Report_2_Bridge_Inspection_5570-007P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Natchez Trace Parkway Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-17-B-00009
About this file
Report 2_Bridge Inspection_5570-007P
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf | ||
| Report_5_Bridge_Inspection_5570-202P.pdf | ||
| Report_4_Bridge_Inspection_5570-009P.pdf | ||
| Plans_FTNP-NATR_1G10.pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_FTNP-NATR_1G10.pdf | ||
| Subcontracting_plan.doc | DOC document | |
| Report_1_NEPA.pdf | ||
| Report_3_Bridge_Inspection_5570-008P.pdf | ||
| Synopsis_-_FTNP-NATR_1G10.doc | DOC document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
LITTLE BUFFALO RIVER BRIDGE
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER LITTLE BUFFALO RIVER
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-007P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/13/13
Report prepared by: EU
MILE POINT: 378.15
Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 608.56 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-007P
LITTLE BUFFALO RIVER BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 3/13/13
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 4 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 644.7 FT (196.5 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 80.6 FT (24.6 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... MONOLITHIC CONCRETE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 37.3 FT (11.4 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 34.4 FT (10.5 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. 1985
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1G2,1F7 / 3116A SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1986-DECK REPLACEMENT. 2008-APPROACHES REPAIRED, ROADWAY AND DECK
RESTRIPED. 2009-STRIP SEAL EXPANSION JOINTS REPAIRED.
LOCATION
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 378.15 (KM PT 608.56)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 7.6 MILES TO TN ROUTE 20
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. LITTLE BUFFALO RIVER
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This prestressed concrete multi-girder bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include moderate debris accumulation in the expansion joints with damage to the joints and moderate gravel accumulation along both curblines. It should also be noted that the anchor bolts and nuts at the north abutment bearings have moderate to severe rusting with some section loss. This bridge also has some issues with scour. An island has formed in the channel and is forcing the flow against the south channel bank, which is causing severe sloughing. There is also minor scour at Piers #2, #3, and #4; however, the top of the footing at Pier #4 is no longer exposed.
Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: D.K. JOHNSON, J.S. SMITHDEAL (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
D. KEITH JOHNSON, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/1/13
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-007P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
59.1 CLEAN AND PAINT BEARING ANCHOR BOLTS AND NUTS AT NORTH ABUTMENT. 4 EA
58.2,7 REMOVE GRAVEL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION FROM CURBLINES AND
EXPANSION JOINTS.
1 LS
61.4 REMOVE ACCUMULATION OF DRIFT AND FALLEN TREES FROM CHANNEL. 1 LS
60.9 BACKFILL AND STABILIZE AREAS OF EROSION ALONG WINGWALLS. 4 CY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-007P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
OTHER
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
FOUNDATIONS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
PIER(S)
OTHER
SLOPE PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
EXPANSION JOINTS
WEEP HOLES
WINGWALLS
FOUNDATIONS
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
(STRIPING)
F G N N N G N N G
N G
G N G G N G F N F G N N
G N G N G G
G(VEGETATION)
11.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
58.1,2,4, 60.4 MINOR LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF DECK
SURFACE; MINOR SCALING IN NORTHBOUND LANE, SPAN #2.
MODERATE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN EXPANSION JOINTS
THROUGHOUT. MANY WELDS IN JOINT ARMOR AT EXPANSION
JOINTS ARE CRACKED. SEALANT BETWEEN DECK AND EXPANSION
JOINTS HAS MINOR ADHESION FAILURE OR MISSING SECTIONS.
SIGNS OF MODERATE LEAKAGE THROUGH JOINTS ON OVERHANGS,
EXTERIOR SIDES OF EXTERIOR GIRDERS AND PIER CAPS.
ROUGH RIDE AT EACH JOINT CAUSING MINOR SPALLS IN DECK
SURFACE AND TOP OF BACKWALL.
58.5,6 MINOR VERTICAL, TRANSVERSE, AND MAP CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON RAILINGS. SEVERAL POPOUTS ON RAILINGS
AND CURBS. MOSS GROWTH ON EAST CURB AND RAILING.
58.7 MODERATE GRAVEL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG BOTH
CURBLINES.
58.10, 222.9 ROADWAY STRIPING ON DECK AND APPROACHES IS CRACKING AND
FADING.
59.1 MODERATE TO SEVERE RUSTING OF BEARING ANCHOR BOLTS AND
NUTS WITH SOME MINOR SECTION LOSS AT NORTH ABUTMENT;
MINOR RUSTING ELSEWHERE. BEARING DEVICES CONTRACTED
(1/4" AT 65°F) AT PIER #1, SPAN #1 SIDE.
59.2,6 MINOR SPALLING OF FINISH COAT THROUGHOUT EXTERIOR
GIRDERS. MINOR HONEYCOMBING ON LOWER PORTIONS OF
SEVERAL GIRDERS AND DIAPHRAGMS. MINOR SPALL ON FIRST
DIAPHRAGM BETWEEN GIRDERS #1 AND #2, SPAN #1.
60.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS.
60.6 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND POPOUTS WITH
EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH WINGWALLS. MINOR VERTICAL
CRACKING ON NORTHEAST WINGWALL.
N G G G F N
F
F
G
G
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-007P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL 6
F F N F N
HIGH
SUFF
22 FT.
STONES
222. APPROACHES 6
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS 7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION 5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS 2.
1. APPROACH SLABS
(STRIPING)
N N N F G G F G F
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.
FOUNDATION 3.
WEEP HOLES 2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
60.7 WEEP HOLES ARE PARTIALLY CLOGGED AT NORTH ABUTMENT.
60.9 MINOR EROSION/SETTLEMENT OF BACKFILL AT SOUTHEAST AND
NORTHEAST WINGWALLS. MINOR EROSION ALONG SOUTHWEST
WINGWALL. MODERATE EROSION AND UNDERMINING ALONG
FLARED PORTION OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL (7'L X 1'W X 1'D X 2'
UNDER). MODERATE EROSION UNDER WEST DRAIN NEAR NORTH
ABUTMENT IN SPAN #8.
60.13 MINOR SCALING ON PIERS #2, #3, AND #4 NEAR WATERLINE.
HORIZONTAL CRACKING ON WEST SIDE OF PIER #4 NEAR CAP.
MINOR VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST SIDE OF
PIER #6.
60.15 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON PIER CAPS
THROUGHOUT. MINOR STAINING AND MOSS GROWTH ON EAST
AND WEST FACES OF PIER CAPS.
60.17 MINOR SCOUR AT PIERS #2, #3 AND #4; PREVIOUSLY EXPOSED
FOOTING FOR PIER #4 NO LONGER EXPOSED.
ALL FOOTINGS EXTEND ONE FOOT INTO ROCK (UNABLE TO
OBSERVE).
60.19 MINOR VINE/VEGETATION GROWTH ON PIERS #1 AND #4 - #7.
MODERATE EROSION UNDER WEST DRAIN NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT
IN SPAN #8.
61.1,4 ISLAND HAS FORMED IN CHANNEL UNDER SPAN #2, SPLITTING
FLOW AGAINST SOUTH CHANNEL BANK AND PIER #2. SEE 61.2.
MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DRIFT ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF PIER
#2. FALLEN TREES APPROXIMATELY 50' UPSTREAM AND
DOWNSTREAM OF STRUCTURE. HEAVY ACCUMULATION OF
TREES/DRIFT UNDER STRUCTURE, ALL SPANS.
61.2 MODERATE SLOUGHING AND UNDERCUTTING OF SOUTH CHANNEL
BANK BENEATH SPAN #2. MINOR EROSION ALONG SOUTH
UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK.
222.4 MINOR TO MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH
PAVEMENT.
222.5 MINOR EROSION AT PARAPET ENDS.
222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKER TAPE AT CORNERS OF
STRUCTURE; NORTHWEST OBJECT MARKER TORN IN HALF.
"LITTLE BUFFALO RIVER" SIGNS AT NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST
CORNERS. TEMPORARY FLASHER ON WEST RAIL, SOUTH
APPROACH AND EAST RAIL, NORTH APPROACH.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-007P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 20 18 34 31
TYPE 3 20 18 33 30
TYPE 3S2 24 22 41 37
TYPE 3-3 28 25 46 42
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-007P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... LITTLE BUFFALO RIVER BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 101 - LEWIS
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-007P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... LITTLE BUFFALO RIVER
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 007P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570007P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 7.6 MILES TO TN ROUTE 20
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. M. LEWIS (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1G2,1F7 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 378.15 (KM PT 608.56)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3116A (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
80.6 FT (24.6 M)
644.7 FT (196.5 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 1 - MONOLITHIC CONCRETE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 20.0 TONS (18.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 4 - POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 34.0 TONS (30.8 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 3/13 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-007P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°24'54.80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.4 FT (10.5 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 87°30'42.40" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 37.3 FT (11.4 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 47 MI (76 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (6.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 6.0 FT (1.8 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (1.8 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 750 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2011 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 825 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 34.4 FT (10.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2031 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 1 - CONCRETE
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.71 FT (0.83 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
5 - Stable; scour within limits of
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
$0
$0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1986-DECK REPLACEMENT. 2008-APPROACHES REPAIRED, ROADWAY AND DECK RESTRIPED. 2009-STRIP SEAL EXPANSION JOINTS
REPAIRED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:87�30'42.40 http:35�24'54.80
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-007P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-007P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD TUPELO
PHOTO #2 - WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW
LOOKING NORTH; NOTE TYPICAL CRACKING
AND FADING OF ROADWAY STRIPING
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION
IN EXPANSION JOINTS THROUGHOUT;
EXPANSION JOINT OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT
SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL CRACKED WELDS IN
JOINT ARMOR AT EXPANSION JOINTS;
EXPANSION JOINT OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT
SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL SPALLING OF DECK
SURFACE ALONG EXPANSION JOINTS; DECK
SURFACE ALONG PIER #1 EXPANSION JOINT
SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON RAILINGS; WEST
RAILING OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL GRAVEL AND DEBRIS
ACCUMULATION ALONG BOTH CURBLINES;
EAST CURBLINE, SPAN #1 SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE
CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT; NORTH
APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL EROSION AT PARAPET ENDS; SOUTHEAST
PARAPET END SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH, SPAN #2
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF BEARING ANCHOR BOLTS AND
NUTS WITH SOME SECTION LOSS; BEARING #2 AT NORTH ABUTMENT
SHOWN
PHOTO #14 - SPALL ON DIAPHRAGM BETWEEN GIRDERS #1 AND #2,
SPAN #1
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL LEAKAGE THROUGH
JOINTS ON OVERHANGS, EXTERIOR SIDES OF
EXTERIOR GIRDERS AND CAPS; PIER #6 CAP,
WEST END SHOWN
PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING OF
ABUTMENT BACKWALLS; CENTER BAY, SOUTH
ABUTMENT BACKWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #18 - EROSION AND UNDERMINING OF
FLARED PORTION ALONG NORTHWEST
WINGWALL
PHOTO #19 - EROSION UNDER WEST DRAIN
NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT IN SPAN #8
PHOTO #20 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER #2,
SOUTH FACE; NOTE ACCUMULATION OF DRIFT
ON UPSTREAM SIDE
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING
WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON PIER CAPS; PIER
#1 CAP, SOUTH FACE SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - ISLAND FORMED IN CHANNEL,
SPAN 2
PHOTO #23 - SLOUGHING AND UNDERCUTTING OF SOUTH CHANNEL
BANK, SPAN 2
PHOTO #24 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL; NOTE FALLEN TREES
PHOTO #25 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL; NOTE FALLEN TREES
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .