Report_5_Bridge_Inspection_5570-202P.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 375.70

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LS

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-202P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 4/6/15

Report prepared by: WS

MILE POINT: 375.70

Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 604.61 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-202P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 375.70 INSPECTION DATE: 4/6/15

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

CONCRETE

FRAME

NOT APPLICABLE

BITUMINOUS

SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

N/A

CONCRETE

1G / 00000

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK W IDTH:

CURB TO CURB W IDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

12.4 FT (3.8 M)

12.4 FT (3.8 M)

45.3 FT (13.8 M)

34.0 FT (10.4 M)

N/A 0 °

NO

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 375.70 (KM PT 604.61)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 5.6 MILES FROM US ROUTE 64

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. COUNTY ROAD

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall with only minor problems. These include a 9" shoulder drop off from the pavement resulting in hazardous driving conditions for motorists and a lack of minimum vertical clearance signs along the underpass roadway. Other problems include minor cracking with efflorescence throughout the structure, and spalling of the east wingwalls. Consideration should be given to installing a guardrail system over the structure and along the approaches to improve motorist safety.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: N. JANSEN, G. GOODLIN

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

NATHANAEL JANSEN, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6255

REPORT REVIEW :

CARLOS CASTRO, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 571-434-1546

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/31/15

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-202P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

222.6 FILL SHOULDER OF APPROACH ROADWAY TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT

HEIGHT.

4 CY

222.7 INSTALL MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY. 2 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS) QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

58.6, 222.3 INSTALL GUARDRAIL SYSTEM OVER STRUCTURE AND

APPROACHES.

100 LF $0

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : $0

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

$0

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-202P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal 5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK N ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

N1. DECK SLAB

N2. EXPANSION JOINTS

G3. WEARING SURFACE

G4. RIDEABILITY

N5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

N6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

G7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

N8. UTILITIES

N9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

N10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

N

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

1. BEARING DEVICES

N

G3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

N5. TRUSSES

N6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

N7. PAINT

N8. FASCIA(E)

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

G10. ALIGNMENT

N11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7

58.1, 59.3 MINOR CRACKING ON CORNERS OF FRAME.

58.6, 222.3 NO GUARDRAIL OVER STRUCTURE NOR APPROACHES.

60.1 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST UPPER

CORNER OF SOUTH ABUTMENT AND EAST UPPER CORNER OF

NORTH ABUTMENT. MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE AT BOTH CORNERS

OF NORTH ABUTMENT, AND WEST CORNER OF SOUTH ABUTMENT.

60.6 MODERATE SPALLING OF NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST

WINGWALLS.

MINOR TO MODERATE SPALLING OF FINISH COAT ON SOUTHEAST

AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALL. MINOR CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.

MINOR TO MODERATE MOSS GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.

60.7 MINOR LOSS OF EMBANKMENT THROUGH WEEP HOLES AT NORTH

ABUTMENT.

ABUTMENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G

PILE BENTS 2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. N

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. N

FOUNDATIONS 5. N

WINGWALLS 6. G

WEEP HOLES7. F

EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION11. N

OTHER12. N

PIER(S)

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N

PILE BENTS 14. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. N

FOUNDATIONS 16. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR17. N

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION18. N

OTHER19. N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-202P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER9.

ALIGNMENT8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS2.

1. APPROACH SLABS N

N N G G F F G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0

N N N

222.4,6 PREVIOUS RESURFACING OF APPROACH ROADWAY HAS RESULTED

IN 9" DROP OFF OF TO SHOULDERS. MINOR TRANSVERSE

CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE AT SOUTH APPROACH.

222.5 MINOR SETTLEMENT ALONG EAST AND WEST HEADWALLS.

222.7 NO MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS ON UNDERPASS

ROADWAY. BOTH HEADWALL MARKERS ARE BENT.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-202P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 27 24 45 41

TYPE 3 25 23 42 38

TYPE 3S2 40 36 67 61

TYPE 3-3 49 44 82 74

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-202P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 375.70

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-202P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 202P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. M. LEWIS

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1G

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

101 - LEWIS

161000010

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570202P0000000

5.6 MILES FROM US ROUTE

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

375.70 (KM PT 604.61)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

07 - FRAME

12.4 FT (3.8 M)

12.4 FT (3.8 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 45.0 TONS (41.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 4/15 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-202P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°23'20.40" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 87°32'05.50" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 45.3 FT (13.8 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 47 MI (76 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (6.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 01 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 6.0 FT (1.8 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (1.8 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 750 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2011 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 825 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2031 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 0 - N/A

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 0 - N/A

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 0 - N/A LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 99.9 FT (99.9 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 11.58 FT (3.53 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-202P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-202P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH TOWARD NASHVILLE

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DROP OFF ALONG

SHOULDERS, EAST SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT UPPER

CORNERS OF BREASTWALLS, EAST SIDE OF NORTH BREASTWALL

SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO

NORTHWEST CORNER OF

WINGWALL/BREASTWALL JUNCTION, SIMILAR

COLLISION DAMAGE AT NORTHEAST AND

SOUTHEAST CORNERS

PHOTO #8 - CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE AND SPALLING OF FINISH

COAT AT SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO #9 - SPALLING AT NORTH END OF EAST

WINGWALL

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL SETTLEMENT BEHIND

HEADWALLS, WEST HEADWALL SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - SEVERE MOSS GROWTH ON SOUTHEAST WINGWALL