLOOR BEAM AT SOUTH

END.

1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

59.2,6,7 CLEAN AND PAINT ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL. 1 LS $0

58 REPLACE TIMBER DECK AND RUNNER BOARDS. REPLACE TIMBER

BRIDGE RAILING. INSTALL PEDESTRIAN RAILING.

1 LS $0

59 CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (APPROXIMATELY70%

TOTAL REHAB COST), PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.

1 LS $0

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : $0

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

$0

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

Existing paint on structural steel is likely lead-based and may require special environmental protection measures for removal.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

(REFLECTORS)

F F N N N F P N G

N G

P F F P G N

P

N

G

F

58.1,3 MODERATE CHECKING WITH MINOR DECAY OF 6" X 7" TRANSVERSE

DECK PLANKS AND 3" X 8" TIMBER RUNNERS. SEVERE DECAY AND

DAMAGE TO DECK PLANK AT NORTH END OF DECK. SEVERE

DECAY OF DECK PLANKS AT SPOTS. SEVERE DECAY AND DAMAGE

TO EAST RUNNING BOARDS.

SEVERE SOIL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON DECK SURFACE,

MAINLY ALONG CURBS. UNDERSIDE OF DECK PLANKS ARE WET.

58.5,6 MINOR TO MODERATE CHECKING OF TIMBER BRIDGE RAILINGS.

SEVERE DECAY OF RAILING SYSTEM AND DIAGONAL APPROACH

RAILS. MISSING LOWER HORIZONTAL RAIL OF EAST PEDESTRIAN

RAIL, MID-SPAN. NORTH RAILING LEANING TOWARDS UPSTREAM.

58.8 TWO GALVANIZED CONDUITS ATTACHED ABOVE BOTTOM FLANGE

OF EAST EXTERIOR GIRDER.

58.10 MISSING REFLECTORS AT ENDS OF RAILS.

59.1 ANCHOR BOLTS FOR WEST EXTERIOR BEAM ARE BENT AT BOTH

ABUTMENTS, LIKELY DUE TO HORIZONTAL LOADING FROM FLOOD

WATERS IN JULY 2001. ALL ANCHOR BOLT NUTS AT NORTH

ABUTMENT ARE LOOSE EXCEPT AT EAST EXTERIOR ANCHOR.

59.2,6,7 SEVERE PEELING OF PAINT ON INTERIOR BEAMS, EXTERIOR

BEAMS ARE NOT PAINTED. MODERATE RUSTING OF STEEL BEAMS,

DIAPHRAGMS, AND LATERAL BRACING.

MINOR TO MODERATE SECTION LOSS FROM BOTTOM FLANGES OF

ALL BEAMS NEAR ABUTMENTS; MINOR SECTION LOSS FROM WEB

OF BEAM #2 , 4" FROM BOTTOM OF FLANGE NEAR NORTH

ABUTMENT; MINOR SECTION LOSS FROM TOP FLANGE OF BEAM #2

NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT.

59.9,10 BEAM #4 (WEST EXTERIOR BEAM) APPEARS TO HAVE A SLIGHT,

PERMANENT HORIZONTAL DEFLECTION TOWARD EAST; LIKELY

DUE TO FLOOD DAMAGE IN JULY 2001.

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. G

PILE BENTS2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. G

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. G

FOUNDATIONS5. G

WINGWALLS6. G

WEEP HOLES7. N

EXPANSION JOINTS8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. F

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION11. N

OTHER (SUPPORT COLUMNS) 12. F

PIER(S)

N13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

N14. PILE BENTS

N15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

N16. FOUNDATIONS

N17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

N18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

N19. OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G G G N N

MED

SUFF

10 FT.

ROCK, STONES, GRAVEL

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. G

N N F G G N F N

223. RETAINING WALL 6

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL F

N N G F N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

60.3 HEAVY ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ON BEARING SEATS.

60.6 MINOR SPALLING AT TOP OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL AND

HONEYCOMBING AT BASE.

60.9 SOUTH ABUTMENT FOOTING (CONCRETE REPAIR) AT UPSTREAM

JUNCTION WITH WINGWALL IS EXPOSED UP TO 30"; FOOTING

APPEARS TO BE WELL-FOUNDED ON LARGE ROCKS, HOWEVER.

60.12 TIMBER SUPPORT COLUMNS BRACE FLOOR BEAM OF PEDESTRIAN

SIDEWALK AT BOTH ENDS OF BRIDGE. MISSING SHIMS AT

BLOCKING SUPPORT OF FLOOR BEAM AT SOUTH END.

61.2,3 FLOOD IN JULY 2001 LOWERED STREAM BED APPROXIMATELY 4'.

LARGE CLASS RIPRAP HAS BEEN PLACED ON BANKS AND IN

CHANNEL FOR PROTECTION.

222.1,4 MINOR CRACKING OF CONCRETE APPROACH SLAB AT SOUTH

ABUTMENT.

DEBRIS AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION ON NORTH APPROACH

CONCRETE SLAB. WATER PONDING AT NORTH APPROACH.

222.8 SHARP CURVE OF NORTH APPROACH ROADWAY.

223.1,5 LOOSELY STACKED STONE WALLS ADJACENT TO SOUTH

WINGWALLS ALONG WV ROUTE 82 HAVE SETTLED AND DEFLECTED

SLIGHTLY.

LARGE TREE AT NORTHEAST CORNER HAS UPROOTED AND

FALLEN.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 19 17 32 29

TYPE 3 17 15 29 26

TYPE 3S2 27 24 45 41

TYPE 3-3 34 31 56 51

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 3/16

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: GIRDER MOMENT CAPACITY

REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND

CONDITION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NEW RIVER GORGE NATIONAL RIVER (1) STATE: ....................................... 543 - WEST VIRGINIA (WV)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... FAYETTE STATION BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 019 - FAYETTE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 4780-003P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 3 - NORTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 0 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... WOLF CREEK

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 003P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. FAYETTE STATION BRIDGE

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 3 - SPECIAL PURPOSE (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 4780003P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 0.01 MILES FROM WV ROUTE

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 0000000000 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 0.00 (KM PT 0.00)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

3 - STEEL

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

51.1 FT (15.6 M)

53.0 FT (16.2 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

8 - WOOD OR TIMBER

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 7 - WOOD OR TIMBER

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 19.0 TONS (17.2 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 32.0 TONS (29.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 11/15 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 38°03'56.30" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 9.9 FT (3.0 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 81°04'48.80" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 14.3 FT (4.4 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 13.0 FT (4.0 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 01 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 250 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2013 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 375 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 9.9 FT (3.0 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2033 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... 1 - NAV PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED MATERIAL: .............................. 7 - TIMBER

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.30 FT (0.70 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK: .............. 35 - GENERAL REHAB

(75B) WORK DONE BY: ............. 1 - CONTRACT

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: .. 25.0 FT (7.6 M)

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

7 - Countermeasures installed to

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

B - MAJOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2001-ABUTMENT UNDERMINING REPAIRED WITH CONCRETE.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 4780-003P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; NOTE

DETERIORATION OF TIMBER RUNNERS AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION

ALONG CURBLINES

PHOTO #4 - DECAY OF TIMBER DECK PLANKS ABOUT 20' FROM NORTH

ABUTMENT ON WEST SIDE; CONDITION IS SIMILAR ALONG EAST SIDE

PHOTO #5 - DECAY OF TIMBER DECK PLANKS, APPROXIMATELY 11'

FROM SOUTH ABUTMENT ON EAST SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - DECAY OF TIMBER DECK PLANKS, 4' FROM NORTH

ABUTMENT ON EAST SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - SOME TIMBER RUNNERS HAVE

BEEN REPLACED; HOWEVER SEVERAL

RUNNERS SHOW CRACKING AND

DETERIORATION

PHOTO #8 - HEAVY DEBRIS ACCUMULATION

ALONG EAST CURBLINE

PHOTO #9 - TOP RAIL OF EAST TIMBER RAILING HAS BEEN REPLACED

SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION; NOTE DETERIORATION OF BOTTOM

RAIL

PHOTO #10 - MISSING LOWER HORIZONTAL RAIL OF EAST

PEDESTRIAN RAIL NEAR MID-SPAN

PHOTO #11 - DECAY OF TOP RAIL IN WEST

RAILING, SECTION NEAR MIDSPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - RECENTLY REPLACED EAST

DIAGONAL RAIL AT SOUTH APPROACH IS NOT

WELL ANCHORED AT BOTTOM AND IS

LEANING EAST

PHOTO #13 - ANCHOR OF EAST DIAGONAL RAIL AT SOUTH APPROACH

NOT PROPERLY CONNECTED

PHOTO #14 - WEST DIAGONAL RAIL AT SOUTH APPROACH IS NOT

PROPERLY ANCHORED

PHOTO #15 - DECAY OF WEST DIAGONAL

TIMBER RAILING AT NORTH END

PHOTO #16 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND

WATER PONDING AT NORTH APPROACH

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; NOTE WET

CONDITION; NOTE ALSO PAINT FAILURE AND RUSTING OF BEAMS

PHOTO #18 - DECAYED AND BROKEN TIMBER PLANKS AT WEST SIDE

OF STRUCTURE NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #19 - MISSING DECK PLANK APPROXIMATELY 10' SOUTH OF

NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL RUSTING, DETERIORATION, AND SECTION LOSS

ALONG BOTTOM FLANGE OF BEAMS; BEAM #2 FROM WEST NEAR

SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL RUSTING, DETERIORATION, AND SECTION LOSS

ALONG BOTTOM FLANGE OF BEAMS; BEAM #3 FROM WEST NEAR

SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL WET CONDITION OF STEEL BEAMS, CENTER

BAY NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE PITTING AND

CORROSION OF BOTTOM FLANGES; NOTE ALSO FLAKING PAINT

PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BEARING SEAT

AREA, SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #24 - ANCHOR NUT NOT FULLY THREADED ON NORTH END OF

EAST EXTERIOR BEAM

PHOTO #25 - BENT ANCHOR BOLT AND NOT FULLY THREADED NUT

ON WEST EXTERIOR BEAM AT NORTH END; NOTE ALSO TYPICAL

DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BEARING SEAT AREA

PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #27 - MISALIGNMENT OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE VOIDS

BETWEEN STACKED STONES

PHOTO #28 - LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM BRIDGE

PHOTO #29 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM; NOTE FALLEN TREE ACROSS

CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .