Bridge Inspection Report - Bear Creek.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

BEAR CREEK BRIDGE

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER BEAR CREEK & TISHOMINGO ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-038P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/18/09

Report prepared by: EU

MILE POINT: 304.70

Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 490.35 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-038P

BEAR CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 3/18/09

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... NO. OF APPR. SPANS: ........ STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER 0

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 4 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 760.4 FT (231.8 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 177.2 FT (54.0 M) WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 32.5 FT (9.9 M) ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L / SPREAYEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 3A1 / 41906 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 43 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1983-JOINT REPAIR; 1999-SNOOPER INSPECTION. 2005-NEW AC OVERLAY

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 304.70 (KM PT 490.35)

STATE: ................................. MISSISSIPPI LOCATION: 1.7 MILES NORTH OF MS ROUTE 25.

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. BEAR CREEK & TISHOMINGO ROAD

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This steel multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall. Problems include paint deterioration with minor rusting of the structural steel, and delaminated concrete along the the east curb in span #5. The steel should be scheduled for cleaning and painting to help prevent section loss and prolong the life of the structure. Other problems include erosion of the piers and abutments, vegetation and tree growth around Piers #4 and #5, clogged scuppers, and debris accumulation on the bearing seats. In addition, erosion with undermining exists along the west side of the south abutment slope paving. There have been no significant changes in the structural condition since the last inspection.

Corrective measures should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: R. PARKER, W. COLLINS (VOLKERT & ASSOCIATES, INC.)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

RICHARD W. PARKER, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., LEAD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 7/16/09

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., LEAD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 703-404-6252

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-038P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT

COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

60.9,17 PROTECT PIER #4 AND NORTH ABUTMENT SLOPES WITH ENGINEERED RIPRAP. 35 CY $1,000 $35,000

58.7 CLEAN OUT CLOGGED SCUPPERS. 1 LS $1,500 $1,500

60.3 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM BEARING SEATS. 1 LS $1,500 $1,500

60.9 FILL AND STABILIZE EMBANKMENT AT WEST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE

PAVING.

6 CY $200 $1,500

60.13 REMOVE TREE AND VEGETATION GROWTH FROM PIERS #4 AND #5. 1 LS $1,000 $1,000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $40,500

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

59 CLEAN AND PAINT STRUCTURAL STEEL. 25,000 SF $20 $500,000 $0

58.5 REPLACE DELAMINATED CONCRETE ON EAST CURB IN SPAN #5. 48 SF $200 $10,000 $0

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : $510,000 $0

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL:

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

$0 $510,000 $40,500

$550,500

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

$1,101,000

REMARKS: Structure will likely need full re-painting in 10-12 years. Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-038P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

F F N N N G F N G

N G

G N F G N G G N F G G N

G N F G F G N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1 SEVERAL AREAS OF DELAMINATIONS ON TOP OF UNPAVED DECK

AREA IN SPAN #6 RANDOMLY LOCATED. MINOR HONEYCOMBING

ON DECK UNDERSIDE WITH EFFLORESCENCE NEAR NORTH

ABUTMENT, WEST SIDE. WIDESPREAD TRANSVERSE CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE; LEAKAGE THROUGH SOME CRACKS.

MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE OF DECK NEAR

WEST SIDE, SPAN #1. REBAR CHAIRS EXPOSED IN SEVERAL

LOCATIONS ON DECK UNDERSIDE. CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST SIDE IN ONE 48' LONG LOCATION IN

SPAN #5; SOME ALSO IN SPAN #6, (UNABLE TO VERIFY AREA IN

SPAN #6). 12"X12" AREA OF SEVERE HONEYCOMBING,

EFFLORESCENCE, AND LEAKAGE THROUGH DECK IN SPAN #4,

WEST BAY, (UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING THIS INSPECTION). ALSO,

2' X 2' SPALL ON SPAN #4, BETWEEN GIRDERS #1 AND #2 NEAR

MIDSPAN.

58.2 NO CATCH GUTTERS UNDER JOINTS; RUNOFF WATER DRAINS

THROUGH JOINT AND DIRECTLY ONTO BEARING AREA. MINOR

RUSTING OF FINGER JOINTS AND CURB JOINT PLATES.

58.5,6 AREA OF DELAMINATION IN EAST CURB OF SPAN #5, 48' L X UP TO

12" W STARTING APPROXIMATELY 18' FROM PIER #4. MINOR

WIDESPREAD CRACKING OF CURBS AND RAILINGS, ESPECIALLY

NEAR CURB/RAIL JOINTS. MODERATE FLAKING OF FINISH COAT IN

SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MINOR POPOUTS THROUGHOUT. MINOR

COLLISION DAMAGE TO EAST PARAPET AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

58.7 75% OF SCUPPERS FILLED WITH DEBRIS PREVENTING PROPER

DRAINAGE.

59.1,2,6 MINOR SPOT RUSTING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL THROUGHOUT

SUPERSTRUCTURE. MODERATE RUSTING OF BEARINGS AT SOUTH

ABUTMENT DUE TO WATER LEAKAGE. SEE ALSO 60.1,3,13.

59.7 PEELING OF PAINT AT SEVERAL AREAS EXPOSING LEAD PRIMER

COAT, MOSTLY IN NORTH SPANS.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING ON BREASTWALLS WITH

EFFLORESCENCE. MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH AT EAST

SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT EXTENDS UP TO BEARINGS.

G G F F P N

N

F

G

F

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-038P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G G F G N

LOW

SUFF

150 FT.

CLAY, ROCK

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. N

N N G G G F G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

60.3,15 MODERATE TO SEVERE WATER LEAKAGE AND MINOR VEGETATION

GROWTH AT SOUTH ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT AND AT PIER #3

BEARING AREA; MOST BEARING AREAS ARE DAMP. MODERATE

ACCUMULATION OF GRAVEL ON BOTH ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS.

60.4 MINOR CRACKING OF BACKWALLS.

60.6 CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE, LEAKAGE AND STAINING AND

MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG NORTHWEST WINGWALL.

MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON CORNERS OF

ABUTMENT SEATS. FULL HEIGHT CRACK IN SOUTHEAST AND

NORTHWEST WINGWALLS.

60.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF SOIL IN WEEP HOLES.

60.9 MODERATE EROSION ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT SLOPE;

AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED PREVIOUSLY WITH RIPRAP.

MODERATE EROSION AT BASE OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL, (5'-6" L

X 3' W X 1'-3"D) AND ALONG WEST EDGE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

SLOPE PAVING, (12'L X 1'-8" W X 2' D), WITH UP TO 3'-10" OF

UNDERMINING. MINOR EROSION ALONG AND AT END OF

NORTHWEST WINGWALL.

60.11 PREVIOUSLY REPORTED SEVERAL LARGE CRACKS IN PAVED DITCH

(FOR ROADWAY BELOW) AT BASE OF SLOPE PAVING AT SOUTH

ABUTMENT COULD NOT BE VERIFIED DUE TO SOIL AND DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION IN DITCH. MODERATE SPALL ON BASE OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT SLOPE PAVING.

60.13 LARGE TREES GROWING AT NORTH FACE OF PIER #4 AND HAVE

REACHED BOTTOM OF DECK IN SPAN #5. MODERATE VEGETATION

GROWTH ON PIERS #4 AND #5 EXTENDS UP TO BEARINGS IN

SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PIERS; PIER

CONCRETE GENERALLY IN GOOD CONDITION. MINOR VERTICAL

AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF PIER #3; MODERATE STAINING OF

PIER #3 DUE TO LEAKAGE THROUGH JOINT.

60.16,17, 61 MODERATE EROSION AT SIDES OF PIER #5 AND BELOW SCUPPERS

IN SPAN #4. RIPRAP HAS BEEN PLACED AT STREAM FACE OF PIER

#5. MOST RIPRAP SET AT UPSTREAM SIDE OF PIER #4 HAS

WASHED AWAY (UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING THIS INSPECTION).

61.2,4 MINOR EROSION OF CHANNEL BANKS. PREVIOUSLY REPORTED

MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN CHANNEL JUST UPSTREAM

FROM STRUCTURE HAS BEEN REMOVED.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-038P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 27 24 45 41

TYPE 3 30 27 51 46

TYPE 3S2 33 30 55 50

TYPE 3-3 35 32 58 53

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-038P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 284 - MISSISSIPPI (MS)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... BEAR CREEK BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 141 - TISHOMINGO

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-038P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... BEAR CREEK & TISHOMINGO

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........038P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570038P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.7 MILES NORTH OF MS RO

(210) OPERATING UNIT: .............CHEROKEE (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................3A1 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 304.70 (KM PT 490.35)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 41906 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

4 - STEEL CONTINUOUS

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

177.2 FT (54.0 M)

760.4 FT (231.8 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 45.0 TONS (40.8 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 3/09 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-038P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 34°36'41.00"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 88°11'31.30"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 30 MI (48 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 6 - HIGHWAY-WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 20.0 FT (6.1 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 4.0 FT (1.2 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 32.5 FT (9.9 M)

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 22.0 FT (6.7 M)

LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 6.0 FT (1.8 M)

RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (1.8 M)

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 43 °

(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

MATERIAL: .............................. 1 - CONCRETE

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 1.83 FT (0.56 M)

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 14.33 FT (4.37 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ...........N

(224) EST. REMAINING LIFE: ....30 YEARS

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

7 - Countermeasures installed. N

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

C - MODERATE

$40,500

$510,000

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1983-JOINT REPAIR; 1999-SNOOPER INSPECTION. 2005-NEW AC OVERLAY

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-038P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-038P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD TUPELO

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SPAN #6 LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #5 - EXPANSION JOINT AT SOUTH

ABUTMENT, NORTH ABUTMENT SIMILAR

PHOTO #6 - CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST SHOULDER IN

SPAN #1

PHOTO #7 - PARTIALLY FILLED SCUPPER ALONG EAST CURB LINE

PHOTO #8 - AREA OF DELAMINATION ON EAST CURB IN SPAN #5

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL FLAKING ON FINISH

COAT ON CURBS, WEST CURB SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - CRACKING ON EAST SIDE

OVERHANG IN SPAN #5

PHOTO #11 - RUSTING OF FINGER JOINTS AND CURB PLATES AT

NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #12 - CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTHWEST

WINGWALL; NOTE LEAKAGE AND STAINING

PHOTO #13 - EROSION AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINGWALL

PHOTO #14 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO NORTHEAST BRIDGE END

PHOTO #15 - EROSION AT NORTHWEST PARAPET END

PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #17 - VERTICAL CRACK WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST SIDE OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL

PHOTO #18 - EROSION AND UNDERMINING ON

WEST SIDE OF CONCRETE SLOPE

PROTECTION AT SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE

ERODED AREA AT BASE OF SOUTHWEST

WINGWALL

PHOTO #19 - CRACKING OF DECK OVERHANG IN SPAN #1, WEST SIDE;

NOTE EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL ROLLER BEARING DEVICE AT INTERMEDIATE

PIERS; GIRDER #1 AT PIER #1 SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - ROLLER BEARING AT GIRDER #4 AT NORTH ABUTMENT;

NOTE DEBRIS

PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN SPAN #2

PHOTO #23 - ISOLATED PAINT FAILURE IN SPAN #2, GIRDER #3 SHOWN

PHOTO #24 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING IN PIER WALLS, SOUTH

FACE OF PIER WALL #2 SHOWN

PHOTO #25 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SPAN #3 LOOKING

NORTH

PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH FACE OF PIER #3; NOTE

STAINING

PHOTO #27 - PEELING PAINT WITH EXPOSED PRIMER AND

CORROSION IN SPAN #3

PHOTO #28 - EROSION ON SOUTH FACE OF PIER #4

PHOTO #29 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF SPAN #4 LOOKING

NORTH

PHOTO #30 - PEELING PAINT WITH EXPOSED PRIMER AND

CORROSION IN SPAN #4

PHOTO #31 - SPALL ON SPAN #4 AT MIDSPAN BETWEEN GIRDERS #1

AND #2

PHOTO #32 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH FACE OF PIER #4; NOTE VINE

GROWTH AND LACK OF RIPRAP PROTECTION

PHOTO #33 - TREE GROWTH ON NORTH FACE

OF PIER #4

PHOTO #34 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF

SPAN #5 LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #35 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH FACE

OF PIER #5; NOTE LACK OF RIPRAP

PHOTO #36 - VIEW FROM PIER #5 LOOKING

UPSTREAM

PHOTO #37 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE

VEGETATION AND VERTICAL CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #38 - RIPRAP PLACED IN EROSION AREA ON EAST SIDE OF

NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #39 - PREVIOUSLY REPORTED DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG

EAST UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK HAS BEEN CLEARED

PHOTO #40 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTO #41 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM