Report_4_Bridge_Inspection_5570-009P.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 372.70

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-009P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/16/13

Report prepared by: ES

MILE POINT: 372.70

Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 599.79 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-009P

COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 372.70 INSPECTION DATE: 3/16/13

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 26.8 FT (8.2 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 26.8 FT (8.2 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 32.3 FT (9.8 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.3 FT (8.6 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1G5 / 2804 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 15 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1981-JOINT REPAIR. 2006-ROADWAY REPAVED.

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 372.70 (KM PT 599.79)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 2.6 MILES FROM U.S. ROUTE 64

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. COUNTY ROAD

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall and has only minor problems at this time. Problems include partially clogged drainage pipes under the abutments, minor spalling with exposed rebar on the west railing and southwest wingwall, and minor collision damage and scrapes on the frame. Additionally, object marker tape is missing from the south parapet ends and object markers are not provided at the abutments for the underpass.

Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: M.R. PUTALLAZ, W.R. FAIRLIE (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

MICHAEL R. PUTALLAZ, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/1/13

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-009P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

60.12 REGRADE UNDERPASS ROADWAY DITCHES AND CLEAN OUT PIPE CULVERTS

UNDER ABUTMENTS TO ALLOW ADEQUATE DRAINAGE.

1 LS

222.7 INSTALL OBJECT MARKER TAPE AT SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST PARAPET

ENDS. INSTALL OBJECT MARKERS AT ABUTMENTS FOR UNDERPASS.

6 EA

58.6, 60.6 CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST RAILING AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALL AND

COAT WITH APPROVED SEALANT.

2 SF

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL:

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

$0

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-009P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N N G N N N N N G

N G

G G G G G N

N

N

G

G

58.1, 59.3 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE

ALONG CENTERLINE CONSTRUCTION JOINT. MINOR

HONEYCOMBING ON SLAB UNDERSIDE. MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE

TO UNDERSIDE AND SIDES OF SLAB; MINOR SPALL AT WEST SIDE.

58.3, 222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT

WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH PAVEMENT. MINOR

DEPRESSION IN EAST SHOULDER PAVEMENT AT TRANSVERSE

CRACK IN NORTH APPROACH.

58.5,6 MINOR CRACKING THROUGHOUT CURBS AND RAILINGS. FLAKING

OF FINISH COAT IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. EXPOSED REBAR ON

WEST RAILING NEAR BOTH ENDS. MINOR MOWER DAMAGE AT

PARAPET ENDS.

60.1 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTH ABUTMENT AT

CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND SOUTH ABUTMENT AT CENTERLINE AT

HAUNCH. MINOR MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL, EAST CORNER. MINOR

COLLISION DAMAGE ON BREASTWALL CORNERS AT BOTTOM.

ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS HAVE BEEN ROUTINELY PAINTED TO

COVER GRAFFITI; WIDESPREAD GRAFFITI PRESENT.

60.6 MINOR MOSS GROWTH AND MINOR CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON ALL WINGWALLS. MINOR SPALL WITH

EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.

60.7 SEVERAL WEEP HOLES PARTIALLY CLOGGED. SOUTH ABUTMENT

WEEP HOLES HAVE MOSS GROWTH AND ARE LOSING

EMBANKMENT MATERIAL.

60.12 CULVERT PIPES THROUGH ABUTMENTS CARRY DITCH DRAINAGE;

PIPES PARTIALLY CLOGGED.

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G

PILE BENTS 2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. N

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. N

FOUNDATIONS 5. N

WINGWALLS 6. G

WEEP HOLES 7. F

EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 9. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION 11. N

OTHER (PIPE CULVERTS) 12. F

PIER(S)

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N

PILE BENTS 14. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. N

FOUNDATIONS 16. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 17. N

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 18. N

OTHER 19. N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-009P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS N

N N G G G F G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0

N N N

222 LARGE TREE HAS FALLEN NEAR NORTHEAST CORNER OF

STRUCTURE ON APPROACH EMBANKMENT.

222.5 MINOR EROSION AT PARAPET ENDS WITH DROP-OFF (UP TO 15")

FROM SHOULDER PAVEMENT.

222.7 13'-0" VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS PRESENT IN ADVANCE OF

STRUCTURE ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY AND ON STRUCTURE.

OBJECT MARKERS NOT PROVIDED AT ABUTMENTS FOR

UNDERPASS.

TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKER TAPE AT PARAPET ENDS;

TAPE MISSING FROM SOUTH ENDS OF PARAPETS. TEMPORARY

FLASHER MOUNTED ON WEST RAIL NEAR NORTH END. SURVEY

MARKER ON TOP OF WEST CURB NEAR NORTH END.

36.A RAILING HEIGHT OF 1'-11" DOES NOT MEET AASHTO MINIMUM

HEIGHT SPECIFICATION OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-009P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 25 23 42 38

TYPE 3 21 19 35 32

TYPE 3S2 31 28 52 47

TYPE 3-3 40 36 67 61

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-009P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 372.70

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-009P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 009P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. M. LEWIS

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1G5

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

099 - LAWRENCE

161000010

COUNTY ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570009P0000000

2.6 MILES FROM U.S. ROUTE

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

372.70 (KM PT 599.79)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

07 - FRAME

26.8 FT (8.2 M)

26.8 FT (8.2 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 25.0 TONS (23.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 42.0 TONS (38.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 3/13 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-009P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 28.3 FT (8.6 M)

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°21'16.90"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 87°33'42.40"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 47 MI (76 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 2.6 FT (0.8 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

32.3 FT (9.8 M)

34.0 FT (10.4 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

6.0 FT (1.8 M)

6.0 FT (1.8 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

15 °

NO

28.3 FT (8.6 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

1.92 FT (0.59 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

13.17 FT (4.01 M)

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1981-JOINT REPAIR. 2006-ROADWAY REPAVED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:87�33'42.40 http:35�21'16.90

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-009P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-009P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD TUPELO

PHOTO #2 - WEST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING

OF APPROACH PAVEMENT; NORTH APPROACH

SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST

RAILING NEAR NORTH END

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL DROP-OFF FROM

SHOULDER PAVEMENT AT PARAPET ENDS;

SOUTHEAST PARAPET END SHOWN; ALSO

NOTE MISSING OBJECT MARKER TAPE

PHOTO #7 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #8 - CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE

ALONG CENTERLINE CONSTRUCTION JOINT

PHOTO #9 - COLLISION DAMAGE AND TYPICAL

SCRAPES ON SLAB UNDERSIDE AT WEST

SIDE; NOTE SPALL

PHOTO #10 - CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO

PHOTO #11 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT; NOTE GRAFFITI

PHOTO #12 - MAP CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST CORNER OF

NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL COLLISION DAMAGE TO

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL CORNERS; EAST

CORNER OF SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN; ALSO

NOTE CLOGGED PIPE CULVERT

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL CLOGGED ABUTMENT

WEEP HOLE; SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN;

ALSO NOTE MOSS GROWTH AND LOSS OF

EMBANKMENT FILL

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL CLOGGED PIPE

CULVERT; WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT

SHOWN

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH AND

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

WINGWALLS; NORTHWEST WINGWALL

SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #18 - FALLEN TREE ON EAST SIDE OF

NORTH EMBANKMENT