Bridge_Inspection_Report_Str-3300-027.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
George Washington Memorial Parkway 500(1)
Solicitation number
DTFH71-15-B-00016
Issued by

About this file

Bridge Inspection Report_Str-3300-027

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_0002_-_PRA-GWMP_500(1).pdf PDF
Amendment_0001_-_PRA-GWMP_500(1).pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
FP03_Eng_.pdf PDF
FP03_Errata.pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_PRA-GWMP_500(1).pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_Str-3300-028.pdf PDF
Plans_PRA-GWMP_500(1).pdf PDF
VETS-100A-Form.pdf PDF
Certification_Program_for_Bridge_Temporary_Works.pdf PDF
ADV_Subcontracting_Plan.doc DOC document
Categorical_Exclusion_Form_(NEPA).pdf PDF
Synopsis_PRA-GWMP_500(1).doc DOC document
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

NATIONAL AIRPORT SOUTH EXIT BRIDGE

SOUTH EXIT FROM NATIONAL AIRPORT OVER GWMP

GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY

LE

STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 4/23/13

Report prepared by: SS

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P

NATIONAL AIRPORT SOUTH EXIT BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 4/23/13

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 192.0 FT (58.5 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 116.0 FT (35.4 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 35.0 FT (10.7 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1A7 / 555 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 99 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1984-RAILING PAINTED.

LOCATION

GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 0.17 (KM PT 0.27)

STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 1.8 MILES SOUTH OF I-395.

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ SOUTH EXIT FROM NATIONAL AIRPORT

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. GWMP

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This reinforced concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. The main problem is the cracking and deterioration of the wearing surface along with settlement of the approach pavement. Other problems include loose stones due to deteriorated mortar on the northwest approach guardwall, popouts with exposed rebar on barrier wall of underpass roadway, deteriorated vertical expansion joints, erosion and undermining of the north sidewalk at the west end, spalling with exposed rebar on the pier barrier wall, and vegetation growth overhanging the rail and sidewalk at the southeast corner.

Since the previous inspection, the bridge rail has been cleaned and painted and the previous cracking on the south face of the frame in the west span has been repaired. In addition, patching material has been applied along the end joints of the bridge roadway and sidewalks.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: R. PARKER, A. HAVARD (VOLKERT, INC.)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

RICHARD W. PARKER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/29/13

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

222.3 RESET LOOSE STONES AND REPOINT MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS ON APPROACH

GUARDWALLS. CLEAN AND COAT EXPOSED REBAR WITH APPROVED COATING

ON PIER BARRIER WALL FOR UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

2 CY

60.8 CLEAN AND RESEAL VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS. 80 LF

222.5 REPAIR UNDERMINING AT WEST END OF NORTH SIDEWALK. 4 CF

58.10, 222.9

REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BRIDGE AND

TRIM OVERHANGING LIMBS FOR TREE AT SOUTH APPROACH.

1 LS

58.5 REPAIR SPALLED AREAS ON BOTH SIDEWALKS. 5 SF

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

58.3 REMOVE ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE; REPAIR DECK AS

NECESSARY; PLACE NEW MODIFIED CONCRETE WEARING

SURFACE.

1 LS

222.4,6 RECONSTRUCT AND REPAVE APPROACHES. 1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

(VEGETATION)

N N F N N N N N G

N G

G N N N N G N P G G G N

G N G N G G

G(PIER COLLAR)

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1, 59.3 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE AND WATER LEAKAGE WITH SOME

RUST STAINS ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS ON UNDERSIDE OF

OVERHANGS, DECK SIDES, AND UNDERSIDE. SEVERAL EXPOSED

AND RUSTED REBAR TIES THROUGHOUT UNDERSIDE. MINOR

TRANSVERSE CRACKING AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS ON UNDERSIDE

OF OVERHANGS. MINOR MAP CRACKING OF UNDERSIDE, EAST

SPAN.

PREVIOUS LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH DELAMINATION ON

SOUTH FACE OF FRAME, WEST SPAN OVER LEFT LANE HAS BEEN

PATCHED; HOWEVER MINOR CRACKING REMAINS. MINOR

COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTH EDGE OF UNDERSIDE, EAST SPAN

OVER LEFT LANE.

58.3,4 MODERATE RANDOM CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF

BITUMINOUS WEARING SURFACE. JOINT SEALANT MATERIAL HAS

BEEN APPLIED TO BRIDGE ENDS SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.

58.5 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING AND SCALING OF SIDEWALKS.

MINOR SPALL ON NORTH SIDEWALK AT EAST END. MINOR SPALL

ON SOUTH SIDEWALK, WEST SPAN AT WEST EXPANSION JOINT.

MODERATE SPALL ON SOUTH SIDEWALK, EAST SPAN NEAR PIER.

SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION, SIDEWALK JOINTS AT BRIDGE ENDS

HAVE BEEN SEALED.

58.6 MODERATE COLLISION DAMAGE TO TOP RAIL OF SOUTH RAILING

AT WEST EXPANSION JOINT AND IN WEST APPROACH. RAILING

HAS BEEN CLEANED AND PAINTED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.

58.7 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES.

58.10, 222.9 VEGETATION OVERHANGS SOUTHEAST BRIDGE RAIL AND

GUARDRAIL. TREE OVERHANGING ROADWAY ON SOUTH SIDE OF

WEST APPROACH.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS (UP TO

1/16" W), AT 1/3 POINTS ON EAST ABUTMENT AND SPACED AT 10'

ON WEST ABUTMENT. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF SIDES OF

BREASTWALLS.

F F G G G N

F

N

G

F

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 5

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1.

(VEGETATION)

N N F F F F N G F

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0

N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

60.6 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALL

MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS. LIGHT VEGETATION GROWTH ON

SOUTHEAST AND NORTHWEST WINGWALLS.

60.8 SEVERE DETERIORATION AND LOSS OF JOINT FILLER MATERIAL AT

ALL VERTICAL JOINTS.

60.11 MINOR DETERIORATION OF CONCRETE BLOCK SLOPE PAVING

MORTAR JOINTS.

60.13 MODERATE SPALL (30" L X 8" H X 1-1/2" D) ON SOUTH FACE OF

NORTH COLUMN AT BASE.

60.15 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF UNDERSIDE OF PIER CAP.

60.19 MINOR SETTLEMENT AND CRACKING OF SEVERAL CONCRETE

PANELS ON TOP OF PIER COLLAR; MINOR CRACKING AND

SPALLING OF CONCRETE BARRIERS FRAMING PIER COLLAR WITH

EXPOSED REBAR.

222.3,4,6 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF GUARDWALL MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS WITH AREAS OF LOOSE STONES AT BOTH APPROACHES.

MODERATE SETTLEMENT OF NORTHWEST GUARDWALL HAS

CAUSED MODERATE CRACKING OF MORTAR JOINTS.

MODERATE TO SEVERE CRACKING AND SETTLEMENT OF

APPROACH PAVEMENT, BOTH APPROACHES. TREE OVERHANGING

APPROACH SIDEWALK AND ROADWAY, SOUTH SIDE AT WEST

APPROACH.

POPOUTS WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON BOTH SIDES OF PIER

BARRIER WALL OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

222.5 MINOR EROSION ALONG NORTH GUARDWALL AT EAST APPROACH

WITH FOOTING EXPOSED. MODERATE EROSION WITH

UNDERMINING (72 "L X 6" H X UP TO 1'-7" BACK UNDER) AT WEST

END OF NORTH SIDEWALK; EROSION WITH UNDERMINING

REPAIRED AT WEST END OF SOUTH SIDEWALK SINCE LAST

INSPECTION.

36.A,B,C BRIDGE RAILING HEIGHT OF 2'-10" DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM

SAFETY REQUIREMENT HEIGHT OF 3'-6" FOR COMBINATION

TRAFFIC/PEDESTRIAN BARRIERS. MASONRY GUARDWALL HEIGHT

OF 1'-3" DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM HEIGHT SAFETY REQUIREMENT

OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS. GUARDWALL IS NOT CONNECTED

TO BRIDGE RAILING.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 33 30

HS 30 27 49 44

TYPE 3 28 25 47 43

TYPE 3S2 34 31 56 51

TYPE 3-3 37 34 62 56

DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... NATIONAL AIRPORT SOUTH EXIT BRIDG

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 3300-027P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 2 - NATIONAL CAPITAL

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 500

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 027P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1A7

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

513 - VIRGINIA (VA)

013 - ARLINGTON

162000010

GWMP

SOUTH EXIT FROM NATIONA

3300027P0000000

1.8 MILES SOUTH OF I-395.

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.17 (KM PT 0.27)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

07 - FRAME

116.0 FT (35.4 M)

192.0 FT (58.5 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 30.0 TONS (27.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 49.0 TONS (44.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 4/13 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 38°50'49.40"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 77°02'55.10"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 2 MI (3 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 04

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 8.0 FT (2.4 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 1.0 FT (0.3 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 35.0 FT (10.7 M)

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 99 °

(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT : ...................................... 4.2 FT (1.3 M)

RIGHT : ................................... 4.2 FT (1.3 M)

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

MATERIAL: .............................. 4 - STEEL

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.83 FT (0.86 M)

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 16.16 FT (4.93 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 000N

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

C - MODERATE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1984-RAILING PAINTED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:77�02'55.10 http:38�50'49.40

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA

PHOTO #2 - NORTH SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF WEST SPAN LOOKING

EAST; NOTE EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #5 - EROSION ALONG NORTH

GUARDRAIL AT EAST APPROACH

PHOTO #6 - DISPLACED STONE AT NORTH

GUARDRAIL END AT EAST APPROACH

PHOTO #7 - VEGETATION GROWTH

OVERHANGING RAILS AND SIDEWALK AT

SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BRIDGE AND

APPROACH

PHOTO #8 - CRACKING AND SETTLEMENT OF

EAST APPROACH PAVEMENT

PHOTO #9 - SPALL ON SOUTH SIDEWALK,

EAST SPAN NEAR PIER SHOWN; NOTE JOINT

FILLER SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION

PHOTO #10 - SETTLEMENT OF WEST

APPROACH PAVEMENT AT WEST ABUTMENT,

WESTBOUND LANE SHOWN; NOTE JOINT

FILLER HAS BEEN APPLIED SINCE PREVIOUS

INSPECTION

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF ASPHALT

WEARING SURFACE, WEST SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO TOP RAIL OF SOUTH RAILING AT

WEST EXPANSION JOINT; NOTE RAILS HAVE BEEN PAINTED SINCE

PREVIOUS INSPECTION

PHOTO #13 - CRACKING AND SETTLEMENT OF

WEST APPROACH PAVEMENT; NOTE JOINT

MATERIAL APPLIED SINCE PREVIOUS

INSPECTION

PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHWEST

APPROACH PARAPET; NOTE HEIGHT

DIFFERENTIAL COMPARED TO BRIDGE

PARAPET

PHOTO #15 - DETERIORATION OF

NORTHWEST APPROACH GUARDRAIL

MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS

PHOTO #16 - EROSION AND UNDERMINING OF

NORTH SIDEWALK AT WEST END

PHOTO #17 - UNDERMINING AT NORTH

SIDEWALK AT WEST END; NOTE DROP OFF

PHOTO #18 - TREE OVERHANGING SOUTH

RAILING AT WEST APPROACH

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF EAST SPAN LOOKING

EAST

PHOTO #20 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTH EDGE OF DECK

UNDERSIDE IN EAST SPAN

PHOTO #21 - REPAIR OF LONGITUDINAL CRACKING AND

DELAMINATION ON SOUTH FACE OF FRAME OVER SOUTHBOUND

TRAFFIC

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST FACE OF PIER

PHOTO #23 - SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST SIDE OF

BARRIER WALL FOR CENTER PIER, EAST SIDE SIMILAR

PHOTO #24 - SETTLEMENT AND CRACKING OF CONCRETE PANELS ON

TOP OF PIER COLUMNS

PHOTO #25 - SPALLING ON SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER COLUMN AT

PIER

PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #27 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF

VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS, SOUTHWEST

CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #28 - VEGETATION GROWTH AT

SOUTHEAST CORNER

PHOTO #29 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON

NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #30 -

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .