Bridge_Inspection_Report_Str-3300-027.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- George Washington Memorial Parkway 500(1)
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-15-B-00016
About this file
Bridge Inspection Report_Str-3300-027
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_0002_-_PRA-GWMP_500(1).pdf | ||
| Amendment_0001_-_PRA-GWMP_500(1).pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| FP03_Eng_.pdf | ||
| FP03_Errata.pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_PRA-GWMP_500(1).pdf | ||
| Bridge_Inspection_Report_Str-3300-028.pdf | ||
| Plans_PRA-GWMP_500(1).pdf | ||
| VETS-100A-Form.pdf | ||
| Certification_Program_for_Bridge_Temporary_Works.pdf | ||
| ADV_Subcontracting_Plan.doc | DOC document | |
| Categorical_Exclusion_Form_(NEPA).pdf | ||
| Synopsis_PRA-GWMP_500(1).doc | DOC document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
NATIONAL AIRPORT SOUTH EXIT BRIDGE
SOUTH EXIT FROM NATIONAL AIRPORT OVER GWMP
GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY
LE
STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 4/23/13
Report prepared by: SS
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P
NATIONAL AIRPORT SOUTH EXIT BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 4/23/13
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 192.0 FT (58.5 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 116.0 FT (35.4 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 35.0 FT (10.7 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1A7 / 555 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 99 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1984-RAILING PAINTED.
LOCATION
GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 0.17 (KM PT 0.27)
STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 1.8 MILES SOUTH OF I-395.
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ SOUTH EXIT FROM NATIONAL AIRPORT
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. GWMP
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This reinforced concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. The main problem is the cracking and deterioration of the wearing surface along with settlement of the approach pavement. Other problems include loose stones due to deteriorated mortar on the northwest approach guardwall, popouts with exposed rebar on barrier wall of underpass roadway, deteriorated vertical expansion joints, erosion and undermining of the north sidewalk at the west end, spalling with exposed rebar on the pier barrier wall, and vegetation growth overhanging the rail and sidewalk at the southeast corner.
Since the previous inspection, the bridge rail has been cleaned and painted and the previous cracking on the south face of the frame in the west span has been repaired. In addition, patching material has been applied along the end joints of the bridge roadway and sidewalks.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: R. PARKER, A. HAVARD (VOLKERT, INC.)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
RICHARD W. PARKER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/29/13
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
222.3 RESET LOOSE STONES AND REPOINT MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS ON APPROACH
GUARDWALLS. CLEAN AND COAT EXPOSED REBAR WITH APPROVED COATING
ON PIER BARRIER WALL FOR UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
2 CY
60.8 CLEAN AND RESEAL VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS. 80 LF
222.5 REPAIR UNDERMINING AT WEST END OF NORTH SIDEWALK. 4 CF
58.10, 222.9
REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BRIDGE AND
TRIM OVERHANGING LIMBS FOR TREE AT SOUTH APPROACH.
1 LS
58.5 REPAIR SPALLED AREAS ON BOTH SIDEWALKS. 5 SF
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
58.3 REMOVE ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE; REPAIR DECK AS
NECESSARY; PLACE NEW MODIFIED CONCRETE WEARING
SURFACE.
1 LS
222.4,6 RECONSTRUCT AND REPAVE APPROACHES. 1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
OTHER
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
FOUNDATIONS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
PIER(S)
OTHER
SLOPE PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
EXPANSION JOINTS
WEEP HOLES
WINGWALLS
FOUNDATIONS
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
(VEGETATION)
N N F N N N N N G
N G
G N N N N G N P G G G N
G N G N G G
G(PIER COLLAR)
11.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
58.1, 59.3 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE AND WATER LEAKAGE WITH SOME
RUST STAINS ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS ON UNDERSIDE OF
OVERHANGS, DECK SIDES, AND UNDERSIDE. SEVERAL EXPOSED
AND RUSTED REBAR TIES THROUGHOUT UNDERSIDE. MINOR
TRANSVERSE CRACKING AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS ON UNDERSIDE
OF OVERHANGS. MINOR MAP CRACKING OF UNDERSIDE, EAST
SPAN.
PREVIOUS LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH DELAMINATION ON
SOUTH FACE OF FRAME, WEST SPAN OVER LEFT LANE HAS BEEN
PATCHED; HOWEVER MINOR CRACKING REMAINS. MINOR
COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTH EDGE OF UNDERSIDE, EAST SPAN
OVER LEFT LANE.
58.3,4 MODERATE RANDOM CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF
BITUMINOUS WEARING SURFACE. JOINT SEALANT MATERIAL HAS
BEEN APPLIED TO BRIDGE ENDS SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.
58.5 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING AND SCALING OF SIDEWALKS.
MINOR SPALL ON NORTH SIDEWALK AT EAST END. MINOR SPALL
ON SOUTH SIDEWALK, WEST SPAN AT WEST EXPANSION JOINT.
MODERATE SPALL ON SOUTH SIDEWALK, EAST SPAN NEAR PIER.
SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION, SIDEWALK JOINTS AT BRIDGE ENDS
HAVE BEEN SEALED.
58.6 MODERATE COLLISION DAMAGE TO TOP RAIL OF SOUTH RAILING
AT WEST EXPANSION JOINT AND IN WEST APPROACH. RAILING
HAS BEEN CLEANED AND PAINTED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.
58.7 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES.
58.10, 222.9 VEGETATION OVERHANGS SOUTHEAST BRIDGE RAIL AND
GUARDRAIL. TREE OVERHANGING ROADWAY ON SOUTH SIDE OF
WEST APPROACH.
60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS (UP TO
1/16" W), AT 1/3 POINTS ON EAST ABUTMENT AND SPACED AT 10'
ON WEST ABUTMENT. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF SIDES OF
BREASTWALLS.
F F G G G N
F
N
G
F
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 5
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
2. RELIEF JOINTS
APPROACH SLABS1.
(VEGETATION)
N N F F F F N G F
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0
N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
60.6 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALL
MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS. LIGHT VEGETATION GROWTH ON
SOUTHEAST AND NORTHWEST WINGWALLS.
60.8 SEVERE DETERIORATION AND LOSS OF JOINT FILLER MATERIAL AT
ALL VERTICAL JOINTS.
60.11 MINOR DETERIORATION OF CONCRETE BLOCK SLOPE PAVING
MORTAR JOINTS.
60.13 MODERATE SPALL (30" L X 8" H X 1-1/2" D) ON SOUTH FACE OF
NORTH COLUMN AT BASE.
60.15 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF UNDERSIDE OF PIER CAP.
60.19 MINOR SETTLEMENT AND CRACKING OF SEVERAL CONCRETE
PANELS ON TOP OF PIER COLLAR; MINOR CRACKING AND
SPALLING OF CONCRETE BARRIERS FRAMING PIER COLLAR WITH
EXPOSED REBAR.
222.3,4,6 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF GUARDWALL MASONRY MORTAR
JOINTS WITH AREAS OF LOOSE STONES AT BOTH APPROACHES.
MODERATE SETTLEMENT OF NORTHWEST GUARDWALL HAS
CAUSED MODERATE CRACKING OF MORTAR JOINTS.
MODERATE TO SEVERE CRACKING AND SETTLEMENT OF
APPROACH PAVEMENT, BOTH APPROACHES. TREE OVERHANGING
APPROACH SIDEWALK AND ROADWAY, SOUTH SIDE AT WEST
APPROACH.
POPOUTS WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON BOTH SIDES OF PIER
BARRIER WALL OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
222.5 MINOR EROSION ALONG NORTH GUARDWALL AT EAST APPROACH
WITH FOOTING EXPOSED. MODERATE EROSION WITH
UNDERMINING (72 "L X 6" H X UP TO 1'-7" BACK UNDER) AT WEST
END OF NORTH SIDEWALK; EROSION WITH UNDERMINING
REPAIRED AT WEST END OF SOUTH SIDEWALK SINCE LAST
INSPECTION.
36.A,B,C BRIDGE RAILING HEIGHT OF 2'-10" DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM
SAFETY REQUIREMENT HEIGHT OF 3'-6" FOR COMBINATION
TRAFFIC/PEDESTRIAN BARRIERS. MASONRY GUARDWALL HEIGHT
OF 1'-3" DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM HEIGHT SAFETY REQUIREMENT
OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS. GUARDWALL IS NOT CONNECTED
TO BRIDGE RAILING.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 33 30
HS 30 27 49 44
TYPE 3 28 25 47 43
TYPE 3S2 34 31 56 51
TYPE 3-3 37 34 62 56
DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... NATIONAL AIRPORT SOUTH EXIT BRIDG
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 3300-027P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 2 - NATIONAL CAPITAL
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 500
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 027P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1A7
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
513 - VIRGINIA (VA)
013 - ARLINGTON
162000010
GWMP
SOUTH EXIT FROM NATIONA
3300027P0000000
1.8 MILES SOUTH OF I-395.
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.17 (KM PT 0.27)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
07 - FRAME
116.0 FT (35.4 M)
192.0 FT (58.5 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
6 - N/A
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 30.0 TONS (27.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 49.0 TONS (44.0 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 4/13 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 38°50'49.40"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 77°02'55.10"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 2 MI (3 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 04
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 8.0 FT (2.4 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 1.0 FT (0.3 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)
(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 35.0 FT (10.7 M)
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 24.0 FT (7.3 M)
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)
LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 99 °
(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT : ...................................... 4.2 FT (1.3 M)
RIGHT : ................................... 4.2 FT (1.3 M)
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
MATERIAL: .............................. 4 - STEEL
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.83 FT (0.86 M)
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 16.16 FT (4.93 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 000N
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
C - MODERATE
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1984-RAILING PAINTED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:77�02'55.10 http:38�50'49.40
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 3300-027P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA
PHOTO #2 - NORTH SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF WEST SPAN LOOKING
EAST; NOTE EFFLORESCENCE
PHOTO #5 - EROSION ALONG NORTH
GUARDRAIL AT EAST APPROACH
PHOTO #6 - DISPLACED STONE AT NORTH
GUARDRAIL END AT EAST APPROACH
PHOTO #7 - VEGETATION GROWTH
OVERHANGING RAILS AND SIDEWALK AT
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BRIDGE AND
APPROACH
PHOTO #8 - CRACKING AND SETTLEMENT OF
EAST APPROACH PAVEMENT
PHOTO #9 - SPALL ON SOUTH SIDEWALK,
EAST SPAN NEAR PIER SHOWN; NOTE JOINT
FILLER SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION
PHOTO #10 - SETTLEMENT OF WEST
APPROACH PAVEMENT AT WEST ABUTMENT,
WESTBOUND LANE SHOWN; NOTE JOINT
FILLER HAS BEEN APPLIED SINCE PREVIOUS
INSPECTION
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF ASPHALT
WEARING SURFACE, WEST SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO TOP RAIL OF SOUTH RAILING AT
WEST EXPANSION JOINT; NOTE RAILS HAVE BEEN PAINTED SINCE
PREVIOUS INSPECTION
PHOTO #13 - CRACKING AND SETTLEMENT OF
WEST APPROACH PAVEMENT; NOTE JOINT
MATERIAL APPLIED SINCE PREVIOUS
INSPECTION
PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHWEST
APPROACH PARAPET; NOTE HEIGHT
DIFFERENTIAL COMPARED TO BRIDGE
PARAPET
PHOTO #15 - DETERIORATION OF
NORTHWEST APPROACH GUARDRAIL
MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS
PHOTO #16 - EROSION AND UNDERMINING OF
NORTH SIDEWALK AT WEST END
PHOTO #17 - UNDERMINING AT NORTH
SIDEWALK AT WEST END; NOTE DROP OFF
PHOTO #18 - TREE OVERHANGING SOUTH
RAILING AT WEST APPROACH
PHOTO #19 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF EAST SPAN LOOKING
EAST
PHOTO #20 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTH EDGE OF DECK
UNDERSIDE IN EAST SPAN
PHOTO #21 - REPAIR OF LONGITUDINAL CRACKING AND
DELAMINATION ON SOUTH FACE OF FRAME OVER SOUTHBOUND
TRAFFIC
PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST FACE OF PIER
PHOTO #23 - SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST SIDE OF
BARRIER WALL FOR CENTER PIER, EAST SIDE SIMILAR
PHOTO #24 - SETTLEMENT AND CRACKING OF CONCRETE PANELS ON
TOP OF PIER COLUMNS
PHOTO #25 - SPALLING ON SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER COLUMN AT
PIER
PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #27 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF
VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS, SOUTHWEST
CORNER SHOWN
PHOTO #28 - VEGETATION GROWTH AT
SOUTHEAST CORNER
PHOTO #29 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON
NORTHWEST WINGWALL
PHOTO #30 -
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .